In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning

ABSTRACT Objectives One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Lasers in surgery and medicine 2024-12, Vol.56 (10), p.836-844
Hauptverfasser: Potapova, Elena V., Shupletsov, Valery V., Dremin, Viktor V., Zherebtsov, Evgenii A., Mamoshin, Andrian V., Dunaev, Andrey V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 844
container_issue 10
container_start_page 836
container_title Lasers in surgery and medicine
container_volume 56
creator Potapova, Elena V.
Shupletsov, Valery V.
Dremin, Viktor V.
Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.
Mamoshin, Andrian V.
Dunaev, Andrey V.
description ABSTRACT Objectives One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes. Materials and Methods An optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine‐needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared. Results Our results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time‐resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90. Conclusions These promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00–00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lsm.23861
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11629289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3142512725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-7a072bbcc150b062ea1bf6b032872bbc4e20e2338305ab77ee9d2a75df466ca83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qGzEUhUVIiJ2fRV-gCLJJFk6uJM_fqhSnaQJjCvlbBYRGvuMozEiuNOPiXR-hz9gniWInoS10pYvOdw_ncgj5wOCUAfCzJrSnXOQp2yJDBkU6KhiwbTIEFuccCj4geyE8AYDgkO2SgSiSJGrZkDxcWXpvlo7emhZ___x1jcE1S5zRi6Z3HoNGq5GeY4e6M85SV9PSLNHTiYqCpzf9YuF8FxeqFZ0q_Wgs0hKVt8bOD8hOrZqAh6_vPrm7-HI7uRyV375eTT6XIy3EmI0yBRmvKq1ZAhWkHBWr6rSKYfP1_xg5IBciF5CoKssQixlXWTKrx2mqVS72yaeN76KvWpzFzJ1XjVx40yq_kk4Z-bdizaOcu6VkLOUFz4vocPzq4N33HkMnWxNvbxpl0fVBCsaLNBcxQESP_kGfXO9tvC9SY54wnvEX6mRDae9C8Fi_p2EgX0qTsTS5Li2yH_-M_06-tRSBsw3wwzS4-r-TLG-mG8tnVWiiQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3142512725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Potapova, Elena V. ; Shupletsov, Valery V. ; Dremin, Viktor V. ; Zherebtsov, Evgenii A. ; Mamoshin, Andrian V. ; Dunaev, Andrey V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Potapova, Elena V. ; Shupletsov, Valery V. ; Dremin, Viktor V. ; Zherebtsov, Evgenii A. ; Mamoshin, Andrian V. ; Dunaev, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT Objectives One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes. Materials and Methods An optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine‐needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared. Results Our results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time‐resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90. Conclusions These promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00–00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8092</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39551967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Basic Science ; Biomedical materials ; Biopsy ; Classification ; Energy metabolism ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescence spectroscopy ; Glycolysis ; Hepatocytes ; Humans ; In vivo methods and tests ; Learning algorithms ; Liver ; Liver cancer ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Machine Learning ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; optical biopsy ; Optical Imaging - methods ; Optics ; Oxidative metabolism ; Oxidative phosphorylation ; Parenchyma ; percutaneous needle biopsy ; Phosphorylation ; Sensitivity ; Separation ; Spectrometry, Fluorescence ; Time measurement ; time‐resolved fluorescence ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2024-12, Vol.56 (10), p.836-844</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-7a072bbcc150b062ea1bf6b032872bbc4e20e2338305ab77ee9d2a75df466ca83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9227-6308 ; 0009-0006-0024-8518 ; 0000-0002-3635-1430 ; 0000-0001-6974-3505 ; 0000-0003-1787-5156 ; 0000-0003-4431-6288</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flsm.23861$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flsm.23861$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39551967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potapova, Elena V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupletsov, Valery V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dremin, Viktor V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamoshin, Andrian V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunaev, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><title>In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning</title><title>Lasers in surgery and medicine</title><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT Objectives One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes. Materials and Methods An optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine‐needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared. Results Our results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time‐resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90. Conclusions These promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00–00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Basic Science</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Energy metabolism</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescence spectroscopy</subject><subject>Glycolysis</subject><subject>Hepatocytes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>optical biopsy</subject><subject>Optical Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Oxidative metabolism</subject><subject>Oxidative phosphorylation</subject><subject>Parenchyma</subject><subject>percutaneous needle biopsy</subject><subject>Phosphorylation</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>time‐resolved fluorescence</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qGzEUhUVIiJ2fRV-gCLJJFk6uJM_fqhSnaQJjCvlbBYRGvuMozEiuNOPiXR-hz9gniWInoS10pYvOdw_ncgj5wOCUAfCzJrSnXOQp2yJDBkU6KhiwbTIEFuccCj4geyE8AYDgkO2SgSiSJGrZkDxcWXpvlo7emhZ___x1jcE1S5zRi6Z3HoNGq5GeY4e6M85SV9PSLNHTiYqCpzf9YuF8FxeqFZ0q_Wgs0hKVt8bOD8hOrZqAh6_vPrm7-HI7uRyV375eTT6XIy3EmI0yBRmvKq1ZAhWkHBWr6rSKYfP1_xg5IBciF5CoKssQixlXWTKrx2mqVS72yaeN76KvWpzFzJ1XjVx40yq_kk4Z-bdizaOcu6VkLOUFz4vocPzq4N33HkMnWxNvbxpl0fVBCsaLNBcxQESP_kGfXO9tvC9SY54wnvEX6mRDae9C8Fi_p2EgX0qTsTS5Li2yH_-M_06-tRSBsw3wwzS4-r-TLG-mG8tnVWiiQA</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Potapova, Elena V.</creator><creator>Shupletsov, Valery V.</creator><creator>Dremin, Viktor V.</creator><creator>Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.</creator><creator>Mamoshin, Andrian V.</creator><creator>Dunaev, Andrey V.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9227-6308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0024-8518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-1430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-3505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-5156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-6288</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning</title><author>Potapova, Elena V. ; Shupletsov, Valery V. ; Dremin, Viktor V. ; Zherebtsov, Evgenii A. ; Mamoshin, Andrian V. ; Dunaev, Andrey V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-7a072bbcc150b062ea1bf6b032872bbc4e20e2338305ab77ee9d2a75df466ca83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Basic Science</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Energy metabolism</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescence spectroscopy</topic><topic>Glycolysis</topic><topic>Hepatocytes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>optical biopsy</topic><topic>Optical Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Oxidative metabolism</topic><topic>Oxidative phosphorylation</topic><topic>Parenchyma</topic><topic>percutaneous needle biopsy</topic><topic>Phosphorylation</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>time‐resolved fluorescence</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potapova, Elena V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupletsov, Valery V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dremin, Viktor V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamoshin, Andrian V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunaev, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potapova, Elena V.</au><au>Shupletsov, Valery V.</au><au>Dremin, Viktor V.</au><au>Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.</au><au>Mamoshin, Andrian V.</au><au>Dunaev, Andrey V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>836</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>836-844</pages><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><eissn>1096-9101</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT Objectives One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes. Materials and Methods An optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine‐needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared. Results Our results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time‐resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90. Conclusions These promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00–00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39551967</pmid><doi>10.1002/lsm.23861</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9227-6308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0024-8518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-1430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-3505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-5156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-6288</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0196-8092
ispartof Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2024-12, Vol.56 (10), p.836-844
issn 0196-8092
1096-9101
1096-9101
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11629289
source MEDLINE; Wiley Journals
subjects Accuracy
Basic Science
Biomedical materials
Biopsy
Classification
Energy metabolism
Fluorescence
Fluorescence spectroscopy
Glycolysis
Hepatocytes
Humans
In vivo methods and tests
Learning algorithms
Liver
Liver cancer
Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis
Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging
Liver Neoplasms - pathology
Machine Learning
Metastases
Metastasis
optical biopsy
Optical Imaging - methods
Optics
Oxidative metabolism
Oxidative phosphorylation
Parenchyma
percutaneous needle biopsy
Phosphorylation
Sensitivity
Separation
Spectrometry, Fluorescence
Time measurement
time‐resolved fluorescence
Tumors
title In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T03%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vivo%20Time%E2%80%90Resolved%20Fluorescence%20Detection%20of%20Liver%20Cancer%20Supported%20by%20Machine%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20surgery%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Potapova,%20Elena%20V.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=836&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=836-844&rft.issn=0196-8092&rft.eissn=1096-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lsm.23861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3142512725%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3142512725&rft_id=info:pmid/39551967&rfr_iscdi=true