Comparison of Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Settings for Glaucoma Management

: This study aims to compare micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) laser parameters and determine the optimal laser setting. : A retrospective study was performed on 351 eyes from patients who underwent MP-TSCPC at four power settings (1500 mW, 2000 mW, 2250 mW, and 2500 mW) from...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2024-09, Vol.13 (19), p.5753
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Emily Y, Walker, Brooks D, Hopkins, Nikolas S, Fowler, Samuel, Jerkins, Brian M, Kanner, Elliott M, Wright, Claire L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 19
container_start_page 5753
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 13
creator Kim, Emily Y
Walker, Brooks D
Hopkins, Nikolas S
Fowler, Samuel
Jerkins, Brian M
Kanner, Elliott M
Wright, Claire L
description : This study aims to compare micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) laser parameters and determine the optimal laser setting. : A retrospective study was performed on 351 eyes from patients who underwent MP-TSCPC at four power settings (1500 mW, 2000 mW, 2250 mW, and 2500 mW) from June 2018 to December 2021. The primary measurements of the efficacy of MP-TSCPC were the degree of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and the number of glaucoma medication reductions. The rate of hypotony was obtained to assess the safety of MP-TSCPC. At 1500, 2000, and 2500 mW, the mean IOP reduction at each visit was statistically significant compared to the baseline, and at 2250 mW, the mean IOP was only significantly different at 18 months ( < 0.05). The change in the number of medications with 2000 mW has shown significance at 1 and 3 months from the baseline; with 2500 mW, statistical significance was shown at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months ( < 0.05) compared to the baseline. Mean IOP reductions (%) were greater in 2000 mW than in 1500 mW at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months and were greater in 2500 than in 1500 mW at 1 week ( < 0.05). There was no significance for mean IOP reductions at 6, 12, and 18 months across all powers. Only two occurrences of hypotony were reported. : MP-TSCPC at 1500 mW, 2000 mW, and 2500 mW is a safe and effective treatment for IOP reduction. MP-TSCPC at 2250 mW is safe but may show delayed effectiveness in IOP reduction. In the long term, no one specific power setting was found to be superior for IOP reduction.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm13195753
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11476880</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A812615812</galeid><sourcerecordid>A812615812</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-facaa858063eb7ef338dd11f4f0227a1cc731d704db67e6a227221c1d833df0a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1rGzEQhkVJaUKaU-5lIZdAcaLZ2ZXkUwkmTUsdemh7FmOt5MrsSo60G8i_r0w-cEokkIbRM-8wehk7BX6BOOeXGzMAwryVLb5jRzWXcsZR4cFefMhOct7wspRqapAf2CHOGy4V4BH7sYjDlpLPMVTRVdfOeUPmYRffepPiduqzrZaUbap-2XH0YZ0rF1N109Nk4kDVLQVa28GG8SN776jgJ0_3Mfvz9fr34tts-fPm--JqOTMo2nHmyBCpVnGBdiWtQ1RdB-Aax-taEhgjETrJm24lpBVUknUNBjqF2DlOeMy-POpup9VgO1NaJ-r1NvmB0oOO5PXrl-D_6nW81wCNFErxonD-pJDi3WTzqAefje17CjZOWSOA5LIBUAU9-w_dxCmFMt-OEqJFJfaoNfVW--BiaWx2ovpKQS2gLWehLt6gyu7s4E0M1vmSf1Xw-bGgOJFzsu5lSOB657_e87_Qn_b_5YV9dhv_AaLCqUY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3116653868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Settings for Glaucoma Management</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Kim, Emily Y ; Walker, Brooks D ; Hopkins, Nikolas S ; Fowler, Samuel ; Jerkins, Brian M ; Kanner, Elliott M ; Wright, Claire L</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Emily Y ; Walker, Brooks D ; Hopkins, Nikolas S ; Fowler, Samuel ; Jerkins, Brian M ; Kanner, Elliott M ; Wright, Claire L</creatorcontrib><description>: This study aims to compare micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) laser parameters and determine the optimal laser setting. : A retrospective study was performed on 351 eyes from patients who underwent MP-TSCPC at four power settings (1500 mW, 2000 mW, 2250 mW, and 2500 mW) from June 2018 to December 2021. The primary measurements of the efficacy of MP-TSCPC were the degree of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and the number of glaucoma medication reductions. The rate of hypotony was obtained to assess the safety of MP-TSCPC. At 1500, 2000, and 2500 mW, the mean IOP reduction at each visit was statistically significant compared to the baseline, and at 2250 mW, the mean IOP was only significantly different at 18 months ( &lt; 0.05). The change in the number of medications with 2000 mW has shown significance at 1 and 3 months from the baseline; with 2500 mW, statistical significance was shown at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months ( &lt; 0.05) compared to the baseline. Mean IOP reductions (%) were greater in 2000 mW than in 1500 mW at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months and were greater in 2500 than in 1500 mW at 1 week ( &lt; 0.05). There was no significance for mean IOP reductions at 6, 12, and 18 months across all powers. Only two occurrences of hypotony were reported. : MP-TSCPC at 1500 mW, 2000 mW, and 2500 mW is a safe and effective treatment for IOP reduction. MP-TSCPC at 2250 mW is safe but may show delayed effectiveness in IOP reduction. In the long term, no one specific power setting was found to be superior for IOP reduction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195753</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39407813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Comparative analysis ; Glaucoma ; Laser therapy ; Lasers ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Methods ; Physiological aspects ; Success ; Surgeons ; Survival analysis ; Visual acuity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-09, Vol.13 (19), p.5753</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-facaa858063eb7ef338dd11f4f0227a1cc731d704db67e6a227221c1d833df0a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4921-3985</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476880/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11476880/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27903,27904,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39407813$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Emily Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Brooks D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Nikolas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerkins, Brian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanner, Elliott M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Claire L</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Settings for Glaucoma Management</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>: This study aims to compare micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) laser parameters and determine the optimal laser setting. : A retrospective study was performed on 351 eyes from patients who underwent MP-TSCPC at four power settings (1500 mW, 2000 mW, 2250 mW, and 2500 mW) from June 2018 to December 2021. The primary measurements of the efficacy of MP-TSCPC were the degree of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and the number of glaucoma medication reductions. The rate of hypotony was obtained to assess the safety of MP-TSCPC. At 1500, 2000, and 2500 mW, the mean IOP reduction at each visit was statistically significant compared to the baseline, and at 2250 mW, the mean IOP was only significantly different at 18 months ( &lt; 0.05). The change in the number of medications with 2000 mW has shown significance at 1 and 3 months from the baseline; with 2500 mW, statistical significance was shown at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months ( &lt; 0.05) compared to the baseline. Mean IOP reductions (%) were greater in 2000 mW than in 1500 mW at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months and were greater in 2500 than in 1500 mW at 1 week ( &lt; 0.05). There was no significance for mean IOP reductions at 6, 12, and 18 months across all powers. Only two occurrences of hypotony were reported. : MP-TSCPC at 1500 mW, 2000 mW, and 2500 mW is a safe and effective treatment for IOP reduction. MP-TSCPC at 2250 mW is safe but may show delayed effectiveness in IOP reduction. In the long term, no one specific power setting was found to be superior for IOP reduction.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Glaucoma</subject><subject>Laser therapy</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkU1rGzEQhkVJaUKaU-5lIZdAcaLZ2ZXkUwkmTUsdemh7FmOt5MrsSo60G8i_r0w-cEokkIbRM-8wehk7BX6BOOeXGzMAwryVLb5jRzWXcsZR4cFefMhOct7wspRqapAf2CHOGy4V4BH7sYjDlpLPMVTRVdfOeUPmYRffepPiduqzrZaUbap-2XH0YZ0rF1N109Nk4kDVLQVa28GG8SN776jgJ0_3Mfvz9fr34tts-fPm--JqOTMo2nHmyBCpVnGBdiWtQ1RdB-Aax-taEhgjETrJm24lpBVUknUNBjqF2DlOeMy-POpup9VgO1NaJ-r1NvmB0oOO5PXrl-D_6nW81wCNFErxonD-pJDi3WTzqAefje17CjZOWSOA5LIBUAU9-w_dxCmFMt-OEqJFJfaoNfVW--BiaWx2ovpKQS2gLWehLt6gyu7s4E0M1vmSf1Xw-bGgOJFzsu5lSOB657_e87_Qn_b_5YV9dhv_AaLCqUY</recordid><startdate>20240927</startdate><enddate>20240927</enddate><creator>Kim, Emily Y</creator><creator>Walker, Brooks D</creator><creator>Hopkins, Nikolas S</creator><creator>Fowler, Samuel</creator><creator>Jerkins, Brian M</creator><creator>Kanner, Elliott M</creator><creator>Wright, Claire L</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-3985</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240927</creationdate><title>Comparison of Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Settings for Glaucoma Management</title><author>Kim, Emily Y ; Walker, Brooks D ; Hopkins, Nikolas S ; Fowler, Samuel ; Jerkins, Brian M ; Kanner, Elliott M ; Wright, Claire L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c365t-facaa858063eb7ef338dd11f4f0227a1cc731d704db67e6a227221c1d833df0a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Glaucoma</topic><topic>Laser therapy</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Emily Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Brooks D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Nikolas S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Samuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jerkins, Brian M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanner, Elliott M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Claire L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Emily Y</au><au>Walker, Brooks D</au><au>Hopkins, Nikolas S</au><au>Fowler, Samuel</au><au>Jerkins, Brian M</au><au>Kanner, Elliott M</au><au>Wright, Claire L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Settings for Glaucoma Management</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-09-27</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>5753</spage><pages>5753-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>: This study aims to compare micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (MP-TSCPC) laser parameters and determine the optimal laser setting. : A retrospective study was performed on 351 eyes from patients who underwent MP-TSCPC at four power settings (1500 mW, 2000 mW, 2250 mW, and 2500 mW) from June 2018 to December 2021. The primary measurements of the efficacy of MP-TSCPC were the degree of intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction and the number of glaucoma medication reductions. The rate of hypotony was obtained to assess the safety of MP-TSCPC. At 1500, 2000, and 2500 mW, the mean IOP reduction at each visit was statistically significant compared to the baseline, and at 2250 mW, the mean IOP was only significantly different at 18 months ( &lt; 0.05). The change in the number of medications with 2000 mW has shown significance at 1 and 3 months from the baseline; with 2500 mW, statistical significance was shown at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months ( &lt; 0.05) compared to the baseline. Mean IOP reductions (%) were greater in 2000 mW than in 1500 mW at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months and were greater in 2500 than in 1500 mW at 1 week ( &lt; 0.05). There was no significance for mean IOP reductions at 6, 12, and 18 months across all powers. Only two occurrences of hypotony were reported. : MP-TSCPC at 1500 mW, 2000 mW, and 2500 mW is a safe and effective treatment for IOP reduction. MP-TSCPC at 2250 mW is safe but may show delayed effectiveness in IOP reduction. In the long term, no one specific power setting was found to be superior for IOP reduction.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39407813</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13195753</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4921-3985</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-09, Vol.13 (19), p.5753
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11476880
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Care and treatment
Comparative analysis
Glaucoma
Laser therapy
Lasers
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Methods
Physiological aspects
Success
Surgeons
Survival analysis
Visual acuity
title Comparison of Efficacy of Micropulse Laser Settings for Glaucoma Management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T06%3A33%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Efficacy%20of%20Micropulse%20Laser%20Settings%20for%20Glaucoma%20Management&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Kim,%20Emily%20Y&rft.date=2024-09-27&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=5753&rft.pages=5753-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13195753&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA812615812%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3116653868&rft_id=info:pmid/39407813&rft_galeid=A812615812&rfr_iscdi=true