Human dorsal root ganglia are either preserved or completely lost after deafferentation by brachial plexus injury
Plexus injury results in lifelong suffering from flaccid paralysis, sensory loss, and intractable pain. For this clinical problem, regenerative medicine concepts set high expectations. However, it is largely unknown how dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are affected by accidental deafferentation. Here, we p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA 2024-12, Vol.133 (6), p.1250-1262 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1262 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1250 |
container_title | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA |
container_volume | 133 |
creator | Sodmann, Annemarie Degenbeck, Johannes Aue, Annemarie Schindehütte, Magnus Schlott, Felicitas Arampatzi, Panagiota Bischler, Thorsten Schneider, Max Brack, Alexander Monoranu, Camelia M. Gräfenhan, Tom Bohnert, Michael Pham, Mirko Antoniadis, Gregor Blum, Robert Rittner, Heike L. |
description | Plexus injury results in lifelong suffering from flaccid paralysis, sensory loss, and intractable pain. For this clinical problem, regenerative medicine concepts set high expectations. However, it is largely unknown how dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are affected by accidental deafferentation.
Here, we phenotyped DRG of a clinically and MRI-characterised cohort of 13 patients with plexus injury. Avulsed DRG were collected during reconstructive nerve surgery. For control, we used DRG from forensic autopsy. The cellular composition of the DRG was analysed in histopathological slices with multicolour high-resolution immunohistochemistry, tile microscopy, and deep-learning-based bioimage analysis. We then sequenced the bulk RNA of corresponding DRG slices.
In about half of the patients we found loss of the typical DRG units consisting of neurones and satellite glial cells. The DRG cells were replaced by mesodermal/connective tissue. In the remaining patients, the cellular units were well preserved. Preoperative plexus MRI neurography was not able to distinguish the two types. Patients with ‘neuronal preservation’ had less maximum pain than patients with ‘neuronal loss’. Arm function improved after nerve reconstruction, but severe pain persisted. Transcriptome analysis of preserved DRGs revealed expression of subtype-specific sensory neurone marker genes, but downregulation of neuronal attributes. Furthermore, they showed signs of ongoing inflammation and connective tissue remodelling.
Patients with plexus injury separate into two groups with either neuronal preservation or neuronal loss. The former could benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy. For the latter, studies should explore mechanisms of neuronal loss especially for regenerative approaches.
DRKS00017266. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.004 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11589459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0007091224005555</els_id><sourcerecordid>3115771270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f26a2a6286a3ce509aa4919940dbe1dd0c53e8b366e75118cb5ef93d6423c2b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xIjl66zUd_TPAgsqgrLHjRc6hOqmfSpDuzSXrY-fdmmHXRi-RQhzz1VFEvIW85qznj3YepHiaoBRNNzVTNWPOMbHjT86rre_6cbBhjfcUUF1fkVUoTY7wXqn1JrqQ6P6U25P52nWGhNsQEnsYQMt3BsvMOKESk6PIeIz1ETBiPaGmI1IT54DGjP1EfUqYw5oJYhHHEiEuG7MJChxMdIpi9K9qCP6yJumVa4-k1eTGCT_jmsV6TX1-__Ly5re5-fPt-8_muMlI2uRpFBwI6se1AGmyZAmgUV6phdkBuLTOtxO0guw77lvOtGVoclbRdI6QRQyOvyaeL97AOM1pTNovg9SG6GeJJB3D635_F7fUuHDXn7VY1rSqG94-GGO5XTFnPLhn0HhYMa9KykOXQomcF5RfUxJBSxPFpDmf6nJWedMlKn7PSTOmSVel59_eCTx1_winAxwuA5UxHh1En43AxaF1Ek7UN7j_638Wcp_E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115771270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human dorsal root ganglia are either preserved or completely lost after deafferentation by brachial plexus injury</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Sodmann, Annemarie ; Degenbeck, Johannes ; Aue, Annemarie ; Schindehütte, Magnus ; Schlott, Felicitas ; Arampatzi, Panagiota ; Bischler, Thorsten ; Schneider, Max ; Brack, Alexander ; Monoranu, Camelia M. ; Gräfenhan, Tom ; Bohnert, Michael ; Pham, Mirko ; Antoniadis, Gregor ; Blum, Robert ; Rittner, Heike L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sodmann, Annemarie ; Degenbeck, Johannes ; Aue, Annemarie ; Schindehütte, Magnus ; Schlott, Felicitas ; Arampatzi, Panagiota ; Bischler, Thorsten ; Schneider, Max ; Brack, Alexander ; Monoranu, Camelia M. ; Gräfenhan, Tom ; Bohnert, Michael ; Pham, Mirko ; Antoniadis, Gregor ; Blum, Robert ; Rittner, Heike L.</creatorcontrib><description>Plexus injury results in lifelong suffering from flaccid paralysis, sensory loss, and intractable pain. For this clinical problem, regenerative medicine concepts set high expectations. However, it is largely unknown how dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are affected by accidental deafferentation.
Here, we phenotyped DRG of a clinically and MRI-characterised cohort of 13 patients with plexus injury. Avulsed DRG were collected during reconstructive nerve surgery. For control, we used DRG from forensic autopsy. The cellular composition of the DRG was analysed in histopathological slices with multicolour high-resolution immunohistochemistry, tile microscopy, and deep-learning-based bioimage analysis. We then sequenced the bulk RNA of corresponding DRG slices.
In about half of the patients we found loss of the typical DRG units consisting of neurones and satellite glial cells. The DRG cells were replaced by mesodermal/connective tissue. In the remaining patients, the cellular units were well preserved. Preoperative plexus MRI neurography was not able to distinguish the two types. Patients with ‘neuronal preservation’ had less maximum pain than patients with ‘neuronal loss’. Arm function improved after nerve reconstruction, but severe pain persisted. Transcriptome analysis of preserved DRGs revealed expression of subtype-specific sensory neurone marker genes, but downregulation of neuronal attributes. Furthermore, they showed signs of ongoing inflammation and connective tissue remodelling.
Patients with plexus injury separate into two groups with either neuronal preservation or neuronal loss. The former could benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy. For the latter, studies should explore mechanisms of neuronal loss especially for regenerative approaches.
DRKS00017266.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0007-0912</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-6771</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.004</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39393999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Brachial Plexus - injuries ; Cohort Studies ; deafferentation ; dorsal root ganglia ; Female ; Ganglia, Spinal ; Humans ; Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods ; Male ; Middle Aged ; nerve injury ; neuropathic pain ; Pain ; RNA-seq ; sensory neurone ; transcriptome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2024-12, Vol.133 (6), p.1250-1262</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f26a2a6286a3ce509aa4919940dbe1dd0c53e8b366e75118cb5ef93d6423c2b43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7925-8984 ; 0000-0003-4867-0188 ; 0000-0002-5270-3854 ; 0000-0001-5902-0979 ; 0000-0003-1295-2685 ; 0000-0003-3042-3832</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39393999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sodmann, Annemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degenbeck, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aue, Annemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindehütte, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlott, Felicitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arampatzi, Panagiota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bischler, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brack, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monoranu, Camelia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gräfenhan, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohnert, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham, Mirko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoniadis, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rittner, Heike L.</creatorcontrib><title>Human dorsal root ganglia are either preserved or completely lost after deafferentation by brachial plexus injury</title><title>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</title><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><description>Plexus injury results in lifelong suffering from flaccid paralysis, sensory loss, and intractable pain. For this clinical problem, regenerative medicine concepts set high expectations. However, it is largely unknown how dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are affected by accidental deafferentation.
Here, we phenotyped DRG of a clinically and MRI-characterised cohort of 13 patients with plexus injury. Avulsed DRG were collected during reconstructive nerve surgery. For control, we used DRG from forensic autopsy. The cellular composition of the DRG was analysed in histopathological slices with multicolour high-resolution immunohistochemistry, tile microscopy, and deep-learning-based bioimage analysis. We then sequenced the bulk RNA of corresponding DRG slices.
In about half of the patients we found loss of the typical DRG units consisting of neurones and satellite glial cells. The DRG cells were replaced by mesodermal/connective tissue. In the remaining patients, the cellular units were well preserved. Preoperative plexus MRI neurography was not able to distinguish the two types. Patients with ‘neuronal preservation’ had less maximum pain than patients with ‘neuronal loss’. Arm function improved after nerve reconstruction, but severe pain persisted. Transcriptome analysis of preserved DRGs revealed expression of subtype-specific sensory neurone marker genes, but downregulation of neuronal attributes. Furthermore, they showed signs of ongoing inflammation and connective tissue remodelling.
Patients with plexus injury separate into two groups with either neuronal preservation or neuronal loss. The former could benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy. For the latter, studies should explore mechanisms of neuronal loss especially for regenerative approaches.
DRKS00017266.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Brachial Plexus - injuries</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>deafferentation</subject><subject>dorsal root ganglia</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Ganglia, Spinal</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>nerve injury</subject><subject>neuropathic pain</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>RNA-seq</subject><subject>sensory neurone</subject><subject>transcriptome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo7rj6A7xIjl66zUd_TPAgsqgrLHjRc6hOqmfSpDuzSXrY-fdmmHXRi-RQhzz1VFEvIW85qznj3YepHiaoBRNNzVTNWPOMbHjT86rre_6cbBhjfcUUF1fkVUoTY7wXqn1JrqQ6P6U25P52nWGhNsQEnsYQMt3BsvMOKESk6PIeIz1ETBiPaGmI1IT54DGjP1EfUqYw5oJYhHHEiEuG7MJChxMdIpi9K9qCP6yJumVa4-k1eTGCT_jmsV6TX1-__Ly5re5-fPt-8_muMlI2uRpFBwI6se1AGmyZAmgUV6phdkBuLTOtxO0guw77lvOtGVoclbRdI6QRQyOvyaeL97AOM1pTNovg9SG6GeJJB3D635_F7fUuHDXn7VY1rSqG94-GGO5XTFnPLhn0HhYMa9KykOXQomcF5RfUxJBSxPFpDmf6nJWedMlKn7PSTOmSVel59_eCTx1_winAxwuA5UxHh1En43AxaF1Ek7UN7j_638Wcp_E</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Sodmann, Annemarie</creator><creator>Degenbeck, Johannes</creator><creator>Aue, Annemarie</creator><creator>Schindehütte, Magnus</creator><creator>Schlott, Felicitas</creator><creator>Arampatzi, Panagiota</creator><creator>Bischler, Thorsten</creator><creator>Schneider, Max</creator><creator>Brack, Alexander</creator><creator>Monoranu, Camelia M.</creator><creator>Gräfenhan, Tom</creator><creator>Bohnert, Michael</creator><creator>Pham, Mirko</creator><creator>Antoniadis, Gregor</creator><creator>Blum, Robert</creator><creator>Rittner, Heike L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7925-8984</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-0188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5270-3854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-0979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1295-2685</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-3832</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Human dorsal root ganglia are either preserved or completely lost after deafferentation by brachial plexus injury</title><author>Sodmann, Annemarie ; Degenbeck, Johannes ; Aue, Annemarie ; Schindehütte, Magnus ; Schlott, Felicitas ; Arampatzi, Panagiota ; Bischler, Thorsten ; Schneider, Max ; Brack, Alexander ; Monoranu, Camelia M. ; Gräfenhan, Tom ; Bohnert, Michael ; Pham, Mirko ; Antoniadis, Gregor ; Blum, Robert ; Rittner, Heike L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-f26a2a6286a3ce509aa4919940dbe1dd0c53e8b366e75118cb5ef93d6423c2b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Brachial Plexus - injuries</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>deafferentation</topic><topic>dorsal root ganglia</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Ganglia, Spinal</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>nerve injury</topic><topic>neuropathic pain</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>RNA-seq</topic><topic>sensory neurone</topic><topic>transcriptome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sodmann, Annemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Degenbeck, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aue, Annemarie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schindehütte, Magnus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlott, Felicitas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arampatzi, Panagiota</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bischler, Thorsten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Max</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brack, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monoranu, Camelia M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gräfenhan, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bohnert, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pham, Mirko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antoniadis, Gregor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blum, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rittner, Heike L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sodmann, Annemarie</au><au>Degenbeck, Johannes</au><au>Aue, Annemarie</au><au>Schindehütte, Magnus</au><au>Schlott, Felicitas</au><au>Arampatzi, Panagiota</au><au>Bischler, Thorsten</au><au>Schneider, Max</au><au>Brack, Alexander</au><au>Monoranu, Camelia M.</au><au>Gräfenhan, Tom</au><au>Bohnert, Michael</au><au>Pham, Mirko</au><au>Antoniadis, Gregor</au><au>Blum, Robert</au><au>Rittner, Heike L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Human dorsal root ganglia are either preserved or completely lost after deafferentation by brachial plexus injury</atitle><jtitle>British journal of anaesthesia : BJA</jtitle><addtitle>Br J Anaesth</addtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>133</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1250</spage><epage>1262</epage><pages>1250-1262</pages><issn>0007-0912</issn><issn>1471-6771</issn><eissn>1471-6771</eissn><abstract>Plexus injury results in lifelong suffering from flaccid paralysis, sensory loss, and intractable pain. For this clinical problem, regenerative medicine concepts set high expectations. However, it is largely unknown how dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are affected by accidental deafferentation.
Here, we phenotyped DRG of a clinically and MRI-characterised cohort of 13 patients with plexus injury. Avulsed DRG were collected during reconstructive nerve surgery. For control, we used DRG from forensic autopsy. The cellular composition of the DRG was analysed in histopathological slices with multicolour high-resolution immunohistochemistry, tile microscopy, and deep-learning-based bioimage analysis. We then sequenced the bulk RNA of corresponding DRG slices.
In about half of the patients we found loss of the typical DRG units consisting of neurones and satellite glial cells. The DRG cells were replaced by mesodermal/connective tissue. In the remaining patients, the cellular units were well preserved. Preoperative plexus MRI neurography was not able to distinguish the two types. Patients with ‘neuronal preservation’ had less maximum pain than patients with ‘neuronal loss’. Arm function improved after nerve reconstruction, but severe pain persisted. Transcriptome analysis of preserved DRGs revealed expression of subtype-specific sensory neurone marker genes, but downregulation of neuronal attributes. Furthermore, they showed signs of ongoing inflammation and connective tissue remodelling.
Patients with plexus injury separate into two groups with either neuronal preservation or neuronal loss. The former could benefit from anti-inflammatory therapy. For the latter, studies should explore mechanisms of neuronal loss especially for regenerative approaches.
DRKS00017266.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>39393999</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.004</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7925-8984</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-0188</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5270-3854</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5902-0979</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1295-2685</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3042-3832</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0007-0912 |
ispartof | British journal of anaesthesia : BJA, 2024-12, Vol.133 (6), p.1250-1262 |
issn | 0007-0912 1471-6771 1471-6771 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11589459 |
source | MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Adult Aged Brachial Plexus - injuries Cohort Studies deafferentation dorsal root ganglia Female Ganglia, Spinal Humans Magnetic Resonance Imaging - methods Male Middle Aged nerve injury neuropathic pain Pain RNA-seq sensory neurone transcriptome Young Adult |
title | Human dorsal root ganglia are either preserved or completely lost after deafferentation by brachial plexus injury |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-20T22%3A26%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20dorsal%20root%20ganglia%20are%20either%20preserved%20or%20completely%20lost%20after%20deafferentation%20by%20brachial%20plexus%20injury&rft.jtitle=British%20journal%20of%20anaesthesia%20:%20BJA&rft.au=Sodmann,%20Annemarie&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=133&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1250&rft.epage=1262&rft.pages=1250-1262&rft.issn=0007-0912&rft.eissn=1471-6771&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.bja.2024.09.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3115771270%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115771270&rft_id=info:pmid/39393999&rft_els_id=S0007091224005555&rfr_iscdi=true |