Best analgesia control in pancreatic adenocarcinoma study: justification and feasibility of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care-a prospective observational study (The BAC-PAC study)
Limited and conflicting trial data is available on the efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN). This study aimed to assess the feasibility, justification and to inform design considerations of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care. This was a q...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJC reports 2023-09, Vol.1 (1), p.14, Article 14 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 14 |
container_title | BJC reports |
container_volume | 1 |
creator | Koulouris, Andreas I Wagner, Adam P Clark, Allan Alexandre, Leo |
description | Limited and conflicting trial data is available on the efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN). This study aimed to assess the feasibility, justification and to inform design considerations of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care.
This was a questionnaire-based prospective observational study of patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were self-reporting their performance status, pain levels, analgesic use, quality of life (QoL) and healthcare resource use, on a monthly basis.
Over a total period of twelve months 143 patients were screened for eligibility, of which 56 met the criteria. In total, 12 (21%) patients were recruited. The median survival from the first record of pain was 5.2 (IQR 2.46-5.9) months. In total, 80% of the questionnaires were completed. The median Visual Analogue Score for pain was 2.6 (0.8-5.1) and the median daily morphine dose was 36 (20-48) mg.
Recruitment rates remained low throughout this study. Despite these limitations, overall, this study supports the justification of trial administering endoscopic analgesia. However, uncertainties remain with regards to its feasibility. In a future trial, data collection procedures need to minimise burden to patients. Further observational research with a larger sample size, longer follow-up and refined procedures is required. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s44276-023-00013-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11523951</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3128742375</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199x-8257f1fa912ab98afe28de139642f7dccaacedf682a44936a19307ac169e0f563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUjBCIVqV_gAPysRxM_ZHEMRe0jcqHVEEl2rP11nluXWXjYCer3b_Ir8K721blZGs8b8aaN0XxnrNPnMnmPJWlUDVlQlLGGJd086o4FkpyqqVSr1_cj4rTlB4ySUqmVCXeFkdSV7xWjB8Xfy8wTQQG6O8weSA2DFMMPfEDGWGwEWHylkCHQ7AQrR_CCkia5m77mTzMafLO20wJQ9boiENIful7P21JcARIzGhY-YQdmaKHfocixH5LLm9_0_b6J1ljTHPKkpkJsSPZBSmQMYY0op38GklYJozrvUtW2JuTs5t7JBeLll4v2gP08V3xxkGf8PTxPCluv17etN_p1a9vP9rFFbVc6w1tRKUcd6C5gKVuwKFoOuRS16VwqrMWwGLn6kZAWWpZA9c5N7C81shcVcuT4stBd5yXK-ws5sSgN2P0K4hbE8Cb_18Gf2_uwtpwXold8lnh7FEhhj9zXoDJEVnsexgwzMlILhpVCqmqTBUHqs2BpIju2YczsyuCORTB5CKYfRHMJg99ePnD55Gntct_A0q0PQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3128742375</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Best analgesia control in pancreatic adenocarcinoma study: justification and feasibility of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care-a prospective observational study (The BAC-PAC study)</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Koulouris, Andreas I ; Wagner, Adam P ; Clark, Allan ; Alexandre, Leo</creator><creatorcontrib>Koulouris, Andreas I ; Wagner, Adam P ; Clark, Allan ; Alexandre, Leo</creatorcontrib><description>Limited and conflicting trial data is available on the efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN). This study aimed to assess the feasibility, justification and to inform design considerations of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care.
This was a questionnaire-based prospective observational study of patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were self-reporting their performance status, pain levels, analgesic use, quality of life (QoL) and healthcare resource use, on a monthly basis.
Over a total period of twelve months 143 patients were screened for eligibility, of which 56 met the criteria. In total, 12 (21%) patients were recruited. The median survival from the first record of pain was 5.2 (IQR 2.46-5.9) months. In total, 80% of the questionnaires were completed. The median Visual Analogue Score for pain was 2.6 (0.8-5.1) and the median daily morphine dose was 36 (20-48) mg.
Recruitment rates remained low throughout this study. Despite these limitations, overall, this study supports the justification of trial administering endoscopic analgesia. However, uncertainties remain with regards to its feasibility. In a future trial, data collection procedures need to minimise burden to patients. Further observational research with a larger sample size, longer follow-up and refined procedures is required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2731-9377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2731-9377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s44276-023-00013-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39516701</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><ispartof>BJC reports, 2023-09, Vol.1 (1), p.14, Article 14</ispartof><rights>2023. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c199x-8257f1fa912ab98afe28de139642f7dccaacedf682a44936a19307ac169e0f563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523951/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523951/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39516701$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Koulouris, Andreas I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Adam P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandre, Leo</creatorcontrib><title>Best analgesia control in pancreatic adenocarcinoma study: justification and feasibility of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care-a prospective observational study (The BAC-PAC study)</title><title>BJC reports</title><addtitle>BJC Rep</addtitle><description>Limited and conflicting trial data is available on the efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN). This study aimed to assess the feasibility, justification and to inform design considerations of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care.
This was a questionnaire-based prospective observational study of patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were self-reporting their performance status, pain levels, analgesic use, quality of life (QoL) and healthcare resource use, on a monthly basis.
Over a total period of twelve months 143 patients were screened for eligibility, of which 56 met the criteria. In total, 12 (21%) patients were recruited. The median survival from the first record of pain was 5.2 (IQR 2.46-5.9) months. In total, 80% of the questionnaires were completed. The median Visual Analogue Score for pain was 2.6 (0.8-5.1) and the median daily morphine dose was 36 (20-48) mg.
Recruitment rates remained low throughout this study. Despite these limitations, overall, this study supports the justification of trial administering endoscopic analgesia. However, uncertainties remain with regards to its feasibility. In a future trial, data collection procedures need to minimise burden to patients. Further observational research with a larger sample size, longer follow-up and refined procedures is required.</description><issn>2731-9377</issn><issn>2731-9377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUk1v1DAUjBCIVqV_gAPysRxM_ZHEMRe0jcqHVEEl2rP11nluXWXjYCer3b_Ir8K721blZGs8b8aaN0XxnrNPnMnmPJWlUDVlQlLGGJd086o4FkpyqqVSr1_cj4rTlB4ySUqmVCXeFkdSV7xWjB8Xfy8wTQQG6O8weSA2DFMMPfEDGWGwEWHylkCHQ7AQrR_CCkia5m77mTzMafLO20wJQ9boiENIful7P21JcARIzGhY-YQdmaKHfocixH5LLm9_0_b6J1ljTHPKkpkJsSPZBSmQMYY0op38GklYJozrvUtW2JuTs5t7JBeLll4v2gP08V3xxkGf8PTxPCluv17etN_p1a9vP9rFFbVc6w1tRKUcd6C5gKVuwKFoOuRS16VwqrMWwGLn6kZAWWpZA9c5N7C81shcVcuT4stBd5yXK-ws5sSgN2P0K4hbE8Cb_18Gf2_uwtpwXold8lnh7FEhhj9zXoDJEVnsexgwzMlILhpVCqmqTBUHqs2BpIju2YczsyuCORTB5CKYfRHMJg99ePnD55Gntct_A0q0PQ</recordid><startdate>20230918</startdate><enddate>20230918</enddate><creator>Koulouris, Andreas I</creator><creator>Wagner, Adam P</creator><creator>Clark, Allan</creator><creator>Alexandre, Leo</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230918</creationdate><title>Best analgesia control in pancreatic adenocarcinoma study: justification and feasibility of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care-a prospective observational study (The BAC-PAC study)</title><author>Koulouris, Andreas I ; Wagner, Adam P ; Clark, Allan ; Alexandre, Leo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c199x-8257f1fa912ab98afe28de139642f7dccaacedf682a44936a19307ac169e0f563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Koulouris, Andreas I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wagner, Adam P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Allan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alexandre, Leo</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BJC reports</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Koulouris, Andreas I</au><au>Wagner, Adam P</au><au>Clark, Allan</au><au>Alexandre, Leo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Best analgesia control in pancreatic adenocarcinoma study: justification and feasibility of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care-a prospective observational study (The BAC-PAC study)</atitle><jtitle>BJC reports</jtitle><addtitle>BJC Rep</addtitle><date>2023-09-18</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>1</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>14</spage><pages>14-</pages><artnum>14</artnum><issn>2731-9377</issn><eissn>2731-9377</eissn><abstract>Limited and conflicting trial data is available on the efficacy of Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Coeliac Plexus Neurolysis (EUS-CPN). This study aimed to assess the feasibility, justification and to inform design considerations of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care.
This was a questionnaire-based prospective observational study of patients with inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were self-reporting their performance status, pain levels, analgesic use, quality of life (QoL) and healthcare resource use, on a monthly basis.
Over a total period of twelve months 143 patients were screened for eligibility, of which 56 met the criteria. In total, 12 (21%) patients were recruited. The median survival from the first record of pain was 5.2 (IQR 2.46-5.9) months. In total, 80% of the questionnaires were completed. The median Visual Analogue Score for pain was 2.6 (0.8-5.1) and the median daily morphine dose was 36 (20-48) mg.
Recruitment rates remained low throughout this study. Despite these limitations, overall, this study supports the justification of trial administering endoscopic analgesia. However, uncertainties remain with regards to its feasibility. In a future trial, data collection procedures need to minimise burden to patients. Further observational research with a larger sample size, longer follow-up and refined procedures is required.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>39516701</pmid><doi>10.1038/s44276-023-00013-x</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2731-9377 |
ispartof | BJC reports, 2023-09, Vol.1 (1), p.14, Article 14 |
issn | 2731-9377 2731-9377 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11523951 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central |
title | Best analgesia control in pancreatic adenocarcinoma study: justification and feasibility of a randomised trial of early EUS-CPN versus standard care-a prospective observational study (The BAC-PAC study) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T03%3A45%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Best%20analgesia%20control%20in%20pancreatic%20adenocarcinoma%20study:%20justification%20and%20feasibility%20of%20a%20randomised%20trial%20of%20early%20EUS-CPN%20versus%20standard%20care-a%20prospective%20observational%20study%20(The%20BAC-PAC%20study)&rft.jtitle=BJC%20reports&rft.au=Koulouris,%20Andreas%20I&rft.date=2023-09-18&rft.volume=1&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=14&rft.pages=14-&rft.artnum=14&rft.issn=2731-9377&rft.eissn=2731-9377&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s44276-023-00013-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3128742375%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3128742375&rft_id=info:pmid/39516701&rfr_iscdi=true |