Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial

Home treatment (HT) has been associated with fewer inpatient treatment (IT) readmission days but lacks evidence on reducing combined psychiatric hospital service use (IT, HT, day clinic). To assess the association of intensive home treatment (IHT) compared with IT regarding readmission rate, social...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA network open 2024-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e2445042
Hauptverfasser: Bechdolf, Andreas, Nikolaidis, Konstantinos, von Peter, Sebastian, Längle, Gerhard, Brieger, Peter, Timm, Jürgen, Killian, Reinhold, Fischer, Lasse, Raschmann, Svenja, Schwarz, Julian, Holzke, Martin, Rout, Sandeep, Hirschmeier, Constance, Hamann, Johannes, Herwig, Uwe, Richter, Janina, Baumgardt, Johanna, Weinmann, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 11
container_start_page e2445042
container_title JAMA network open
container_volume 7
creator Bechdolf, Andreas
Nikolaidis, Konstantinos
von Peter, Sebastian
Längle, Gerhard
Brieger, Peter
Timm, Jürgen
Killian, Reinhold
Fischer, Lasse
Raschmann, Svenja
Schwarz, Julian
Holzke, Martin
Rout, Sandeep
Hirschmeier, Constance
Hamann, Johannes
Herwig, Uwe
Richter, Janina
Baumgardt, Johanna
Weinmann, Stefan
description Home treatment (HT) has been associated with fewer inpatient treatment (IT) readmission days but lacks evidence on reducing combined psychiatric hospital service use (IT, HT, day clinic). To assess the association of intensive home treatment (IHT) compared with IT regarding readmission rate, social outcomes, and clinical outcomes. This quasi-experimental, nonrandomized trial was conducted from 2020 to 2022 in 10 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to compare both treatment models at the 12-month follow-up using standardized instruments and routine hospital data. All patients were screened until the target sample size was reached, based on these criteria: stable residence with privacy for sessions, no child welfare risk, primary diagnosis within International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes F0X to F6X, residence in the catchment area, no commitment order, no acute suicidality or severe aggression requiring hospitalization, capacity to consent, not participating in other interventional studies, sufficient German language skills, no substantial cognitive deficits or intellectual impairment, and no more than 7 days in IHT or IT before recruitment. Statistical analysis was performed from February to November 2023. IHT provided daily acute psychiatric treatment at home, while IT was psychiatric inpatient treatment as usual. The mean treatment duration of the index treatment was 37.2 days for IHT and 28.2 days for IT. The inpatient readmission rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were combined readmission rate, total inpatient days, job integration, quality of life, psychosocial functioning, symptom severity, and recovery. Of 1396 individuals, 200 patients receiving IHT and 200 patients receiving IT were included (264 female [65%]; mean [SD] age, 45.45 [15.83] years [range, 18-88 years]). Baseline sociodemographic and psychometric characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. At 12-month follow-up, patients in the IHT group had lower inpatient readmission rate (IHT vs IT: 31.12% vs 49.74% IT; mean difference, 18% [95% CI, 9%-28%; P 
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45042
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11568461</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3128979039</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a295t-5b6078c8e965bdf7cdfd234084b0ef03c0328ad823756707ef63ef393b7d89e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9P3DAQxa2qVUFbvkJltZdedjuxncThUqEVFCREK3U5W44zAW8de2t7F8Gnryl_RDl5JL9582Z-hHyqYFEBVF_XetIe802Iv8MG_YIBEwtRg2BvyD6rWzHnEuq3L-o9cpDSGgAYVLxr6vdkj3e1aHgl9km4zNbZO51t8DSM9Ge6NddW52gNPQ1pY7N29BfGnTWY6ElwLtxYf0XPfEaf7A6LakK6iqjzhD4f0iN6EXzUfgiTvcOBLp311hSXVbTafSDvRu0SHjy-M3J5crxans7Pf3w_Wx6dzzXr6jyv-wZaaSSWvP0wtmYYB8YFSNEDjsANcCb1IBlv66aFFseG48g73reD7FDyGfn24LvZ9hMOpkSL2qlNtJOOtypoq_7_8fZaXYWdqqq6kaKpisOXR4cY_mwxZTXZZNC5cv6wTYpXTHZtB2XojHx-JV2HbfRlv6ISnEsOAorq8EFlYkgp4vicpgJ1z1a9Yqvu2ap_bEvzx5f7PLc-keR_AVoepzs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3143383040</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Bechdolf, Andreas ; Nikolaidis, Konstantinos ; von Peter, Sebastian ; Längle, Gerhard ; Brieger, Peter ; Timm, Jürgen ; Killian, Reinhold ; Fischer, Lasse ; Raschmann, Svenja ; Schwarz, Julian ; Holzke, Martin ; Rout, Sandeep ; Hirschmeier, Constance ; Hamann, Johannes ; Herwig, Uwe ; Richter, Janina ; Baumgardt, Johanna ; Weinmann, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Bechdolf, Andreas ; Nikolaidis, Konstantinos ; von Peter, Sebastian ; Längle, Gerhard ; Brieger, Peter ; Timm, Jürgen ; Killian, Reinhold ; Fischer, Lasse ; Raschmann, Svenja ; Schwarz, Julian ; Holzke, Martin ; Rout, Sandeep ; Hirschmeier, Constance ; Hamann, Johannes ; Herwig, Uwe ; Richter, Janina ; Baumgardt, Johanna ; Weinmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>Home treatment (HT) has been associated with fewer inpatient treatment (IT) readmission days but lacks evidence on reducing combined psychiatric hospital service use (IT, HT, day clinic). To assess the association of intensive home treatment (IHT) compared with IT regarding readmission rate, social outcomes, and clinical outcomes. This quasi-experimental, nonrandomized trial was conducted from 2020 to 2022 in 10 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to compare both treatment models at the 12-month follow-up using standardized instruments and routine hospital data. All patients were screened until the target sample size was reached, based on these criteria: stable residence with privacy for sessions, no child welfare risk, primary diagnosis within International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes F0X to F6X, residence in the catchment area, no commitment order, no acute suicidality or severe aggression requiring hospitalization, capacity to consent, not participating in other interventional studies, sufficient German language skills, no substantial cognitive deficits or intellectual impairment, and no more than 7 days in IHT or IT before recruitment. Statistical analysis was performed from February to November 2023. IHT provided daily acute psychiatric treatment at home, while IT was psychiatric inpatient treatment as usual. The mean treatment duration of the index treatment was 37.2 days for IHT and 28.2 days for IT. The inpatient readmission rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were combined readmission rate, total inpatient days, job integration, quality of life, psychosocial functioning, symptom severity, and recovery. Of 1396 individuals, 200 patients receiving IHT and 200 patients receiving IT were included (264 female [65%]; mean [SD] age, 45.45 [15.83] years [range, 18-88 years]). Baseline sociodemographic and psychometric characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. At 12-month follow-up, patients in the IHT group had lower inpatient readmission rate (IHT vs IT: 31.12% vs 49.74% IT; mean difference, 18% [95% CI, 9%-28%; P &lt; .001), combined readmission rate (mean difference, 13% [95% CI, 4%-24%; P &lt; .001), and fewer inpatient days (mean difference, 6.82 days; P &lt; .001) than the IT group. This nonrandomized clinical trial found that patients receiving IHT had a lower likelihood of utilizing hospital-based psychiatric services and spent fewer inpatient days, suggesting that IHT is a viable alternative to IT. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04745507.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2574-3805</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45042</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39546314</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Clinical trials ; Female ; Germany ; Home Care Services - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Hospitals, Psychiatric - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Humans ; Male ; Mental Disorders - therapy ; Mental institutions ; Middle Aged ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Psychiatry</subject><ispartof>JAMA network open, 2024-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e2445042</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright 2024 Bechdolf A et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a295t-5b6078c8e965bdf7cdfd234084b0ef03c0328ad823756707ef63ef393b7d89e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39546314$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bechdolf, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolaidis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Peter, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Längle, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brieger, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timm, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killian, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Lasse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raschmann, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzke, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rout, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschmeier, Constance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herwig, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Janina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgardt, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial</title><title>JAMA network open</title><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><description>Home treatment (HT) has been associated with fewer inpatient treatment (IT) readmission days but lacks evidence on reducing combined psychiatric hospital service use (IT, HT, day clinic). To assess the association of intensive home treatment (IHT) compared with IT regarding readmission rate, social outcomes, and clinical outcomes. This quasi-experimental, nonrandomized trial was conducted from 2020 to 2022 in 10 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to compare both treatment models at the 12-month follow-up using standardized instruments and routine hospital data. All patients were screened until the target sample size was reached, based on these criteria: stable residence with privacy for sessions, no child welfare risk, primary diagnosis within International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes F0X to F6X, residence in the catchment area, no commitment order, no acute suicidality or severe aggression requiring hospitalization, capacity to consent, not participating in other interventional studies, sufficient German language skills, no substantial cognitive deficits or intellectual impairment, and no more than 7 days in IHT or IT before recruitment. Statistical analysis was performed from February to November 2023. IHT provided daily acute psychiatric treatment at home, while IT was psychiatric inpatient treatment as usual. The mean treatment duration of the index treatment was 37.2 days for IHT and 28.2 days for IT. The inpatient readmission rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were combined readmission rate, total inpatient days, job integration, quality of life, psychosocial functioning, symptom severity, and recovery. Of 1396 individuals, 200 patients receiving IHT and 200 patients receiving IT were included (264 female [65%]; mean [SD] age, 45.45 [15.83] years [range, 18-88 years]). Baseline sociodemographic and psychometric characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. At 12-month follow-up, patients in the IHT group had lower inpatient readmission rate (IHT vs IT: 31.12% vs 49.74% IT; mean difference, 18% [95% CI, 9%-28%; P &lt; .001), combined readmission rate (mean difference, 13% [95% CI, 4%-24%; P &lt; .001), and fewer inpatient days (mean difference, 6.82 days; P &lt; .001) than the IT group. This nonrandomized clinical trial found that patients receiving IHT had a lower likelihood of utilizing hospital-based psychiatric services and spent fewer inpatient days, suggesting that IHT is a viable alternative to IT. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04745507.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>Home Care Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Hospitals, Psychiatric - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mental Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Mental institutions</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Psychiatry</subject><issn>2574-3805</issn><issn>2574-3805</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9P3DAQxa2qVUFbvkJltZdedjuxncThUqEVFCREK3U5W44zAW8de2t7F8Gnryl_RDl5JL9582Z-hHyqYFEBVF_XetIe802Iv8MG_YIBEwtRg2BvyD6rWzHnEuq3L-o9cpDSGgAYVLxr6vdkj3e1aHgl9km4zNbZO51t8DSM9Ge6NddW52gNPQ1pY7N29BfGnTWY6ElwLtxYf0XPfEaf7A6LakK6iqjzhD4f0iN6EXzUfgiTvcOBLp311hSXVbTafSDvRu0SHjy-M3J5crxans7Pf3w_Wx6dzzXr6jyv-wZaaSSWvP0wtmYYB8YFSNEDjsANcCb1IBlv66aFFseG48g73reD7FDyGfn24LvZ9hMOpkSL2qlNtJOOtypoq_7_8fZaXYWdqqq6kaKpisOXR4cY_mwxZTXZZNC5cv6wTYpXTHZtB2XojHx-JV2HbfRlv6ISnEsOAorq8EFlYkgp4vicpgJ1z1a9Yqvu2ap_bEvzx5f7PLc-keR_AVoepzs</recordid><startdate>20241104</startdate><enddate>20241104</enddate><creator>Bechdolf, Andreas</creator><creator>Nikolaidis, Konstantinos</creator><creator>von Peter, Sebastian</creator><creator>Längle, Gerhard</creator><creator>Brieger, Peter</creator><creator>Timm, Jürgen</creator><creator>Killian, Reinhold</creator><creator>Fischer, Lasse</creator><creator>Raschmann, Svenja</creator><creator>Schwarz, Julian</creator><creator>Holzke, Martin</creator><creator>Rout, Sandeep</creator><creator>Hirschmeier, Constance</creator><creator>Hamann, Johannes</creator><creator>Herwig, Uwe</creator><creator>Richter, Janina</creator><creator>Baumgardt, Johanna</creator><creator>Weinmann, Stefan</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20241104</creationdate><title>Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial</title><author>Bechdolf, Andreas ; Nikolaidis, Konstantinos ; von Peter, Sebastian ; Längle, Gerhard ; Brieger, Peter ; Timm, Jürgen ; Killian, Reinhold ; Fischer, Lasse ; Raschmann, Svenja ; Schwarz, Julian ; Holzke, Martin ; Rout, Sandeep ; Hirschmeier, Constance ; Hamann, Johannes ; Herwig, Uwe ; Richter, Janina ; Baumgardt, Johanna ; Weinmann, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a295t-5b6078c8e965bdf7cdfd234084b0ef03c0328ad823756707ef63ef393b7d89e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>Home Care Services - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Hospitals, Psychiatric - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mental Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Mental institutions</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Patient Readmission - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Psychiatry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bechdolf, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nikolaidis, Konstantinos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Peter, Sebastian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Längle, Gerhard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brieger, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Timm, Jürgen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Killian, Reinhold</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Lasse</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raschmann, Svenja</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwarz, Julian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Holzke, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rout, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirschmeier, Constance</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hamann, Johannes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herwig, Uwe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richter, Janina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baumgardt, Johanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinmann, Stefan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bechdolf, Andreas</au><au>Nikolaidis, Konstantinos</au><au>von Peter, Sebastian</au><au>Längle, Gerhard</au><au>Brieger, Peter</au><au>Timm, Jürgen</au><au>Killian, Reinhold</au><au>Fischer, Lasse</au><au>Raschmann, Svenja</au><au>Schwarz, Julian</au><au>Holzke, Martin</au><au>Rout, Sandeep</au><au>Hirschmeier, Constance</au><au>Hamann, Johannes</au><au>Herwig, Uwe</au><au>Richter, Janina</au><au>Baumgardt, Johanna</au><au>Weinmann, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial</atitle><jtitle>JAMA network open</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Netw Open</addtitle><date>2024-11-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e2445042</spage><pages>e2445042-</pages><issn>2574-3805</issn><eissn>2574-3805</eissn><abstract>Home treatment (HT) has been associated with fewer inpatient treatment (IT) readmission days but lacks evidence on reducing combined psychiatric hospital service use (IT, HT, day clinic). To assess the association of intensive home treatment (IHT) compared with IT regarding readmission rate, social outcomes, and clinical outcomes. This quasi-experimental, nonrandomized trial was conducted from 2020 to 2022 in 10 psychiatric hospitals in Germany. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to compare both treatment models at the 12-month follow-up using standardized instruments and routine hospital data. All patients were screened until the target sample size was reached, based on these criteria: stable residence with privacy for sessions, no child welfare risk, primary diagnosis within International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision codes F0X to F6X, residence in the catchment area, no commitment order, no acute suicidality or severe aggression requiring hospitalization, capacity to consent, not participating in other interventional studies, sufficient German language skills, no substantial cognitive deficits or intellectual impairment, and no more than 7 days in IHT or IT before recruitment. Statistical analysis was performed from February to November 2023. IHT provided daily acute psychiatric treatment at home, while IT was psychiatric inpatient treatment as usual. The mean treatment duration of the index treatment was 37.2 days for IHT and 28.2 days for IT. The inpatient readmission rate was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were combined readmission rate, total inpatient days, job integration, quality of life, psychosocial functioning, symptom severity, and recovery. Of 1396 individuals, 200 patients receiving IHT and 200 patients receiving IT were included (264 female [65%]; mean [SD] age, 45.45 [15.83] years [range, 18-88 years]). Baseline sociodemographic and psychometric characteristics did not differ significantly between the groups. At 12-month follow-up, patients in the IHT group had lower inpatient readmission rate (IHT vs IT: 31.12% vs 49.74% IT; mean difference, 18% [95% CI, 9%-28%; P &lt; .001), combined readmission rate (mean difference, 13% [95% CI, 4%-24%; P &lt; .001), and fewer inpatient days (mean difference, 6.82 days; P &lt; .001) than the IT group. This nonrandomized clinical trial found that patients receiving IHT had a lower likelihood of utilizing hospital-based psychiatric services and spent fewer inpatient days, suggesting that IHT is a viable alternative to IT. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04745507.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>39546314</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45042</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2574-3805
ispartof JAMA network open, 2024-11, Vol.7 (11), p.e2445042
issn 2574-3805
2574-3805
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11568461
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Clinical trials
Female
Germany
Home Care Services - statistics & numerical data
Hospitals, Psychiatric - statistics & numerical data
Humans
Male
Mental Disorders - therapy
Mental institutions
Middle Aged
Online Only
Original Investigation
Patient Readmission - statistics & numerical data
Psychiatry
title Utilization of Psychiatric Hospital Services Following Intensive Home Treatment: A Nonrandomized Clinical Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A58%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilization%20of%20Psychiatric%20Hospital%20Services%20Following%20Intensive%20Home%20Treatment:%20A%20Nonrandomized%20Clinical%20Trial&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20network%20open&rft.au=Bechdolf,%20Andreas&rft.date=2024-11-04&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e2445042&rft.pages=e2445042-&rft.issn=2574-3805&rft.eissn=2574-3805&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.45042&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3128979039%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3143383040&rft_id=info:pmid/39546314&rfr_iscdi=true