Prospective external validation of radiomics‐based predictive model of distant metastasis after dynamic tumor tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A multi‐institutional analysis
Background and purpose This study aims to externally validate a predictive model for distant metastasis (DM) with computed tomography (CT)‐based radiomics features in prospectively enrolled non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients undergoing dynamic tumor‐tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy (DTT...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics 2024-10, Vol.25 (10), p.e14475-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | e14475 |
container_title | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Adachi, Takanori Nakamura, Mitsuhiro Matsuo, Yukinori Karasawa, Katsuyuki Kokubo, Masaki Sakamoto, Takashi Hiraoka, Masahiro Mizowaki, Takashi |
description | Background and purpose
This study aims to externally validate a predictive model for distant metastasis (DM) with computed tomography (CT)‐based radiomics features in prospectively enrolled non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients undergoing dynamic tumor‐tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy (DTT‐SBRT).
Materials and methods
The study collected retrospective data from 567 patients across 11 institutions as the training dataset and prospectively enrolled 42 patients from four institutions as the external test dataset. Four clinical features were collected, and 944 CT‐based radiomic features were extracted from gross tumor volumes. After standardization and feature selection, DM predictive models were developed using fine and gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF), incorporating clinical and radiomic features, and their combinations within the training dataset. Then, the model was applied to the test dataset, dividing patients into high‐ and low‐risk groups based on medians of risk scores. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C‐index), and the statistical significance between groups was evaluated using Gray's test.
Results
In the training dataset, 122 of 567 patients (21.5%) developed DM, compared to 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) in the test dataset. In the test dataset, the C‐indices of the clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models with FG were 0.559, 0.544, and 0.560, respectively, whereas those with RSF were 0.576, 0.604, and 0.627, respectively.
The hybrid model with RSF, which exhibited the best predictive performance of all models, identified 7 of 23 patients (30.4%) as high risk and 2 of 19 patients (10.5%) as low risk for DM incidence in the test dataset (p = 0.116).
Conclusion
Although predictive models for DM lack significance when applied to prospectively enrolled cases undergoing DTT‐lung SBRT, the model with RSF exhibits a consistent capacity to effectively classify patients at a high risk of developing DM. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/acm2.14475 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11466494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A813854820</galeid><sourcerecordid>A813854820</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-655c413fcaa48dbd783d6b6df4743c659cc00c449584117402d7d08c8855a41e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QGQJS4IaRc7cRKHS7Va8U8qggOco1nb2bo4drCdLbnxCDwjD8AzMGlKVTigSLHl-c03M5ovyx4zumaU5i9A9vmacV6Xd7JjVubVqmkYv3vrfpQ9iPGCUsZEIe5nR0XDasGK5jj79TH4OGiZzEET_S3p4MCSA1ijIBnviO9IAGV8b2T8-f3HDqJWZAhamSWn90rbmVImJnCJ9DoB3qKJBDrUI2pygNkkjb0PJAWQX4zbk4gx7ROgjCQ7r6arOkvRdK4DDBMxjgz4ol2K5NKkc-K8wyZiD9biKbW1xI4oJsFJHV6SDelHmwzGjIvJpHGWw4EAfxO29DC714GN-tH1eZJ9fv3q0_bt6uzDm3fbzdlKclqWq6osJWdFJwG4UDtVi0JVu0p1vOaFrMpGSkol500pOGM1p7mqFRVSiLIEznRxkp0uusO467WSOEEA2w7B9BCm1oNp_444c97u_aFljFcVbzgqPLtWCP7rqGNqexPngcFpP8a2oA12KZqqQPTpP-iFH-c9IsVYiS5oaI3UeqH2YHVrXOfnVeCnNG7HO90ZfN-gLUTJRU4x4fmSINEiMejupn1G29l47Wy89sp4CD-5PfAN-sdpCLAFuMQy03-k2s32fb6I_gbzB-5s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3115152907</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective external validation of radiomics‐based predictive model of distant metastasis after dynamic tumor tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A multi‐institutional analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Adachi, Takanori ; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ; Matsuo, Yukinori ; Karasawa, Katsuyuki ; Kokubo, Masaki ; Sakamoto, Takashi ; Hiraoka, Masahiro ; Mizowaki, Takashi</creator><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Takanori ; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ; Matsuo, Yukinori ; Karasawa, Katsuyuki ; Kokubo, Masaki ; Sakamoto, Takashi ; Hiraoka, Masahiro ; Mizowaki, Takashi</creatorcontrib><description>Background and purpose
This study aims to externally validate a predictive model for distant metastasis (DM) with computed tomography (CT)‐based radiomics features in prospectively enrolled non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients undergoing dynamic tumor‐tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy (DTT‐SBRT).
Materials and methods
The study collected retrospective data from 567 patients across 11 institutions as the training dataset and prospectively enrolled 42 patients from four institutions as the external test dataset. Four clinical features were collected, and 944 CT‐based radiomic features were extracted from gross tumor volumes. After standardization and feature selection, DM predictive models were developed using fine and gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF), incorporating clinical and radiomic features, and their combinations within the training dataset. Then, the model was applied to the test dataset, dividing patients into high‐ and low‐risk groups based on medians of risk scores. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C‐index), and the statistical significance between groups was evaluated using Gray's test.
Results
In the training dataset, 122 of 567 patients (21.5%) developed DM, compared to 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) in the test dataset. In the test dataset, the C‐indices of the clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models with FG were 0.559, 0.544, and 0.560, respectively, whereas those with RSF were 0.576, 0.604, and 0.627, respectively.
The hybrid model with RSF, which exhibited the best predictive performance of all models, identified 7 of 23 patients (30.4%) as high risk and 2 of 19 patients (10.5%) as low risk for DM incidence in the test dataset (p = 0.116).
Conclusion
Although predictive models for DM lack significance when applied to prospectively enrolled cases undergoing DTT‐lung SBRT, the model with RSF exhibits a consistent capacity to effectively classify patients at a high risk of developing DM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-9914</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14475</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39178139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Analysis ; Cancer therapies ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy ; Care and treatment ; Clinical trials ; CT imaging ; Datasets ; Digital television ; distant metastasis ; dynamic tumor tracking ; Female ; Humans ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Imaging Physics ; Lung cancer ; Lung cancer, Non-small cell ; Lung cancer, Small cell ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; lung SBRT ; Male ; Medical prognosis ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Metastasis ; Middle Aged ; multi‐institutional study ; Neoplasm Metastasis ; Nomograms ; Patients ; Prognosis ; prognostic prediction ; prospective external validation ; Prospective Studies ; Radiation ; Radiation therapy ; Radiomics ; Radiosurgery - methods ; Radiotherapy ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods ; Retrospective Studies ; Software ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2024-10, Vol.25 (10), p.e14475-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.</rights><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the "License"). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-655c413fcaa48dbd783d6b6df4743c659cc00c449584117402d7d08c8855a41e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4372-8259 ; 0000-0003-1356-5118 ; 0000-0002-8135-8746</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466494/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11466494/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,1413,11544,27906,27907,45556,45557,46034,46458,53773,53775</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39178139$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Takanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Mitsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Yukinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasawa, Katsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokubo, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiraoka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizowaki, Takashi</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective external validation of radiomics‐based predictive model of distant metastasis after dynamic tumor tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A multi‐institutional analysis</title><title>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</title><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><description>Background and purpose
This study aims to externally validate a predictive model for distant metastasis (DM) with computed tomography (CT)‐based radiomics features in prospectively enrolled non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients undergoing dynamic tumor‐tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy (DTT‐SBRT).
Materials and methods
The study collected retrospective data from 567 patients across 11 institutions as the training dataset and prospectively enrolled 42 patients from four institutions as the external test dataset. Four clinical features were collected, and 944 CT‐based radiomic features were extracted from gross tumor volumes. After standardization and feature selection, DM predictive models were developed using fine and gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF), incorporating clinical and radiomic features, and their combinations within the training dataset. Then, the model was applied to the test dataset, dividing patients into high‐ and low‐risk groups based on medians of risk scores. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C‐index), and the statistical significance between groups was evaluated using Gray's test.
Results
In the training dataset, 122 of 567 patients (21.5%) developed DM, compared to 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) in the test dataset. In the test dataset, the C‐indices of the clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models with FG were 0.559, 0.544, and 0.560, respectively, whereas those with RSF were 0.576, 0.604, and 0.627, respectively.
The hybrid model with RSF, which exhibited the best predictive performance of all models, identified 7 of 23 patients (30.4%) as high risk and 2 of 19 patients (10.5%) as low risk for DM incidence in the test dataset (p = 0.116).
Conclusion
Although predictive models for DM lack significance when applied to prospectively enrolled cases undergoing DTT‐lung SBRT, the model with RSF exhibits a consistent capacity to effectively classify patients at a high risk of developing DM.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Digital television</subject><subject>distant metastasis</subject><subject>dynamic tumor tracking</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Imaging Physics</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Lung cancer, Non-small cell</subject><subject>Lung cancer, Small cell</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>lung SBRT</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>multi‐institutional study</subject><subject>Neoplasm Metastasis</subject><subject>Nomograms</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>prognostic prediction</subject><subject>prospective external validation</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Radiomics</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1526-9914</issn><issn>1526-9914</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ks9u1DAQxiMEoqVw4QGQJS4IaRc7cRKHS7Va8U8qggOco1nb2bo4drCdLbnxCDwjD8AzMGlKVTigSLHl-c03M5ovyx4zumaU5i9A9vmacV6Xd7JjVubVqmkYv3vrfpQ9iPGCUsZEIe5nR0XDasGK5jj79TH4OGiZzEET_S3p4MCSA1ijIBnviO9IAGV8b2T8-f3HDqJWZAhamSWn90rbmVImJnCJ9DoB3qKJBDrUI2pygNkkjb0PJAWQX4zbk4gx7ROgjCQ7r6arOkvRdK4DDBMxjgz4ol2K5NKkc-K8wyZiD9biKbW1xI4oJsFJHV6SDelHmwzGjIvJpHGWw4EAfxO29DC714GN-tH1eZJ9fv3q0_bt6uzDm3fbzdlKclqWq6osJWdFJwG4UDtVi0JVu0p1vOaFrMpGSkol500pOGM1p7mqFRVSiLIEznRxkp0uusO467WSOEEA2w7B9BCm1oNp_444c97u_aFljFcVbzgqPLtWCP7rqGNqexPngcFpP8a2oA12KZqqQPTpP-iFH-c9IsVYiS5oaI3UeqH2YHVrXOfnVeCnNG7HO90ZfN-gLUTJRU4x4fmSINEiMejupn1G29l47Wy89sp4CD-5PfAN-sdpCLAFuMQy03-k2s32fb6I_gbzB-5s</recordid><startdate>202410</startdate><enddate>202410</enddate><creator>Adachi, Takanori</creator><creator>Nakamura, Mitsuhiro</creator><creator>Matsuo, Yukinori</creator><creator>Karasawa, Katsuyuki</creator><creator>Kokubo, Masaki</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Takashi</creator><creator>Hiraoka, Masahiro</creator><creator>Mizowaki, Takashi</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4372-8259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1356-5118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-8746</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202410</creationdate><title>Prospective external validation of radiomics‐based predictive model of distant metastasis after dynamic tumor tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A multi‐institutional analysis</title><author>Adachi, Takanori ; Nakamura, Mitsuhiro ; Matsuo, Yukinori ; Karasawa, Katsuyuki ; Kokubo, Masaki ; Sakamoto, Takashi ; Hiraoka, Masahiro ; Mizowaki, Takashi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4055-655c413fcaa48dbd783d6b6df4743c659cc00c449584117402d7d08c8855a41e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Digital television</topic><topic>distant metastasis</topic><topic>dynamic tumor tracking</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Imaging Physics</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Lung cancer, Non-small cell</topic><topic>Lung cancer, Small cell</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>lung SBRT</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>multi‐institutional study</topic><topic>Neoplasm Metastasis</topic><topic>Nomograms</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>prognostic prediction</topic><topic>prospective external validation</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Radiomics</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Takanori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Mitsuhiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matsuo, Yukinori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karasawa, Katsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kokubo, Masaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Takashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiraoka, Masahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizowaki, Takashi</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adachi, Takanori</au><au>Nakamura, Mitsuhiro</au><au>Matsuo, Yukinori</au><au>Karasawa, Katsuyuki</au><au>Kokubo, Masaki</au><au>Sakamoto, Takashi</au><au>Hiraoka, Masahiro</au><au>Mizowaki, Takashi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective external validation of radiomics‐based predictive model of distant metastasis after dynamic tumor tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A multi‐institutional analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics</jtitle><addtitle>J Appl Clin Med Phys</addtitle><date>2024-10</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>e14475</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e14475-n/a</pages><issn>1526-9914</issn><eissn>1526-9914</eissn><abstract>Background and purpose
This study aims to externally validate a predictive model for distant metastasis (DM) with computed tomography (CT)‐based radiomics features in prospectively enrolled non‐small‐cell lung cancer patients undergoing dynamic tumor‐tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy (DTT‐SBRT).
Materials and methods
The study collected retrospective data from 567 patients across 11 institutions as the training dataset and prospectively enrolled 42 patients from four institutions as the external test dataset. Four clinical features were collected, and 944 CT‐based radiomic features were extracted from gross tumor volumes. After standardization and feature selection, DM predictive models were developed using fine and gray regression (FG) and random survival forest (RSF), incorporating clinical and radiomic features, and their combinations within the training dataset. Then, the model was applied to the test dataset, dividing patients into high‐ and low‐risk groups based on medians of risk scores. Model performance was assessed using the concordance index (C‐index), and the statistical significance between groups was evaluated using Gray's test.
Results
In the training dataset, 122 of 567 patients (21.5%) developed DM, compared to 9 of 42 patients (21.4%) in the test dataset. In the test dataset, the C‐indices of the clinical, radiomics, and hybrid models with FG were 0.559, 0.544, and 0.560, respectively, whereas those with RSF were 0.576, 0.604, and 0.627, respectively.
The hybrid model with RSF, which exhibited the best predictive performance of all models, identified 7 of 23 patients (30.4%) as high risk and 2 of 19 patients (10.5%) as low risk for DM incidence in the test dataset (p = 0.116).
Conclusion
Although predictive models for DM lack significance when applied to prospectively enrolled cases undergoing DTT‐lung SBRT, the model with RSF exhibits a consistent capacity to effectively classify patients at a high risk of developing DM.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>39178139</pmid><doi>10.1002/acm2.14475</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4372-8259</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1356-5118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8135-8746</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-9914 |
ispartof | Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 2024-10, Vol.25 (10), p.e14475-n/a |
issn | 1526-9914 1526-9914 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11466494 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Analysis Cancer therapies Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - radiotherapy Care and treatment Clinical trials CT imaging Datasets Digital television distant metastasis dynamic tumor tracking Female Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Imaging Physics Lung cancer Lung cancer, Non-small cell Lung cancer, Small cell Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Lung Neoplasms - pathology Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy lung SBRT Male Medical prognosis Medical research Medicine, Experimental Metastasis Middle Aged multi‐institutional study Neoplasm Metastasis Nomograms Patients Prognosis prognostic prediction prospective external validation Prospective Studies Radiation Radiation therapy Radiomics Radiosurgery - methods Radiotherapy Radiotherapy Dosage Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - methods Retrospective Studies Software Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods Tumors |
title | Prospective external validation of radiomics‐based predictive model of distant metastasis after dynamic tumor tracking stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer: A multi‐institutional analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A55%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20external%20validation%20of%20radiomics%E2%80%90based%20predictive%20model%20of%20distant%20metastasis%20after%20dynamic%20tumor%20tracking%20stereotactic%20body%20radiation%20therapy%20in%20patients%20with%20non%E2%80%90small%E2%80%90cell%20lung%20cancer:%20A%20multi%E2%80%90institutional%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Applied%20Clinical%20Medical%20Physics&rft.au=Adachi,%20Takanori&rft.date=2024-10&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=e14475&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e14475-n/a&rft.issn=1526-9914&rft.eissn=1526-9914&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/acm2.14475&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA813854820%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3115152907&rft_id=info:pmid/39178139&rft_galeid=A813854820&rfr_iscdi=true |