AAPM BTSC Report 377.B: Physicist brachytherapy training in 2022 – A survey of therapeutic medical physics residents

Background A survey of medical physics residency program directors was conducted in Spring 2021 to examine the current state of brachytherapy (BT) training during residency. In this related work, a subsequent survey of therapeutic medical physics residents in 2022 was conducted to assess the confide...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied clinical medical physics 2024-11, Vol.25 (11), p.e14501-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Simiele, Samantha J., Aima, Manik, Melhus, Christopher S., Richardson, Susan L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 11
container_start_page e14501
container_title Journal of applied clinical medical physics
container_volume 25
creator Simiele, Samantha J.
Aima, Manik
Melhus, Christopher S.
Richardson, Susan L.
description Background A survey of medical physics residency program directors was conducted in Spring 2021 to examine the current state of brachytherapy (BT) training during residency. In this related work, a subsequent survey of therapeutic medical physics residents in 2022 was conducted to assess the confidence and experience of the trainees. Concerns for access to high‐quality and diverse training in BT have escalated in importance due to recent declines in BT utilization. Methods A survey consisting of 26 questions was designed by a working unit of the Brachytherapy Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and approved for distribution by the Executive Committee of the AAPM. The survey was distributed to current trainees and recent graduates of the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs accredited therapeutic medical physics residency programs by the AAPM. The participant response was anonymously recorded in an online platform and subsequently analyzed using spreadsheet software. Results The survey was distributed to 796 current medical physics residents or recent graduates over the course of 6 weeks in February and March of 2022. The survey received 736 views and a total of 182 responses were collected, with 165 respondents completing the survey in full. Among those responses, 110 had completed their residency training, with program start dates ranging from calendar years 2015 to 2021. Individual responses from the survey takers (including partial survey submissions) were evaluated and analyzed to compile results. Conclusions Medical physics residents reported the highest levels of confidence and caseload for gynecological BT procedures when compared with other surveyed treatment techniques. This indicates opportunities to improve training and increase access to clinical caseload are needed in order to improve competency and confidence. Time constraints (clinical and rotation‐based) were indicated as impediments to BT proficiency. Medical physics residents reported enthusiasm for additional training opportunities in BT, and it is evident that additional structure and programs are required to ensure adequate access to BT training during residency.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/acm2.14501
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11539968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3124594219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3381-c8fcbb6cd74f4c3b7227d1c28b483767a3c965d8d36096504c91adf28b6cb0633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi0EoqWw4QGQJTYIaQZf24ljNigd8Se1ooKytpwbp-MqkwQ7GZQd78Ab8iS4TakKC1a-0j06_q4-Qp4CWwNj_JXFHV-DzBjcI4eQ8XylNcj7d-YD8ijGS8YAClE8JAdCCyUFU4dkX5Znp_T4_MuGfnZDH0YqlFofv6Zn2zl69HGkVbC4ncetC3aY6Ris73x3QX1HOeOc_vrxk5Y0TmHvZto3dAHdNHqkO1d7tC0drmWRBhd97boxPiYPGttG9-TmPSJf370933xYnXx6_3FTnqxQiAJWWDRYVTnWSjYSRaU4VzUgLypZCJUrK1DnWV3UImdpYBI12LpJ-xwrlgtxRN4s3mGqUhhMfwfbmiH4nQ2z6a03f286vzUX_d4AZELrvEiGFzeG0H-bXBzNzkd0bWs710_RCAAJGTCVJfT5P-hlP4Uu3ZcoLjMtOehEvVwoDH2MwTW3aYCZqz7NVZ_mus8EP7ub_xb9U2ACYAG--9bN_1GZcnPKF-lv8k6p_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3124594219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>AAPM BTSC Report 377.B: Physicist brachytherapy training in 2022 – A survey of therapeutic medical physics residents</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Simiele, Samantha J. ; Aima, Manik ; Melhus, Christopher S. ; Richardson, Susan L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Simiele, Samantha J. ; Aima, Manik ; Melhus, Christopher S. ; Richardson, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><description>Background A survey of medical physics residency program directors was conducted in Spring 2021 to examine the current state of brachytherapy (BT) training during residency. In this related work, a subsequent survey of therapeutic medical physics residents in 2022 was conducted to assess the confidence and experience of the trainees. Concerns for access to high‐quality and diverse training in BT have escalated in importance due to recent declines in BT utilization. Methods A survey consisting of 26 questions was designed by a working unit of the Brachytherapy Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and approved for distribution by the Executive Committee of the AAPM. The survey was distributed to current trainees and recent graduates of the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs accredited therapeutic medical physics residency programs by the AAPM. The participant response was anonymously recorded in an online platform and subsequently analyzed using spreadsheet software. Results The survey was distributed to 796 current medical physics residents or recent graduates over the course of 6 weeks in February and March of 2022. The survey received 736 views and a total of 182 responses were collected, with 165 respondents completing the survey in full. Among those responses, 110 had completed their residency training, with program start dates ranging from calendar years 2015 to 2021. Individual responses from the survey takers (including partial survey submissions) were evaluated and analyzed to compile results. Conclusions Medical physics residents reported the highest levels of confidence and caseload for gynecological BT procedures when compared with other surveyed treatment techniques. This indicates opportunities to improve training and increase access to clinical caseload are needed in order to improve competency and confidence. Time constraints (clinical and rotation‐based) were indicated as impediments to BT proficiency. Medical physics residents reported enthusiasm for additional training opportunities in BT, and it is evident that additional structure and programs are required to ensure adequate access to BT training during residency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14501</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39374307</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>AAPM Reports &amp; Documents ; brachytherapy ; Brachytherapy - methods ; Cancer therapies ; Cervical cancer ; Clinical Competence ; Didacticism ; education ; Health physics ; Health Physics - education ; Humans ; Internet resources ; Internship and Residency ; Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Oncology ; Physicists ; Physics ; Planning ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Prostate cancer ; Radiation therapy ; residency ; Response rates ; survey ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; training ; United States</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024-11, Vol.25 (11), p.e14501-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3381-c8fcbb6cd74f4c3b7227d1c28b483767a3c965d8d36096504c91adf28b6cb0633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539968/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11539968/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,1416,11561,27923,27924,45573,45574,46051,46475,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39374307$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Simiele, Samantha J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aima, Manik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melhus, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><title>AAPM BTSC Report 377.B: Physicist brachytherapy training in 2022 – A survey of therapeutic medical physics residents</title><title>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Background A survey of medical physics residency program directors was conducted in Spring 2021 to examine the current state of brachytherapy (BT) training during residency. In this related work, a subsequent survey of therapeutic medical physics residents in 2022 was conducted to assess the confidence and experience of the trainees. Concerns for access to high‐quality and diverse training in BT have escalated in importance due to recent declines in BT utilization. Methods A survey consisting of 26 questions was designed by a working unit of the Brachytherapy Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and approved for distribution by the Executive Committee of the AAPM. The survey was distributed to current trainees and recent graduates of the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs accredited therapeutic medical physics residency programs by the AAPM. The participant response was anonymously recorded in an online platform and subsequently analyzed using spreadsheet software. Results The survey was distributed to 796 current medical physics residents or recent graduates over the course of 6 weeks in February and March of 2022. The survey received 736 views and a total of 182 responses were collected, with 165 respondents completing the survey in full. Among those responses, 110 had completed their residency training, with program start dates ranging from calendar years 2015 to 2021. Individual responses from the survey takers (including partial survey submissions) were evaluated and analyzed to compile results. Conclusions Medical physics residents reported the highest levels of confidence and caseload for gynecological BT procedures when compared with other surveyed treatment techniques. This indicates opportunities to improve training and increase access to clinical caseload are needed in order to improve competency and confidence. Time constraints (clinical and rotation‐based) were indicated as impediments to BT proficiency. Medical physics residents reported enthusiasm for additional training opportunities in BT, and it is evident that additional structure and programs are required to ensure adequate access to BT training during residency.</description><subject>AAPM Reports &amp; Documents</subject><subject>brachytherapy</subject><subject>Brachytherapy - methods</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Cervical cancer</subject><subject>Clinical Competence</subject><subject>Didacticism</subject><subject>education</subject><subject>Health physics</subject><subject>Health Physics - education</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Internship and Residency</subject><subject>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Physicists</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Planning</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>residency</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>survey</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>training</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi0EoqWw4QGQJTYIaQZf24ljNigd8Se1ooKytpwbp-MqkwQ7GZQd78Ab8iS4TakKC1a-0j06_q4-Qp4CWwNj_JXFHV-DzBjcI4eQ8XylNcj7d-YD8ijGS8YAClE8JAdCCyUFU4dkX5Znp_T4_MuGfnZDH0YqlFofv6Zn2zl69HGkVbC4ncetC3aY6Ris73x3QX1HOeOc_vrxk5Y0TmHvZto3dAHdNHqkO1d7tC0drmWRBhd97boxPiYPGttG9-TmPSJf370933xYnXx6_3FTnqxQiAJWWDRYVTnWSjYSRaU4VzUgLypZCJUrK1DnWV3UImdpYBI12LpJ-xwrlgtxRN4s3mGqUhhMfwfbmiH4nQ2z6a03f286vzUX_d4AZELrvEiGFzeG0H-bXBzNzkd0bWs710_RCAAJGTCVJfT5P-hlP4Uu3ZcoLjMtOehEvVwoDH2MwTW3aYCZqz7NVZ_mus8EP7ub_xb9U2ACYAG--9bN_1GZcnPKF-lv8k6p_Q</recordid><startdate>202411</startdate><enddate>202411</enddate><creator>Simiele, Samantha J.</creator><creator>Aima, Manik</creator><creator>Melhus, Christopher S.</creator><creator>Richardson, Susan L.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202411</creationdate><title>AAPM BTSC Report 377.B: Physicist brachytherapy training in 2022 – A survey of therapeutic medical physics residents</title><author>Simiele, Samantha J. ; Aima, Manik ; Melhus, Christopher S. ; Richardson, Susan L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3381-c8fcbb6cd74f4c3b7227d1c28b483767a3c965d8d36096504c91adf28b6cb0633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>AAPM Reports &amp; Documents</topic><topic>brachytherapy</topic><topic>Brachytherapy - methods</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Cervical cancer</topic><topic>Clinical Competence</topic><topic>Didacticism</topic><topic>education</topic><topic>Health physics</topic><topic>Health Physics - education</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Internship and Residency</topic><topic>Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Physicists</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Planning</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>residency</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>survey</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>training</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Simiele, Samantha J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aima, Manik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melhus, Christopher S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richardson, Susan L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest_Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Simiele, Samantha J.</au><au>Aima, Manik</au><au>Melhus, Christopher S.</au><au>Richardson, Susan L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>AAPM BTSC Report 377.B: Physicist brachytherapy training in 2022 – A survey of therapeutic medical physics residents</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied clinical medical physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2024-11</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e14501</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14501-n/a</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Background A survey of medical physics residency program directors was conducted in Spring 2021 to examine the current state of brachytherapy (BT) training during residency. In this related work, a subsequent survey of therapeutic medical physics residents in 2022 was conducted to assess the confidence and experience of the trainees. Concerns for access to high‐quality and diverse training in BT have escalated in importance due to recent declines in BT utilization. Methods A survey consisting of 26 questions was designed by a working unit of the Brachytherapy Subcommittee of the American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM) and approved for distribution by the Executive Committee of the AAPM. The survey was distributed to current trainees and recent graduates of the Commission on Accreditation of Medical Physics Education Programs accredited therapeutic medical physics residency programs by the AAPM. The participant response was anonymously recorded in an online platform and subsequently analyzed using spreadsheet software. Results The survey was distributed to 796 current medical physics residents or recent graduates over the course of 6 weeks in February and March of 2022. The survey received 736 views and a total of 182 responses were collected, with 165 respondents completing the survey in full. Among those responses, 110 had completed their residency training, with program start dates ranging from calendar years 2015 to 2021. Individual responses from the survey takers (including partial survey submissions) were evaluated and analyzed to compile results. Conclusions Medical physics residents reported the highest levels of confidence and caseload for gynecological BT procedures when compared with other surveyed treatment techniques. This indicates opportunities to improve training and increase access to clinical caseload are needed in order to improve competency and confidence. Time constraints (clinical and rotation‐based) were indicated as impediments to BT proficiency. Medical physics residents reported enthusiasm for additional training opportunities in BT, and it is evident that additional structure and programs are required to ensure adequate access to BT training during residency.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39374307</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.14501</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-9914
ispartof Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2024-11, Vol.25 (11), p.e14501-n/a
issn 1526-9914
1526-9914
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11539968
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Open Access; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects AAPM Reports & Documents
brachytherapy
Brachytherapy - methods
Cancer therapies
Cervical cancer
Clinical Competence
Didacticism
education
Health physics
Health Physics - education
Humans
Internet resources
Internship and Residency
Neoplasms - radiotherapy
Oncology
Physicists
Physics
Planning
Polls & surveys
Prostate cancer
Radiation therapy
residency
Response rates
survey
Surveys and Questionnaires
training
United States
title AAPM BTSC Report 377.B: Physicist brachytherapy training in 2022 – A survey of therapeutic medical physics residents
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A44%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=AAPM%20BTSC%20Report%20377.B:%20Physicist%20brachytherapy%20training%20in%202022%20%E2%80%93%20A%20survey%20of%20therapeutic%20medical%20physics%20residents&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20clinical%20medical%20physics&rft.au=Simiele,%20Samantha%20J.&rft.date=2024-11&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e14501&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14501-n/a&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.14501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3124594219%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3124594219&rft_id=info:pmid/39374307&rfr_iscdi=true