Prospective, multi-site evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 plus test on nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues its largely aseasonal spread with millions of cases per year. Highly sensitive, point-of-care testing is critical for rapid detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and initiation of antiviral therapy to avert adver...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical microbiology 2024-12, Vol.62 (12), p.e0121924
Hauptverfasser: Greninger, Alexander L, Larcena, Allan, Patel, Amrish, Webster, Brian, Ulen, Christina, Green, Dallas F, King, Dana, Patel, Deepesh Rubin, McElvania, Erin, Harnett, Glenn, Jandali, Imad, Gibson, Jane, Killion, Jennifer, Atwi, Jibran, Bergmann, Kelly, Slade, Lance, Allen Staat, Mary, Faron, Matthew, Washington, Megan, Patel, Rahul, Annamalai, Rajasekaran, Ackerman, Ronald, Stewart, 3rd, William P, Amador, Yuliet Mora, Rao, Deepa, Liu, Xiaohong, Raman, Aarthi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page e0121924
container_title Journal of clinical microbiology
container_volume 62
creator Greninger, Alexander L
Larcena, Allan
Patel, Amrish
Webster, Brian
Ulen, Christina
Green, Dallas F
King, Dana
Patel, Deepesh Rubin
McElvania, Erin
Harnett, Glenn
Jandali, Imad
Gibson, Jane
Killion, Jennifer
Atwi, Jibran
Bergmann, Kelly
Slade, Lance
Allen Staat, Mary
Faron, Matthew
Washington, Megan
Patel, Rahul
Annamalai, Rajasekaran
Ackerman, Ronald
Stewart, 3rd, William P
Amador, Yuliet Mora
Rao, Deepa
Liu, Xiaohong
Raman, Aarthi
description Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues its largely aseasonal spread with millions of cases per year. Highly sensitive, point-of-care testing is critical for rapid detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and initiation of antiviral therapy to avert adverse health outcomes and reduce onward transmission of the virus. While hundreds of COVID-19 diagnostics received emergency use authorization from the FDA during the pandemic, significantly fewer have navigated the course to FDA clearance or approval. Here, we determined the clinical performance of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 3,750 anterior nasal swab (NS) specimens and nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) from 32 sites in comparison to the FDA-authorized BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1. Three-quarters of specimens collected were tested on the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 in the point-of-care setting. Overall positive percent agreement (PPA) was 98.1% (95% CI: 96.7%-98.9%) and negative percent agreement (NPA) was 98.3% (97.7%-98.7%). Performance of the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 was slightly improved in NS compared to NPS specimens, with PPA of 99.3% versus 97.0% (Fisher's exact test, = 0.06) and NPA of 98.3% versus 98.2% ( = 0.89), respectively. Assay PPA was similar between untrained and trained users (98.7% vs 97.3%, = 0.75), while NPA was slightly improved for untrained users (99.0% vs 97.6%, = 0.0003). This study showed that Cepheid Xpert Xpress COV-2 is highly sensitive and specific/has high PPA and NPA for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from both NS and NPS specimens. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to cause millions of infections and tens of thousands of deaths per year in the United States. While the FDA authorized hundreds of SARS-CoV-2 tests during the public health emergency, significantly fewer have made the transition to being cleared or approved. There continues to be a need for FDA-authorized point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 testing that can be performed by untrained users. We conducted a large prospective study of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in both nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs by trained and untrained users. The assay demonstrated excellent clinical performance characteristics and, as a result of this study, was cleared by the FDA.
doi_str_mv 10.1128/jcm.01219-24
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11633094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3124691961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-a3b9af9407331a0292a4b1edba90d90d673f7991dd9117385c5185806a01d56a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc-L1TAQx4Mo7nP15llyVNiumSRNm5MsD3_Bgh5U9ham7XRfHm1Tm_SJ_715vnXRgxAmYebDdzLzZew5iEsAWb_et-OlAAm2kPoB24CwdWGMuHnINkLYsgBQ1Rl7EuNeCNC6LB-zM2VLobTVGzZ_XkKcqU3-QBd8XIfki-gTcTrgsGLyYeKh52lHfEvzjnzHb2ZaUo4Lxci34Vsh-TyskSeKiWd8wogDx6k7vsK8w-XndEs5FX9gE5-yRz0OkZ7d3efs67u3X7YfiutP7z9ur64LVMKkHBuLvdWiUgpQSCtRN0Bdg1Z0-ZhK9ZW10HUWoFJ12ZZQl7UwKKArDapz9uakO6_NSF1LU1pwcPPix_whF9C7fyuT37nbcHAARilhdVZ4eaewhO9rHs6NPrY0DDhRWKNTILWxYA1k9OKEtnmbcaH-vg8Id3TJZZfcb5ecPCq_OuEYR-n2YV2mvIr_sS_-nuNe-I-F6hdLH5vs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3124691961</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective, multi-site evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 plus test on nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs</title><source>American Society for Microbiology</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Greninger, Alexander L ; Larcena, Allan ; Patel, Amrish ; Webster, Brian ; Ulen, Christina ; Green, Dallas F ; King, Dana ; Patel, Deepesh Rubin ; McElvania, Erin ; Harnett, Glenn ; Jandali, Imad ; Gibson, Jane ; Killion, Jennifer ; Atwi, Jibran ; Bergmann, Kelly ; Slade, Lance ; Allen Staat, Mary ; Faron, Matthew ; Washington, Megan ; Patel, Rahul ; Annamalai, Rajasekaran ; Ackerman, Ronald ; Stewart, 3rd, William P ; Amador, Yuliet Mora ; Rao, Deepa ; Liu, Xiaohong ; Raman, Aarthi</creator><contributor>St. George, Kirsten</contributor><creatorcontrib>Greninger, Alexander L ; Larcena, Allan ; Patel, Amrish ; Webster, Brian ; Ulen, Christina ; Green, Dallas F ; King, Dana ; Patel, Deepesh Rubin ; McElvania, Erin ; Harnett, Glenn ; Jandali, Imad ; Gibson, Jane ; Killion, Jennifer ; Atwi, Jibran ; Bergmann, Kelly ; Slade, Lance ; Allen Staat, Mary ; Faron, Matthew ; Washington, Megan ; Patel, Rahul ; Annamalai, Rajasekaran ; Ackerman, Ronald ; Stewart, 3rd, William P ; Amador, Yuliet Mora ; Rao, Deepa ; Liu, Xiaohong ; Raman, Aarthi ; St. George, Kirsten</creatorcontrib><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues its largely aseasonal spread with millions of cases per year. Highly sensitive, point-of-care testing is critical for rapid detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and initiation of antiviral therapy to avert adverse health outcomes and reduce onward transmission of the virus. While hundreds of COVID-19 diagnostics received emergency use authorization from the FDA during the pandemic, significantly fewer have navigated the course to FDA clearance or approval. Here, we determined the clinical performance of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 3,750 anterior nasal swab (NS) specimens and nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) from 32 sites in comparison to the FDA-authorized BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1. Three-quarters of specimens collected were tested on the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 in the point-of-care setting. Overall positive percent agreement (PPA) was 98.1% (95% CI: 96.7%-98.9%) and negative percent agreement (NPA) was 98.3% (97.7%-98.7%). Performance of the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 was slightly improved in NS compared to NPS specimens, with PPA of 99.3% versus 97.0% (Fisher's exact test, = 0.06) and NPA of 98.3% versus 98.2% ( = 0.89), respectively. Assay PPA was similar between untrained and trained users (98.7% vs 97.3%, = 0.75), while NPA was slightly improved for untrained users (99.0% vs 97.6%, = 0.0003). This study showed that Cepheid Xpert Xpress COV-2 is highly sensitive and specific/has high PPA and NPA for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from both NS and NPS specimens. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to cause millions of infections and tens of thousands of deaths per year in the United States. While the FDA authorized hundreds of SARS-CoV-2 tests during the public health emergency, significantly fewer have made the transition to being cleared or approved. There continues to be a need for FDA-authorized point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 testing that can be performed by untrained users. We conducted a large prospective study of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in both nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs by trained and untrained users. The assay demonstrated excellent clinical performance characteristics and, as a result of this study, was cleared by the FDA.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-1137</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-660X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/jcm.01219-24</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39503494</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; COVID-19 - diagnosis ; COVID-19 - virology ; COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods ; COVID-19 Testing - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Infant ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nasopharynx - virology ; Nose - virology ; Point-of-Care Testing ; Prospective Studies ; SARS-CoV-2 - genetics ; SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specimen Handling - methods ; United States ; Virology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024-12, Vol.62 (12), p.e0121924</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Greninger et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Greninger et al. 2024 Greninger et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-a3b9af9407331a0292a4b1edba90d90d673f7991dd9117385c5185806a01d56a3</cites><orcidid>0009-0007-3959-2583 ; 0000-0002-7443-0527</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/pdf/10.1128/jcm.01219-24$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.asm.org/doi/full/10.1128/jcm.01219-24$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasm2$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3175,27901,27902,52726,52727,52728</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39503494$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>St. George, Kirsten</contributor><creatorcontrib>Greninger, Alexander L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larcena, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Amrish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulen, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Dallas F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Deepesh Rubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElvania, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnett, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jandali, Imad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killion, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atwi, Jibran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen Staat, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faron, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washington, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annamalai, Rajasekaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, 3rd, William P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amador, Yuliet Mora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Aarthi</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective, multi-site evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 plus test on nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs</title><title>Journal of clinical microbiology</title><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><description>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues its largely aseasonal spread with millions of cases per year. Highly sensitive, point-of-care testing is critical for rapid detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and initiation of antiviral therapy to avert adverse health outcomes and reduce onward transmission of the virus. While hundreds of COVID-19 diagnostics received emergency use authorization from the FDA during the pandemic, significantly fewer have navigated the course to FDA clearance or approval. Here, we determined the clinical performance of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 3,750 anterior nasal swab (NS) specimens and nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) from 32 sites in comparison to the FDA-authorized BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1. Three-quarters of specimens collected were tested on the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 in the point-of-care setting. Overall positive percent agreement (PPA) was 98.1% (95% CI: 96.7%-98.9%) and negative percent agreement (NPA) was 98.3% (97.7%-98.7%). Performance of the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 was slightly improved in NS compared to NPS specimens, with PPA of 99.3% versus 97.0% (Fisher's exact test, = 0.06) and NPA of 98.3% versus 98.2% ( = 0.89), respectively. Assay PPA was similar between untrained and trained users (98.7% vs 97.3%, = 0.75), while NPA was slightly improved for untrained users (99.0% vs 97.6%, = 0.0003). This study showed that Cepheid Xpert Xpress COV-2 is highly sensitive and specific/has high PPA and NPA for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from both NS and NPS specimens. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to cause millions of infections and tens of thousands of deaths per year in the United States. While the FDA authorized hundreds of SARS-CoV-2 tests during the public health emergency, significantly fewer have made the transition to being cleared or approved. There continues to be a need for FDA-authorized point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 testing that can be performed by untrained users. We conducted a large prospective study of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in both nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs by trained and untrained users. The assay demonstrated excellent clinical performance characteristics and, as a result of this study, was cleared by the FDA.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>COVID-19 - diagnosis</subject><subject>COVID-19 - virology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods</subject><subject>COVID-19 Testing - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nasopharynx - virology</subject><subject>Nose - virology</subject><subject>Point-of-Care Testing</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specimen Handling - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Virology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc-L1TAQx4Mo7nP15llyVNiumSRNm5MsD3_Bgh5U9ham7XRfHm1Tm_SJ_715vnXRgxAmYebDdzLzZew5iEsAWb_et-OlAAm2kPoB24CwdWGMuHnINkLYsgBQ1Rl7EuNeCNC6LB-zM2VLobTVGzZ_XkKcqU3-QBd8XIfki-gTcTrgsGLyYeKh52lHfEvzjnzHb2ZaUo4Lxci34Vsh-TyskSeKiWd8wogDx6k7vsK8w-XndEs5FX9gE5-yRz0OkZ7d3efs67u3X7YfiutP7z9ur64LVMKkHBuLvdWiUgpQSCtRN0Bdg1Z0-ZhK9ZW10HUWoFJ12ZZQl7UwKKArDapz9uakO6_NSF1LU1pwcPPix_whF9C7fyuT37nbcHAARilhdVZ4eaewhO9rHs6NPrY0DDhRWKNTILWxYA1k9OKEtnmbcaH-vg8Id3TJZZfcb5ecPCq_OuEYR-n2YV2mvIr_sS_-nuNe-I-F6hdLH5vs</recordid><startdate>20241211</startdate><enddate>20241211</enddate><creator>Greninger, Alexander L</creator><creator>Larcena, Allan</creator><creator>Patel, Amrish</creator><creator>Webster, Brian</creator><creator>Ulen, Christina</creator><creator>Green, Dallas F</creator><creator>King, Dana</creator><creator>Patel, Deepesh Rubin</creator><creator>McElvania, Erin</creator><creator>Harnett, Glenn</creator><creator>Jandali, Imad</creator><creator>Gibson, Jane</creator><creator>Killion, Jennifer</creator><creator>Atwi, Jibran</creator><creator>Bergmann, Kelly</creator><creator>Slade, Lance</creator><creator>Allen Staat, Mary</creator><creator>Faron, Matthew</creator><creator>Washington, Megan</creator><creator>Patel, Rahul</creator><creator>Annamalai, Rajasekaran</creator><creator>Ackerman, Ronald</creator><creator>Stewart, 3rd, William P</creator><creator>Amador, Yuliet Mora</creator><creator>Rao, Deepa</creator><creator>Liu, Xiaohong</creator><creator>Raman, Aarthi</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3959-2583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7443-0527</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241211</creationdate><title>Prospective, multi-site evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 plus test on nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs</title><author>Greninger, Alexander L ; Larcena, Allan ; Patel, Amrish ; Webster, Brian ; Ulen, Christina ; Green, Dallas F ; King, Dana ; Patel, Deepesh Rubin ; McElvania, Erin ; Harnett, Glenn ; Jandali, Imad ; Gibson, Jane ; Killion, Jennifer ; Atwi, Jibran ; Bergmann, Kelly ; Slade, Lance ; Allen Staat, Mary ; Faron, Matthew ; Washington, Megan ; Patel, Rahul ; Annamalai, Rajasekaran ; Ackerman, Ronald ; Stewart, 3rd, William P ; Amador, Yuliet Mora ; Rao, Deepa ; Liu, Xiaohong ; Raman, Aarthi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-a3b9af9407331a0292a4b1edba90d90d673f7991dd9117385c5185806a01d56a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>COVID-19 - diagnosis</topic><topic>COVID-19 - virology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods</topic><topic>COVID-19 Testing - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nasopharynx - virology</topic><topic>Nose - virology</topic><topic>Point-of-Care Testing</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - genetics</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specimen Handling - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Virology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greninger, Alexander L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Larcena, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Amrish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Webster, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulen, Christina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Green, Dallas F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>King, Dana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Deepesh Rubin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McElvania, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnett, Glenn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jandali, Imad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gibson, Jane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killion, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atwi, Jibran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Lance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen Staat, Mary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faron, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washington, Megan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patel, Rahul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Annamalai, Rajasekaran</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ackerman, Ronald</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, 3rd, William P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amador, Yuliet Mora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xiaohong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raman, Aarthi</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greninger, Alexander L</au><au>Larcena, Allan</au><au>Patel, Amrish</au><au>Webster, Brian</au><au>Ulen, Christina</au><au>Green, Dallas F</au><au>King, Dana</au><au>Patel, Deepesh Rubin</au><au>McElvania, Erin</au><au>Harnett, Glenn</au><au>Jandali, Imad</au><au>Gibson, Jane</au><au>Killion, Jennifer</au><au>Atwi, Jibran</au><au>Bergmann, Kelly</au><au>Slade, Lance</au><au>Allen Staat, Mary</au><au>Faron, Matthew</au><au>Washington, Megan</au><au>Patel, Rahul</au><au>Annamalai, Rajasekaran</au><au>Ackerman, Ronald</au><au>Stewart, 3rd, William P</au><au>Amador, Yuliet Mora</au><au>Rao, Deepa</au><au>Liu, Xiaohong</au><au>Raman, Aarthi</au><au>St. George, Kirsten</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective, multi-site evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 plus test on nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical microbiology</jtitle><stitle>J Clin Microbiol</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Microbiol</addtitle><date>2024-12-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>e0121924</spage><pages>e0121924-</pages><issn>0095-1137</issn><issn>1098-660X</issn><eissn>1098-660X</eissn><abstract>Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues its largely aseasonal spread with millions of cases per year. Highly sensitive, point-of-care testing is critical for rapid detection of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) cases and initiation of antiviral therapy to avert adverse health outcomes and reduce onward transmission of the virus. While hundreds of COVID-19 diagnostics received emergency use authorization from the FDA during the pandemic, significantly fewer have navigated the course to FDA clearance or approval. Here, we determined the clinical performance of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in 3,750 anterior nasal swab (NS) specimens and nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) from 32 sites in comparison to the FDA-authorized BioFire Respiratory Panel 2.1. Three-quarters of specimens collected were tested on the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 in the point-of-care setting. Overall positive percent agreement (PPA) was 98.1% (95% CI: 96.7%-98.9%) and negative percent agreement (NPA) was 98.3% (97.7%-98.7%). Performance of the Xpert Xpress CoV-2 was slightly improved in NS compared to NPS specimens, with PPA of 99.3% versus 97.0% (Fisher's exact test, = 0.06) and NPA of 98.3% versus 98.2% ( = 0.89), respectively. Assay PPA was similar between untrained and trained users (98.7% vs 97.3%, = 0.75), while NPA was slightly improved for untrained users (99.0% vs 97.6%, = 0.0003). This study showed that Cepheid Xpert Xpress COV-2 is highly sensitive and specific/has high PPA and NPA for detection of SARS-CoV-2 from both NS and NPS specimens. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) continues to cause millions of infections and tens of thousands of deaths per year in the United States. While the FDA authorized hundreds of SARS-CoV-2 tests during the public health emergency, significantly fewer have made the transition to being cleared or approved. There continues to be a need for FDA-authorized point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 testing that can be performed by untrained users. We conducted a large prospective study of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 test for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in both nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs by trained and untrained users. The assay demonstrated excellent clinical performance characteristics and, as a result of this study, was cleared by the FDA.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>39503494</pmid><doi>10.1128/jcm.01219-24</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3959-2583</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7443-0527</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0095-1137
ispartof Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024-12, Vol.62 (12), p.e0121924
issn 0095-1137
1098-660X
1098-660X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11633094
source American Society for Microbiology; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Child
Child, Preschool
COVID-19 - diagnosis
COVID-19 - virology
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing - methods
COVID-19 Testing - methods
Female
Humans
Infant
Male
Middle Aged
Nasopharynx - virology
Nose - virology
Point-of-Care Testing
Prospective Studies
SARS-CoV-2 - genetics
SARS-CoV-2 - isolation & purification
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specimen Handling - methods
United States
Virology
Young Adult
title Prospective, multi-site evaluation of the Cepheid Xpert Xpress CoV-2 plus test on nasal and nasopharyngeal swabs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T13%3A07%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective,%20multi-site%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Cepheid%20Xpert%20Xpress%20CoV-2%20plus%20test%20on%20nasal%20and%20nasopharyngeal%20swabs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20microbiology&rft.au=Greninger,%20Alexander%20L&rft.date=2024-12-11&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=e0121924&rft.pages=e0121924-&rft.issn=0095-1137&rft.eissn=1098-660X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/jcm.01219-24&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3124691961%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3124691961&rft_id=info:pmid/39503494&rfr_iscdi=true