Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records
Background Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to com...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intellectual disability research 2025-01, Vol.69 (1), p.103-111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 111 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 103 |
container_title | Journal of intellectual disability research |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Gorman, A. Odalović, M. McCallion, P. Paul, A. Burke, É. MacLachlan, M. McCarron, M. Henman, M. C. Moran, M. O'Connell, J. Shankar, R. Ryan, C. O'Dwyer, M. |
description | Background
Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between two different sources of medication data of older adults with intellectual disability (ID).
Methods
Self‐report medication data were gathered from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing and linked to national pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the two data sources for psychotropic medication.
Results
The lowest agreement level was ‘moderate’ for the number of anxiolytics reported (kappa 0.56). The highest level of agreement was ‘almost perfect’ for the binary variable of antipsychotics (kappa 0.91). Other agreement results were ‘substantial’ or ‘almost perfect’.
Conclusions
Good agreement was found between the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing medication dataset and national dispensing records. Self‐report medication data appear to be a valid method of data collection in psychotropic medication use in adults with ID. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jir.13192 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11621587</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3141268381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-8c0b0dc1723636a33da76cd7d14b7503d2dd4d44e800cd72693931c639e8049c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTju68AUk4EYXNZPUTaUqKxkaf0YGBNF1SCfpNk0qKZOU0uDCR_AZfRLTU-OggtkknHyc-3MQekzJGa3nfO_SGQUq2jtoRYF3TdsPw120IoKzpuUAJ-hBzntCCKeM30cnIBgBMYgV-raO46SSCzucrd_-_P4j2SmmgkdrnFbFxYCNKgpvUxyxwj6GnSuzcUF5nOvjgCvhQrHeW13mqhqX1cZ5Vw5YBYPDtcmiTzbkY6lkdUwmP0T3tspn--jmPkUfX738sH7TXL17fbm-uGo0AGubQZMNMZr2LXDgCsConmvTG8o2fUfAtMYww5gdCKlyywUIoJqDqAoTGk7Ri8V3mjd1Lm1DScrLKblRpYOMysm_f4L7JHfxi6SUt7Qb-urw7MYhxc-zzUWOLus6swo2zllCJXnfCdpV9Ok_6D7OqS7gSDHa8gEGWqnnC6VTzDnZ7W03lMhjqLKGKq9DreyTP9u_JX-nWIHzBfjqvD3830m-vXy_WP4CFZOvNA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3141268381</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Gorman, A. ; Odalović, M. ; McCallion, P. ; Paul, A. ; Burke, É. ; MacLachlan, M. ; McCarron, M. ; Henman, M. C. ; Moran, M. ; O'Connell, J. ; Shankar, R. ; Ryan, C. ; O'Dwyer, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gorman, A. ; Odalović, M. ; McCallion, P. ; Paul, A. ; Burke, É. ; MacLachlan, M. ; McCarron, M. ; Henman, M. C. ; Moran, M. ; O'Connell, J. ; Shankar, R. ; Ryan, C. ; O'Dwyer, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between two different sources of medication data of older adults with intellectual disability (ID).
Methods
Self‐report medication data were gathered from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing and linked to national pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the two data sources for psychotropic medication.
Results
The lowest agreement level was ‘moderate’ for the number of anxiolytics reported (kappa 0.56). The highest level of agreement was ‘almost perfect’ for the binary variable of antipsychotics (kappa 0.91). Other agreement results were ‘substantial’ or ‘almost perfect’.
Conclusions
Good agreement was found between the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing medication dataset and national dispensing records. Self‐report medication data appear to be a valid method of data collection in psychotropic medication use in adults with ID.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jir.13192</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39403989</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Aging ; Aging (Individuals) ; agreement ; Agreements ; Antipsychotics ; Brief Report ; Data collection ; Drug Use ; Drugs ; Female ; Humans ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability ; Intellectual Disability - drug therapy ; Intellectual Disability - epidemiology ; Ireland - epidemiology ; Kappa statistic ; Longitudinal Studies ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Older people ; pharmacoepidemiology ; Pharmacy ; Psychotropic drugs ; Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use ; psychotropic medication ; psychotropics ; Self Report</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2025-01, Vol.69 (1), p.103-111</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley & Sons and MENCAP.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by John Wiley & Sons and MENCAP.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-8c0b0dc1723636a33da76cd7d14b7503d2dd4d44e800cd72693931c639e8049c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8524-2399 ; 0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjir.13192$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjir.13192$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,1412,27905,27906,30980,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39403989$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gorman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odalović, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCallion, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, É.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLachlan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henman, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dwyer, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background
Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between two different sources of medication data of older adults with intellectual disability (ID).
Methods
Self‐report medication data were gathered from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing and linked to national pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the two data sources for psychotropic medication.
Results
The lowest agreement level was ‘moderate’ for the number of anxiolytics reported (kappa 0.56). The highest level of agreement was ‘almost perfect’ for the binary variable of antipsychotics (kappa 0.91). Other agreement results were ‘substantial’ or ‘almost perfect’.
Conclusions
Good agreement was found between the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing medication dataset and national dispensing records. Self‐report medication data appear to be a valid method of data collection in psychotropic medication use in adults with ID.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aging (Individuals)</subject><subject>agreement</subject><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Drug Use</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - drug therapy</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ireland - epidemiology</subject><subject>Kappa statistic</subject><subject>Longitudinal Studies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>pharmacoepidemiology</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Psychotropic drugs</subject><subject>Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use</subject><subject>psychotropic medication</subject><subject>psychotropics</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc2KFDEUhYMoTju68AUk4EYXNZPUTaUqKxkaf0YGBNF1SCfpNk0qKZOU0uDCR_AZfRLTU-OggtkknHyc-3MQekzJGa3nfO_SGQUq2jtoRYF3TdsPw120IoKzpuUAJ-hBzntCCKeM30cnIBgBMYgV-raO46SSCzucrd_-_P4j2SmmgkdrnFbFxYCNKgpvUxyxwj6GnSuzcUF5nOvjgCvhQrHeW13mqhqX1cZ5Vw5YBYPDtcmiTzbkY6lkdUwmP0T3tspn--jmPkUfX738sH7TXL17fbm-uGo0AGubQZMNMZr2LXDgCsConmvTG8o2fUfAtMYww5gdCKlyywUIoJqDqAoTGk7Ri8V3mjd1Lm1DScrLKblRpYOMysm_f4L7JHfxi6SUt7Qb-urw7MYhxc-zzUWOLus6swo2zllCJXnfCdpV9Ok_6D7OqS7gSDHa8gEGWqnnC6VTzDnZ7W03lMhjqLKGKq9DreyTP9u_JX-nWIHzBfjqvD3830m-vXy_WP4CFZOvNA</recordid><startdate>202501</startdate><enddate>202501</enddate><creator>Gorman, A.</creator><creator>Odalović, M.</creator><creator>McCallion, P.</creator><creator>Paul, A.</creator><creator>Burke, É.</creator><creator>MacLachlan, M.</creator><creator>McCarron, M.</creator><creator>Henman, M. C.</creator><creator>Moran, M.</creator><creator>O'Connell, J.</creator><creator>Shankar, R.</creator><creator>Ryan, C.</creator><creator>O'Dwyer, M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-2399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202501</creationdate><title>Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records</title><author>Gorman, A. ; Odalović, M. ; McCallion, P. ; Paul, A. ; Burke, É. ; MacLachlan, M. ; McCarron, M. ; Henman, M. C. ; Moran, M. ; O'Connell, J. ; Shankar, R. ; Ryan, C. ; O'Dwyer, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3342-8c0b0dc1723636a33da76cd7d14b7503d2dd4d44e800cd72693931c639e8049c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aging (Individuals)</topic><topic>agreement</topic><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Drug Use</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - drug therapy</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ireland - epidemiology</topic><topic>Kappa statistic</topic><topic>Longitudinal Studies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>pharmacoepidemiology</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Psychotropic drugs</topic><topic>Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use</topic><topic>psychotropic medication</topic><topic>psychotropics</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gorman, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Odalović, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCallion, P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paul, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burke, É.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacLachlan, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCarron, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Henman, M. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moran, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connell, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Dwyer, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gorman, A.</au><au>Odalović, M.</au><au>McCallion, P.</au><au>Paul, A.</au><au>Burke, É.</au><au>MacLachlan, M.</au><au>McCarron, M.</au><au>Henman, M. C.</au><au>Moran, M.</au><au>O'Connell, J.</au><au>Shankar, R.</au><au>Ryan, C.</au><au>O'Dwyer, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2025-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>103-111</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><abstract>Background
Medication data are a valuable resource in epidemiological studies. As the most common data collection method of medication data is self‐report, it is important to understand the accuracy of this in comparison with other methods such as dispensing records. The aim of this study was to compare the agreement between two different sources of medication data of older adults with intellectual disability (ID).
Methods
Self‐report medication data were gathered from the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing and linked to national pharmacy dispensing records. The kappa statistic was used to measure agreement between the two data sources for psychotropic medication.
Results
The lowest agreement level was ‘moderate’ for the number of anxiolytics reported (kappa 0.56). The highest level of agreement was ‘almost perfect’ for the binary variable of antipsychotics (kappa 0.91). Other agreement results were ‘substantial’ or ‘almost perfect’.
Conclusions
Good agreement was found between the Intellectual Disability Supplement to the Irish Longitudinal Study on Ageing medication dataset and national dispensing records. Self‐report medication data appear to be a valid method of data collection in psychotropic medication use in adults with ID.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39403989</pmid><doi>10.1111/jir.13192</doi><tpages>111</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8524-2399</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5129-6399</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-2633 |
ispartof | Journal of intellectual disability research, 2025-01, Vol.69 (1), p.103-111 |
issn | 0964-2633 1365-2788 1365-2788 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11621587 |
source | MEDLINE; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Aged Aged, 80 and over Aging Aging (Individuals) agreement Agreements Antipsychotics Brief Report Data collection Drug Use Drugs Female Humans Intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability Intellectual Disability - drug therapy Intellectual Disability - epidemiology Ireland - epidemiology Kappa statistic Longitudinal Studies Male Middle Aged Older people pharmacoepidemiology Pharmacy Psychotropic drugs Psychotropic Drugs - therapeutic use psychotropic medication psychotropics Self Report |
title | Comparing self‐report medication data from a longitudinal study on intellectual disability and national dispensing records |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T15%3A59%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20self%E2%80%90report%20medication%20data%20from%20a%20longitudinal%20study%20on%20intellectual%20disability%20and%20national%20dispensing%20records&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Gorman,%20A.&rft.date=2025-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=103-111&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jir.13192&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3141268381%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3141268381&rft_id=info:pmid/39403989&rfr_iscdi=true |