To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study
Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was condu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Updates in surgery 2024-10, Vol.76 (6), p.2395-2402 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2402 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 2395 |
container_title | Updates in surgery |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Brucchi, F. Ferraina, F. Masci, E. Ferrara, D. Cassini, D. Faillace, G. |
description | Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41–84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant (
p
= 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh (
p
= 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11541364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3053980873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-bfed4b92c1124605453460f323990926599a69c6af31f44b6f1f636fd63f8d923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQtRCIVkv_AAfkIwcCdibJxlyqqiofUhE9LBI3y3HsrEs2DmOn0v43fhx2d1nBBUv2zPi9ef54hLzk7C1nbP0ucABWFaxMk7drVuyfkPOSQVsA8PLpMefAv5-RixDuWRog8vqcnEG7Bqja-pz82niqRx_MGzr5SOOp8pgLpSPt3DAYvKRf1KQGNw00bg3tjTUJ85aOCodUO8x1ghc3qZFuDU5OZQk0_aLNYxO68CO3JOqCaKa03S-YJUc1K_RB-9lpurm6u0ucWTl8T1XKYoLmJO8eDNV-6zHSEJd-_4I8s2oM5uIYV-Tbh5vN9afi9uvHz9dXt4UG0cais6avOlFqzsuqYXVVQwoWShCCibKphVCN0I2ywG1VdY3ltoHG9g3YthclrMjlQXdeup3ptZkiqlHO6HYK99IrJ_9FJreVg3-QnNcVh6ZKCq-PCuh_LiZEuXNBm3FUk_FLkMDqdFWWbVmR8kDV6dUBjT2dw5nM1suD9TJZLx-tl_vU9OrvG55a_hidCHAghDl_uEF57xdMToX_yf4GZJy9Yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053980873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Brucchi, F. ; Ferraina, F. ; Masci, E. ; Ferrara, D. ; Cassini, D. ; Faillace, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brucchi, F. ; Ferraina, F. ; Masci, E. ; Ferrara, D. ; Cassini, D. ; Faillace, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41–84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant (
p
= 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh (
p
= 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2038-131X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38733485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery ; Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Original Article ; Propensity Score ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Surgery ; Surgical Mesh ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Updates in surgery, 2024-10, Vol.76 (6), p.2395-2402</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-bfed4b92c1124605453460f323990926599a69c6af31f44b6f1f636fd63f8d923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3191-4369 ; 0000-0003-3697-0001</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38733485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brucchi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraina, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masci, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faillace, G.</creatorcontrib><title>To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study</title><title>Updates in surgery</title><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><description>Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41–84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant (
p
= 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh (
p
= 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQtRCIVkv_AAfkIwcCdibJxlyqqiofUhE9LBI3y3HsrEs2DmOn0v43fhx2d1nBBUv2zPi9ef54hLzk7C1nbP0ucABWFaxMk7drVuyfkPOSQVsA8PLpMefAv5-RixDuWRog8vqcnEG7Bqja-pz82niqRx_MGzr5SOOp8pgLpSPt3DAYvKRf1KQGNw00bg3tjTUJ85aOCodUO8x1ghc3qZFuDU5OZQk0_aLNYxO68CO3JOqCaKa03S-YJUc1K_RB-9lpurm6u0ucWTl8T1XKYoLmJO8eDNV-6zHSEJd-_4I8s2oM5uIYV-Tbh5vN9afi9uvHz9dXt4UG0cais6avOlFqzsuqYXVVQwoWShCCibKphVCN0I2ywG1VdY3ltoHG9g3YthclrMjlQXdeup3ptZkiqlHO6HYK99IrJ_9FJreVg3-QnNcVh6ZKCq-PCuh_LiZEuXNBm3FUk_FLkMDqdFWWbVmR8kDV6dUBjT2dw5nM1suD9TJZLx-tl_vU9OrvG55a_hidCHAghDl_uEF57xdMToX_yf4GZJy9Yg</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Brucchi, F.</creator><creator>Ferraina, F.</creator><creator>Masci, E.</creator><creator>Ferrara, D.</creator><creator>Cassini, D.</creator><creator>Faillace, G.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-4369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-0001</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study</title><author>Brucchi, F. ; Ferraina, F. ; Masci, E. ; Ferrara, D. ; Cassini, D. ; Faillace, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-bfed4b92c1124605453460f323990926599a69c6af31f44b6f1f636fd63f8d923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brucchi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraina, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masci, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faillace, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Updates in surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brucchi, F.</au><au>Ferraina, F.</au><au>Masci, E.</au><au>Ferrara, D.</au><au>Cassini, D.</au><au>Faillace, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Updates in surgery</jtitle><stitle>Updates Surg</stitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2395</spage><epage>2402</epage><pages>2395-2402</pages><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><eissn>2038-3312</eissn><abstract>Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41–84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant (
p
= 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh (
p
= 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>38733485</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-4369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-0001</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2038-131X |
ispartof | Updates in surgery, 2024-10, Vol.76 (6), p.2395-2402 |
issn | 2038-131X 2038-3312 2038-3312 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11541364 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Cohort Studies Female Follow-Up Studies Hernia, Inguinal - surgery Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects Herniorrhaphy - methods Humans Laparoscopy - adverse effects Laparoscopy - methods Male Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Original Original Article Propensity Score Recurrence Retrospective Studies Risk Surgery Surgical Mesh Treatment Outcome |
title | To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A09%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20close,%20not%20to%20close,%20or%20to%20act%20bigger?%20Managing%20the%20defect%20of%20large%20direct%20inguinal%20hernia%20to%20reduce%20the%20risk%20of%20recurrence%20during%20laparoscopic%20TAPP%20repair:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Updates%20in%20surgery&rft.au=Brucchi,%20F.&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2395&rft.epage=2402&rft.pages=2395-2402&rft.issn=2038-131X&rft.eissn=2038-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3053980873%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053980873&rft_id=info:pmid/38733485&rfr_iscdi=true |