Finding food: how generalist predators use contact-chemosensory information to guide prey preferences
Understanding the processes that guide carnivores in finding and selecting prey is a fundamental, unresolved challenge in sensory biology. To our knowledge, no published work has yet revealed the complete structural identities of compounds that cue preferences by generalist predators for different p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of experimental biology 2024-10, Vol.227 (19) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of experimental biology |
container_volume | 227 |
creator | Zimmer, Richard K Ferrier, Graham A Zimmer, Cheryl A |
description | Understanding the processes that guide carnivores in finding and selecting prey is a fundamental, unresolved challenge in sensory biology. To our knowledge, no published work has yet revealed the complete structural identities of compounds that cue preferences by generalist predators for different prey species. With this research imperative in mind, we determined the chemistry driving consumer preferences for live intact prey using two generalist predatory species (sea stars, Pisaster ochraceus; whelks, Acanthinucella spirata), along with two foundation prey species (mussels, Mytilus californianus; barnacles, Balanus glandula), inhabiting rocky, wave-swept shores. Each prey species is known to secrete either a 29.6 kDa (named 'KEYSTONEin') or a 199.6 kDa (named 'MULTIFUNCin') glycoprotein as a contact-chemical cue. Here, experimental manipulations utilized faux prey consisting of cleaned barnacle or mussel shells infused with KEYSTONEin, MULTIFUNCin or seawater (control) gels. Whelks exhibited a strong penchant for MULTIFUNCin over KEYSTONEin, irrespective of shell type. In contrast, sea stars generally preferred KEYSTONEin over MULTIFUNCin, but this preference shifted depending on the experimental context in which they encountered physical (shell) and chemical (glycoprotein) stimuli. This study ultimately demonstrates clear and contrasting chemical preferences between sea stars and whelks. It highlights the importance of experimental setting in determining chemical preferences. Finally, it shows that prey preferences by these predators hinge only on one or two contact-protein cues, without the need for quality coding via fluid-borne compounds, low-molecular-weight substances or mixture blends. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1242/jeb.247523 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11491814</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3102070380</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-a8dae240f057c0eac668b5d33266c2189a361255470ade55ec3297c1ff7827bd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU1LBDEMhosoun5c_AHSowij_ZzOeBERv0DwoufSbTO7lZ12bTvK_ntnWRXNITnkyZuEF6FjSs4pE-ziDabnTCjJ-BaaUKFU1VIht9GEEMYq0op2D-3n_EbGqKXYRXu8ZaKmkk8Q3PngfJjhLkZ3iefxE88gQDILnwteJnCmxJTxkAHbGIqxpbJz6GOGkGNaYR-6mHpTfAy4RDwbvIP13GqdOkgQLORDtNOZRYaj73qAXu9uX24eqqfn-8eb66fKsroplWmcASZIR6SyBIyt62YqHeesri2jTWt4TZmUQhHjQEqwnLXK0q5TDVNTxw_Q1UZ3OUx7cBZCGT_Ry-R7k1Y6Gq__d4Kf61n80JSKljZUjAqn3wopvg-Qi-59trBYmABxyJpTwogivCEjerZBbYo5j8_-7qFEr43RozF6Y8wIn_y97Bf9cYJ_Ae54i9Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3102070380</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finding food: how generalist predators use contact-chemosensory information to guide prey preferences</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Company of Biologists</source><creator>Zimmer, Richard K ; Ferrier, Graham A ; Zimmer, Cheryl A</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Richard K ; Ferrier, Graham A ; Zimmer, Cheryl A</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding the processes that guide carnivores in finding and selecting prey is a fundamental, unresolved challenge in sensory biology. To our knowledge, no published work has yet revealed the complete structural identities of compounds that cue preferences by generalist predators for different prey species. With this research imperative in mind, we determined the chemistry driving consumer preferences for live intact prey using two generalist predatory species (sea stars, Pisaster ochraceus; whelks, Acanthinucella spirata), along with two foundation prey species (mussels, Mytilus californianus; barnacles, Balanus glandula), inhabiting rocky, wave-swept shores. Each prey species is known to secrete either a 29.6 kDa (named 'KEYSTONEin') or a 199.6 kDa (named 'MULTIFUNCin') glycoprotein as a contact-chemical cue. Here, experimental manipulations utilized faux prey consisting of cleaned barnacle or mussel shells infused with KEYSTONEin, MULTIFUNCin or seawater (control) gels. Whelks exhibited a strong penchant for MULTIFUNCin over KEYSTONEin, irrespective of shell type. In contrast, sea stars generally preferred KEYSTONEin over MULTIFUNCin, but this preference shifted depending on the experimental context in which they encountered physical (shell) and chemical (glycoprotein) stimuli. This study ultimately demonstrates clear and contrasting chemical preferences between sea stars and whelks. It highlights the importance of experimental setting in determining chemical preferences. Finally, it shows that prey preferences by these predators hinge only on one or two contact-protein cues, without the need for quality coding via fluid-borne compounds, low-molecular-weight substances or mixture blends.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0949</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1477-9145</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-9145</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1242/jeb.247523</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39246153</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: The Company of Biologists Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Bivalvia - physiology ; Cues ; Echinodermata - physiology ; Glycoproteins - chemistry ; Mytilus - physiology ; Predatory Behavior ; Thoracica - physiology</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental biology, 2024-10, Vol.227 (19)</ispartof><rights>2024. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-a8dae240f057c0eac668b5d33266c2189a361255470ade55ec3297c1ff7827bd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9163-2377</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,777,781,882,3665,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39246153$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Richard K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrier, Graham A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Cheryl A</creatorcontrib><title>Finding food: how generalist predators use contact-chemosensory information to guide prey preferences</title><title>Journal of experimental biology</title><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><description>Understanding the processes that guide carnivores in finding and selecting prey is a fundamental, unresolved challenge in sensory biology. To our knowledge, no published work has yet revealed the complete structural identities of compounds that cue preferences by generalist predators for different prey species. With this research imperative in mind, we determined the chemistry driving consumer preferences for live intact prey using two generalist predatory species (sea stars, Pisaster ochraceus; whelks, Acanthinucella spirata), along with two foundation prey species (mussels, Mytilus californianus; barnacles, Balanus glandula), inhabiting rocky, wave-swept shores. Each prey species is known to secrete either a 29.6 kDa (named 'KEYSTONEin') or a 199.6 kDa (named 'MULTIFUNCin') glycoprotein as a contact-chemical cue. Here, experimental manipulations utilized faux prey consisting of cleaned barnacle or mussel shells infused with KEYSTONEin, MULTIFUNCin or seawater (control) gels. Whelks exhibited a strong penchant for MULTIFUNCin over KEYSTONEin, irrespective of shell type. In contrast, sea stars generally preferred KEYSTONEin over MULTIFUNCin, but this preference shifted depending on the experimental context in which they encountered physical (shell) and chemical (glycoprotein) stimuli. This study ultimately demonstrates clear and contrasting chemical preferences between sea stars and whelks. It highlights the importance of experimental setting in determining chemical preferences. Finally, it shows that prey preferences by these predators hinge only on one or two contact-protein cues, without the need for quality coding via fluid-borne compounds, low-molecular-weight substances or mixture blends.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Bivalvia - physiology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Echinodermata - physiology</subject><subject>Glycoproteins - chemistry</subject><subject>Mytilus - physiology</subject><subject>Predatory Behavior</subject><subject>Thoracica - physiology</subject><issn>0022-0949</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU1LBDEMhosoun5c_AHSowij_ZzOeBERv0DwoufSbTO7lZ12bTvK_ntnWRXNITnkyZuEF6FjSs4pE-ziDabnTCjJ-BaaUKFU1VIht9GEEMYq0op2D-3n_EbGqKXYRXu8ZaKmkk8Q3PngfJjhLkZ3iefxE88gQDILnwteJnCmxJTxkAHbGIqxpbJz6GOGkGNaYR-6mHpTfAy4RDwbvIP13GqdOkgQLORDtNOZRYaj73qAXu9uX24eqqfn-8eb66fKsroplWmcASZIR6SyBIyt62YqHeesri2jTWt4TZmUQhHjQEqwnLXK0q5TDVNTxw_Q1UZ3OUx7cBZCGT_Ry-R7k1Y6Gq__d4Kf61n80JSKljZUjAqn3wopvg-Qi-59trBYmABxyJpTwogivCEjerZBbYo5j8_-7qFEr43RozF6Y8wIn_y97Bf9cYJ_Ae54i9Q</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Zimmer, Richard K</creator><creator>Ferrier, Graham A</creator><creator>Zimmer, Cheryl A</creator><general>The Company of Biologists Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-2377</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Finding food: how generalist predators use contact-chemosensory information to guide prey preferences</title><author>Zimmer, Richard K ; Ferrier, Graham A ; Zimmer, Cheryl A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-a8dae240f057c0eac668b5d33266c2189a361255470ade55ec3297c1ff7827bd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Bivalvia - physiology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Echinodermata - physiology</topic><topic>Glycoproteins - chemistry</topic><topic>Mytilus - physiology</topic><topic>Predatory Behavior</topic><topic>Thoracica - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Richard K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferrier, Graham A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zimmer, Cheryl A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmer, Richard K</au><au>Ferrier, Graham A</au><au>Zimmer, Cheryl A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finding food: how generalist predators use contact-chemosensory information to guide prey preferences</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental biology</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Biol</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>227</volume><issue>19</issue><issn>0022-0949</issn><issn>1477-9145</issn><eissn>1477-9145</eissn><abstract>Understanding the processes that guide carnivores in finding and selecting prey is a fundamental, unresolved challenge in sensory biology. To our knowledge, no published work has yet revealed the complete structural identities of compounds that cue preferences by generalist predators for different prey species. With this research imperative in mind, we determined the chemistry driving consumer preferences for live intact prey using two generalist predatory species (sea stars, Pisaster ochraceus; whelks, Acanthinucella spirata), along with two foundation prey species (mussels, Mytilus californianus; barnacles, Balanus glandula), inhabiting rocky, wave-swept shores. Each prey species is known to secrete either a 29.6 kDa (named 'KEYSTONEin') or a 199.6 kDa (named 'MULTIFUNCin') glycoprotein as a contact-chemical cue. Here, experimental manipulations utilized faux prey consisting of cleaned barnacle or mussel shells infused with KEYSTONEin, MULTIFUNCin or seawater (control) gels. Whelks exhibited a strong penchant for MULTIFUNCin over KEYSTONEin, irrespective of shell type. In contrast, sea stars generally preferred KEYSTONEin over MULTIFUNCin, but this preference shifted depending on the experimental context in which they encountered physical (shell) and chemical (glycoprotein) stimuli. This study ultimately demonstrates clear and contrasting chemical preferences between sea stars and whelks. It highlights the importance of experimental setting in determining chemical preferences. Finally, it shows that prey preferences by these predators hinge only on one or two contact-protein cues, without the need for quality coding via fluid-borne compounds, low-molecular-weight substances or mixture blends.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>The Company of Biologists Ltd</pub><pmid>39246153</pmid><doi>10.1242/jeb.247523</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9163-2377</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-0949 |
ispartof | Journal of experimental biology, 2024-10, Vol.227 (19) |
issn | 0022-0949 1477-9145 1477-9145 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11491814 |
source | MEDLINE; Company of Biologists |
subjects | Animals Bivalvia - physiology Cues Echinodermata - physiology Glycoproteins - chemistry Mytilus - physiology Predatory Behavior Thoracica - physiology |
title | Finding food: how generalist predators use contact-chemosensory information to guide prey preferences |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A51%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finding%20food:%20how%20generalist%20predators%20use%20contact-chemosensory%20information%20to%20guide%20prey%20preferences&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20biology&rft.au=Zimmer,%20Richard%20K&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=227&rft.issue=19&rft.issn=0022-0949&rft.eissn=1477-9145&rft_id=info:doi/10.1242/jeb.247523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3102070380%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3102070380&rft_id=info:pmid/39246153&rfr_iscdi=true |