Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis

To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients wer...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urolithiasis 2024-10, Vol.52 (1), p.154, Article 154
Hauptverfasser: Assem, Ahmed, Abdalla, Ahmed, Elzoheiry, Mohamed, Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd, Amr, Hesham, Bakr, Heba, Rammah, Ahmed M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 154
container_title Urolithiasis
container_volume 52
creator Assem, Ahmed
Abdalla, Ahmed
Elzoheiry, Mohamed
Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd
Amr, Hesham
Bakr, Heba
Rammah, Ahmed M
description To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS > 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients’ demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score ( P : 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) ( P : 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS > 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11522052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3121791873</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4aac66173ae0ff8413e68fabe0f30c0f21d48d3a1d0b604befcf5f120deb14b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAltiURcCXXNmgqoKCdARIpWvLcSbnuHLi4MuRwgPyXMxpSiks8MIXzTf_XDxZ9pzR14zS-k2glBc0xy2nrBJ1Xj7Kjjlri7zmonr84H6UnYZwQ3G1bVsw-jQ7Em1R04aL4-znVZq90i5EZUmy0avg0tSTbTI99ETNs3dK78gMXqeoJnApkAnmnXfWxJ2LblzI2dX15Xn-9fPmFdmDD0h4iN5tveqBmAlFPUyoH5Lfgl_I4DyxCu9k72wakQnOqojx0oyBiFZ20XBwiG6C8JYogmmEGXQ0eyBeTb0bzY9Dfii7BBOeZU8GZQOc3p0n2fWH998uPuabL5efLs43uRZlFfNCKV1VrBYK6DA0BRNQNYPq8CWopgNnfdH0QrGedhUtOhj0UA6M0x46VnSVOMnerbpz6kboNRyKs3L2ZlR-kU4Z-bdlMju5dXvJWMk5LTkqnN0pePc9QYhyNEGDtWtvpWCcV7xltEH05T_ojUseK76lWN2yphZI8ZXS2KLgYbjPhlF5GBW5jorETd6OiizR6cXDOu5dfg8GAmIFApom_LU_sf8j-wuITNE9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3121791873</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Assem, Ahmed ; Abdalla, Ahmed ; Elzoheiry, Mohamed ; Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd ; Amr, Hesham ; Bakr, Heba ; Rammah, Ahmed M</creator><creatorcontrib>Assem, Ahmed ; Abdalla, Ahmed ; Elzoheiry, Mohamed ; Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd ; Amr, Hesham ; Bakr, Heba ; Rammah, Ahmed M</creatorcontrib><description>To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS &gt; 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients’ demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score ( P : 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) ( P : 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS &gt; 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-7236</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2194-7228</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2194-7236</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39470823</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Adult ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Kidney Calices - surgery ; Male ; Medical Biochemistry ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods ; Nephrology ; Operative Time ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Prospective Studies ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasonography, Interventional ; Urological surgery ; Urology</subject><ispartof>Urolithiasis, 2024-10, Vol.52 (1), p.154, Article 154</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4aac66173ae0ff8413e68fabe0f30c0f21d48d3a1d0b604befcf5f120deb14b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4762-0210</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39470823$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Assem, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdalla, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzoheiry, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amr, Hesham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakr, Heba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rammah, Ahmed M</creatorcontrib><title>Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis</title><title>Urolithiasis</title><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><description>To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS &gt; 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients’ demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score ( P : 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) ( P : 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS &gt; 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney Calices - surgery</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical Biochemistry</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects</subject><subject>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><subject>Urological surgery</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>2194-7236</issn><issn>2194-7228</issn><issn>2194-7236</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kstu1TAQhiMEolXpC7BAltiURcCXXNmgqoKCdARIpWvLcSbnuHLi4MuRwgPyXMxpSiks8MIXzTf_XDxZ9pzR14zS-k2glBc0xy2nrBJ1Xj7Kjjlri7zmonr84H6UnYZwQ3G1bVsw-jQ7Em1R04aL4-znVZq90i5EZUmy0avg0tSTbTI99ETNs3dK78gMXqeoJnApkAnmnXfWxJ2LblzI2dX15Xn-9fPmFdmDD0h4iN5tveqBmAlFPUyoH5Lfgl_I4DyxCu9k72wakQnOqojx0oyBiFZ20XBwiG6C8JYogmmEGXQ0eyBeTb0bzY9Dfii7BBOeZU8GZQOc3p0n2fWH998uPuabL5efLs43uRZlFfNCKV1VrBYK6DA0BRNQNYPq8CWopgNnfdH0QrGedhUtOhj0UA6M0x46VnSVOMnerbpz6kboNRyKs3L2ZlR-kU4Z-bdlMju5dXvJWMk5LTkqnN0pePc9QYhyNEGDtWtvpWCcV7xltEH05T_ojUseK76lWN2yphZI8ZXS2KLgYbjPhlF5GBW5jorETd6OiizR6cXDOu5dfg8GAmIFApom_LU_sf8j-wuITNE9</recordid><startdate>20241029</startdate><enddate>20241029</enddate><creator>Assem, Ahmed</creator><creator>Abdalla, Ahmed</creator><creator>Elzoheiry, Mohamed</creator><creator>Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd</creator><creator>Amr, Hesham</creator><creator>Bakr, Heba</creator><creator>Rammah, Ahmed M</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4762-0210</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241029</creationdate><title>Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis</title><author>Assem, Ahmed ; Abdalla, Ahmed ; Elzoheiry, Mohamed ; Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd ; Amr, Hesham ; Bakr, Heba ; Rammah, Ahmed M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-4aac66173ae0ff8413e68fabe0f30c0f21d48d3a1d0b604befcf5f120deb14b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney Calices - surgery</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical Biochemistry</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects</topic><topic>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><topic>Urological surgery</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Assem, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdalla, Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elzoheiry, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amr, Hesham</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakr, Heba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rammah, Ahmed M</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Urolithiasis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Assem, Ahmed</au><au>Abdalla, Ahmed</au><au>Elzoheiry, Mohamed</au><au>Elaziz, Islam Nasser Abd</au><au>Amr, Hesham</au><au>Bakr, Heba</au><au>Rammah, Ahmed M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis</atitle><jtitle>Urolithiasis</jtitle><stitle>Urolithiasis</stitle><addtitle>Urolithiasis</addtitle><date>2024-10-29</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>154</spage><pages>154-</pages><artnum>154</artnum><issn>2194-7236</issn><issn>2194-7228</issn><eissn>2194-7236</eissn><abstract>To assess outcomes of supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) in isolated large volume upper calyceal stones (UCS). This was a prospective randomized study including patients with isolated UCS &gt; 20mm. The patients were randomized into two groups: group (P) (SUGA-PNL) and group (R) (RIRS). Patients’ demographics, stones characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes essentially the stone free rate (SFR) and complications rate were documented. The stone clearance was defined as no fragments or residual fragments less than 2mm in the one month non contrast CT scan follow up. Eighty-nine patients opted to undergo the procedure according to the preoperative randomization. Four patients, 2 patients from each group, lost to follow up and other 2 patients were excluded from group (R) due to a tight ureter. Both groups were comparable as regards the preoperative demographics and stone characteristics. There were statistically significant differences regarding total operative time, the change in hemoglobin level, and postoperative pain score ( P : 0.024, 0.010 and 0.032 respectively). The SFR was 88.1% in group (P) compared to 73.2% in group (R) ( P : 0.019). Moreover, it did not differ significantly between both groups regarding the intraoperative and postoperative complications. No visceral and thoracic injuries were documented in group (P). On other side, 6 patients (14.6%) from group (R) had different grades of ureteral injury during access sheath placement. SUGA-PNL is a safe and effective treatment modality for UCS &gt; 20mm with a higher SFR than RIRS.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39470823</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4762-0210</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2194-7236
ispartof Urolithiasis, 2024-10, Vol.52 (1), p.154, Article 154
issn 2194-7236
2194-7228
2194-7236
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11522052
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Adult
Female
Humans
Kidney Calculi - surgery
Kidney Calices - surgery
Male
Medical Biochemistry
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Middle Aged
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - adverse effects
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous - methods
Nephrology
Operative Time
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Prospective Studies
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasonography, Interventional
Urological surgery
Urology
title Supracostal ultrasound guided approach percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SUGA-PNL) versus retrograde intrarenal surgery for large volume isolated upper calyceal stones: a prospective randomized analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T15%3A42%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Supracostal%20ultrasound%20guided%20approach%20percutaneous%20nephrolithotomy%20(SUGA-PNL)%20versus%20retrograde%20intrarenal%20surgery%20for%20large%20volume%20isolated%20upper%20calyceal%20stones:%20a%20prospective%20randomized%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Urolithiasis&rft.au=Assem,%20Ahmed&rft.date=2024-10-29&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=154&rft.pages=154-&rft.artnum=154&rft.issn=2194-7236&rft.eissn=2194-7236&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00240-024-01637-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3121791873%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3121791873&rft_id=info:pmid/39470823&rfr_iscdi=true