Incorporation of human–wildlife interactions in ecosystem‐based management to enhance conservation of endangered guitarfish
Growing human use of the marine environment increases the proximity of humans to marine wildlife and thus likely increases human–wildlife interactions. Such interactions influence perceptions of nature and promote or undermine conservation. Despite their importance, human–wildlife interactions are r...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Conservation biology 2024-12, Vol.38 (6), p.e14327-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | e14327 |
container_title | Conservation biology |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Grossmark, Yaara Azriali Zohar, Barak Barash, Adi Portman, Michelle E. |
description | Growing human use of the marine environment increases the proximity of humans to marine wildlife and thus likely increases human–wildlife interactions. Such interactions influence perceptions of nature and promote or undermine conservation. Despite their importance, human–wildlife interactions are rarely considered in ecosystem‐based marine spatial planning (MSP). Ideally, these interactions should be identified and considered in ecosystem‐based management (EBM), which is often purported to be the basis for MSP. We used Marxan software and data from a citizen science project documenting location, species, age, sex, and activity type to identify regions along Israel's coast with a high probability of encounters between people and 2 species of guitarfish. We considered the geographic distribution of these encounters and the various activities undertaken by the reporting observers. We ran 4 scenarios in Marxan. Two had conservation goals of 30% and 50% guitarfish habitat protection. In the third and fourth scenarios, we added a 50% conservation goal of human leisure activities to each guitarfish conservation goal. We also conducted a gap analysis between our guitarfish conservation goals and the Israel Nature and Parks Authority's master plan for marine protected areas. We found the park authority was close to meeting the 30% goal but was far from meeting the conservation goal of 50% of guitarfish habitat conservation. Different human uses were more likely to interact with different life stages of guitarfish, and different recreational activities occurred in different areas. Identifying areas of specific human use showed which activities should be addressed in conservation management decisions. Our addition of certain recreational uses to the model of habitat conservation showed how enhancing human dimensions in conservation planning can lead to more holistic ecosystem‐based conservation necessary for effective marine planning.
Incorporación de las interacciones humano‐fauna dentro de la gestión basada en el ecosistema para mejorar la conservación del pez guitarra en peligro
Resumen
El uso creciente que el humano le da al mar incrementa la cercanía de las personas con la fauna marina, lo que probablemente incrementa las interacciones humano‐fauna. Dichas interacciones influyen sobre las percepciones que se tienen de la naturaleza y promueven debilitan la conservación. A pesar de su importancia, pocas veces se consideran las relaciones humano‐fauna dentro de l |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/cobi.14327 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11588974</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3132694752</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3387-e252027f4f15f7f6476e54e2cbd2ed6d791c082bc93e1e11cffe80e33eda67403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kctq3DAUhkVoSabTbvIAwZBNKTjVxbakVWiHXgYC2bRrIctHMwq2NJHslFk1j1DoG-ZJqumkQ9NFpYUQ5zsfR_oROiX4guT11oTWXZCKUX6EZqSmrCScyWdohoUQpRCSnqAXKd1gjGVNqmN0woTMm_EZ-r70JsRNiHp0wRfBFutp0P7h_uc313e9s1A4P0LUZldP-VKACWmbRhge7n-0OkFX5Aa9ggH8WIyhAL_W3kBhMg_x7iAG32m_gpgbVpMbdbQurV-i51b3CV49nnP09eOHL4vP5dX1p-Xi3VVpGBO8BFpTTLmtLKktt03FG6groKbtKHRNxyUxWNDWSAYECDHWgsDAGHS64RVmc3S5926mdoDO5Fmj7tUmukHHrQraqacV79ZqFe4UIXX-QV5lw-tHQwy3E6RRDS4Z6HvtIUxJMcwFJ1LWO_T8H_QmTNHn9ylGGG1kxXNKc_RmT5kYUopgD9MQrHbBql2w6newGT77e_4D-ifJDJA9kHOD7X9UanH9frmX_gIhmbQr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3132694752</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Incorporation of human–wildlife interactions in ecosystem‐based management to enhance conservation of endangered guitarfish</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Grossmark, Yaara ; Azriali Zohar, Barak ; Barash, Adi ; Portman, Michelle E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Grossmark, Yaara ; Azriali Zohar, Barak ; Barash, Adi ; Portman, Michelle E.</creatorcontrib><description>Growing human use of the marine environment increases the proximity of humans to marine wildlife and thus likely increases human–wildlife interactions. Such interactions influence perceptions of nature and promote or undermine conservation. Despite their importance, human–wildlife interactions are rarely considered in ecosystem‐based marine spatial planning (MSP). Ideally, these interactions should be identified and considered in ecosystem‐based management (EBM), which is often purported to be the basis for MSP. We used Marxan software and data from a citizen science project documenting location, species, age, sex, and activity type to identify regions along Israel's coast with a high probability of encounters between people and 2 species of guitarfish. We considered the geographic distribution of these encounters and the various activities undertaken by the reporting observers. We ran 4 scenarios in Marxan. Two had conservation goals of 30% and 50% guitarfish habitat protection. In the third and fourth scenarios, we added a 50% conservation goal of human leisure activities to each guitarfish conservation goal. We also conducted a gap analysis between our guitarfish conservation goals and the Israel Nature and Parks Authority's master plan for marine protected areas. We found the park authority was close to meeting the 30% goal but was far from meeting the conservation goal of 50% of guitarfish habitat conservation. Different human uses were more likely to interact with different life stages of guitarfish, and different recreational activities occurred in different areas. Identifying areas of specific human use showed which activities should be addressed in conservation management decisions. Our addition of certain recreational uses to the model of habitat conservation showed how enhancing human dimensions in conservation planning can lead to more holistic ecosystem‐based conservation necessary for effective marine planning.
Incorporación de las interacciones humano‐fauna dentro de la gestión basada en el ecosistema para mejorar la conservación del pez guitarra en peligro
Resumen
El uso creciente que el humano le da al mar incrementa la cercanía de las personas con la fauna marina, lo que probablemente incrementa las interacciones humano‐fauna. Dichas interacciones influyen sobre las percepciones que se tienen de la naturaleza y promueven debilitan la conservación. A pesar de su importancia, pocas veces se consideran las relaciones humano‐fauna dentro de la planeación espacial basada en ecosistemas marinos (PEM). Lo ideal debería ser la identificación y consideración de estas interacciones dentro de la gestión basada en el ecosistema (GBE), la cual con frecuencia se considera como la base de la PEM. Usamos software Marxan y datos de un proyecto de ciencia ciudadana que documenta la ubicación, especie, edad, sexo y tipo de actividad para identificar las regiones de la costa de Israel con una alta probabilidad de encuentros entre las personas y dos especies de pez guitarra. Consideramos la distribución geográfica de estos encuentros y las diferentes actividades que realizan los observadores. En Marxan corrimos cuatro escenarios. Dos de los escenarios contaban objetivos de conservación del 30% y 50% de la protección del hábitat del pez guitarra. En los otros dos escenarios, añadimos un objetivo de conservación de 50% de las actividades humanas de recreación a los objetivos uno y dos. También realizamos un análisis de brecha entre los objetivos de conservación del pez guitarra y el plan maestro para las áreas marinas protegidas de la Autoridad de Parques y Naturaleza de Israel. Descubrimos que esta autoridad estaba cerca de lograr el objetivo del 30% pero lejos del de 50% de la conservación del hábitat del pez guitarra. Fue más probable que los diferentes usos humanos interactuaran con diferentes estadios de vida del pez guitarra y las diversas actividades recreativas ocurrieron en áreas distintas. La identificación de las áreas con un uso humano específico mostró cuáles actividades deberían abordarse en las decisiones de gestión de la conservación. La suma de ciertos usos recreativos al modelo de conservación del hábitat mostró cómo aumentar las dimensiones humanas en la planeación de la conservación puede derivar en una conservación basada en el ecosistema más holística, necesaria para la planeación marina eficiente.
将人类与野生动物互动纳入基于生态系统的管理, 以加强对濒危犁头鳐的保护
人类对海洋环境的利用日益增加, 导致人类与海洋野生动物的距离越来越近, 这可能加强了人类与野生动物之间的互动。这种互动会影响人们对自然的看法, 从而促进或破坏自然保护。尽管人类与野生动物的互动非常重要, 但在基于生态系统的海洋空间规划中却很少考虑到这一点。基于生态系统的管理常常被认为是海洋空间规划的基础, 理想情况下, 这些管理措施应识别并考虑这些互动。本研究利用Marxan软件和一项公民科学项目中记录的位置、物种、年龄、性别和活动类型等数据, 确定了人类与两种犁头鳐在以色列沿海相遇概率较高的区域。我们考虑了这些相遇事件的地理分布以及报告观察者所进行的各种活动。我们在Marxan软件中模拟了四种情景, 其中两种情景分别设立了保护犁头鳐30%和50%栖息地的保护目标, 而在第三和第四种情景中, 我们在每个犁头鳐保护目标中增加了50%的人类娱乐活动的保护目标。我们还对犁头鳐保护目标与以色列自然和公园管理局的海洋保护区总体规划之间的差距进行了分析。我们发现, 公园管理局已接近实现30%的目标, 但离实现50%的犁头鳐栖息地保护目标还相差甚远。不同人类利用行为更有可能影响犁头鳐的不同生命阶段, 且不同娱乐活动发生在不同的区域。确定特定的人类利用区域指出了保护管理决策应重点关注的人类活动。本研究在栖息地保护模型中纳入了一些人类娱乐活动, 展现了如何在保护规划中增加人类维度以制定更全面的基于生态系统的保护措施, 而这正是有效的海洋规划所必需的。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-8892</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/cobi.14327</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38989837</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; ciencia ciudadana ; citizen science ; Conservation ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; conservation planning ; Contributed Paper ; Ecosystem ; Ecosystem management ; Ecosystems ; ecosystem‐based management ; Endangered Species ; Environmental planning ; Environmental protection ; Fauna ; Gap analysis ; Geographical distribution ; gestión basada en el ecosistema ; Habitats ; Human-Animal Interaction ; Human-wildlife relations ; Humans ; human–wildlife interaction ; interacción humano‐fauna ; Israel ; Marinas ; Marine animals ; Marine ecosystems ; Marine environment ; Marine fishes ; marine planning ; Marine protected areas ; Marine resources ; Marine spatial planning ; planeación de la conservación ; planeación marina ; Planning ; priorización espacial de la conservación ; Project management ; Protected areas ; Recreation ; Recreation areas ; Recreational use ; Software ; spatial conservation prioritization ; Spatial planning ; Wildlife ; Wildlife conservation ; 人类与野生动物互动 ; 保护规划 ; 公民科学 ; 基于生态系统的管理 ; 海洋规划 ; 空间优先保护化</subject><ispartof>Conservation biology, 2024-12, Vol.38 (6), p.e14327-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for .</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Conservation Biology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3387-e252027f4f15f7f6476e54e2cbd2ed6d791c082bc93e1e11cffe80e33eda67403</cites><orcidid>0009-0002-4168-5133</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fcobi.14327$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fcobi.14327$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38989837$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grossmark, Yaara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azriali Zohar, Barak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barash, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portman, Michelle E.</creatorcontrib><title>Incorporation of human–wildlife interactions in ecosystem‐based management to enhance conservation of endangered guitarfish</title><title>Conservation biology</title><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><description>Growing human use of the marine environment increases the proximity of humans to marine wildlife and thus likely increases human–wildlife interactions. Such interactions influence perceptions of nature and promote or undermine conservation. Despite their importance, human–wildlife interactions are rarely considered in ecosystem‐based marine spatial planning (MSP). Ideally, these interactions should be identified and considered in ecosystem‐based management (EBM), which is often purported to be the basis for MSP. We used Marxan software and data from a citizen science project documenting location, species, age, sex, and activity type to identify regions along Israel's coast with a high probability of encounters between people and 2 species of guitarfish. We considered the geographic distribution of these encounters and the various activities undertaken by the reporting observers. We ran 4 scenarios in Marxan. Two had conservation goals of 30% and 50% guitarfish habitat protection. In the third and fourth scenarios, we added a 50% conservation goal of human leisure activities to each guitarfish conservation goal. We also conducted a gap analysis between our guitarfish conservation goals and the Israel Nature and Parks Authority's master plan for marine protected areas. We found the park authority was close to meeting the 30% goal but was far from meeting the conservation goal of 50% of guitarfish habitat conservation. Different human uses were more likely to interact with different life stages of guitarfish, and different recreational activities occurred in different areas. Identifying areas of specific human use showed which activities should be addressed in conservation management decisions. Our addition of certain recreational uses to the model of habitat conservation showed how enhancing human dimensions in conservation planning can lead to more holistic ecosystem‐based conservation necessary for effective marine planning.
Incorporación de las interacciones humano‐fauna dentro de la gestión basada en el ecosistema para mejorar la conservación del pez guitarra en peligro
Resumen
El uso creciente que el humano le da al mar incrementa la cercanía de las personas con la fauna marina, lo que probablemente incrementa las interacciones humano‐fauna. Dichas interacciones influyen sobre las percepciones que se tienen de la naturaleza y promueven debilitan la conservación. A pesar de su importancia, pocas veces se consideran las relaciones humano‐fauna dentro de la planeación espacial basada en ecosistemas marinos (PEM). Lo ideal debería ser la identificación y consideración de estas interacciones dentro de la gestión basada en el ecosistema (GBE), la cual con frecuencia se considera como la base de la PEM. Usamos software Marxan y datos de un proyecto de ciencia ciudadana que documenta la ubicación, especie, edad, sexo y tipo de actividad para identificar las regiones de la costa de Israel con una alta probabilidad de encuentros entre las personas y dos especies de pez guitarra. Consideramos la distribución geográfica de estos encuentros y las diferentes actividades que realizan los observadores. En Marxan corrimos cuatro escenarios. Dos de los escenarios contaban objetivos de conservación del 30% y 50% de la protección del hábitat del pez guitarra. En los otros dos escenarios, añadimos un objetivo de conservación de 50% de las actividades humanas de recreación a los objetivos uno y dos. También realizamos un análisis de brecha entre los objetivos de conservación del pez guitarra y el plan maestro para las áreas marinas protegidas de la Autoridad de Parques y Naturaleza de Israel. Descubrimos que esta autoridad estaba cerca de lograr el objetivo del 30% pero lejos del de 50% de la conservación del hábitat del pez guitarra. Fue más probable que los diferentes usos humanos interactuaran con diferentes estadios de vida del pez guitarra y las diversas actividades recreativas ocurrieron en áreas distintas. La identificación de las áreas con un uso humano específico mostró cuáles actividades deberían abordarse en las decisiones de gestión de la conservación. La suma de ciertos usos recreativos al modelo de conservación del hábitat mostró cómo aumentar las dimensiones humanas en la planeación de la conservación puede derivar en una conservación basada en el ecosistema más holística, necesaria para la planeación marina eficiente.
将人类与野生动物互动纳入基于生态系统的管理, 以加强对濒危犁头鳐的保护
人类对海洋环境的利用日益增加, 导致人类与海洋野生动物的距离越来越近, 这可能加强了人类与野生动物之间的互动。这种互动会影响人们对自然的看法, 从而促进或破坏自然保护。尽管人类与野生动物的互动非常重要, 但在基于生态系统的海洋空间规划中却很少考虑到这一点。基于生态系统的管理常常被认为是海洋空间规划的基础, 理想情况下, 这些管理措施应识别并考虑这些互动。本研究利用Marxan软件和一项公民科学项目中记录的位置、物种、年龄、性别和活动类型等数据, 确定了人类与两种犁头鳐在以色列沿海相遇概率较高的区域。我们考虑了这些相遇事件的地理分布以及报告观察者所进行的各种活动。我们在Marxan软件中模拟了四种情景, 其中两种情景分别设立了保护犁头鳐30%和50%栖息地的保护目标, 而在第三和第四种情景中, 我们在每个犁头鳐保护目标中增加了50%的人类娱乐活动的保护目标。我们还对犁头鳐保护目标与以色列自然和公园管理局的海洋保护区总体规划之间的差距进行了分析。我们发现, 公园管理局已接近实现30%的目标, 但离实现50%的犁头鳐栖息地保护目标还相差甚远。不同人类利用行为更有可能影响犁头鳐的不同生命阶段, 且不同娱乐活动发生在不同的区域。确定特定的人类利用区域指出了保护管理决策应重点关注的人类活动。本研究在栖息地保护模型中纳入了一些人类娱乐活动, 展现了如何在保护规划中增加人类维度以制定更全面的基于生态系统的保护措施, 而这正是有效的海洋规划所必需的。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>ciencia ciudadana</subject><subject>citizen science</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>conservation planning</subject><subject>Contributed Paper</subject><subject>Ecosystem</subject><subject>Ecosystem management</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>ecosystem‐based management</subject><subject>Endangered Species</subject><subject>Environmental planning</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Gap analysis</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>gestión basada en el ecosistema</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Human-Animal Interaction</subject><subject>Human-wildlife relations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>human–wildlife interaction</subject><subject>interacción humano‐fauna</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Marinas</subject><subject>Marine animals</subject><subject>Marine ecosystems</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>marine planning</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Marine resources</subject><subject>Marine spatial planning</subject><subject>planeación de la conservación</subject><subject>planeación marina</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>priorización espacial de la conservación</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Recreation</subject><subject>Recreation areas</subject><subject>Recreational use</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>spatial conservation prioritization</subject><subject>Spatial planning</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>人类与野生动物互动</subject><subject>保护规划</subject><subject>公民科学</subject><subject>基于生态系统的管理</subject><subject>海洋规划</subject><subject>空间优先保护化</subject><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kctq3DAUhkVoSabTbvIAwZBNKTjVxbakVWiHXgYC2bRrIctHMwq2NJHslFk1j1DoG-ZJqumkQ9NFpYUQ5zsfR_oROiX4guT11oTWXZCKUX6EZqSmrCScyWdohoUQpRCSnqAXKd1gjGVNqmN0woTMm_EZ-r70JsRNiHp0wRfBFutp0P7h_uc313e9s1A4P0LUZldP-VKACWmbRhge7n-0OkFX5Aa9ggH8WIyhAL_W3kBhMg_x7iAG32m_gpgbVpMbdbQurV-i51b3CV49nnP09eOHL4vP5dX1p-Xi3VVpGBO8BFpTTLmtLKktt03FG6groKbtKHRNxyUxWNDWSAYECDHWgsDAGHS64RVmc3S5926mdoDO5Fmj7tUmukHHrQraqacV79ZqFe4UIXX-QV5lw-tHQwy3E6RRDS4Z6HvtIUxJMcwFJ1LWO_T8H_QmTNHn9ylGGG1kxXNKc_RmT5kYUopgD9MQrHbBql2w6newGT77e_4D-ifJDJA9kHOD7X9UanH9frmX_gIhmbQr</recordid><startdate>202412</startdate><enddate>202412</enddate><creator>Grossmark, Yaara</creator><creator>Azriali Zohar, Barak</creator><creator>Barash, Adi</creator><creator>Portman, Michelle E.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4168-5133</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202412</creationdate><title>Incorporation of human–wildlife interactions in ecosystem‐based management to enhance conservation of endangered guitarfish</title><author>Grossmark, Yaara ; Azriali Zohar, Barak ; Barash, Adi ; Portman, Michelle E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3387-e252027f4f15f7f6476e54e2cbd2ed6d791c082bc93e1e11cffe80e33eda67403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>ciencia ciudadana</topic><topic>citizen science</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>conservation planning</topic><topic>Contributed Paper</topic><topic>Ecosystem</topic><topic>Ecosystem management</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>ecosystem‐based management</topic><topic>Endangered Species</topic><topic>Environmental planning</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Gap analysis</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>gestión basada en el ecosistema</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Human-Animal Interaction</topic><topic>Human-wildlife relations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>human–wildlife interaction</topic><topic>interacción humano‐fauna</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Marinas</topic><topic>Marine animals</topic><topic>Marine ecosystems</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>marine planning</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Marine resources</topic><topic>Marine spatial planning</topic><topic>planeación de la conservación</topic><topic>planeación marina</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>priorización espacial de la conservación</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Recreation</topic><topic>Recreation areas</topic><topic>Recreational use</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>spatial conservation prioritization</topic><topic>Spatial planning</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>人类与野生动物互动</topic><topic>保护规划</topic><topic>公民科学</topic><topic>基于生态系统的管理</topic><topic>海洋规划</topic><topic>空间优先保护化</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grossmark, Yaara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azriali Zohar, Barak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barash, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portman, Michelle E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grossmark, Yaara</au><au>Azriali Zohar, Barak</au><au>Barash, Adi</au><au>Portman, Michelle E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Incorporation of human–wildlife interactions in ecosystem‐based management to enhance conservation of endangered guitarfish</atitle><jtitle>Conservation biology</jtitle><addtitle>Conserv Biol</addtitle><date>2024-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e14327</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14327-n/a</pages><issn>0888-8892</issn><issn>1523-1739</issn><eissn>1523-1739</eissn><abstract>Growing human use of the marine environment increases the proximity of humans to marine wildlife and thus likely increases human–wildlife interactions. Such interactions influence perceptions of nature and promote or undermine conservation. Despite their importance, human–wildlife interactions are rarely considered in ecosystem‐based marine spatial planning (MSP). Ideally, these interactions should be identified and considered in ecosystem‐based management (EBM), which is often purported to be the basis for MSP. We used Marxan software and data from a citizen science project documenting location, species, age, sex, and activity type to identify regions along Israel's coast with a high probability of encounters between people and 2 species of guitarfish. We considered the geographic distribution of these encounters and the various activities undertaken by the reporting observers. We ran 4 scenarios in Marxan. Two had conservation goals of 30% and 50% guitarfish habitat protection. In the third and fourth scenarios, we added a 50% conservation goal of human leisure activities to each guitarfish conservation goal. We also conducted a gap analysis between our guitarfish conservation goals and the Israel Nature and Parks Authority's master plan for marine protected areas. We found the park authority was close to meeting the 30% goal but was far from meeting the conservation goal of 50% of guitarfish habitat conservation. Different human uses were more likely to interact with different life stages of guitarfish, and different recreational activities occurred in different areas. Identifying areas of specific human use showed which activities should be addressed in conservation management decisions. Our addition of certain recreational uses to the model of habitat conservation showed how enhancing human dimensions in conservation planning can lead to more holistic ecosystem‐based conservation necessary for effective marine planning.
Incorporación de las interacciones humano‐fauna dentro de la gestión basada en el ecosistema para mejorar la conservación del pez guitarra en peligro
Resumen
El uso creciente que el humano le da al mar incrementa la cercanía de las personas con la fauna marina, lo que probablemente incrementa las interacciones humano‐fauna. Dichas interacciones influyen sobre las percepciones que se tienen de la naturaleza y promueven debilitan la conservación. A pesar de su importancia, pocas veces se consideran las relaciones humano‐fauna dentro de la planeación espacial basada en ecosistemas marinos (PEM). Lo ideal debería ser la identificación y consideración de estas interacciones dentro de la gestión basada en el ecosistema (GBE), la cual con frecuencia se considera como la base de la PEM. Usamos software Marxan y datos de un proyecto de ciencia ciudadana que documenta la ubicación, especie, edad, sexo y tipo de actividad para identificar las regiones de la costa de Israel con una alta probabilidad de encuentros entre las personas y dos especies de pez guitarra. Consideramos la distribución geográfica de estos encuentros y las diferentes actividades que realizan los observadores. En Marxan corrimos cuatro escenarios. Dos de los escenarios contaban objetivos de conservación del 30% y 50% de la protección del hábitat del pez guitarra. En los otros dos escenarios, añadimos un objetivo de conservación de 50% de las actividades humanas de recreación a los objetivos uno y dos. También realizamos un análisis de brecha entre los objetivos de conservación del pez guitarra y el plan maestro para las áreas marinas protegidas de la Autoridad de Parques y Naturaleza de Israel. Descubrimos que esta autoridad estaba cerca de lograr el objetivo del 30% pero lejos del de 50% de la conservación del hábitat del pez guitarra. Fue más probable que los diferentes usos humanos interactuaran con diferentes estadios de vida del pez guitarra y las diversas actividades recreativas ocurrieron en áreas distintas. La identificación de las áreas con un uso humano específico mostró cuáles actividades deberían abordarse en las decisiones de gestión de la conservación. La suma de ciertos usos recreativos al modelo de conservación del hábitat mostró cómo aumentar las dimensiones humanas en la planeación de la conservación puede derivar en una conservación basada en el ecosistema más holística, necesaria para la planeación marina eficiente.
将人类与野生动物互动纳入基于生态系统的管理, 以加强对濒危犁头鳐的保护
人类对海洋环境的利用日益增加, 导致人类与海洋野生动物的距离越来越近, 这可能加强了人类与野生动物之间的互动。这种互动会影响人们对自然的看法, 从而促进或破坏自然保护。尽管人类与野生动物的互动非常重要, 但在基于生态系统的海洋空间规划中却很少考虑到这一点。基于生态系统的管理常常被认为是海洋空间规划的基础, 理想情况下, 这些管理措施应识别并考虑这些互动。本研究利用Marxan软件和一项公民科学项目中记录的位置、物种、年龄、性别和活动类型等数据, 确定了人类与两种犁头鳐在以色列沿海相遇概率较高的区域。我们考虑了这些相遇事件的地理分布以及报告观察者所进行的各种活动。我们在Marxan软件中模拟了四种情景, 其中两种情景分别设立了保护犁头鳐30%和50%栖息地的保护目标, 而在第三和第四种情景中, 我们在每个犁头鳐保护目标中增加了50%的人类娱乐活动的保护目标。我们还对犁头鳐保护目标与以色列自然和公园管理局的海洋保护区总体规划之间的差距进行了分析。我们发现, 公园管理局已接近实现30%的目标, 但离实现50%的犁头鳐栖息地保护目标还相差甚远。不同人类利用行为更有可能影响犁头鳐的不同生命阶段, 且不同娱乐活动发生在不同的区域。确定特定的人类利用区域指出了保护管理决策应重点关注的人类活动。本研究在栖息地保护模型中纳入了一些人类娱乐活动, 展现了如何在保护规划中增加人类维度以制定更全面的基于生态系统的保护措施, 而这正是有效的海洋规划所必需的。【翻译:胡怡思;审校:聂永刚】</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38989837</pmid><doi>10.1111/cobi.14327</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4168-5133</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-8892 |
ispartof | Conservation biology, 2024-12, Vol.38 (6), p.e14327-n/a |
issn | 0888-8892 1523-1739 1523-1739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11588974 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Animals ciencia ciudadana citizen science Conservation Conservation of Natural Resources - methods conservation planning Contributed Paper Ecosystem Ecosystem management Ecosystems ecosystem‐based management Endangered Species Environmental planning Environmental protection Fauna Gap analysis Geographical distribution gestión basada en el ecosistema Habitats Human-Animal Interaction Human-wildlife relations Humans human–wildlife interaction interacción humano‐fauna Israel Marinas Marine animals Marine ecosystems Marine environment Marine fishes marine planning Marine protected areas Marine resources Marine spatial planning planeación de la conservación planeación marina Planning priorización espacial de la conservación Project management Protected areas Recreation Recreation areas Recreational use Software spatial conservation prioritization Spatial planning Wildlife Wildlife conservation 人类与野生动物互动 保护规划 公民科学 基于生态系统的管理 海洋规划 空间优先保护化 |
title | Incorporation of human–wildlife interactions in ecosystem‐based management to enhance conservation of endangered guitarfish |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T23%3A04%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Incorporation%20of%20human%E2%80%93wildlife%20interactions%20in%20ecosystem%E2%80%90based%20management%20to%20enhance%20conservation%20of%20endangered%20guitarfish&rft.jtitle=Conservation%20biology&rft.au=Grossmark,%20Yaara&rft.date=2024-12&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e14327&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14327-n/a&rft.issn=0888-8892&rft.eissn=1523-1739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/cobi.14327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3132694752%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3132694752&rft_id=info:pmid/38989837&rfr_iscdi=true |