Height-Age as An Alternative to Height-For-Age z-Scores to Assess the Effect of Interventions on Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Assessments of the efficacy of interventions to improve child growth are often based on differences in mean height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) and stunting (HAZ

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current developments in nutrition 2024-12, Vol.8 (12), p.104495, Article 104495
Hauptverfasser: Watson, Kelly M, Dasiewicz, Alison SB, Bassani, Diego G, Chen, Chun-Yuan, Qamar, Huma, O'Callaghan, Karen M, Roth, Daniel E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 12
container_start_page 104495
container_title Current developments in nutrition
container_volume 8
creator Watson, Kelly M
Dasiewicz, Alison SB
Bassani, Diego G
Chen, Chun-Yuan
Qamar, Huma
O'Callaghan, Karen M
Roth, Daniel E
description Assessments of the efficacy of interventions to improve child growth are often based on differences in mean height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) and stunting (HAZ
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104495
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11621485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A820477313</galeid><els_id>S2475299124024296</els_id><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c28566f116ab4722998dcb7a87b792ec</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A820477313</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-3b7d0fe35421e0b9efdcdabb0b61bd3eea26316fd935e0428436e038ac306433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Uk1rGzEQXUpLE9L8gkIR9NLLuvpa7e6hlMXkw-DSQ3MXWmnWlllLqSQ7pL-kP7ey1w0JlKKDhpn3nmZGryjeEzwjmIjPm5k2bpdmFFOeM5y31avinPK6KmnbktfP4rPiMsYNxpi0bStw-7Y4Y63gLa_FefH7FuxqncpuBUhF1DnUjQmCU8nuASWPTvVrH46YX-UP7QPEQ6mLEWKO1oCuhgF0Qn5AC5fpe3DJeheRd2i-tqNBS-tABXQT_ENaI-vQ0j-USDmDvlljRigXTvstoLnfuRQsxHfFm0GNES5P90Vxd311N78tl99vFvNuWWpes1SyvjZ4AFZxSgD3LQxGG9X3uBekNwxAUcGIGEzLKsCcNpwJwKxRmmHBGbsoFpOs8Woj74PdqvAovbLymPBhJVVIVo8gNW0qIQZChOp5TfNqG6P7WjV1X7cUdNb6Omnd7_otGJ2XENT4QvRlxdm1XPm9zJKU8KbKCp9OCsH_3EFMcmujhnFUDvwuSka4qBpCKM_QjxN0pXJv1g0-S-oDXHYNxbyuGTmMN_sHKh8DW6u9g8Hm_AsCmwg6-BgDDE_tEywPzpMbeXSePDhPTs7LrA_PJ3_i_PVZBnyZAJC_cm8hyKgtOA3GhmycvGz73wf-AJiC6ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3146581124</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Height-Age as An Alternative to Height-For-Age z-Scores to Assess the Effect of Interventions on Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Watson, Kelly M ; Dasiewicz, Alison SB ; Bassani, Diego G ; Chen, Chun-Yuan ; Qamar, Huma ; O'Callaghan, Karen M ; Roth, Daniel E</creator><creatorcontrib>Watson, Kelly M ; Dasiewicz, Alison SB ; Bassani, Diego G ; Chen, Chun-Yuan ; Qamar, Huma ; O'Callaghan, Karen M ; Roth, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><description>Assessments of the efficacy of interventions to improve child growth are often based on differences in mean height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) and stunting (HAZ&lt;−2) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, this approach does not account for children’s starting skeletal age and does not enable assessment of the extent to which interventions optimized linear growth. The objectives of this study were to develop and apply a new method using height-age to express linear growth effects in RCTs. Longitudinal individual participant data (IPD) from a Bangladeshi trial cohort were used to compare height-age estimates derived from individual-level heights, mean raw height, or mean HAZ. Then, using mean height-age as a proxy for skeletal age, we developed the "proportion of maximal benefit" (PMB) metric to quantify intervention effects relative to optimal growth for children’s starting skeletal age. Optimal growth occurs when height-age increases in parallel with chronologic age (i.e., PMB = 100%), whereas no effect (compared with control) corresponds to a PMB of 0%. Linear growth outcomes in 4 published RCTs of nutrition-specific interventions were re-expressed as mean height-age and PMB and compared with effects conventionally expressed as intervention-compared with-control mean differences (MD) in HAZ. Mean height-age could be derived from any published estimate of mean raw height or mean HAZ; however, to calculate the PMB, height or HAZ data were required at both the beginning and end of the observation period. Interpretations of intervention effects were consistent when expressed as either the height-age MD or HAZ MD. In contrast, the PMB does not have a corresponding metric on the HAZ scale and, therefore, provided a new way to quantify intervention efficacy. Height-age can be used as an alternative to HAZ to express intervention effects. The PMB has the advantage of conveying the extent to which an intervention improved average linear growth in relation to a biologically-defined benchmark.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2475-2991</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104495</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39649476</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Child development ; child growth ; Growth ; height-age ; height-for-age z-scores ; low and middle-income countries ; Original Research ; stunting</subject><ispartof>Current developments in nutrition, 2024-12, Vol.8 (12), p.104495, Article 104495</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>2024 The Authors.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Oxford University Press</rights><rights>2024 The Authors 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-3b7d0fe35421e0b9efdcdabb0b61bd3eea26316fd935e0428436e038ac306433</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7742-0925</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621485/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11621485/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39649476$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Watson, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasiewicz, Alison SB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassani, Diego G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chun-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qamar, Huma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Callaghan, Karen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><title>Height-Age as An Alternative to Height-For-Age z-Scores to Assess the Effect of Interventions on Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries</title><title>Current developments in nutrition</title><addtitle>Curr Dev Nutr</addtitle><description>Assessments of the efficacy of interventions to improve child growth are often based on differences in mean height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) and stunting (HAZ&lt;−2) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, this approach does not account for children’s starting skeletal age and does not enable assessment of the extent to which interventions optimized linear growth. The objectives of this study were to develop and apply a new method using height-age to express linear growth effects in RCTs. Longitudinal individual participant data (IPD) from a Bangladeshi trial cohort were used to compare height-age estimates derived from individual-level heights, mean raw height, or mean HAZ. Then, using mean height-age as a proxy for skeletal age, we developed the "proportion of maximal benefit" (PMB) metric to quantify intervention effects relative to optimal growth for children’s starting skeletal age. Optimal growth occurs when height-age increases in parallel with chronologic age (i.e., PMB = 100%), whereas no effect (compared with control) corresponds to a PMB of 0%. Linear growth outcomes in 4 published RCTs of nutrition-specific interventions were re-expressed as mean height-age and PMB and compared with effects conventionally expressed as intervention-compared with-control mean differences (MD) in HAZ. Mean height-age could be derived from any published estimate of mean raw height or mean HAZ; however, to calculate the PMB, height or HAZ data were required at both the beginning and end of the observation period. Interpretations of intervention effects were consistent when expressed as either the height-age MD or HAZ MD. In contrast, the PMB does not have a corresponding metric on the HAZ scale and, therefore, provided a new way to quantify intervention efficacy. Height-age can be used as an alternative to HAZ to express intervention effects. The PMB has the advantage of conveying the extent to which an intervention improved average linear growth in relation to a biologically-defined benchmark.</description><subject>Child development</subject><subject>child growth</subject><subject>Growth</subject><subject>height-age</subject><subject>height-for-age z-scores</subject><subject>low and middle-income countries</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>stunting</subject><issn>2475-2991</issn><issn>2475-2991</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Uk1rGzEQXUpLE9L8gkIR9NLLuvpa7e6hlMXkw-DSQ3MXWmnWlllLqSQ7pL-kP7ey1w0JlKKDhpn3nmZGryjeEzwjmIjPm5k2bpdmFFOeM5y31avinPK6KmnbktfP4rPiMsYNxpi0bStw-7Y4Y63gLa_FefH7FuxqncpuBUhF1DnUjQmCU8nuASWPTvVrH46YX-UP7QPEQ6mLEWKO1oCuhgF0Qn5AC5fpe3DJeheRd2i-tqNBS-tABXQT_ENaI-vQ0j-USDmDvlljRigXTvstoLnfuRQsxHfFm0GNES5P90Vxd311N78tl99vFvNuWWpes1SyvjZ4AFZxSgD3LQxGG9X3uBekNwxAUcGIGEzLKsCcNpwJwKxRmmHBGbsoFpOs8Woj74PdqvAovbLymPBhJVVIVo8gNW0qIQZChOp5TfNqG6P7WjV1X7cUdNb6Omnd7_otGJ2XENT4QvRlxdm1XPm9zJKU8KbKCp9OCsH_3EFMcmujhnFUDvwuSka4qBpCKM_QjxN0pXJv1g0-S-oDXHYNxbyuGTmMN_sHKh8DW6u9g8Hm_AsCmwg6-BgDDE_tEywPzpMbeXSePDhPTs7LrA_PJ3_i_PVZBnyZAJC_cm8hyKgtOA3GhmycvGz73wf-AJiC6ig</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Watson, Kelly M</creator><creator>Dasiewicz, Alison SB</creator><creator>Bassani, Diego G</creator><creator>Chen, Chun-Yuan</creator><creator>Qamar, Huma</creator><creator>O'Callaghan, Karen M</creator><creator>Roth, Daniel E</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Society for Nutrition</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-0925</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Height-Age as An Alternative to Height-For-Age z-Scores to Assess the Effect of Interventions on Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries</title><author>Watson, Kelly M ; Dasiewicz, Alison SB ; Bassani, Diego G ; Chen, Chun-Yuan ; Qamar, Huma ; O'Callaghan, Karen M ; Roth, Daniel E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c473t-3b7d0fe35421e0b9efdcdabb0b61bd3eea26316fd935e0428436e038ac306433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Child development</topic><topic>child growth</topic><topic>Growth</topic><topic>height-age</topic><topic>height-for-age z-scores</topic><topic>low and middle-income countries</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>stunting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Watson, Kelly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dasiewicz, Alison SB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassani, Diego G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chun-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qamar, Huma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Callaghan, Karen M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roth, Daniel E</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Watson, Kelly M</au><au>Dasiewicz, Alison SB</au><au>Bassani, Diego G</au><au>Chen, Chun-Yuan</au><au>Qamar, Huma</au><au>O'Callaghan, Karen M</au><au>Roth, Daniel E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Height-Age as An Alternative to Height-For-Age z-Scores to Assess the Effect of Interventions on Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries</atitle><jtitle>Current developments in nutrition</jtitle><addtitle>Curr Dev Nutr</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>104495</spage><pages>104495-</pages><artnum>104495</artnum><issn>2475-2991</issn><eissn>2475-2991</eissn><abstract>Assessments of the efficacy of interventions to improve child growth are often based on differences in mean height-for-age z-scores (HAZ) and stunting (HAZ&lt;−2) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, this approach does not account for children’s starting skeletal age and does not enable assessment of the extent to which interventions optimized linear growth. The objectives of this study were to develop and apply a new method using height-age to express linear growth effects in RCTs. Longitudinal individual participant data (IPD) from a Bangladeshi trial cohort were used to compare height-age estimates derived from individual-level heights, mean raw height, or mean HAZ. Then, using mean height-age as a proxy for skeletal age, we developed the "proportion of maximal benefit" (PMB) metric to quantify intervention effects relative to optimal growth for children’s starting skeletal age. Optimal growth occurs when height-age increases in parallel with chronologic age (i.e., PMB = 100%), whereas no effect (compared with control) corresponds to a PMB of 0%. Linear growth outcomes in 4 published RCTs of nutrition-specific interventions were re-expressed as mean height-age and PMB and compared with effects conventionally expressed as intervention-compared with-control mean differences (MD) in HAZ. Mean height-age could be derived from any published estimate of mean raw height or mean HAZ; however, to calculate the PMB, height or HAZ data were required at both the beginning and end of the observation period. Interpretations of intervention effects were consistent when expressed as either the height-age MD or HAZ MD. In contrast, the PMB does not have a corresponding metric on the HAZ scale and, therefore, provided a new way to quantify intervention efficacy. Height-age can be used as an alternative to HAZ to express intervention effects. The PMB has the advantage of conveying the extent to which an intervention improved average linear growth in relation to a biologically-defined benchmark.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>39649476</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104495</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7742-0925</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2475-2991
ispartof Current developments in nutrition, 2024-12, Vol.8 (12), p.104495, Article 104495
issn 2475-2991
2475-2991
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11621485
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; PubMed Central
subjects Child development
child growth
Growth
height-age
height-for-age z-scores
low and middle-income countries
Original Research
stunting
title Height-Age as An Alternative to Height-For-Age z-Scores to Assess the Effect of Interventions on Child Linear Growth in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A06%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Height-Age%20as%20An%20Alternative%20to%20Height-For-Age%20z-Scores%20to%20Assess%20the%20Effect%20of%20Interventions%20on%20Child%20Linear%20Growth%20in%20Low-%20and%20Middle-Income%20Countries&rft.jtitle=Current%20developments%20in%20nutrition&rft.au=Watson,%20Kelly%20M&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=104495&rft.pages=104495-&rft.artnum=104495&rft.issn=2475-2991&rft.eissn=2475-2991&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cdnut.2024.104495&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA820477313%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3146581124&rft_id=info:pmid/39649476&rft_galeid=A820477313&rft_els_id=S2475299124024296&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c28566f116ab4722998dcb7a87b792ec&rfr_iscdi=true