Contrasting Weather and Stocking Effects on Eucalyptus Initial Coppice Response in Brazil
In plantations, coppice rotations often yield less than initial rotations. The TECHS project (Tolerance of Clones to Hydric, Thermal and Biotic Stresses) studied short rotation coppicing across a 3000 km gradient. The main objective of this work was to compare the survival, sprouting, and initial gr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Plants (Basel) 2024-11, Vol.13 (22), p.3254 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 22 |
| container_start_page | 3254 |
| container_title | Plants (Basel) |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Fernandes, Pietro Gragnolati Alvares, Clayton Alcarde Queiroz, Túlio Barroso Pimenta, Pedro Vitor Borges, Jarbas Silva Stahl, James Mendes, Flávio Teixeira Souza, Amanda Silva, Gustavo Matheus da Silva, Gualter Guenther Costa Milhomem, Sara Bezerra Bandeira Sousa, Rosilvam Ramos de Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji |
| description | In
plantations, coppice rotations often yield less than initial rotations. The TECHS project (Tolerance of
Clones to Hydric, Thermal and Biotic Stresses) studied short rotation coppicing across a 3000 km gradient. The main objective of this work was to compare the survival, sprouting, and initial growth of
clones managed and to examine factors that might influence the productivity of the coppice rotation: climate, genotypes, and stocking. Eight of the TECHS sites spread from latitudes 6° S to 30° S were included in the coppice study, with 17 genotypes at each site. The initial rotation had been planted at a 3 m × 3 m spacing and also in a spacing trial at densities from 500 to 3500 trees ha
. Six months after harvesting the initial
rotation, average survival was 88%, with tropical clones showing over twice the sprouting biomass (6.7 vs. 2.9 Mg ha
) and four times the woody biomass compared to subtropical clones (4.7 vs. 1.1 Mg ha
). Greater initial water deficits had stronger sprouting and growth. Clones with higher belowground carbon allocation in the initial rotation performed better in coppicing, and precipitation became more influential after 12 months. Drought and spacing trials significantly affected growth. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/plants13223254 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11598381</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3133459135</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1791-7c86adf10382e22d250a23b7822029bbd84620c9cebe0c2eaff63cebc7086c0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkdtrHCEUxqU0NGGT1zwWoS992UQ9c_OptMs2WQgEciHkSRznTGI6q1N1AulfHzc3korgUX_nw8-PkH3ODgAkOxwH7VLkIASIsvhEdkSu5nVd1J_f1dtkL8Y7lkeTJ6--kG2QpZRFBTvkeuFdCjom627oFep0i4Fq19Hz5M2fzeGy79GkSL2jy8no4WFMU6QrZ5PVA134cbQG6RnG0buI1Dr6K-h_dtglW70eIu69rDNy-Xt5sTien5werRY_T-aG15LPa9NUuus5g0agEJ0omRbQ1o0QTMi27ZqiEsxIgy0yI1D3fQV5Y2rWVIZ1MCM_nnXHqV1jZ3DjZ1BjsGsdHpTXVn28cfZW3fh7xXkpG2h4Vvj-ohD83wljUmsbDQ75d9FPUQEHKErJoczot__QOz8Fl_09UcBFUW6og2fKBB9jwP7tNZypTXLqY3K54et7D2_4a07wCO_xlgE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3133312455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contrasting Weather and Stocking Effects on Eucalyptus Initial Coppice Response in Brazil</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fernandes, Pietro Gragnolati ; Alvares, Clayton Alcarde ; Queiroz, Túlio Barroso ; Pimenta, Pedro Vitor ; Borges, Jarbas Silva ; Stahl, James ; Mendes, Flávio Teixeira ; Souza, Amanda ; Silva, Gustavo Matheus ; da Silva, Gualter Guenther Costa ; Milhomem, Sara Bezerra Bandeira ; Sousa, Rosilvam Ramos de ; Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji</creator><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Pietro Gragnolati ; Alvares, Clayton Alcarde ; Queiroz, Túlio Barroso ; Pimenta, Pedro Vitor ; Borges, Jarbas Silva ; Stahl, James ; Mendes, Flávio Teixeira ; Souza, Amanda ; Silva, Gustavo Matheus ; da Silva, Gualter Guenther Costa ; Milhomem, Sara Bezerra Bandeira ; Sousa, Rosilvam Ramos de ; Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji</creatorcontrib><description>In
plantations, coppice rotations often yield less than initial rotations. The TECHS project (Tolerance of
Clones to Hydric, Thermal and Biotic Stresses) studied short rotation coppicing across a 3000 km gradient. The main objective of this work was to compare the survival, sprouting, and initial growth of
clones managed and to examine factors that might influence the productivity of the coppice rotation: climate, genotypes, and stocking. Eight of the TECHS sites spread from latitudes 6° S to 30° S were included in the coppice study, with 17 genotypes at each site. The initial rotation had been planted at a 3 m × 3 m spacing and also in a spacing trial at densities from 500 to 3500 trees ha
. Six months after harvesting the initial
rotation, average survival was 88%, with tropical clones showing over twice the sprouting biomass (6.7 vs. 2.9 Mg ha
) and four times the woody biomass compared to subtropical clones (4.7 vs. 1.1 Mg ha
). Greater initial water deficits had stronger sprouting and growth. Clones with higher belowground carbon allocation in the initial rotation performed better in coppicing, and precipitation became more influential after 12 months. Drought and spacing trials significantly affected growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2223-7747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2223-7747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/plants13223254</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39599463</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Biomass ; Carbohydrates ; Carbon ; Climate ; Cloning ; Coppicing ; Drought ; Eucalyptus ; Genotypes ; Mortality ; Productivity ; Rotation ; Survival ; Water</subject><ispartof>Plants (Basel), 2024-11, Vol.13 (22), p.3254</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1791-7c86adf10382e22d250a23b7822029bbd84620c9cebe0c2eaff63cebc7086c0d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9840-1205 ; 0000-0002-3770-2992 ; 0000-0002-0208-1225 ; 0000-0001-7731-6327</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11598381/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11598381/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,729,782,786,866,887,27931,27932,53798,53800</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39599463$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Pietro Gragnolati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvares, Clayton Alcarde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Túlio Barroso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimenta, Pedro Vitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Jarbas Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahl, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Flávio Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Gustavo Matheus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Gualter Guenther Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milhomem, Sara Bezerra Bandeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Rosilvam Ramos de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji</creatorcontrib><title>Contrasting Weather and Stocking Effects on Eucalyptus Initial Coppice Response in Brazil</title><title>Plants (Basel)</title><addtitle>Plants (Basel)</addtitle><description>In
plantations, coppice rotations often yield less than initial rotations. The TECHS project (Tolerance of
Clones to Hydric, Thermal and Biotic Stresses) studied short rotation coppicing across a 3000 km gradient. The main objective of this work was to compare the survival, sprouting, and initial growth of
clones managed and to examine factors that might influence the productivity of the coppice rotation: climate, genotypes, and stocking. Eight of the TECHS sites spread from latitudes 6° S to 30° S were included in the coppice study, with 17 genotypes at each site. The initial rotation had been planted at a 3 m × 3 m spacing and also in a spacing trial at densities from 500 to 3500 trees ha
. Six months after harvesting the initial
rotation, average survival was 88%, with tropical clones showing over twice the sprouting biomass (6.7 vs. 2.9 Mg ha
) and four times the woody biomass compared to subtropical clones (4.7 vs. 1.1 Mg ha
). Greater initial water deficits had stronger sprouting and growth. Clones with higher belowground carbon allocation in the initial rotation performed better in coppicing, and precipitation became more influential after 12 months. Drought and spacing trials significantly affected growth.</description><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Cloning</subject><subject>Coppicing</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Eucalyptus</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Water</subject><issn>2223-7747</issn><issn>2223-7747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkdtrHCEUxqU0NGGT1zwWoS992UQ9c_OptMs2WQgEciHkSRznTGI6q1N1AulfHzc3korgUX_nw8-PkH3ODgAkOxwH7VLkIASIsvhEdkSu5nVd1J_f1dtkL8Y7lkeTJ6--kG2QpZRFBTvkeuFdCjom627oFep0i4Fq19Hz5M2fzeGy79GkSL2jy8no4WFMU6QrZ5PVA134cbQG6RnG0buI1Dr6K-h_dtglW70eIu69rDNy-Xt5sTien5werRY_T-aG15LPa9NUuus5g0agEJ0omRbQ1o0QTMi27ZqiEsxIgy0yI1D3fQV5Y2rWVIZ1MCM_nnXHqV1jZ3DjZ1BjsGsdHpTXVn28cfZW3fh7xXkpG2h4Vvj-ohD83wljUmsbDQ75d9FPUQEHKErJoczot__QOz8Fl_09UcBFUW6og2fKBB9jwP7tNZypTXLqY3K54et7D2_4a07wCO_xlgE</recordid><startdate>20241120</startdate><enddate>20241120</enddate><creator>Fernandes, Pietro Gragnolati</creator><creator>Alvares, Clayton Alcarde</creator><creator>Queiroz, Túlio Barroso</creator><creator>Pimenta, Pedro Vitor</creator><creator>Borges, Jarbas Silva</creator><creator>Stahl, James</creator><creator>Mendes, Flávio Teixeira</creator><creator>Souza, Amanda</creator><creator>Silva, Gustavo Matheus</creator><creator>da Silva, Gualter Guenther Costa</creator><creator>Milhomem, Sara Bezerra Bandeira</creator><creator>Sousa, Rosilvam Ramos de</creator><creator>Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-1205</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3770-2992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-1225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7731-6327</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241120</creationdate><title>Contrasting Weather and Stocking Effects on Eucalyptus Initial Coppice Response in Brazil</title><author>Fernandes, Pietro Gragnolati ; Alvares, Clayton Alcarde ; Queiroz, Túlio Barroso ; Pimenta, Pedro Vitor ; Borges, Jarbas Silva ; Stahl, James ; Mendes, Flávio Teixeira ; Souza, Amanda ; Silva, Gustavo Matheus ; da Silva, Gualter Guenther Costa ; Milhomem, Sara Bezerra Bandeira ; Sousa, Rosilvam Ramos de ; Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1791-7c86adf10382e22d250a23b7822029bbd84620c9cebe0c2eaff63cebc7086c0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Cloning</topic><topic>Coppicing</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Eucalyptus</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fernandes, Pietro Gragnolati</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvares, Clayton Alcarde</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Queiroz, Túlio Barroso</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pimenta, Pedro Vitor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Jarbas Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stahl, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendes, Flávio Teixeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souza, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Gustavo Matheus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>da Silva, Gualter Guenther Costa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milhomem, Sara Bezerra Bandeira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sousa, Rosilvam Ramos de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Plants (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fernandes, Pietro Gragnolati</au><au>Alvares, Clayton Alcarde</au><au>Queiroz, Túlio Barroso</au><au>Pimenta, Pedro Vitor</au><au>Borges, Jarbas Silva</au><au>Stahl, James</au><au>Mendes, Flávio Teixeira</au><au>Souza, Amanda</au><au>Silva, Gustavo Matheus</au><au>da Silva, Gualter Guenther Costa</au><au>Milhomem, Sara Bezerra Bandeira</au><au>Sousa, Rosilvam Ramos de</au><au>Hakamada, Rodrigo Eiji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contrasting Weather and Stocking Effects on Eucalyptus Initial Coppice Response in Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Plants (Basel)</jtitle><addtitle>Plants (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-11-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>22</issue><spage>3254</spage><pages>3254-</pages><issn>2223-7747</issn><eissn>2223-7747</eissn><abstract>In
plantations, coppice rotations often yield less than initial rotations. The TECHS project (Tolerance of
Clones to Hydric, Thermal and Biotic Stresses) studied short rotation coppicing across a 3000 km gradient. The main objective of this work was to compare the survival, sprouting, and initial growth of
clones managed and to examine factors that might influence the productivity of the coppice rotation: climate, genotypes, and stocking. Eight of the TECHS sites spread from latitudes 6° S to 30° S were included in the coppice study, with 17 genotypes at each site. The initial rotation had been planted at a 3 m × 3 m spacing and also in a spacing trial at densities from 500 to 3500 trees ha
. Six months after harvesting the initial
rotation, average survival was 88%, with tropical clones showing over twice the sprouting biomass (6.7 vs. 2.9 Mg ha
) and four times the woody biomass compared to subtropical clones (4.7 vs. 1.1 Mg ha
). Greater initial water deficits had stronger sprouting and growth. Clones with higher belowground carbon allocation in the initial rotation performed better in coppicing, and precipitation became more influential after 12 months. Drought and spacing trials significantly affected growth.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39599463</pmid><doi>10.3390/plants13223254</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9840-1205</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3770-2992</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-1225</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7731-6327</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2223-7747 |
| ispartof | Plants (Basel), 2024-11, Vol.13 (22), p.3254 |
| issn | 2223-7747 2223-7747 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11598381 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Biomass Carbohydrates Carbon Climate Cloning Coppicing Drought Eucalyptus Genotypes Mortality Productivity Rotation Survival Water |
| title | Contrasting Weather and Stocking Effects on Eucalyptus Initial Coppice Response in Brazil |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T04%3A20%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contrasting%20Weather%20and%20Stocking%20Effects%20on%20Eucalyptus%20Initial%20Coppice%20Response%20in%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Plants%20(Basel)&rft.au=Fernandes,%20Pietro%20Gragnolati&rft.date=2024-11-20&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=22&rft.spage=3254&rft.pages=3254-&rft.issn=2223-7747&rft.eissn=2223-7747&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/plants13223254&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3133459135%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3133312455&rft_id=info:pmid/39599463&rfr_iscdi=true |