Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate

Objectives To evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods This was a single‐centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJU international 2024-12, Vol.134 (S2), p.30-37
Hauptverfasser: Kuo, Lu Yu, Kuo, Jenny, Silverman, Joshua, Kim, Jason Jae Yeun, Letch, Caitlin, McClintock, Scott
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 37
container_issue S2
container_start_page 30
container_title BJU international
container_volume 134
creator Kuo, Lu Yu
Kuo, Jenny
Silverman, Joshua
Kim, Jason Jae Yeun
Letch, Caitlin
McClintock, Scott
description Objectives To evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods This was a single‐centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no‐AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic‐related morbidity were captured within a 3‐month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no‐AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two‐sided t‐test, and chi‐square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability‐weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk. Results There were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for >14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no‐AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Conclusion This is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding‐related complications than rivaroxaban.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bju.16478
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11603099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3133567421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3348-9488f7a15269352d925631540d091e13b2c52cce1df7f0c977b600cea209fbb73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EoqVw4AsgS1zgsO1MnDjxCcGK8keVuFCJm-U4k62XrL3YTqt-e7zdbQVI-GCPPD89vZnH2EuEUyznrF_PpyjrtnvEjrGW9aJG-PH4vgYlj9izlNYA5UM2T9mRUBWCRHXM0jJstia6FDwPI99SdKFcJrtr4v1ENDi_4qX_k_eUb4g8H1wkm3mIZuLGZ2eDWc1TqRJ3nudofJoj5atdP1IqrDuIx5CyyfScPRnNlOjF4T1hl-cfvy8_Ly6-ffqyfH-xsELU3ULVXTe2BptKKtFUg6oaKbCpYQCFhKKvbFNZSziM7QhWtW0vASyZCtTY9604Ye_2utu539BgyRdzk95GtzHxVgfj9N8d7670KlxrRAkClCoKbw4KMfyaKWW9ccnSVKalMCe9gzpAEDv09T_oOszRl_m0QCEa2dYVFurtnrJlFynS-OAGQe-y1CVLfZdlYV_9af-BvA-vAGd74MZNdPt_Jf3h6-Ve8jfOn6tK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133567421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Kuo, Lu Yu ; Kuo, Jenny ; Silverman, Joshua ; Kim, Jason Jae Yeun ; Letch, Caitlin ; McClintock, Scott</creator><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Lu Yu ; Kuo, Jenny ; Silverman, Joshua ; Kim, Jason Jae Yeun ; Letch, Caitlin ; McClintock, Scott</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods This was a single‐centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no‐AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic‐related morbidity were captured within a 3‐month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no‐AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two‐sided t‐test, and chi‐square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability‐weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk. Results There were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for &gt;14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no‐AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Conclusion This is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding‐related complications than rivaroxaban.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.16478</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39210619</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject><![CDATA[Administration, Oral ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; anticoagulant ; Anticoagulants ; Anticoagulants - administration & dosage ; Anticoagulants - adverse effects ; apixaban ; Bleeding ; Hematuria ; Humans ; Hyperplasia ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Morbidity ; Original ; Postoperative Hemorrhage - chemically induced ; Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology ; Prostate ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - drug therapy ; Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery ; Pyrazoles - administration & dosage ; Pyrazoles - adverse effects ; Pyridones - administration & dosage ; Pyridones - adverse effects ; Retrospective Studies ; rivaroxaban ; Rivaroxaban - administration & dosage ; Rivaroxaban - adverse effects ; Statistical analysis ; Stroke ; Thromboembolism ; Thromboembolism - epidemiology ; Thromboembolism - etiology ; Thromboembolism - prevention & control ; transurethral prostatectomy ; Transurethral Resection of Prostate - adverse effects ; TURP ; Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand ; Warfarin - administration & dosage ; Warfarin - adverse effects]]></subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2024-12, Vol.134 (S2), p.30-37</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). BJU International published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3348-9488f7a15269352d925631540d091e13b2c52cce1df7f0c977b600cea209fbb73</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9193-2449 ; 0000-0002-6945-4997 ; 0000-0001-9195-494X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.16478$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.16478$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39210619$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Lu Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverman, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jason Jae Yeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letch, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClintock, Scott</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objectives To evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods This was a single‐centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no‐AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic‐related morbidity were captured within a 3‐month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no‐AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two‐sided t‐test, and chi‐square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability‐weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk. Results There were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for &gt;14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no‐AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Conclusion This is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding‐related complications than rivaroxaban.</description><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>anticoagulant</subject><subject>Anticoagulants</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Anticoagulants - adverse effects</subject><subject>apixaban</subject><subject>Bleeding</subject><subject>Hematuria</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hyperplasia</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Postoperative Hemorrhage - chemically induced</subject><subject>Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology</subject><subject>Prostate</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - drug therapy</subject><subject>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</subject><subject>Pyrazoles - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pyrazoles - adverse effects</subject><subject>Pyridones - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Pyridones - adverse effects</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>rivaroxaban</subject><subject>Rivaroxaban - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Rivaroxaban - adverse effects</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Stroke</subject><subject>Thromboembolism</subject><subject>Thromboembolism - epidemiology</subject><subject>Thromboembolism - etiology</subject><subject>Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>transurethral prostatectomy</subject><subject>Transurethral Resection of Prostate - adverse effects</subject><subject>TURP</subject><subject>Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand</subject><subject>Warfarin - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Warfarin - adverse effects</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxS0EoqVw4AsgS1zgsO1MnDjxCcGK8keVuFCJm-U4k62XrL3YTqt-e7zdbQVI-GCPPD89vZnH2EuEUyznrF_PpyjrtnvEjrGW9aJG-PH4vgYlj9izlNYA5UM2T9mRUBWCRHXM0jJstia6FDwPI99SdKFcJrtr4v1ENDi_4qX_k_eUb4g8H1wkm3mIZuLGZ2eDWc1TqRJ3nudofJoj5atdP1IqrDuIx5CyyfScPRnNlOjF4T1hl-cfvy8_Ly6-ffqyfH-xsELU3ULVXTe2BptKKtFUg6oaKbCpYQCFhKKvbFNZSziM7QhWtW0vASyZCtTY9604Ye_2utu539BgyRdzk95GtzHxVgfj9N8d7670KlxrRAkClCoKbw4KMfyaKWW9ccnSVKalMCe9gzpAEDv09T_oOszRl_m0QCEa2dYVFurtnrJlFynS-OAGQe-y1CVLfZdlYV_9af-BvA-vAGd74MZNdPt_Jf3h6-Ve8jfOn6tK</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Kuo, Lu Yu</creator><creator>Kuo, Jenny</creator><creator>Silverman, Joshua</creator><creator>Kim, Jason Jae Yeun</creator><creator>Letch, Caitlin</creator><creator>McClintock, Scott</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-2449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-4997</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-494X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate</title><author>Kuo, Lu Yu ; Kuo, Jenny ; Silverman, Joshua ; Kim, Jason Jae Yeun ; Letch, Caitlin ; McClintock, Scott</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3348-9488f7a15269352d925631540d091e13b2c52cce1df7f0c977b600cea209fbb73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>anticoagulant</topic><topic>Anticoagulants</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Anticoagulants - adverse effects</topic><topic>apixaban</topic><topic>Bleeding</topic><topic>Hematuria</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hyperplasia</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Postoperative Hemorrhage - chemically induced</topic><topic>Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology</topic><topic>Prostate</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - drug therapy</topic><topic>Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery</topic><topic>Pyrazoles - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pyrazoles - adverse effects</topic><topic>Pyridones - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Pyridones - adverse effects</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>rivaroxaban</topic><topic>Rivaroxaban - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Rivaroxaban - adverse effects</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Stroke</topic><topic>Thromboembolism</topic><topic>Thromboembolism - epidemiology</topic><topic>Thromboembolism - etiology</topic><topic>Thromboembolism - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>transurethral prostatectomy</topic><topic>Transurethral Resection of Prostate - adverse effects</topic><topic>TURP</topic><topic>Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand</topic><topic>Warfarin - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Warfarin - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Lu Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Jenny</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silverman, Joshua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Jason Jae Yeun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Letch, Caitlin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McClintock, Scott</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kuo, Lu Yu</au><au>Kuo, Jenny</au><au>Silverman, Joshua</au><au>Kim, Jason Jae Yeun</au><au>Letch, Caitlin</au><au>McClintock, Scott</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>S2</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>30-37</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>Objectives To evaluate the perioperative morbidity and mortality associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for patients receiving transurethral resection of prostate (TURP). Patients and Methods This was a single‐centre, retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent TURP for benign prostate hyperplasia from April 2019 to December 2023. The primary objective was to evaluate the perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between anticoagulated (AC) vs no‐AC patients. The secondary objective was to evaluate perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic risk between different formulations of DOACs. Patient demographics, prior treatment, prostate size, baseline bleeding risk, and operative details were collected. Bleeding and thromboembolic‐related morbidity were captured within a 3‐month postoperative period. Perioperative management of AC therapy was recorded, and all patients had their AC therapy withheld. Cohort characteristic between the AC vs no‐AC, and DOAC groups were analysed with two‐sided t‐test, and chi‐square test. Further logistic regression analyses were carried out to identified significant variables between the groups. These significant variables were used for adjustment in inverse probability‐weighted treatment effect analysis to evaluate bleeding risk. Results There were 629 patients in the cohort, and 113 (18%) patients were receiving AC therapy. The AC patients were at 1.6 times statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding, and 11 times increased risk of prolonged haematuria for &gt;14 days. When compared to apixaban, patients on rivaroxaban conferred a statistically significant increased risk of acute bleeding by 2.21 times. Patients receiving AC therapy had a statistically significant increased risk of stroke in the perioperative setting (no‐AC vs AC: 0.4% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Conclusion This is the first study to evaluate risk of bleeding for TURP patients receiving DOACs. The AC patients are more likely to experience haematuria and stroke in the perioperative period despite withholding therapy. Apixaban appears to cause less bleeding‐related complications than rivaroxaban.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>39210619</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.16478</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9193-2449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6945-4997</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9195-494X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-4096
ispartof BJU international, 2024-12, Vol.134 (S2), p.30-37
issn 1464-4096
1464-410X
1464-410X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11603099
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Administration, Oral
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
anticoagulant
Anticoagulants
Anticoagulants - administration & dosage
Anticoagulants - adverse effects
apixaban
Bleeding
Hematuria
Humans
Hyperplasia
Male
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Original
Postoperative Hemorrhage - chemically induced
Postoperative Hemorrhage - epidemiology
Prostate
Prostatic Hyperplasia - complications
Prostatic Hyperplasia - drug therapy
Prostatic Hyperplasia - surgery
Pyrazoles - administration & dosage
Pyrazoles - adverse effects
Pyridones - administration & dosage
Pyridones - adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
rivaroxaban
Rivaroxaban - administration & dosage
Rivaroxaban - adverse effects
Statistical analysis
Stroke
Thromboembolism
Thromboembolism - epidemiology
Thromboembolism - etiology
Thromboembolism - prevention & control
transurethral prostatectomy
Transurethral Resection of Prostate - adverse effects
TURP
Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand
Warfarin - administration & dosage
Warfarin - adverse effects
title Comparison of perioperative bleeding risk between direct oral anticoagulants in transurethral resection of prostate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T02%3A05%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20perioperative%20bleeding%20risk%20between%20direct%20oral%20anticoagulants%20in%20transurethral%20resection%20of%20prostate&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Kuo,%20Lu%20Yu&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=S2&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=30-37&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.16478&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3133567421%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133567421&rft_id=info:pmid/39210619&rfr_iscdi=true