Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation

Background Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) has been established with various robotic platforms. The Dexter robotic system is an open platform consisting of a sterile surgeon’s console, two robotic instrument arms, and one robotic endoscope arm. This study a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7647-7655
Hauptverfasser: Gantner, Lukas, Mignot, Hubert, Pochhammer, Julius, Grieder, Felix, Breitenstein, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7655
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7647
container_title Surgical endoscopy
container_volume 38
creator Gantner, Lukas
Mignot, Hubert
Pochhammer, Julius
Grieder, Felix
Breitenstein, Stefan
description Background Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) has been established with various robotic platforms. The Dexter robotic system is an open platform consisting of a sterile surgeon’s console, two robotic instrument arms, and one robotic endoscope arm. This study aimed to confirm the perioperative and early postoperative safety and clinical performance of the Dexter system in patients undergoing primary transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Methods The primary objectives of this multicenter study conducted at three centers in France, Germany, and Switzerland were to document the successful completion of rTAPP procedures and the occurrence of serious adverse events (Clavien–Dindo grades III–V), device-related events up to 30 days post-surgery. The procedures were performed by three surgeons with varying levels of experience in robotic systems. Results 50 patients with a median age of 62.5 years (IQR 51.0–72.0) and BMI of 25.1 kg/cm 2 (IQR 23.5–28.7), respectively, underwent inguinal hernia repair (33 unilateral, 17 bilateral). All surgeries were successfully completed using three standard laparoscopy trocars. There were no conversions to open surgery, intraoperative complications or device deficiencies. The median skin-to-skin operative time was 50 min (IQR 45–60) for unilateral hernias and 96 min (IQR 84–105) for bilateral hernias. The median console time was 30 min (IQR 26–41) for unilateral and 66 min (IQR 60–77) for bilateral hernias. Twenty-six patients were discharged on the day of surgery, and 22 on postoperative day 1. Conclusion This study confirmed the use of the Dexter system in rTAPP was feasible and safe in multicenter cohorts, with operative times consistent with the literature on other robotic platforms. Our data demonstrated the accessibility of this new robotic approach, even when adopted by surgeons new to robotics. The Dexter system emerged as a valuable device in the hernia repair toolkit for both experienced robotic surgeons and those new to the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00464-024-11361-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11615000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3138983354</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-c7d99e76be663006682a9b3a28fb45a1945562e99879f0a90c6f866a223b64583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS1ERIbAD7BAltiwaeJXu202KAqPRIqEhGBtuTvVM476he0emD38CJ_Gl1DNDOGxYGVLderWrbqEPOLsGWesOk2MKa0KJlTBudS84HfIiispCiG4uUtWzEpWiMqqY3I_pRuGvOXlPXIsbamEsWxFvr4b6zGHhvZhCL3vuh0Nw9ansAX8rOcw-I5uIA7B0wiTD5F-CnlD8wboS_icIdJ4UEi7lKH__uXbc3pGpzimCZq86PRzh3UYFrjpcE6DmjgFUg5rn8M4PCBHre8SPDy8J-TD61fvzy-Kq7dvLs_PropGcpGLprq2Fipdg9aSMa2N8LaWXpi2VqXnVpWlFmCtqWzLvGWNbo3WXghZa1UaeUJe7HWnue7hevEUfeemiKvHnRt9cH9XhrBx63HrONe8xPuhwtODQhw_zriB60NqoOv8AOOcHPo0RqhSSkSf_IPejHPEey6UNNZIWSqkxJ5q8GIpQnvrhjO3xOz2MTuM2f2M2XFsevznHrctv3JFQO6BhKVhDfH37P_I_gDfbbaU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3138983354</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Gantner, Lukas ; Mignot, Hubert ; Pochhammer, Julius ; Grieder, Felix ; Breitenstein, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Gantner, Lukas ; Mignot, Hubert ; Pochhammer, Julius ; Grieder, Felix ; Breitenstein, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Background Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) has been established with various robotic platforms. The Dexter robotic system is an open platform consisting of a sterile surgeon’s console, two robotic instrument arms, and one robotic endoscope arm. This study aimed to confirm the perioperative and early postoperative safety and clinical performance of the Dexter system in patients undergoing primary transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Methods The primary objectives of this multicenter study conducted at three centers in France, Germany, and Switzerland were to document the successful completion of rTAPP procedures and the occurrence of serious adverse events (Clavien–Dindo grades III–V), device-related events up to 30 days post-surgery. The procedures were performed by three surgeons with varying levels of experience in robotic systems. Results 50 patients with a median age of 62.5 years (IQR 51.0–72.0) and BMI of 25.1 kg/cm 2 (IQR 23.5–28.7), respectively, underwent inguinal hernia repair (33 unilateral, 17 bilateral). All surgeries were successfully completed using three standard laparoscopy trocars. There were no conversions to open surgery, intraoperative complications or device deficiencies. The median skin-to-skin operative time was 50 min (IQR 45–60) for unilateral hernias and 96 min (IQR 84–105) for bilateral hernias. The median console time was 30 min (IQR 26–41) for unilateral and 66 min (IQR 60–77) for bilateral hernias. Twenty-six patients were discharged on the day of surgery, and 22 on postoperative day 1. Conclusion This study confirmed the use of the Dexter system in rTAPP was feasible and safe in multicenter cohorts, with operative times consistent with the literature on other robotic platforms. Our data demonstrated the accessibility of this new robotic approach, even when adopted by surgeons new to robotics. The Dexter system emerged as a valuable device in the hernia repair toolkit for both experienced robotic surgeons and those new to the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0930-2794</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2218</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11361-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39542890</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abdominal Surgery ; Aged ; Dynamic Manuscript ; Female ; Gastroenterology ; Gynecology ; Hepatology ; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Proctology ; Prospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Robotics ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Surgical endoscopy, 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7647-7655</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-c7d99e76be663006682a9b3a28fb45a1945562e99879f0a90c6f866a223b64583</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1326-0923</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00464-024-11361-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00464-024-11361-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39542890$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gantner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignot, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pochhammer, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieder, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitenstein, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation</title><title>Surgical endoscopy</title><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><description>Background Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) has been established with various robotic platforms. The Dexter robotic system is an open platform consisting of a sterile surgeon’s console, two robotic instrument arms, and one robotic endoscope arm. This study aimed to confirm the perioperative and early postoperative safety and clinical performance of the Dexter system in patients undergoing primary transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Methods The primary objectives of this multicenter study conducted at three centers in France, Germany, and Switzerland were to document the successful completion of rTAPP procedures and the occurrence of serious adverse events (Clavien–Dindo grades III–V), device-related events up to 30 days post-surgery. The procedures were performed by three surgeons with varying levels of experience in robotic systems. Results 50 patients with a median age of 62.5 years (IQR 51.0–72.0) and BMI of 25.1 kg/cm 2 (IQR 23.5–28.7), respectively, underwent inguinal hernia repair (33 unilateral, 17 bilateral). All surgeries were successfully completed using three standard laparoscopy trocars. There were no conversions to open surgery, intraoperative complications or device deficiencies. The median skin-to-skin operative time was 50 min (IQR 45–60) for unilateral hernias and 96 min (IQR 84–105) for bilateral hernias. The median console time was 30 min (IQR 26–41) for unilateral and 66 min (IQR 60–77) for bilateral hernias. Twenty-six patients were discharged on the day of surgery, and 22 on postoperative day 1. Conclusion This study confirmed the use of the Dexter system in rTAPP was feasible and safe in multicenter cohorts, with operative times consistent with the literature on other robotic platforms. Our data demonstrated the accessibility of this new robotic approach, even when adopted by surgeons new to robotics. The Dexter system emerged as a valuable device in the hernia repair toolkit for both experienced robotic surgeons and those new to the field.</description><subject>Abdominal Surgery</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Dynamic Manuscript</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastroenterology</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Hepatology</subject><subject>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Proctology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctuFDEQRS1ERIbAD7BAltiwaeJXu202KAqPRIqEhGBtuTvVM476he0emD38CJ_Gl1DNDOGxYGVLderWrbqEPOLsGWesOk2MKa0KJlTBudS84HfIiispCiG4uUtWzEpWiMqqY3I_pRuGvOXlPXIsbamEsWxFvr4b6zGHhvZhCL3vuh0Nw9ansAX8rOcw-I5uIA7B0wiTD5F-CnlD8wboS_icIdJ4UEi7lKH__uXbc3pGpzimCZq86PRzh3UYFrjpcE6DmjgFUg5rn8M4PCBHre8SPDy8J-TD61fvzy-Kq7dvLs_PropGcpGLprq2Fipdg9aSMa2N8LaWXpi2VqXnVpWlFmCtqWzLvGWNbo3WXghZa1UaeUJe7HWnue7hevEUfeemiKvHnRt9cH9XhrBx63HrONe8xPuhwtODQhw_zriB60NqoOv8AOOcHPo0RqhSSkSf_IPejHPEey6UNNZIWSqkxJ5q8GIpQnvrhjO3xOz2MTuM2f2M2XFsevznHrctv3JFQO6BhKVhDfH37P_I_gDfbbaU</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Gantner, Lukas</creator><creator>Mignot, Hubert</creator><creator>Pochhammer, Julius</creator><creator>Grieder, Felix</creator><creator>Breitenstein, Stefan</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-0923</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation</title><author>Gantner, Lukas ; Mignot, Hubert ; Pochhammer, Julius ; Grieder, Felix ; Breitenstein, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-c7d99e76be663006682a9b3a28fb45a1945562e99879f0a90c6f866a223b64583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abdominal Surgery</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Dynamic Manuscript</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastroenterology</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Hepatology</topic><topic>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Proctology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gantner, Lukas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mignot, Hubert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pochhammer, Julius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grieder, Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitenstein, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gantner, Lukas</au><au>Mignot, Hubert</au><au>Pochhammer, Julius</au><au>Grieder, Felix</au><au>Breitenstein, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation</atitle><jtitle>Surgical endoscopy</jtitle><stitle>Surg Endosc</stitle><addtitle>Surg Endosc</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7647</spage><epage>7655</epage><pages>7647-7655</pages><issn>0930-2794</issn><issn>1432-2218</issn><eissn>1432-2218</eissn><abstract>Background Robot-assisted transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (rTAPP) has been established with various robotic platforms. The Dexter robotic system is an open platform consisting of a sterile surgeon’s console, two robotic instrument arms, and one robotic endoscope arm. This study aimed to confirm the perioperative and early postoperative safety and clinical performance of the Dexter system in patients undergoing primary transperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Methods The primary objectives of this multicenter study conducted at three centers in France, Germany, and Switzerland were to document the successful completion of rTAPP procedures and the occurrence of serious adverse events (Clavien–Dindo grades III–V), device-related events up to 30 days post-surgery. The procedures were performed by three surgeons with varying levels of experience in robotic systems. Results 50 patients with a median age of 62.5 years (IQR 51.0–72.0) and BMI of 25.1 kg/cm 2 (IQR 23.5–28.7), respectively, underwent inguinal hernia repair (33 unilateral, 17 bilateral). All surgeries were successfully completed using three standard laparoscopy trocars. There were no conversions to open surgery, intraoperative complications or device deficiencies. The median skin-to-skin operative time was 50 min (IQR 45–60) for unilateral hernias and 96 min (IQR 84–105) for bilateral hernias. The median console time was 30 min (IQR 26–41) for unilateral and 66 min (IQR 60–77) for bilateral hernias. Twenty-six patients were discharged on the day of surgery, and 22 on postoperative day 1. Conclusion This study confirmed the use of the Dexter system in rTAPP was feasible and safe in multicenter cohorts, with operative times consistent with the literature on other robotic platforms. Our data demonstrated the accessibility of this new robotic approach, even when adopted by surgeons new to robotics. The Dexter system emerged as a valuable device in the hernia repair toolkit for both experienced robotic surgeons and those new to the field.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>39542890</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00464-024-11361-1</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1326-0923</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0930-2794
ispartof Surgical endoscopy, 2024-12, Vol.38 (12), p.7647-7655
issn 0930-2794
1432-2218
1432-2218
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11615000
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Abdominal Surgery
Aged
Dynamic Manuscript
Female
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Hepatology
Hernia, Inguinal - surgery
Hernias
Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation
Herniorrhaphy - methods
Humans
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Proctology
Prospective Studies
Robotic Surgical Procedures - instrumentation
Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods
Robotics
Surgeons
Surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Robotic minimally invasive inguinal hernia repair with the Dexter robotic system™: A prospective multicenter clinical investigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T16%3A32%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Robotic%20minimally%20invasive%20inguinal%20hernia%20repair%20with%20the%20Dexter%20robotic%20system%E2%84%A2:%20A%20prospective%20multicenter%20clinical%20investigation&rft.jtitle=Surgical%20endoscopy&rft.au=Gantner,%20Lukas&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7647&rft.epage=7655&rft.pages=7647-7655&rft.issn=0930-2794&rft.eissn=1432-2218&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00464-024-11361-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3138983354%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3138983354&rft_id=info:pmid/39542890&rfr_iscdi=true