Distribution and characteristics of bacteria on the hand during oropharyngeal swab collection: Which handwashing points are affected?

Aims To identify the contaminated areas of the hand collection and analyse the distribution characteristics of bacteria in the hand after swab collection. Design This study used a cross‐sectional design. Methods A cross‐sectional study sampling 50 pairs of hands (sampling hand and auxiliary hand) of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical nursing 2024-12, Vol.33 (12), p.4708-4716
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Nuo, He, Wenbin, Chen, Xiaoyan, Li, Yan, Cheng, Xiaolin, Liu, Li, Qian, Hua, Qiao, Fu, Cheng, Fan, Deng, Yi, Wu, Wenwen, Feng, Bilong, Wang, Ying
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Aims To identify the contaminated areas of the hand collection and analyse the distribution characteristics of bacteria in the hand after swab collection. Design This study used a cross‐sectional design. Methods A cross‐sectional study sampling 50 pairs of hands (sampling hand and auxiliary hand) of healthcare workers was performed. Ten samples were collected from each participant. The optimal hand hygiene rates and bacterial colony counts of the whole hand and different hand sections without hand hygiene were identified as the primary outcomes. Results The optimal hand hygiene rates of the sampling hand and auxiliary hand were 88.8% (222/250) and 91.6% (229/250), respectively. The lowest optimal hand hygiene rates for the sampling hand and the auxiliary hand were both on the dorsal side of the finger and the dorsum of the hand (86.0%, 86.0% vs. 90.0%, 86.0%); the optimal hand hygiene rates for both sites of the sampling hand were 86.0% (43/50), and the optimal hand hygiene rates for the auxiliary hand were 90.0% (45/50) and 86.0% (43/50). The bacteria colony counts did not differ between the sampling hands and auxiliary hand. Conclusions The dorsal side of the finger and dorsum of the hand were the most likely to be contaminated during oropharyngeal swab collection. Therefore, it is essential to pay extra attention to hand hygiene care of these two sites during the collection process to minimize the risk of cross‐contamination. Reporting Method The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines were adopted in this study.
ISSN:0962-1067
1365-2702
1365-2702
DOI:10.1111/jocn.17134