Analysis of different outcome parameters and quality of life after different techniques of free vascularized lymph node transfer

Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has become an important surgical technique in the treatment of lymphedema. Considering the different available regions available for flap harvest, we aimed to analyze different donor sites for VLNT with respect to donor site morbidity, impact on limb volume, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY) NY), 2024-11, Vol.12 (6), p.101934, Article 101934
Hauptverfasser: Grünherz, Lisanne, Barbon, Carlotta, von Reibnitz, Donata, Gousopoulos, Epameinondas, Uyulmaz, Semra, Giovanoli, Pietro, Vetter, Diana, Gutschow, Christian Alexander, Lindenblatt, Nicole
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 101934
container_title Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)
container_volume 12
creator Grünherz, Lisanne
Barbon, Carlotta
von Reibnitz, Donata
Gousopoulos, Epameinondas
Uyulmaz, Semra
Giovanoli, Pietro
Vetter, Diana
Gutschow, Christian Alexander
Lindenblatt, Nicole
description Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has become an important surgical technique in the treatment of lymphedema. Considering the different available regions available for flap harvest, we aimed to analyze different donor sites for VLNT with respect to donor site morbidity, impact on limb volume, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). A single-center prospective study of all patients undergoing VLNT at the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery of the University Hospital Zurich between September 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Lymph nodes were harvested either from the omentum (gastroepiploic [GE]-VLNT), the lateral thoracic wall (LTW), or the superficial inguinal region (SI-VLNT). Volume measurements and PROMs were assessed preoperatively and at different postoperative intervals. Overall, 70 patients with upper limb lymphedema (21%) or lower limb lymphedema (79%) with different lymphedema stages were included. There were 49 patients who underwent GE-VLNT, followed by LTW-VLNT (n = 16) and SI-VLNT (n = 5). Lymph node harvest from the SI was associated with a significantly higher frequency of seroma development. The average percentage volume loss related in comparison to the preoperative volume of the affected limb was 9% after GE-VLNT, 10% after LTW-VLNT, and 5% after SI-VLNT without a significant difference between the groups. PROMs revealed significant improvements for physical functioning, symptoms and psychological well-being, with no differences between the VLNT techniques. VLNT leads to a significant improvement of quality of life and can decrease limb volume effectively, regardless of the selection of donor site. GE-VLNT has become our flap of choice owing to its low donor site morbidity and its properties that allow a double transplantation while avoiding a second donor site.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101934
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11523469</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2213333X24002932</els_id><sourcerecordid>3072801800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c2cc9efd86f17d0429106bb60f7fa289a4ae6be169a7808fca08b17a6faf4b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVpaUKSP9BF0bKbmerhkWUolBDSBwSyyaI7cS1fdTTY0kSSDdNVf3rsTjqkm2ojoXvOuVf6CHnH2Zozrj7u1rspT2vBRLVcNLJ6Rc6F4HIlZaVfn87yxxm5ynnH5qWV2tTsLTmTuhGbjdDn5Pd1gP6QfabR0c47hwlDoXEsNg5I95BgwIIpUwgdfRyh9-WwaHvvkIKbSy9sBe02-McR_8S5hEgnyHbsIflf2NH-MOy3NMQOaUkQ8my7JG8c9BmvnvcL8vDl9uHm2-ru_uv3m-u7lZWyLisrrG3QdVo5XnesEg1nqm0Vc7UDoRuoAFWLXDVQa6adBaZbXoNy4Kq2lhfk8zF2P7YDdnaeNkFv9skPkA4mgjf_VoLfmp9xMpxvhKxUMyd8eE5IcXlhMYPPFvseAsYxG8lqoRnXjM1ScZTaFHNO6E59ODMLPbMzCz2z0DNHerPp_csJT5a_rGbBp6MA52-aPCaTrcdgsfMJbTFd9P_LfwL1B7BO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072801800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of different outcome parameters and quality of life after different techniques of free vascularized lymph node transfer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Grünherz, Lisanne ; Barbon, Carlotta ; von Reibnitz, Donata ; Gousopoulos, Epameinondas ; Uyulmaz, Semra ; Giovanoli, Pietro ; Vetter, Diana ; Gutschow, Christian Alexander ; Lindenblatt, Nicole</creator><creatorcontrib>Grünherz, Lisanne ; Barbon, Carlotta ; von Reibnitz, Donata ; Gousopoulos, Epameinondas ; Uyulmaz, Semra ; Giovanoli, Pietro ; Vetter, Diana ; Gutschow, Christian Alexander ; Lindenblatt, Nicole</creatorcontrib><description>Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has become an important surgical technique in the treatment of lymphedema. Considering the different available regions available for flap harvest, we aimed to analyze different donor sites for VLNT with respect to donor site morbidity, impact on limb volume, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). A single-center prospective study of all patients undergoing VLNT at the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery of the University Hospital Zurich between September 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Lymph nodes were harvested either from the omentum (gastroepiploic [GE]-VLNT), the lateral thoracic wall (LTW), or the superficial inguinal region (SI-VLNT). Volume measurements and PROMs were assessed preoperatively and at different postoperative intervals. Overall, 70 patients with upper limb lymphedema (21%) or lower limb lymphedema (79%) with different lymphedema stages were included. There were 49 patients who underwent GE-VLNT, followed by LTW-VLNT (n = 16) and SI-VLNT (n = 5). Lymph node harvest from the SI was associated with a significantly higher frequency of seroma development. The average percentage volume loss related in comparison to the preoperative volume of the affected limb was 9% after GE-VLNT, 10% after LTW-VLNT, and 5% after SI-VLNT without a significant difference between the groups. PROMs revealed significant improvements for physical functioning, symptoms and psychological well-being, with no differences between the VLNT techniques. VLNT leads to a significant improvement of quality of life and can decrease limb volume effectively, regardless of the selection of donor site. GE-VLNT has become our flap of choice owing to its low donor site morbidity and its properties that allow a double transplantation while avoiding a second donor site.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2213-333X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2213-3348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2213-3348</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101934</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38925528</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Clinical Research Studies ; Female ; Free Tissue Flaps ; Humans ; Lymph Nodes - surgery ; Lymph Nodes - transplantation ; Lymphedema - etiology ; Lymphedema - physiopathology ; Lymphedema - surgery ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Omentum flap ; Patient Reported Outcome Measures ; PROM ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Switzerland ; Time Factors ; Treatment Outcome ; Vascularized lymph node transfer ; VLNT</subject><ispartof>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY), 2024-11, Vol.12 (6), p.101934, Article 101934</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s) 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c2cc9efd86f17d0429106bb60f7fa289a4ae6be169a7808fca08b17a6faf4b73</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0293-1004 ; 0000-0002-3559-1061 ; 0000-0003-2030-3044</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523469/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11523469/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53770,53772</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38925528$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grünherz, Lisanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbon, Carlotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Reibnitz, Donata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gousopoulos, Epameinondas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyulmaz, Semra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovanoli, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutschow, Christian Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenblatt, Nicole</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of different outcome parameters and quality of life after different techniques of free vascularized lymph node transfer</title><title>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</title><addtitle>J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord</addtitle><description>Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has become an important surgical technique in the treatment of lymphedema. Considering the different available regions available for flap harvest, we aimed to analyze different donor sites for VLNT with respect to donor site morbidity, impact on limb volume, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). A single-center prospective study of all patients undergoing VLNT at the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery of the University Hospital Zurich between September 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Lymph nodes were harvested either from the omentum (gastroepiploic [GE]-VLNT), the lateral thoracic wall (LTW), or the superficial inguinal region (SI-VLNT). Volume measurements and PROMs were assessed preoperatively and at different postoperative intervals. Overall, 70 patients with upper limb lymphedema (21%) or lower limb lymphedema (79%) with different lymphedema stages were included. There were 49 patients who underwent GE-VLNT, followed by LTW-VLNT (n = 16) and SI-VLNT (n = 5). Lymph node harvest from the SI was associated with a significantly higher frequency of seroma development. The average percentage volume loss related in comparison to the preoperative volume of the affected limb was 9% after GE-VLNT, 10% after LTW-VLNT, and 5% after SI-VLNT without a significant difference between the groups. PROMs revealed significant improvements for physical functioning, symptoms and psychological well-being, with no differences between the VLNT techniques. VLNT leads to a significant improvement of quality of life and can decrease limb volume effectively, regardless of the selection of donor site. GE-VLNT has become our flap of choice owing to its low donor site morbidity and its properties that allow a double transplantation while avoiding a second donor site.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Clinical Research Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Free Tissue Flaps</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - surgery</subject><subject>Lymph Nodes - transplantation</subject><subject>Lymphedema - etiology</subject><subject>Lymphedema - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lymphedema - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Omentum flap</subject><subject>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>PROM</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Switzerland</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Vascularized lymph node transfer</subject><subject>VLNT</subject><issn>2213-333X</issn><issn>2213-3348</issn><issn>2213-3348</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUtr3DAUhUVpaUKSP9BF0bKbmerhkWUolBDSBwSyyaI7cS1fdTTY0kSSDdNVf3rsTjqkm2ojoXvOuVf6CHnH2Zozrj7u1rspT2vBRLVcNLJ6Rc6F4HIlZaVfn87yxxm5ynnH5qWV2tTsLTmTuhGbjdDn5Pd1gP6QfabR0c47hwlDoXEsNg5I95BgwIIpUwgdfRyh9-WwaHvvkIKbSy9sBe02-McR_8S5hEgnyHbsIflf2NH-MOy3NMQOaUkQ8my7JG8c9BmvnvcL8vDl9uHm2-ru_uv3m-u7lZWyLisrrG3QdVo5XnesEg1nqm0Vc7UDoRuoAFWLXDVQa6adBaZbXoNy4Kq2lhfk8zF2P7YDdnaeNkFv9skPkA4mgjf_VoLfmp9xMpxvhKxUMyd8eE5IcXlhMYPPFvseAsYxG8lqoRnXjM1ScZTaFHNO6E59ODMLPbMzCz2z0DNHerPp_csJT5a_rGbBp6MA52-aPCaTrcdgsfMJbTFd9P_LfwL1B7BO</recordid><startdate>20241101</startdate><enddate>20241101</enddate><creator>Grünherz, Lisanne</creator><creator>Barbon, Carlotta</creator><creator>von Reibnitz, Donata</creator><creator>Gousopoulos, Epameinondas</creator><creator>Uyulmaz, Semra</creator><creator>Giovanoli, Pietro</creator><creator>Vetter, Diana</creator><creator>Gutschow, Christian Alexander</creator><creator>Lindenblatt, Nicole</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-1004</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-1061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2030-3044</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241101</creationdate><title>Analysis of different outcome parameters and quality of life after different techniques of free vascularized lymph node transfer</title><author>Grünherz, Lisanne ; Barbon, Carlotta ; von Reibnitz, Donata ; Gousopoulos, Epameinondas ; Uyulmaz, Semra ; Giovanoli, Pietro ; Vetter, Diana ; Gutschow, Christian Alexander ; Lindenblatt, Nicole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c2cc9efd86f17d0429106bb60f7fa289a4ae6be169a7808fca08b17a6faf4b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Clinical Research Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Free Tissue Flaps</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - surgery</topic><topic>Lymph Nodes - transplantation</topic><topic>Lymphedema - etiology</topic><topic>Lymphedema - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lymphedema - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Omentum flap</topic><topic>Patient Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>PROM</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Switzerland</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Vascularized lymph node transfer</topic><topic>VLNT</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grünherz, Lisanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbon, Carlotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Reibnitz, Donata</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gousopoulos, Epameinondas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uyulmaz, Semra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giovanoli, Pietro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vetter, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutschow, Christian Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lindenblatt, Nicole</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grünherz, Lisanne</au><au>Barbon, Carlotta</au><au>von Reibnitz, Donata</au><au>Gousopoulos, Epameinondas</au><au>Uyulmaz, Semra</au><au>Giovanoli, Pietro</au><au>Vetter, Diana</au><au>Gutschow, Christian Alexander</au><au>Lindenblatt, Nicole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of different outcome parameters and quality of life after different techniques of free vascularized lymph node transfer</atitle><jtitle>Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY)</jtitle><addtitle>J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord</addtitle><date>2024-11-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>101934</spage><pages>101934-</pages><artnum>101934</artnum><issn>2213-333X</issn><issn>2213-3348</issn><eissn>2213-3348</eissn><abstract>Vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) has become an important surgical technique in the treatment of lymphedema. Considering the different available regions available for flap harvest, we aimed to analyze different donor sites for VLNT with respect to donor site morbidity, impact on limb volume, and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). A single-center prospective study of all patients undergoing VLNT at the Department of Plastic Surgery and Hand Surgery of the University Hospital Zurich between September 2016 and 2023 was conducted. Lymph nodes were harvested either from the omentum (gastroepiploic [GE]-VLNT), the lateral thoracic wall (LTW), or the superficial inguinal region (SI-VLNT). Volume measurements and PROMs were assessed preoperatively and at different postoperative intervals. Overall, 70 patients with upper limb lymphedema (21%) or lower limb lymphedema (79%) with different lymphedema stages were included. There were 49 patients who underwent GE-VLNT, followed by LTW-VLNT (n = 16) and SI-VLNT (n = 5). Lymph node harvest from the SI was associated with a significantly higher frequency of seroma development. The average percentage volume loss related in comparison to the preoperative volume of the affected limb was 9% after GE-VLNT, 10% after LTW-VLNT, and 5% after SI-VLNT without a significant difference between the groups. PROMs revealed significant improvements for physical functioning, symptoms and psychological well-being, with no differences between the VLNT techniques. VLNT leads to a significant improvement of quality of life and can decrease limb volume effectively, regardless of the selection of donor site. GE-VLNT has become our flap of choice owing to its low donor site morbidity and its properties that allow a double transplantation while avoiding a second donor site.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38925528</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101934</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0293-1004</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3559-1061</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2030-3044</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2213-333X
ispartof Journal of vascular surgery. Venous and lymphatic disorders (New York, NY), 2024-11, Vol.12 (6), p.101934, Article 101934
issn 2213-333X
2213-3348
2213-3348
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11523469
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Adult
Aged
Clinical Research Studies
Female
Free Tissue Flaps
Humans
Lymph Nodes - surgery
Lymph Nodes - transplantation
Lymphedema - etiology
Lymphedema - physiopathology
Lymphedema - surgery
Male
Middle Aged
Omentum flap
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
PROM
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Switzerland
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Vascularized lymph node transfer
VLNT
title Analysis of different outcome parameters and quality of life after different techniques of free vascularized lymph node transfer
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T05%3A13%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20different%20outcome%20parameters%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20after%20different%20techniques%20of%20free%20vascularized%20lymph%20node%20transfer&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20vascular%20surgery.%20Venous%20and%20lymphatic%20disorders%20(New%20York,%20NY)&rft.au=Gr%C3%BCnherz,%20Lisanne&rft.date=2024-11-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=101934&rft.pages=101934-&rft.artnum=101934&rft.issn=2213-333X&rft.eissn=2213-3348&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jvsv.2024.101934&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3072801800%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072801800&rft_id=info:pmid/38925528&rft_els_id=S2213333X24002932&rfr_iscdi=true