To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study

Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was condu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Updates in surgery 2024-10, Vol.76 (6), p.2395-2402
Hauptverfasser: Brucchi, F., Ferraina, F., Masci, E., Ferrara, D., Cassini, D., Faillace, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2402
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2395
container_title Updates in surgery
container_volume 76
creator Brucchi, F.
Ferraina, F.
Masci, E.
Ferrara, D.
Cassini, D.
Faillace, G.
description Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41–84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant ( p  = 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh ( p  = 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11541364</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3053980873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-bfed4b92c1124605453460f323990926599a69c6af31f44b6f1f636fd63f8d923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQtRCIVkv_AAfkIwcCdibJxlyqqiofUhE9LBI3y3HsrEs2DmOn0v43fhx2d1nBBUv2zPi9ef54hLzk7C1nbP0ucABWFaxMk7drVuyfkPOSQVsA8PLpMefAv5-RixDuWRog8vqcnEG7Bqja-pz82niqRx_MGzr5SOOp8pgLpSPt3DAYvKRf1KQGNw00bg3tjTUJ85aOCodUO8x1ghc3qZFuDU5OZQk0_aLNYxO68CO3JOqCaKa03S-YJUc1K_RB-9lpurm6u0ucWTl8T1XKYoLmJO8eDNV-6zHSEJd-_4I8s2oM5uIYV-Tbh5vN9afi9uvHz9dXt4UG0cais6avOlFqzsuqYXVVQwoWShCCibKphVCN0I2ywG1VdY3ltoHG9g3YthclrMjlQXdeup3ptZkiqlHO6HYK99IrJ_9FJreVg3-QnNcVh6ZKCq-PCuh_LiZEuXNBm3FUk_FLkMDqdFWWbVmR8kDV6dUBjT2dw5nM1suD9TJZLx-tl_vU9OrvG55a_hidCHAghDl_uEF57xdMToX_yf4GZJy9Yg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053980873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Brucchi, F. ; Ferraina, F. ; Masci, E. ; Ferrara, D. ; Cassini, D. ; Faillace, G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brucchi, F. ; Ferraina, F. ; Masci, E. ; Ferrara, D. ; Cassini, D. ; Faillace, G.</creatorcontrib><description>Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41–84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant ( p  = 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh ( p  = 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2038-131X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-3312</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38733485</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Cohort Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery ; Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Humans ; Laparoscopy - adverse effects ; Laparoscopy - methods ; Male ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Original Article ; Propensity Score ; Recurrence ; Retrospective Studies ; Risk ; Surgery ; Surgical Mesh ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Updates in surgery, 2024-10, Vol.76 (6), p.2395-2402</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-bfed4b92c1124605453460f323990926599a69c6af31f44b6f1f636fd63f8d923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3191-4369 ; 0000-0003-3697-0001</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38733485$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brucchi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraina, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masci, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faillace, G.</creatorcontrib><title>To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study</title><title>Updates in surgery</title><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><description>Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41–84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant ( p  = 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh ( p  = 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Cohort Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Recurrence</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1v1DAQtRCIVkv_AAfkIwcCdibJxlyqqiofUhE9LBI3y3HsrEs2DmOn0v43fhx2d1nBBUv2zPi9ef54hLzk7C1nbP0ucABWFaxMk7drVuyfkPOSQVsA8PLpMefAv5-RixDuWRog8vqcnEG7Bqja-pz82niqRx_MGzr5SOOp8pgLpSPt3DAYvKRf1KQGNw00bg3tjTUJ85aOCodUO8x1ghc3qZFuDU5OZQk0_aLNYxO68CO3JOqCaKa03S-YJUc1K_RB-9lpurm6u0ucWTl8T1XKYoLmJO8eDNV-6zHSEJd-_4I8s2oM5uIYV-Tbh5vN9afi9uvHz9dXt4UG0cais6avOlFqzsuqYXVVQwoWShCCibKphVCN0I2ywG1VdY3ltoHG9g3YthclrMjlQXdeup3ptZkiqlHO6HYK99IrJ_9FJreVg3-QnNcVh6ZKCq-PCuh_LiZEuXNBm3FUk_FLkMDqdFWWbVmR8kDV6dUBjT2dw5nM1suD9TJZLx-tl_vU9OrvG55a_hidCHAghDl_uEF57xdMToX_yf4GZJy9Yg</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Brucchi, F.</creator><creator>Ferraina, F.</creator><creator>Masci, E.</creator><creator>Ferrara, D.</creator><creator>Cassini, D.</creator><creator>Faillace, G.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-4369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-0001</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study</title><author>Brucchi, F. ; Ferraina, F. ; Masci, E. ; Ferrara, D. ; Cassini, D. ; Faillace, G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-bfed4b92c1124605453460f323990926599a69c6af31f44b6f1f636fd63f8d923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Cohort Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Recurrence</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brucchi, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferraina, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masci, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrara, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cassini, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faillace, G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Updates in surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brucchi, F.</au><au>Ferraina, F.</au><au>Masci, E.</au><au>Ferrara, D.</au><au>Cassini, D.</au><au>Faillace, G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Updates in surgery</jtitle><stitle>Updates Surg</stitle><addtitle>Updates Surg</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2395</spage><epage>2402</epage><pages>2395-2402</pages><issn>2038-131X</issn><issn>2038-3312</issn><eissn>2038-3312</eissn><abstract>Hernia recurrence is a common complication after inguinal hernia repair. Recent studies suggest that laparoscopic mesh repair with closure of direct hernia defects can reduce recurrence rates. Our study examines the effectiveness of this approach. A retrospective, multi-center cohort study was conducted on cases performed from January 2013 to April 2021. Patients with direct inguinal hernias (M3 according to EHS classification) undergoing TAPP were included. Three groups were present: closed-defect group, non-closed placing a standard-sized mesh group or non-closed placing an XL-sized mesh group. A 2-year follow-up was recorded. A total of 158 direct M3 inguinal hernias in 110 patients who underwent surgery were present. After propensity score matching at a 1:1 ratio, 22 patients for each group were analyzed. The mean age of patients was 62 years (41–84); with the majority being male (84.8%). 22 patients (40 hernias) underwent closure of the defect; 22 patients (39 hernias) did not undergo closure and used a standard-sized mesh; 22 patients (27 hernias) did not undergo closure and used an XL-sized mesh. There were 5 recurrences at 1 year post-operatively: all in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh. This difference was statistically significant ( p  = 0.044). There were 7 recurrences (6.6%) at 2 years post-operatively: 6 in the non-closure group with standard-sized mesh and 1 in the non-closure group with XL-sized mesh ( p  = 0.007). Closing large direct inguinal hernia defects has shown promise in reducing early recurrence rates. However, conducting larger RCTs in the future could provide more conclusive evidence that might impact the way we approach laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><pmid>38733485</pmid><doi>10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3191-4369</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3697-0001</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2038-131X
ispartof Updates in surgery, 2024-10, Vol.76 (6), p.2395-2402
issn 2038-131X
2038-3312
2038-3312
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11541364
source MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Cohort Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hernia, Inguinal - surgery
Herniorrhaphy - adverse effects
Herniorrhaphy - methods
Humans
Laparoscopy - adverse effects
Laparoscopy - methods
Male
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Original
Original Article
Propensity Score
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Risk
Surgery
Surgical Mesh
Treatment Outcome
title To close, not to close, or to act bigger? Managing the defect of large direct inguinal hernia to reduce the risk of recurrence during laparoscopic TAPP repair: a retrospective cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T21%3A09%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=To%20close,%20not%20to%20close,%20or%20to%20act%20bigger?%20Managing%20the%20defect%20of%20large%20direct%20inguinal%20hernia%20to%20reduce%20the%20risk%20of%20recurrence%20during%20laparoscopic%20TAPP%20repair:%20a%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Updates%20in%20surgery&rft.au=Brucchi,%20F.&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2395&rft.epage=2402&rft.pages=2395-2402&rft.issn=2038-131X&rft.eissn=2038-3312&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13304-024-01870-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3053980873%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053980873&rft_id=info:pmid/38733485&rfr_iscdi=true