Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery

Climate change poses a significant global health threat and healthcare, including surgery, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts have been made to promote sustainability in surgery, but the literature on sustainability in plastic surgery remains limited. A life-cycle analysis was used to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BJS open 2024-09, Vol.8 (5)
Hauptverfasser: Ang, Ky-Leigh, Jovic, Matthew, Malin, Ian, Ali, Stephen R, Whitaker, Sairan, Whitaker, Iain S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title BJS open
container_volume 8
creator Ang, Ky-Leigh
Jovic, Matthew
Malin, Ian
Ali, Stephen R
Whitaker, Sairan
Whitaker, Iain S
description Climate change poses a significant global health threat and healthcare, including surgery, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts have been made to promote sustainability in surgery, but the literature on sustainability in plastic surgery remains limited. A life-cycle analysis was used to assess and quantify the environmental emissions associated with three distinct reconstructive methods utilized in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery: direct closure, split-thickness skin graft, and full-thickness skin graft. Analyses were conducted in March 2023 in Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK. The carbon footprints for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery in England and Wales were then estimated. The mean carbon emissions for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery ranged from 29.82 to 34.31 kgCO₂eq. Theatre energy consumption (4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq) and consumables (16.87 kgCO₂eq) were significant contributors. Waste produced during non-melanoma skin cancer surgery accounted for 1.31 kgCO₂eq and sterilization of reusable surgical instruments resulted in 1.92 kgCO₂eq of carbon emissions. Meanwhile, transportation, dressings, pharmaceuticals, and laundry accounted for 0.57, 2.65, 1.85, and 0.38 kgCO₂eq respectively. The excision of non-melanoma skin cancer with direct closure (19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq) resulted in the lowest carbon emissions compared with excision with split-thickness skin graft (43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq) and full-thickness skin graft (31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq). In 2021, it was estimated that non-melanoma skin cancer surgery had an annual carbon footprint of 306 775 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 4 402 650 kgCO₂eq in England. It was possible to predict that, by 2035, carbon emissions from non-melanoma skin cancer surgery will account for 388 927 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 5 419 770 kgCO₂eq in England. This study highlights the environmental impact of non-melanoma skin cancer in plastic surgery departments and emphasizes the need for sustainable practices. Collaboration between surgeons and policymakers is essential and further data collection is recommended for better analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11483578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3117614167</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f54e1774e3d932256e9671c9885d194c0051872414e6183b68b02ec4de7cbc0b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkM1PwzAMxSMEYtPYmRvqkUtZ3KRNekJo4kuaxAXOUZq6o6NNRtIijb-eopVpnGzJz8_PP0Iugd4Azdmi2AS3Rbv49hqp5CdkmnDB41zy5PSon5B5CBtKKcgEBIdzMmE5B5FxmBK-1L5wNqqc67a-tl3kqsg6G7fYaOtaHYWP2kZGW4M-Cr1fo99dkLNKNwHnY52Rt4f71-VTvHp5fF7erWKTMNHFVcoRhODIypwlSZphngkwuZRpCTk3lKYgRcKBYwaSFZksaIKGlyhMYWjBZuR277vtixZLg7bzulFDzlb7nXK6Vv8ntn5Xa_elALhkqZCDw_Xo4N1nj6FTbR0MNsNv6PqgGAwcgEMmBuliLzXeheCxOtwBqn55q5G3GnkPG1fH8Q76P7rsB8CHfng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3117614167</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central (PMC)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Ang, Ky-Leigh ; Jovic, Matthew ; Malin, Ian ; Ali, Stephen R ; Whitaker, Sairan ; Whitaker, Iain S</creator><creatorcontrib>Ang, Ky-Leigh ; Jovic, Matthew ; Malin, Ian ; Ali, Stephen R ; Whitaker, Sairan ; Whitaker, Iain S</creatorcontrib><description>Climate change poses a significant global health threat and healthcare, including surgery, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts have been made to promote sustainability in surgery, but the literature on sustainability in plastic surgery remains limited. A life-cycle analysis was used to assess and quantify the environmental emissions associated with three distinct reconstructive methods utilized in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery: direct closure, split-thickness skin graft, and full-thickness skin graft. Analyses were conducted in March 2023 in Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK. The carbon footprints for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery in England and Wales were then estimated. The mean carbon emissions for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery ranged from 29.82 to 34.31 kgCO₂eq. Theatre energy consumption (4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq) and consumables (16.87 kgCO₂eq) were significant contributors. Waste produced during non-melanoma skin cancer surgery accounted for 1.31 kgCO₂eq and sterilization of reusable surgical instruments resulted in 1.92 kgCO₂eq of carbon emissions. Meanwhile, transportation, dressings, pharmaceuticals, and laundry accounted for 0.57, 2.65, 1.85, and 0.38 kgCO₂eq respectively. The excision of non-melanoma skin cancer with direct closure (19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq) resulted in the lowest carbon emissions compared with excision with split-thickness skin graft (43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq) and full-thickness skin graft (31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq). In 2021, it was estimated that non-melanoma skin cancer surgery had an annual carbon footprint of 306 775 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 4 402 650 kgCO₂eq in England. It was possible to predict that, by 2035, carbon emissions from non-melanoma skin cancer surgery will account for 388 927 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 5 419 770 kgCO₂eq in England. This study highlights the environmental impact of non-melanoma skin cancer in plastic surgery departments and emphasizes the need for sustainable practices. Collaboration between surgeons and policymakers is essential and further data collection is recommended for better analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2474-9842</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2474-9842</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39417641</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Carbon Footprint ; England ; Humans ; Original ; Plastic Surgery Procedures ; Skin Neoplasms - surgery ; Skin Transplantation ; Wales</subject><ispartof>BJS open, 2024-09, Vol.8 (5)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-3494-3026 ; 0000-0002-9917-3432 ; 0000-0002-3922-2079</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483578/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483578/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39417641$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ang, Ky-Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jovic, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, Sairan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, Iain S</creatorcontrib><title>Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery</title><title>BJS open</title><addtitle>BJS Open</addtitle><description>Climate change poses a significant global health threat and healthcare, including surgery, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts have been made to promote sustainability in surgery, but the literature on sustainability in plastic surgery remains limited. A life-cycle analysis was used to assess and quantify the environmental emissions associated with three distinct reconstructive methods utilized in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery: direct closure, split-thickness skin graft, and full-thickness skin graft. Analyses were conducted in March 2023 in Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK. The carbon footprints for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery in England and Wales were then estimated. The mean carbon emissions for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery ranged from 29.82 to 34.31 kgCO₂eq. Theatre energy consumption (4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq) and consumables (16.87 kgCO₂eq) were significant contributors. Waste produced during non-melanoma skin cancer surgery accounted for 1.31 kgCO₂eq and sterilization of reusable surgical instruments resulted in 1.92 kgCO₂eq of carbon emissions. Meanwhile, transportation, dressings, pharmaceuticals, and laundry accounted for 0.57, 2.65, 1.85, and 0.38 kgCO₂eq respectively. The excision of non-melanoma skin cancer with direct closure (19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq) resulted in the lowest carbon emissions compared with excision with split-thickness skin graft (43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq) and full-thickness skin graft (31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq). In 2021, it was estimated that non-melanoma skin cancer surgery had an annual carbon footprint of 306 775 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 4 402 650 kgCO₂eq in England. It was possible to predict that, by 2035, carbon emissions from non-melanoma skin cancer surgery will account for 388 927 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 5 419 770 kgCO₂eq in England. This study highlights the environmental impact of non-melanoma skin cancer in plastic surgery departments and emphasizes the need for sustainable practices. Collaboration between surgeons and policymakers is essential and further data collection is recommended for better analysis.</description><subject>Carbon Footprint</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Plastic Surgery Procedures</subject><subject>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Skin Transplantation</subject><subject>Wales</subject><issn>2474-9842</issn><issn>2474-9842</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkM1PwzAMxSMEYtPYmRvqkUtZ3KRNekJo4kuaxAXOUZq6o6NNRtIijb-eopVpnGzJz8_PP0Iugd4Azdmi2AS3Rbv49hqp5CdkmnDB41zy5PSon5B5CBtKKcgEBIdzMmE5B5FxmBK-1L5wNqqc67a-tl3kqsg6G7fYaOtaHYWP2kZGW4M-Cr1fo99dkLNKNwHnY52Rt4f71-VTvHp5fF7erWKTMNHFVcoRhODIypwlSZphngkwuZRpCTk3lKYgRcKBYwaSFZksaIKGlyhMYWjBZuR277vtixZLg7bzulFDzlb7nXK6Vv8ntn5Xa_elALhkqZCDw_Xo4N1nj6FTbR0MNsNv6PqgGAwcgEMmBuliLzXeheCxOtwBqn55q5G3GnkPG1fH8Q76P7rsB8CHfng</recordid><startdate>20240903</startdate><enddate>20240903</enddate><creator>Ang, Ky-Leigh</creator><creator>Jovic, Matthew</creator><creator>Malin, Ian</creator><creator>Ali, Stephen R</creator><creator>Whitaker, Sairan</creator><creator>Whitaker, Iain S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3494-3026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9917-3432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-2079</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240903</creationdate><title>Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery</title><author>Ang, Ky-Leigh ; Jovic, Matthew ; Malin, Ian ; Ali, Stephen R ; Whitaker, Sairan ; Whitaker, Iain S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c237t-f54e1774e3d932256e9671c9885d194c0051872414e6183b68b02ec4de7cbc0b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Carbon Footprint</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Plastic Surgery Procedures</topic><topic>Skin Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Skin Transplantation</topic><topic>Wales</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ang, Ky-Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jovic, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malin, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Stephen R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, Sairan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitaker, Iain S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>BJS open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ang, Ky-Leigh</au><au>Jovic, Matthew</au><au>Malin, Ian</au><au>Ali, Stephen R</au><au>Whitaker, Sairan</au><au>Whitaker, Iain S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery</atitle><jtitle>BJS open</jtitle><addtitle>BJS Open</addtitle><date>2024-09-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>5</issue><issn>2474-9842</issn><eissn>2474-9842</eissn><abstract>Climate change poses a significant global health threat and healthcare, including surgery, contributes to greenhouse gas emissions. Efforts have been made to promote sustainability in surgery, but the literature on sustainability in plastic surgery remains limited. A life-cycle analysis was used to assess and quantify the environmental emissions associated with three distinct reconstructive methods utilized in non-melanoma skin cancer surgery: direct closure, split-thickness skin graft, and full-thickness skin graft. Analyses were conducted in March 2023 in Morriston Hospital, Swansea, UK. The carbon footprints for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery in England and Wales were then estimated. The mean carbon emissions for non-melanoma skin cancer surgery ranged from 29.82 to 34.31 kgCO₂eq. Theatre energy consumption (4.29-8.76 kgCO₂eq) and consumables (16.87 kgCO₂eq) were significant contributors. Waste produced during non-melanoma skin cancer surgery accounted for 1.31 kgCO₂eq and sterilization of reusable surgical instruments resulted in 1.92 kgCO₂eq of carbon emissions. Meanwhile, transportation, dressings, pharmaceuticals, and laundry accounted for 0.57, 2.65, 1.85, and 0.38 kgCO₂eq respectively. The excision of non-melanoma skin cancer with direct closure (19.29-22.41 kgCO₂eq) resulted in the lowest carbon emissions compared with excision with split-thickness skin graft (43.80-49.06 kgCO₂eq) and full-thickness skin graft (31.58-37.02 kgCO₂eq). In 2021, it was estimated that non-melanoma skin cancer surgery had an annual carbon footprint of 306 775 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 4 402 650 kgCO₂eq in England. It was possible to predict that, by 2035, carbon emissions from non-melanoma skin cancer surgery will account for 388 927 kgCO₂eq in Wales and 5 419 770 kgCO₂eq in England. This study highlights the environmental impact of non-melanoma skin cancer in plastic surgery departments and emphasizes the need for sustainable practices. Collaboration between surgeons and policymakers is essential and further data collection is recommended for better analysis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>39417641</pmid><doi>10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3494-3026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9917-3432</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-2079</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2474-9842
ispartof BJS open, 2024-09, Vol.8 (5)
issn 2474-9842
2474-9842
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11483578
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection; MEDLINE; PubMed Central (PMC); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Carbon Footprint
England
Humans
Original
Plastic Surgery Procedures
Skin Neoplasms - surgery
Skin Transplantation
Wales
title Carbon footprint of non-melanoma skin cancer surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T16%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Carbon%20footprint%20of%20non-melanoma%20skin%20cancer%20surgery&rft.jtitle=BJS%20open&rft.au=Ang,%20Ky-Leigh&rft.date=2024-09-03&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=5&rft.issn=2474-9842&rft.eissn=2474-9842&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3117614167%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3117614167&rft_id=info:pmid/39417641&rfr_iscdi=true