In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning
ABSTRACT Objectives One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lasers in surgery and medicine 2024-12, Vol.56 (10), p.836-844 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 844 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 836 |
container_title | Lasers in surgery and medicine |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Potapova, Elena V. Shupletsov, Valery V. Dremin, Viktor V. Zherebtsov, Evgenii A. Mamoshin, Andrian V. Dunaev, Andrey V. |
description | ABSTRACT
Objectives
One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes.
Materials and Methods
An optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine‐needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared.
Results
Our results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time‐resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90.
Conclusions
These promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00–00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lsm.23861 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11629289</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3142512725</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-7a072bbcc150b062ea1bf6b032872bbc4e20e2338305ab77ee9d2a75df466ca83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc1qGzEUhUVIiJ2fRV-gCLJJFk6uJM_fqhSnaQJjCvlbBYRGvuMozEiuNOPiXR-hz9gniWInoS10pYvOdw_ncgj5wOCUAfCzJrSnXOQp2yJDBkU6KhiwbTIEFuccCj4geyE8AYDgkO2SgSiSJGrZkDxcWXpvlo7emhZ___x1jcE1S5zRi6Z3HoNGq5GeY4e6M85SV9PSLNHTiYqCpzf9YuF8FxeqFZ0q_Wgs0hKVt8bOD8hOrZqAh6_vPrm7-HI7uRyV375eTT6XIy3EmI0yBRmvKq1ZAhWkHBWr6rSKYfP1_xg5IBciF5CoKssQixlXWTKrx2mqVS72yaeN76KvWpzFzJ1XjVx40yq_kk4Z-bdizaOcu6VkLOUFz4vocPzq4N33HkMnWxNvbxpl0fVBCsaLNBcxQESP_kGfXO9tvC9SY54wnvEX6mRDae9C8Fi_p2EgX0qTsTS5Li2yH_-M_06-tRSBsw3wwzS4-r-TLG-mG8tnVWiiQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3142512725</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Potapova, Elena V. ; Shupletsov, Valery V. ; Dremin, Viktor V. ; Zherebtsov, Evgenii A. ; Mamoshin, Andrian V. ; Dunaev, Andrey V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Potapova, Elena V. ; Shupletsov, Valery V. ; Dremin, Viktor V. ; Zherebtsov, Evgenii A. ; Mamoshin, Andrian V. ; Dunaev, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT
Objectives
One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes.
Materials and Methods
An optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine‐needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared.
Results
Our results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time‐resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90.
Conclusions
These promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00–00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-8092</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9101</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23861</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39551967</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Basic Science ; Biomedical materials ; Biopsy ; Classification ; Energy metabolism ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescence spectroscopy ; Glycolysis ; Hepatocytes ; Humans ; In vivo methods and tests ; Learning algorithms ; Liver ; Liver cancer ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Liver Neoplasms - pathology ; Machine Learning ; Metastases ; Metastasis ; optical biopsy ; Optical Imaging - methods ; Optics ; Oxidative metabolism ; Oxidative phosphorylation ; Parenchyma ; percutaneous needle biopsy ; Phosphorylation ; Sensitivity ; Separation ; Spectrometry, Fluorescence ; Time measurement ; time‐resolved fluorescence ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2024-12, Vol.56 (10), p.836-844</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Lasers in Surgery and Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-7a072bbcc150b062ea1bf6b032872bbc4e20e2338305ab77ee9d2a75df466ca83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9227-6308 ; 0009-0006-0024-8518 ; 0000-0002-3635-1430 ; 0000-0001-6974-3505 ; 0000-0003-1787-5156 ; 0000-0003-4431-6288</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flsm.23861$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flsm.23861$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39551967$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Potapova, Elena V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupletsov, Valery V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dremin, Viktor V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamoshin, Andrian V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunaev, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><title>In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning</title><title>Lasers in surgery and medicine</title><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><description>ABSTRACT
Objectives
One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes.
Materials and Methods
An optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine‐needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared.
Results
Our results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time‐resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90.
Conclusions
These promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00–00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Basic Science</subject><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Energy metabolism</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescence spectroscopy</subject><subject>Glycolysis</subject><subject>Hepatocytes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In vivo methods and tests</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Liver</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Machine Learning</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>optical biopsy</subject><subject>Optical Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Optics</subject><subject>Oxidative metabolism</subject><subject>Oxidative phosphorylation</subject><subject>Parenchyma</subject><subject>percutaneous needle biopsy</subject><subject>Phosphorylation</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Separation</subject><subject>Spectrometry, Fluorescence</subject><subject>Time measurement</subject><subject>time‐resolved fluorescence</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc1qGzEUhUVIiJ2fRV-gCLJJFk6uJM_fqhSnaQJjCvlbBYRGvuMozEiuNOPiXR-hz9gniWInoS10pYvOdw_ncgj5wOCUAfCzJrSnXOQp2yJDBkU6KhiwbTIEFuccCj4geyE8AYDgkO2SgSiSJGrZkDxcWXpvlo7emhZ___x1jcE1S5zRi6Z3HoNGq5GeY4e6M85SV9PSLNHTiYqCpzf9YuF8FxeqFZ0q_Wgs0hKVt8bOD8hOrZqAh6_vPrm7-HI7uRyV375eTT6XIy3EmI0yBRmvKq1ZAhWkHBWr6rSKYfP1_xg5IBciF5CoKssQixlXWTKrx2mqVS72yaeN76KvWpzFzJ1XjVx40yq_kk4Z-bdizaOcu6VkLOUFz4vocPzq4N33HkMnWxNvbxpl0fVBCsaLNBcxQESP_kGfXO9tvC9SY54wnvEX6mRDae9C8Fi_p2EgX0qTsTS5Li2yH_-M_06-tRSBsw3wwzS4-r-TLG-mG8tnVWiiQA</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Potapova, Elena V.</creator><creator>Shupletsov, Valery V.</creator><creator>Dremin, Viktor V.</creator><creator>Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.</creator><creator>Mamoshin, Andrian V.</creator><creator>Dunaev, Andrey V.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9227-6308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0024-8518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-1430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-3505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-5156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-6288</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning</title><author>Potapova, Elena V. ; Shupletsov, Valery V. ; Dremin, Viktor V. ; Zherebtsov, Evgenii A. ; Mamoshin, Andrian V. ; Dunaev, Andrey V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3341-7a072bbcc150b062ea1bf6b032872bbc4e20e2338305ab77ee9d2a75df466ca83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Basic Science</topic><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Energy metabolism</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescence spectroscopy</topic><topic>Glycolysis</topic><topic>Hepatocytes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In vivo methods and tests</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Liver</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Liver Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Machine Learning</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>optical biopsy</topic><topic>Optical Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Optics</topic><topic>Oxidative metabolism</topic><topic>Oxidative phosphorylation</topic><topic>Parenchyma</topic><topic>percutaneous needle biopsy</topic><topic>Phosphorylation</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Separation</topic><topic>Spectrometry, Fluorescence</topic><topic>Time measurement</topic><topic>time‐resolved fluorescence</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Potapova, Elena V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shupletsov, Valery V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dremin, Viktor V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mamoshin, Andrian V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunaev, Andrey V.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Potapova, Elena V.</au><au>Shupletsov, Valery V.</au><au>Dremin, Viktor V.</au><au>Zherebtsov, Evgenii A.</au><au>Mamoshin, Andrian V.</au><au>Dunaev, Andrey V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning</atitle><jtitle>Lasers in surgery and medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Lasers Surg Med</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>836</spage><epage>844</epage><pages>836-844</pages><issn>0196-8092</issn><issn>1096-9101</issn><eissn>1096-9101</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT
Objectives
One of the widely used optical biopsy methods for monitoring cellular and tissue metabolism is time‐resolved fluorescence. The use of this method in optical liver biopsy has a high potential for studying the shift in energy‐type production from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis and changes in the antioxidant defense of malignant cells. On the other hand, machine learning methods have proven to be an excellent solution to classification problems in medical practice, including biomedical optics. We aim to combine time‐resolved fluorescence measurements and machine learning to automate the division of liver parenchyma and tumors (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) into classes.
Materials and Methods
An optical biopsy was performed using a developed setup with a fine‐needle optical probe in clinical conditions under ultrasound control. Fluorescence decays were recorded in a conditionally healthy liver and lesions during percutaneous needle biopsy. The labeled data set was created on the basis of the recorded fluorescence results and the histopathological classification of the biopsies obtained. Several machine learning methods were trained using different separation strategies of the training test set, and their respective accuracy was compared.
Results
Our results show that each of the tumor types had its own characteristic metabolic shifts recorded by the time‐resolved fluorescence spectroscopy. The application of machine learning demonstrates a reliable separation of the liver and all tumor types into cancer and noncancer classes with sensitivity, specificity and corresponding accuracy greater than 0.91, 0.79 and 0.90, using the random forest method. We also show that our method is capable of giving a preliminary diagnosis of the type of liver tumor (primary malignant, metastases and benign tumors) with a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of at least 0.80, 0.95 and 0.90.
Conclusions
These promising results highlight its potential as a key tool in the future development of diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for liver cancers. Lasers Surg. Med. 00:00–00, 2024. 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39551967</pmid><doi>10.1002/lsm.23861</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9227-6308</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-0024-8518</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3635-1430</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6974-3505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1787-5156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4431-6288</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0196-8092 |
ispartof | Lasers in surgery and medicine, 2024-12, Vol.56 (10), p.836-844 |
issn | 0196-8092 1096-9101 1096-9101 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11629289 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Basic Science Biomedical materials Biopsy Classification Energy metabolism Fluorescence Fluorescence spectroscopy Glycolysis Hepatocytes Humans In vivo methods and tests Learning algorithms Liver Liver cancer Liver Neoplasms - diagnosis Liver Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Liver Neoplasms - pathology Machine Learning Metastases Metastasis optical biopsy Optical Imaging - methods Optics Oxidative metabolism Oxidative phosphorylation Parenchyma percutaneous needle biopsy Phosphorylation Sensitivity Separation Spectrometry, Fluorescence Time measurement time‐resolved fluorescence Tumors |
title | In Vivo Time‐Resolved Fluorescence Detection of Liver Cancer Supported by Machine Learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T03%3A05%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20Vivo%20Time%E2%80%90Resolved%20Fluorescence%20Detection%20of%20Liver%20Cancer%20Supported%20by%20Machine%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Lasers%20in%20surgery%20and%20medicine&rft.au=Potapova,%20Elena%20V.&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=836&rft.epage=844&rft.pages=836-844&rft.issn=0196-8092&rft.eissn=1096-9101&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lsm.23861&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3142512725%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3142512725&rft_id=info:pmid/39551967&rfr_iscdi=true |