Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer
Purpose Positive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa-specific mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) on reducing the incidence of PSM f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | World journal of urology 2024-10, Vol.42 (1), p.571, Article 571 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 571 |
container_title | World journal of urology |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Kobatake, Kohei Goto, Keisuke Honda, Yukiko Naito, Miki Takemoto, Kenshiro Miyamoto, Shunsuke Sekino, Yohei Kitano, Hiroyuki Ikeda, Kenichiro Hieda, Keisuke Goriki, Akihiro Hinata, Nobuyuki |
description | Purpose
Positive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa-specific mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) on reducing the incidence of PSM following RARP.
Methods
We retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing RARP at Hiroshima University between February 2017 and October 2023. The MDTM, comprising a radiologist, uropathologist, and urologist, reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate biopsy results of each patient before RARP and considered the areas requiring attention during RARP. Surgeons were categorized as experienced or non-experienced based on the number of RARP procedures performed.
Results
In the pT2 population, the PSM rate was significantly lower in cases evaluated using the MDTM than in those not (11.1% vs. 24.0%;
p
= 0.0067). Cox regression analysis identified that a PSA level > 7 ng/mL (hazard ratio 2.2799) and nerve-sparing procedures (hazard ratio 2.2619) were independent predictors of increased PSM risk while conducting an MDTM (hazard ratio 0.4773) was an independent predictor of reduced PSM risk in the pT2 population. In the pathological T3 population, there was no significant difference in PSM rates between cases evaluated and not evaluated at an MDTM. In cases evaluated at an MDTM, similar PSM rates were observed regardless of surgeon experience (10.4% for non-experienced and 11.9% for experienced surgeons;
p
= 0.9999).
Conclusions
An MDTM can improve the PSM rate of pT2 PCa following RARP. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11464532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3114502977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-22d7ff8e7d2ade2a4b509b709ddacb0915f719e4838e75527301a34a778265083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwBzggS1y4BMZ2HCcnhKpCkSrBoZwtrzPJukrsYDsr7b-vS0opHDh5pPne88w8Ql4zeM8A1IcEIGpZAa8rkLxhFXtCTlktRNUq3jx9VJ-QFyndADDVgHxOTkQnWq6YOiXH7xHDgtFkd0A6r1N2vUvWLZPzJh5pRjPTGTE7P1I3LzEcMNG8R-q8dT16izQMdAnJbQ4mjs6n0qWLyfswhdFZM9FrTos2ZZORWlNU8SV5Npgp4av794z8-HxxfX5ZXX378vX801VlhWxyxXmvhqFF1XPTIzf1TkK3U9D1vbE76JgcFOuwbkVhpORKADOiNkq1vJHQijPycfNd1t2MvUWfo5n0El2Z9aiDcfrvjnd7PYaDZqxuail4cXh37xDDzxVT1nM5EU6T8RjWpEUhJfBOqYK-_Qe9CWv0Zb-N6pho7kbiG2XLSVLE4WEaBvouWr1Fq0u0-le0mhXRm8d7PEh-Z1kAsQGptPyI8c_f_7G9BSAysXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3114591368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kobatake, Kohei ; Goto, Keisuke ; Honda, Yukiko ; Naito, Miki ; Takemoto, Kenshiro ; Miyamoto, Shunsuke ; Sekino, Yohei ; Kitano, Hiroyuki ; Ikeda, Kenichiro ; Hieda, Keisuke ; Goriki, Akihiro ; Hinata, Nobuyuki</creator><creatorcontrib>Kobatake, Kohei ; Goto, Keisuke ; Honda, Yukiko ; Naito, Miki ; Takemoto, Kenshiro ; Miyamoto, Shunsuke ; Sekino, Yohei ; Kitano, Hiroyuki ; Ikeda, Kenichiro ; Hieda, Keisuke ; Goriki, Akihiro ; Hinata, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
Positive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa-specific mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) on reducing the incidence of PSM following RARP.
Methods
We retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing RARP at Hiroshima University between February 2017 and October 2023. The MDTM, comprising a radiologist, uropathologist, and urologist, reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate biopsy results of each patient before RARP and considered the areas requiring attention during RARP. Surgeons were categorized as experienced or non-experienced based on the number of RARP procedures performed.
Results
In the pT2 population, the PSM rate was significantly lower in cases evaluated using the MDTM than in those not (11.1% vs. 24.0%;
p
= 0.0067). Cox regression analysis identified that a PSA level > 7 ng/mL (hazard ratio 2.2799) and nerve-sparing procedures (hazard ratio 2.2619) were independent predictors of increased PSM risk while conducting an MDTM (hazard ratio 0.4773) was an independent predictor of reduced PSM risk in the pT2 population. In the pathological T3 population, there was no significant difference in PSM rates between cases evaluated and not evaluated at an MDTM. In cases evaluated at an MDTM, similar PSM rates were observed regardless of surgeon experience (10.4% for non-experienced and 11.9% for experienced surgeons;
p
= 0.9999).
Conclusions
An MDTM can improve the PSM rate of pT2 PCa following RARP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0724-4983</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-8726</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39382717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Biopsy ; Humans ; Incidence ; Interdisciplinary Communication ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Male ; Margins of Excision ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Multidisciplinary teams ; Neoplasm Staging ; Nephrology ; Oncology ; Patient Care Team ; Preoperative Care - methods ; Prostate cancer ; Prostatectomy ; Prostatectomy - methods ; Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology ; Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures ; Surgeons ; Urology</subject><ispartof>World journal of urology, 2024-10, Vol.42 (1), p.571, Article 571</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Dec 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-22d7ff8e7d2ade2a4b509b709ddacb0915f719e4838e75527301a34a778265083</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4756-2356 ; 0000-0003-2098-3916 ; 0000-0002-3580-1401 ; 0000-0002-3174-8738 ; 0000-0002-2291-0502 ; 0000-0002-5262-8129 ; 0000-0001-8397-115X ; 0000-0003-3485-0751 ; 0000-0003-1525-5463 ; 0000-0001-7014-6812 ; 0000-0002-9077-4733 ; 0000-0001-5182-8666</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39382717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kobatake, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honda, Yukiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naito, Miki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemoto, Kenshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekino, Yohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hieda, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goriki, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinata, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><title>Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer</title><title>World journal of urology</title><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><description>Purpose
Positive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa-specific mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) on reducing the incidence of PSM following RARP.
Methods
We retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing RARP at Hiroshima University between February 2017 and October 2023. The MDTM, comprising a radiologist, uropathologist, and urologist, reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate biopsy results of each patient before RARP and considered the areas requiring attention during RARP. Surgeons were categorized as experienced or non-experienced based on the number of RARP procedures performed.
Results
In the pT2 population, the PSM rate was significantly lower in cases evaluated using the MDTM than in those not (11.1% vs. 24.0%;
p
= 0.0067). Cox regression analysis identified that a PSA level > 7 ng/mL (hazard ratio 2.2799) and nerve-sparing procedures (hazard ratio 2.2619) were independent predictors of increased PSM risk while conducting an MDTM (hazard ratio 0.4773) was an independent predictor of reduced PSM risk in the pT2 population. In the pathological T3 population, there was no significant difference in PSM rates between cases evaluated and not evaluated at an MDTM. In cases evaluated at an MDTM, similar PSM rates were observed regardless of surgeon experience (10.4% for non-experienced and 11.9% for experienced surgeons;
p
= 0.9999).
Conclusions
An MDTM can improve the PSM rate of pT2 PCa following RARP.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Incidence</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Communication</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Margins of Excision</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary teams</subject><subject>Neoplasm Staging</subject><subject>Nephrology</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Patient Care Team</subject><subject>Preoperative Care - methods</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Prostatectomy</subject><subject>Prostatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Urology</subject><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>0724-4983</issn><issn>1433-8726</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUFv1DAQhS0EoqXwBzggS1y4BMZ2HCcnhKpCkSrBoZwtrzPJukrsYDsr7b-vS0opHDh5pPne88w8Ql4zeM8A1IcEIGpZAa8rkLxhFXtCTlktRNUq3jx9VJ-QFyndADDVgHxOTkQnWq6YOiXH7xHDgtFkd0A6r1N2vUvWLZPzJh5pRjPTGTE7P1I3LzEcMNG8R-q8dT16izQMdAnJbQ4mjs6n0qWLyfswhdFZM9FrTos2ZZORWlNU8SV5Npgp4av794z8-HxxfX5ZXX378vX801VlhWxyxXmvhqFF1XPTIzf1TkK3U9D1vbE76JgcFOuwbkVhpORKADOiNkq1vJHQijPycfNd1t2MvUWfo5n0El2Z9aiDcfrvjnd7PYaDZqxuail4cXh37xDDzxVT1nM5EU6T8RjWpEUhJfBOqYK-_Qe9CWv0Zb-N6pho7kbiG2XLSVLE4WEaBvouWr1Fq0u0-le0mhXRm8d7PEh-Z1kAsQGptPyI8c_f_7G9BSAysXg</recordid><startdate>20241009</startdate><enddate>20241009</enddate><creator>Kobatake, Kohei</creator><creator>Goto, Keisuke</creator><creator>Honda, Yukiko</creator><creator>Naito, Miki</creator><creator>Takemoto, Kenshiro</creator><creator>Miyamoto, Shunsuke</creator><creator>Sekino, Yohei</creator><creator>Kitano, Hiroyuki</creator><creator>Ikeda, Kenichiro</creator><creator>Hieda, Keisuke</creator><creator>Goriki, Akihiro</creator><creator>Hinata, Nobuyuki</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4756-2356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-3916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3580-1401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3174-8738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2291-0502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5262-8129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-115X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-0751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1525-5463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-6812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-4733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-8666</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241009</creationdate><title>Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer</title><author>Kobatake, Kohei ; Goto, Keisuke ; Honda, Yukiko ; Naito, Miki ; Takemoto, Kenshiro ; Miyamoto, Shunsuke ; Sekino, Yohei ; Kitano, Hiroyuki ; Ikeda, Kenichiro ; Hieda, Keisuke ; Goriki, Akihiro ; Hinata, Nobuyuki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-22d7ff8e7d2ade2a4b509b709ddacb0915f719e4838e75527301a34a778265083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Incidence</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Communication</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Margins of Excision</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary teams</topic><topic>Neoplasm Staging</topic><topic>Nephrology</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Patient Care Team</topic><topic>Preoperative Care - methods</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Prostatectomy</topic><topic>Prostatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Urology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kobatake, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goto, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Honda, Yukiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naito, Miki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takemoto, Kenshiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miyamoto, Shunsuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekino, Yohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kitano, Hiroyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, Kenichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hieda, Keisuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goriki, Akihiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hinata, Nobuyuki</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kobatake, Kohei</au><au>Goto, Keisuke</au><au>Honda, Yukiko</au><au>Naito, Miki</au><au>Takemoto, Kenshiro</au><au>Miyamoto, Shunsuke</au><au>Sekino, Yohei</au><au>Kitano, Hiroyuki</au><au>Ikeda, Kenichiro</au><au>Hieda, Keisuke</au><au>Goriki, Akihiro</au><au>Hinata, Nobuyuki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer</atitle><jtitle>World journal of urology</jtitle><stitle>World J Urol</stitle><addtitle>World J Urol</addtitle><date>2024-10-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>571</spage><pages>571-</pages><artnum>571</artnum><issn>1433-8726</issn><issn>0724-4983</issn><eissn>1433-8726</eissn><abstract>Purpose
Positive surgical margins (PSM) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) for prostate cancer (PCa) can increase the risk of biochemical recurrence and PCa-specific mortality. We aimed to evaluate the impact of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDTM) on reducing the incidence of PSM following RARP.
Methods
We retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing RARP at Hiroshima University between February 2017 and October 2023. The MDTM, comprising a radiologist, uropathologist, and urologist, reviewed the preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate biopsy results of each patient before RARP and considered the areas requiring attention during RARP. Surgeons were categorized as experienced or non-experienced based on the number of RARP procedures performed.
Results
In the pT2 population, the PSM rate was significantly lower in cases evaluated using the MDTM than in those not (11.1% vs. 24.0%;
p
= 0.0067). Cox regression analysis identified that a PSA level > 7 ng/mL (hazard ratio 2.2799) and nerve-sparing procedures (hazard ratio 2.2619) were independent predictors of increased PSM risk while conducting an MDTM (hazard ratio 0.4773) was an independent predictor of reduced PSM risk in the pT2 population. In the pathological T3 population, there was no significant difference in PSM rates between cases evaluated and not evaluated at an MDTM. In cases evaluated at an MDTM, similar PSM rates were observed regardless of surgeon experience (10.4% for non-experienced and 11.9% for experienced surgeons;
p
= 0.9999).
Conclusions
An MDTM can improve the PSM rate of pT2 PCa following RARP.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>39382717</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4756-2356</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2098-3916</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3580-1401</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3174-8738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2291-0502</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5262-8129</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-115X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3485-0751</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1525-5463</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7014-6812</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9077-4733</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5182-8666</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1433-8726 |
ispartof | World journal of urology, 2024-10, Vol.42 (1), p.571, Article 571 |
issn | 1433-8726 0724-4983 1433-8726 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11464532 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Aged Biopsy Humans Incidence Interdisciplinary Communication Magnetic resonance imaging Male Margins of Excision Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Multidisciplinary teams Neoplasm Staging Nephrology Oncology Patient Care Team Preoperative Care - methods Prostate cancer Prostatectomy Prostatectomy - methods Prostatic Neoplasms - pathology Prostatic Neoplasms - surgery Retrospective Studies Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures Surgeons Urology |
title | Preoperative multidisciplinary team meeting improves the incidence of positive margins in pathological T2 prostate cancer |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T18%3A44%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preoperative%20multidisciplinary%20team%20meeting%20improves%20the%20incidence%20of%20positive%20margins%20in%20pathological%20T2%20prostate%20cancer&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20urology&rft.au=Kobatake,%20Kohei&rft.date=2024-10-09&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=571&rft.pages=571-&rft.artnum=571&rft.issn=1433-8726&rft.eissn=1433-8726&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00345-024-05261-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3114502977%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3114591368&rft_id=info:pmid/39382717&rfr_iscdi=true |