Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records

Background Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of intellectual disability research 2025-01, Vol.69 (1), p.103-111
Hauptverfasser: Gorman, A., Odalović, M., McCallion, P., Paul, A., Burke, É., MacLachlan, M., McCarron, M., Henman, M. C., Moran, M., O'Connell, J., Shankar, R., Ryan, C., O'Dwyer, M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title Journal of intellectual disability research
container_volume 69
creator Gorman, A.
Odalović, M.
McCallion, P.
Paul, A.
Burke, É.
MacLachlan, M.
McCarron, M.
Henman, M. C.
Moran, M.
O'Connell, J.
Shankar, R.
Ryan, C.
O'Dwyer, M.
description Background Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between two different sources of medication data of older adults with intellectual disability (ID). Methods Self‐report medication data were gathered from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing and linked to national pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the two data sources for psychotropic medication. Results The lowest agreement level was ‘moderate’ for the number of anxiolytics reported (kappa 0.56). The highest level of agreement was ‘almost perfect’ for the binary variable of antipsychotics (kappa 0.91). Other agreement results were ‘substantial’ or ‘almost perfect’. Conclusions Good agreement was found between the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing medication dataset and national dispensing records. Self‐report medication data appear to be a valid method of data collection in psychotropic medication use in adults with ID.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jir.13192
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11621587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3141268381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-8c0b0dc1723636a33da76cd7d14b7503d2dd4d44e800cd72693931c639e8049c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTju68AUk4EYXNZPUTaUqKxkaf0YGBNF1SCfpNk0qKZOU0uDCR_AZfRLTU-OggtkknHyc-3MQekzJGa3nfO_SGQUq2jtoRYF3TdsPw120IoKzpuUAJ-hBzntCCKeM30cnIBgBMYgV-raO46SSCzucrd_-_P4j2SmmgkdrnFbFxYCNKgpvUxyxwj6GnSuzcUF5nOvjgCvhQrHeW13mqhqX1cZ5Vw5YBYPDtcmiTzbkY6lkdUwmP0T3tspn--jmPkUfX738sH7TXL17fbm-uGo0AGubQZMNMZr2LXDgCsConmvTG8o2fUfAtMYww5gdCKlyywUIoJqDqAoTGk7Ri8V3mjd1Lm1DScrLKblRpYOMysm_f4L7JHfxi6SUt7Qb-urw7MYhxc-zzUWOLus6swo2zllCJXnfCdpV9Ok_6D7OqS7gSDHa8gEGWqnnC6VTzDnZ7W03lMhjqLKGKq9DreyTP9u_JX-nWIHzBfjqvD3830m-vXy_WP4CFZOvNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3141268381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Gorman, A. ; Odalović, M. ; McCallion, P. ; Paul, A. ; Burke, É. ; MacLachlan, M. ; McCarron, M. ; Henman, M. C. ; Moran, M. ; O'Connell, J. ; Shankar, R. ; Ryan, C. ; O'Dwyer, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gorman, A. ; Odalović, M. ; McCallion, P. ; Paul, A. ; Burke, É. ; MacLachlan, M. ; McCarron, M. ; Henman, M. C. ; Moran, M. ; O'Connell, J. ; Shankar, R. ; Ryan, C. ; O'Dwyer, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between two different sources of medication data of older adults with intellectual disability (ID). Methods Self‐report medication data were gathered from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing and linked to national pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the two data sources for psychotropic medication. Results The lowest agreement level was ‘moderate’ for the number of anxiolytics reported (kappa 0.56). The highest level of agreement was ‘almost perfect’ for the binary variable of antipsychotics (kappa 0.91). Other agreement results were ‘substantial’ or ‘almost perfect’. Conclusions Good agreement was found between the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing medication dataset and national dispensing records. Self‐report medication data appear to be a valid method of data collection in psychotropic medication use in adults with ID.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jir.13192</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39403989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Aging (Individuals) ; agreement ; Agreements ; Antipsychotics ; Brief Report ; Data collection ; Drug Use ; Drugs ; Female ; Humans ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability ; Intellectual Disability - drug therapy ; Intellectual Disability - epidemiology ; Ireland - epidemiology ; Kappa statistic ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; pharmacoepidemiology ; Pharmacy ; Psychotropic drugs ; Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use ; psychotropic medication ; psychotropics ; Self Report</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2025-01, Vol.69 (1), p.103-111</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons and MENCAP.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by John Wiley &amp; Sons and MENCAP.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-8c0b0dc1723636a33da76cd7d14b7503d2dd4d44e800cd72693931c639e8049c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8524-2399 ; 0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjir.13192$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjir.13192$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,30980,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39403989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gorman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odalović, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCallion, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, É.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLachlan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henman, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dwyer, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between two different sources of medication data of older adults with intellectual disability (ID). Methods Self‐report medication data were gathered from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing and linked to national pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the two data sources for psychotropic medication. Results The lowest agreement level was ‘moderate’ for the number of anxiolytics reported (kappa 0.56). The highest level of agreement was ‘almost perfect’ for the binary variable of antipsychotics (kappa 0.91). Other agreement results were ‘substantial’ or ‘almost perfect’. Conclusions Good agreement was found between the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing medication dataset and national dispensing records. Self‐report medication data appear to be a valid method of data collection in psychotropic medication use in adults with ID.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>agreement</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Drug Use</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - drug therapy</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ireland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Kappa statistic</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>pharmacoepidemiology</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Psychotropic drugs</subject><subject>Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use</subject><subject>psychotropic medication</subject><subject>psychotropics</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTju68AUk4EYXNZPUTaUqKxkaf0YGBNF1SCfpNk0qKZOU0uDCR_AZfRLTU-OggtkknHyc-3MQekzJGa3nfO_SGQUq2jtoRYF3TdsPw120IoKzpuUAJ-hBzntCCKeM30cnIBgBMYgV-raO46SSCzucrd_-_P4j2SmmgkdrnFbFxYCNKgpvUxyxwj6GnSuzcUF5nOvjgCvhQrHeW13mqhqX1cZ5Vw5YBYPDtcmiTzbkY6lkdUwmP0T3tspn--jmPkUfX738sH7TXL17fbm-uGo0AGubQZMNMZr2LXDgCsConmvTG8o2fUfAtMYww5gdCKlyywUIoJqDqAoTGk7Ri8V3mjd1Lm1DScrLKblRpYOMysm_f4L7JHfxi6SUt7Qb-urw7MYhxc-zzUWOLus6swo2zllCJXnfCdpV9Ok_6D7OqS7gSDHa8gEGWqnnC6VTzDnZ7W03lMhjqLKGKq9DreyTP9u_JX-nWIHzBfjqvD3830m-vXy_WP4CFZOvNA</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Gorman, A.</creator><creator>Odalović, M.</creator><creator>McCallion, P.</creator><creator>Paul, A.</creator><creator>Burke, É.</creator><creator>MacLachlan, M.</creator><creator>McCarron, M.</creator><creator>Henman, M. C.</creator><creator>Moran, M.</creator><creator>O'Connell, J.</creator><creator>Shankar, R.</creator><creator>Ryan, C.</creator><creator>O'Dwyer, M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-2399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records</title><author>Gorman, A. ; Odalović, M. ; McCallion, P. ; Paul, A. ; Burke, É. ; MacLachlan, M. ; McCarron, M. ; Henman, M. C. ; Moran, M. ; O'Connell, J. ; Shankar, R. ; Ryan, C. ; O'Dwyer, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-8c0b0dc1723636a33da76cd7d14b7503d2dd4d44e800cd72693931c639e8049c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>agreement</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Drug Use</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - drug therapy</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ireland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Kappa statistic</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>pharmacoepidemiology</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Psychotropic drugs</topic><topic>Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use</topic><topic>psychotropic medication</topic><topic>psychotropics</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gorman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odalović, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCallion, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, É.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLachlan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henman, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dwyer, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gorman, A.</au><au>Odalović, M.</au><au>McCallion, P.</au><au>Paul, A.</au><au>Burke, É.</au><au>MacLachlan, M.</au><au>McCarron, M.</au><au>Henman, M. C.</au><au>Moran, M.</au><au>O'Connell, J.</au><au>Shankar, R.</au><au>Ryan, C.</au><au>O'Dwyer, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>103-111</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><abstract>Background Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between two different sources of medication data of older adults with intellectual disability (ID). Methods Self‐report medication data were gathered from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing and linked to national pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the two data sources for psychotropic medication. Results The lowest agreement level was ‘moderate’ for the number of anxiolytics reported (kappa 0.56). The highest level of agreement was ‘almost perfect’ for the binary variable of antipsychotics (kappa 0.91). Other agreement results were ‘substantial’ or ‘almost perfect’. Conclusions Good agreement was found between the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing medication dataset and national dispensing records. Self‐report medication data appear to be a valid method of data collection in psychotropic medication use in adults with ID.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39403989</pmid><doi>10.1111/jir.13192</doi><tpages>111</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-2399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-2633
ispartof Journal of intellectual disability research, 2025-01, Vol.69 (1), p.103-111
issn 0964-2633
1365-2788
1365-2788
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11621587
source MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Aging
Aging (Individuals)
agreement
Agreements
Antipsychotics
Brief Report
Data collection
Drug Use
Drugs
Female
Humans
Intellectual disabilities
Intellectual Disability
Intellectual Disability - drug therapy
Intellectual Disability - epidemiology
Ireland - epidemiology
Kappa statistic
Longitudinal Studies
Male
Middle Aged
Older people
pharmacoepidemiology
Pharmacy
Psychotropic drugs
Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use
psychotropic medication
psychotropics
Self Report
title Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20self%E2%80%90report%20medication%20data%20from%20a%20longitudinal%20study%20on%20intellectual%20disability%20and%20national%20dispensing%20records&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Gorman,%20A.&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=103-111&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jir.13192&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3141268381%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3141268381&rft_id=info:pmid/39403989&rfr_iscdi=true