Are There Non-Invasive Biomarker(s) That Would Facilitate the Detection of Ovarian Torsion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ovarian torsion (OT) is a rare gynaecological emergency that requires a prompt diagnosis for optimal patient management. To determine whether there were any biomarkers suitable for the non-invasive detection of OT, two independent reviewers performed systematic searches of five literature databases...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of molecular sciences 2024-11, Vol.25 (21), p.11664 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 11664 |
container_title | International journal of molecular sciences |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Naylor, Meg Doherty, Grace Draper, Hannah Fletcher, Daniel M Rigby, Alan Adedipe, Tolu Guinn, Barbara-Ann |
description | Ovarian torsion (OT) is a rare gynaecological emergency that requires a prompt diagnosis for optimal patient management. To determine whether there were any biomarkers suitable for the non-invasive detection of OT, two independent reviewers performed systematic searches of five literature databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, and CINAHL) from inception until October 1st, 2023. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the search included patients with OT that had quantified biomarker expression with no age, geographical location, publication date, language, or setting restrictions. Articles were excluded if OT was found incidentally, was based on qualitative analyses, or were not primary research articles. Full texts of 23 selected articles were assessed for risk of bias and quality assurance using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for clinical studies and SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for the assessment of pre-clinical (animal) studies. A total of 11 articles described studies on animals and all described serum biomarkers comparing results between OT versus a sham operation, a control group, or readings before and after OT. Ischaemia-modified albumhumin (IMA), serum D-dimer (s-DD), heat shock protein-70 (hsp-70), Pentraxin-3 (PTX3), and c-reactive protein (CRP) each showed the most promise, with
-values for the difference between OT and control groups achieving ≤ 0.001. In studies of humans, the biomarkers ranged from 16.4 to 92.3% sensitivity and 77-100% specificity. The most promising biomarkers for the early prediction of OT in patients included s-DD, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IMA, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Signal peptide, CUB domain, and EGF-like domain-containing 1 (SCUBE1) had a high specificity at 93.3%, second only to s-DD and a positive likelihood ratio (LR) > 10. IMA was the only other biomarker that also had a positive LR > 10, making it a promising diagnostic biomarker. The studies identified by this systematic literature review each analysed small patient groups but IMA, DD, and SCUBE1 nevertheless showed promise as serum biomarkers with a pooled LR > 10. However, further well-designed studies are needed to identify and evaluate individual markers or diagnostic panels to help clinicians manage this important organ-threatening condition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/ijms252111664 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11546837</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A815345553</galeid><sourcerecordid>A815345553</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-7399829fc72e1c16ebb1ffd90ea1008ca323722f1b237a3c179179bf2cb70aed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5IoscSmHFH_ky6cqFAqVCpVgEUdr4ky6XhK7tb1Be-w_r0tL6SJky2PNPPNarzVZ9pLRAyEkfWtWU-AlZ4xVVfEo22UF5zmlVf34wX0nexbCilIueCmfZjtClkxyVu9mV61HslhiOr84m5_YGYKZkbwzbgL_E_1-eJPqEMkPtx57cgzajCZCRBKXSN5jRB2Ns8QN5GwGb8CShfMhpQ5JS75tQsQJotHkK84GfxGwPfmMEfLWwrgJJjzPngwwBnxxF_ey78cfFkef8tOzjydH7WmuRSVjXgspGy4HXXNkmlXYdWwYekkRGKWNBsFFzfnAuhRBaFbLtLuB666mgL3Yyw5vdS_W3YS9Rhs9jOrCm2R0oxwYtV2xZqnO3awYK4uqEXVS2L9T8O5yjSGqyQSN4wgW3ToowXhTF0LwJqGv_0FXbu2T499URYtKcPmXOocRlbGDSw_rG1HVNqwURVmWIlEH_6HS6nEy2lkcTMpvNeS3Ddq7EDwO9yYZVTdDo7aGJvGvHv7MPf1nSsQ11_-8hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3126046329</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Are There Non-Invasive Biomarker(s) That Would Facilitate the Detection of Ovarian Torsion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Naylor, Meg ; Doherty, Grace ; Draper, Hannah ; Fletcher, Daniel M ; Rigby, Alan ; Adedipe, Tolu ; Guinn, Barbara-Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Naylor, Meg ; Doherty, Grace ; Draper, Hannah ; Fletcher, Daniel M ; Rigby, Alan ; Adedipe, Tolu ; Guinn, Barbara-Ann</creatorcontrib><description>Ovarian torsion (OT) is a rare gynaecological emergency that requires a prompt diagnosis for optimal patient management. To determine whether there were any biomarkers suitable for the non-invasive detection of OT, two independent reviewers performed systematic searches of five literature databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, and CINAHL) from inception until October 1st, 2023. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the search included patients with OT that had quantified biomarker expression with no age, geographical location, publication date, language, or setting restrictions. Articles were excluded if OT was found incidentally, was based on qualitative analyses, or were not primary research articles. Full texts of 23 selected articles were assessed for risk of bias and quality assurance using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for clinical studies and SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for the assessment of pre-clinical (animal) studies. A total of 11 articles described studies on animals and all described serum biomarkers comparing results between OT versus a sham operation, a control group, or readings before and after OT. Ischaemia-modified albumhumin (IMA), serum D-dimer (s-DD), heat shock protein-70 (hsp-70), Pentraxin-3 (PTX3), and c-reactive protein (CRP) each showed the most promise, with
-values for the difference between OT and control groups achieving ≤ 0.001. In studies of humans, the biomarkers ranged from 16.4 to 92.3% sensitivity and 77-100% specificity. The most promising biomarkers for the early prediction of OT in patients included s-DD, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IMA, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Signal peptide, CUB domain, and EGF-like domain-containing 1 (SCUBE1) had a high specificity at 93.3%, second only to s-DD and a positive likelihood ratio (LR) > 10. IMA was the only other biomarker that also had a positive LR > 10, making it a promising diagnostic biomarker. The studies identified by this systematic literature review each analysed small patient groups but IMA, DD, and SCUBE1 nevertheless showed promise as serum biomarkers with a pooled LR > 10. However, further well-designed studies are needed to identify and evaluate individual markers or diagnostic panels to help clinicians manage this important organ-threatening condition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1422-0067</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1661-6596</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1422-0067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijms252111664</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39519217</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Animals ; Biological markers ; Biomarkers ; Biomarkers - blood ; Care and treatment ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Fertility ; Gynecology ; Heat shock proteins ; Humans ; Intervention ; Laparoscopy ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Oophorectomy ; Ovarian diseases ; Ovarian Torsion - blood ; Ovarian Torsion - diagnosis ; Ovaries ; Quality control ; Review ; Risk factors ; Sample variance ; Systematic review ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>International journal of molecular sciences, 2024-11, Vol.25 (21), p.11664</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-7399829fc72e1c16ebb1ffd90ea1008ca323722f1b237a3c179179bf2cb70aed3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-8365-8215 ; 0000-0003-3779-8864 ; 0000-0002-6847-841X ; 0000-0003-0639-4541</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546837/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11546837/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39519217$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naylor, Meg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draper, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adedipe, Tolu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guinn, Barbara-Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Are There Non-Invasive Biomarker(s) That Would Facilitate the Detection of Ovarian Torsion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><title>International journal of molecular sciences</title><addtitle>Int J Mol Sci</addtitle><description>Ovarian torsion (OT) is a rare gynaecological emergency that requires a prompt diagnosis for optimal patient management. To determine whether there were any biomarkers suitable for the non-invasive detection of OT, two independent reviewers performed systematic searches of five literature databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, and CINAHL) from inception until October 1st, 2023. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the search included patients with OT that had quantified biomarker expression with no age, geographical location, publication date, language, or setting restrictions. Articles were excluded if OT was found incidentally, was based on qualitative analyses, or were not primary research articles. Full texts of 23 selected articles were assessed for risk of bias and quality assurance using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for clinical studies and SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for the assessment of pre-clinical (animal) studies. A total of 11 articles described studies on animals and all described serum biomarkers comparing results between OT versus a sham operation, a control group, or readings before and after OT. Ischaemia-modified albumhumin (IMA), serum D-dimer (s-DD), heat shock protein-70 (hsp-70), Pentraxin-3 (PTX3), and c-reactive protein (CRP) each showed the most promise, with
-values for the difference between OT and control groups achieving ≤ 0.001. In studies of humans, the biomarkers ranged from 16.4 to 92.3% sensitivity and 77-100% specificity. The most promising biomarkers for the early prediction of OT in patients included s-DD, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IMA, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Signal peptide, CUB domain, and EGF-like domain-containing 1 (SCUBE1) had a high specificity at 93.3%, second only to s-DD and a positive likelihood ratio (LR) > 10. IMA was the only other biomarker that also had a positive LR > 10, making it a promising diagnostic biomarker. The studies identified by this systematic literature review each analysed small patient groups but IMA, DD, and SCUBE1 nevertheless showed promise as serum biomarkers with a pooled LR > 10. However, further well-designed studies are needed to identify and evaluate individual markers or diagnostic panels to help clinicians manage this important organ-threatening condition.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biological markers</subject><subject>Biomarkers</subject><subject>Biomarkers - blood</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gynecology</subject><subject>Heat shock proteins</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Oophorectomy</subject><subject>Ovarian diseases</subject><subject>Ovarian Torsion - blood</subject><subject>Ovarian Torsion - diagnosis</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Sample variance</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1422-0067</issn><issn>1661-6596</issn><issn>1422-0067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk1v1DAQhiMEoqVw5IoscSmHFH_ky6cqFAqVCpVgEUdr4ky6XhK7tb1Be-w_r0tL6SJky2PNPPNarzVZ9pLRAyEkfWtWU-AlZ4xVVfEo22UF5zmlVf34wX0nexbCilIueCmfZjtClkxyVu9mV61HslhiOr84m5_YGYKZkbwzbgL_E_1-eJPqEMkPtx57cgzajCZCRBKXSN5jRB2Ns8QN5GwGb8CShfMhpQ5JS75tQsQJotHkK84GfxGwPfmMEfLWwrgJJjzPngwwBnxxF_ey78cfFkef8tOzjydH7WmuRSVjXgspGy4HXXNkmlXYdWwYekkRGKWNBsFFzfnAuhRBaFbLtLuB666mgL3Yyw5vdS_W3YS9Rhs9jOrCm2R0oxwYtV2xZqnO3awYK4uqEXVS2L9T8O5yjSGqyQSN4wgW3ToowXhTF0LwJqGv_0FXbu2T499URYtKcPmXOocRlbGDSw_rG1HVNqwURVmWIlEH_6HS6nEy2lkcTMpvNeS3Ddq7EDwO9yYZVTdDo7aGJvGvHv7MPf1nSsQ11_-8hw</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Naylor, Meg</creator><creator>Doherty, Grace</creator><creator>Draper, Hannah</creator><creator>Fletcher, Daniel M</creator><creator>Rigby, Alan</creator><creator>Adedipe, Tolu</creator><creator>Guinn, Barbara-Ann</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8365-8215</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3779-8864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6847-841X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-4541</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Are There Non-Invasive Biomarker(s) That Would Facilitate the Detection of Ovarian Torsion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</title><author>Naylor, Meg ; Doherty, Grace ; Draper, Hannah ; Fletcher, Daniel M ; Rigby, Alan ; Adedipe, Tolu ; Guinn, Barbara-Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-7399829fc72e1c16ebb1ffd90ea1008ca323722f1b237a3c179179bf2cb70aed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biological markers</topic><topic>Biomarkers</topic><topic>Biomarkers - blood</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gynecology</topic><topic>Heat shock proteins</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Oophorectomy</topic><topic>Ovarian diseases</topic><topic>Ovarian Torsion - blood</topic><topic>Ovarian Torsion - diagnosis</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Sample variance</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naylor, Meg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, Grace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draper, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Daniel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rigby, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adedipe, Tolu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guinn, Barbara-Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of molecular sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naylor, Meg</au><au>Doherty, Grace</au><au>Draper, Hannah</au><au>Fletcher, Daniel M</au><au>Rigby, Alan</au><au>Adedipe, Tolu</au><au>Guinn, Barbara-Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Are There Non-Invasive Biomarker(s) That Would Facilitate the Detection of Ovarian Torsion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of molecular sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Mol Sci</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>11664</spage><pages>11664-</pages><issn>1422-0067</issn><issn>1661-6596</issn><eissn>1422-0067</eissn><abstract>Ovarian torsion (OT) is a rare gynaecological emergency that requires a prompt diagnosis for optimal patient management. To determine whether there were any biomarkers suitable for the non-invasive detection of OT, two independent reviewers performed systematic searches of five literature databases (PubMed, Medline, Scopus, Cochrane, and CINAHL) from inception until October 1st, 2023. Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the search included patients with OT that had quantified biomarker expression with no age, geographical location, publication date, language, or setting restrictions. Articles were excluded if OT was found incidentally, was based on qualitative analyses, or were not primary research articles. Full texts of 23 selected articles were assessed for risk of bias and quality assurance using a modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for clinical studies and SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for the assessment of pre-clinical (animal) studies. A total of 11 articles described studies on animals and all described serum biomarkers comparing results between OT versus a sham operation, a control group, or readings before and after OT. Ischaemia-modified albumhumin (IMA), serum D-dimer (s-DD), heat shock protein-70 (hsp-70), Pentraxin-3 (PTX3), and c-reactive protein (CRP) each showed the most promise, with
-values for the difference between OT and control groups achieving ≤ 0.001. In studies of humans, the biomarkers ranged from 16.4 to 92.3% sensitivity and 77-100% specificity. The most promising biomarkers for the early prediction of OT in patients included s-DD, interleukin-6 (IL-6), IMA, and tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Signal peptide, CUB domain, and EGF-like domain-containing 1 (SCUBE1) had a high specificity at 93.3%, second only to s-DD and a positive likelihood ratio (LR) > 10. IMA was the only other biomarker that also had a positive LR > 10, making it a promising diagnostic biomarker. The studies identified by this systematic literature review each analysed small patient groups but IMA, DD, and SCUBE1 nevertheless showed promise as serum biomarkers with a pooled LR > 10. However, further well-designed studies are needed to identify and evaluate individual markers or diagnostic panels to help clinicians manage this important organ-threatening condition.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39519217</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijms252111664</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8365-8215</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3779-8864</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6847-841X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0639-4541</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1422-0067 |
ispartof | International journal of molecular sciences, 2024-11, Vol.25 (21), p.11664 |
issn | 1422-0067 1661-6596 1422-0067 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11546837 |
source | MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
subjects | Analysis Animals Biological markers Biomarkers Biomarkers - blood Care and treatment Diagnosis Female Fertility Gynecology Heat shock proteins Humans Intervention Laparoscopy Meta-analysis Mortality Oophorectomy Ovarian diseases Ovarian Torsion - blood Ovarian Torsion - diagnosis Ovaries Quality control Review Risk factors Sample variance Systematic review Womens health |
title | Are There Non-Invasive Biomarker(s) That Would Facilitate the Detection of Ovarian Torsion? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T13%3A55%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Are%20There%20Non-Invasive%20Biomarker(s)%20That%20Would%20Facilitate%20the%20Detection%20of%20Ovarian%20Torsion?%20A%20Systematic%20Review%20and%20Meta-Analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20molecular%20sciences&rft.au=Naylor,%20Meg&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=11664&rft.pages=11664-&rft.issn=1422-0067&rft.eissn=1422-0067&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijms252111664&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA815345553%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3126046329&rft_id=info:pmid/39519217&rft_galeid=A815345553&rfr_iscdi=true |