Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis
To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients wer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urolithiasis 2024-10, Vol.52 (1), p.154, Article 154 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 154 |
container_title | Urolithiasis |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Assem, Ahmed Abdalla, Ahmed Elzoheiry, Mohamed Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd Amr, Hesham Bakr, Heba Rammah, Ahmed M |
description | To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients’ demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score (
P
: 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) (
P
: 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS > 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11522052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121791873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4aac66173ae0ff8413e68fabe0f30c0f21d48d3a1d0b604befcf5f120deb14b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAltiURcCXXNmgqoKCdARIpWvLcSbnuHLi4MuRwgPyXMxpSiks8MIXzTf_XDxZ9pzR14zS-k2glBc0xy2nrBJ1Xj7Kjjlri7zmonr84H6UnYZwQ3G1bVsw-jQ7Em1R04aL4-znVZq90i5EZUmy0avg0tSTbTI99ETNs3dK78gMXqeoJnApkAnmnXfWxJ2LblzI2dX15Xn-9fPmFdmDD0h4iN5tveqBmAlFPUyoH5Lfgl_I4DyxCu9k72wakQnOqojx0oyBiFZ20XBwiG6C8JYogmmEGXQ0eyBeTb0bzY9Dfii7BBOeZU8GZQOc3p0n2fWH998uPuabL5efLs43uRZlFfNCKV1VrBYK6DA0BRNQNYPq8CWopgNnfdH0QrGedhUtOhj0UA6M0x46VnSVOMnerbpz6kboNRyKs3L2ZlR-kU4Z-bdlMju5dXvJWMk5LTkqnN0pePc9QYhyNEGDtWtvpWCcV7xltEH05T_ojUseK76lWN2yphZI8ZXS2KLgYbjPhlF5GBW5jorETd6OiizR6cXDOu5dfg8GAmIFApom_LU_sf8j-wuITNE9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121791873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Assem, Ahmed ; Abdalla, Ahmed ; Elzoheiry, Mohamed ; Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd ; Amr, Hesham ; Bakr, Heba ; Rammah, Ahmed M</creator><creatorcontrib>Assem, Ahmed ; Abdalla, Ahmed ; Elzoheiry, Mohamed ; Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd ; Amr, Hesham ; Bakr, Heba ; Rammah, Ahmed M</creatorcontrib><description>To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients’ demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score (
P
: 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) (
P
: 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS > 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-7236</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2194-7228</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2194-7236</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39470823</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Kidney Calices - surgery ; Male ; Medical Biochemistry ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods ; Nephrology ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Urological surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Urolithiasis, 2024-10, Vol.52 (1), p.154, Article 154</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4aac66173ae0ff8413e68fabe0f30c0f21d48d3a1d0b604befcf5f120deb14b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4762-0210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39470823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Assem, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdalla, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzoheiry, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amr, Hesham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakr, Heba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rammah, Ahmed M</creatorcontrib><title>Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis</title><title>Urolithiasis</title><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><description>To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients’ demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score (
P
: 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) (
P
: 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS > 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney Calices - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Biochemistry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2194-7236</issn><issn>2194-7228</issn><issn>2194-7236</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAltiURcCXXNmgqoKCdARIpWvLcSbnuHLi4MuRwgPyXMxpSiks8MIXzTf_XDxZ9pzR14zS-k2glBc0xy2nrBJ1Xj7Kjjlri7zmonr84H6UnYZwQ3G1bVsw-jQ7Em1R04aL4-znVZq90i5EZUmy0avg0tSTbTI99ETNs3dK78gMXqeoJnApkAnmnXfWxJ2LblzI2dX15Xn-9fPmFdmDD0h4iN5tveqBmAlFPUyoH5Lfgl_I4DyxCu9k72wakQnOqojx0oyBiFZ20XBwiG6C8JYogmmEGXQ0eyBeTb0bzY9Dfii7BBOeZU8GZQOc3p0n2fWH998uPuabL5efLs43uRZlFfNCKV1VrBYK6DA0BRNQNYPq8CWopgNnfdH0QrGedhUtOhj0UA6M0x46VnSVOMnerbpz6kboNRyKs3L2ZlR-kU4Z-bdlMju5dXvJWMk5LTkqnN0pePc9QYhyNEGDtWtvpWCcV7xltEH05T_ojUseK76lWN2yphZI8ZXS2KLgYbjPhlF5GBW5jorETd6OiizR6cXDOu5dfg8GAmIFApom_LU_sf8j-wuITNE9</recordid><startdate>20241029</startdate><enddate>20241029</enddate><creator>Assem, Ahmed</creator><creator>Abdalla, Ahmed</creator><creator>Elzoheiry, Mohamed</creator><creator>Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd</creator><creator>Amr, Hesham</creator><creator>Bakr, Heba</creator><creator>Rammah, Ahmed M</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4762-0210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241029</creationdate><title>Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis</title><author>Assem, Ahmed ; Abdalla, Ahmed ; Elzoheiry, Mohamed ; Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd ; Amr, Hesham ; Bakr, Heba ; Rammah, Ahmed M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4aac66173ae0ff8413e68fabe0f30c0f21d48d3a1d0b604befcf5f120deb14b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney Calices - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Biochemistry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Assem, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdalla, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzoheiry, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amr, Hesham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakr, Heba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rammah, Ahmed M</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Urolithiasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Assem, Ahmed</au><au>Abdalla, Ahmed</au><au>Elzoheiry, Mohamed</au><au>Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd</au><au>Amr, Hesham</au><au>Bakr, Heba</au><au>Rammah, Ahmed M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis</atitle><jtitle>Urolithiasis</jtitle><stitle>Urolithiasis</stitle><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><date>2024-10-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>154</spage><pages>154-</pages><artnum>154</artnum><issn>2194-7236</issn><issn>2194-7228</issn><eissn>2194-7236</eissn><abstract>To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients’ demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score (
P
: 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) (
P
: 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS > 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39470823</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4762-0210</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2194-7236 |
ispartof | Urolithiasis, 2024-10, Vol.52 (1), p.154, Article 154 |
issn | 2194-7236 2194-7228 2194-7236 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11522052 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Adult Female Humans Kidney Calculi - surgery Kidney Calices - surgery Male Medical Biochemistry Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods Nephrology Operative Time Postoperative Complications - epidemiology Postoperative Complications - etiology Prospective Studies Treatment Outcome Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasonography, Interventional Urological surgery Urology |
title | Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A42%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supracostal%20ultrasound%20guided%20approach%20percutaneous%20nephrolithotomy%20(SUGA-PNL)%20versus%20retrograde%20intrarenal%20surgery%20for%20large%20volume%20isolated%20upper%20calyceal%20stones:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Urolithiasis&rft.au=Assem,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2024-10-29&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=154&rft.pages=154-&rft.artnum=154&rft.issn=2194-7236&rft.eissn=2194-7236&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3121791873%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121791873&rft_id=info:pmid/39470823&rfr_iscdi=true |