Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An In Vitro Study

Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An In Vitro Study

Pediatric rotary systems have the advantage of improved canal centricity and conservative canal preparation with better obturation quality. Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files are two exclusive pediatric rotary file systems that were introduced in recent times. The aim of the present study is to com...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry 2024-08, Vol.17 (8), p.892-897
Hauptverfasser: Busi, Sravanthy, Nagarathna, P J, Deoghare, Anushka, Parakh, Keyura, Lokhande, Rashmi S, Malladi, Swati
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Original Research
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 897
container_issue 8
container_start_page 892
container_title International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry
container_volume 17
creator Busi, Sravanthy
Nagarathna, P J
Deoghare, Anushka
Parakh, Keyura
Lokhande, Rashmi S
Malladi, Swati
description Pediatric rotary systems have the advantage of improved canal centricity and conservative canal preparation with better obturation quality. Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files are two exclusive pediatric rotary file systems that were introduced in recent times. The aim of the present study is to compare and evaluate the dentine thickness, centering ability, canal transportation, and instrumentation time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). A total of 40 extracted human primary molar teeth with a minimum 7 mm root length were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups: group I, Pro AF Baby Gold; group II, Pedoflex files. Teeth were imaged preoperatively with CBCT, then root canal preparation was done in both groups with respective files, followed by postoperative CBCT imaging to evaluate the dentin thickness, centering ability, and canal transportation of both groups. Instrumentation time was noted using a stopwatch. There is a statistically significant difference in the instrumentation time; Pedoflex took a shorter time when compared to Pro AF Baby Gold files. Regarding canal transportation, there was no significant difference between the two files, with Pedoflex showing a better value than the other files. Regarding centering ability, there was no significant difference between the two files, with Pro AF Baby Gold having a better value than the other files ( < 0.001). From the findings of our present study, it was found that both systems were able to effectively shape curved root canals in terms of canal transportation and centering ability. Busi S, PJ N, Deoghare A, Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):892-897.
doi_str_mv 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2929
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11451867</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>39372350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2079-37581ed8aa2bb0e8b2b88cb4d93318c790dd418c1bbd36e1e604d5a989216acb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUt1u2yAUtqZNa9X1FSoeoN7AYGN2M6VZ01WqtGhzd4vAkJTMBgtwNT_23mDEbqvuisPhfD_Al2UXCH4sISw_HYb84EZvRRdyBFMnL1jB3mSnkNEyRwySt3NNcgrL4iQ7D8FISAglRVXT99kJZpgWuISn2d_rR9GNIhpngbAKrF0_CG9C2rod-KptNBY0D6b9bXUIl2CdOtobuwcraToTp9QSyQhovLBhcD7OXJcz2a0N0Y99giwCjen1kXbrHVhtwJWQE7hxnZqHt1q5Xaf_gI3pdABJdutNL_wEfjgXF5UA7sNRWySfVoMrLfrZ8Ri1Ao3r3d6LIZkFqzQ8BRM-pyrZAL9MTJo_46imD9m7XWLS50_rWXa_uW7W3_K77ze369Vd3haQshzTskZa1UIUUkJdy0LWdSuJYhijuqUMKkVSgaRUuNJIV5CoUrCaFagSrcRn2ZeFdxhlr1WbXsGLjg_LpbgThv9_Ys0D37tHjhApUV3RxFAtDK13IXi9ewEjyI9B4IeBPweBz0HgxyAk4MVr6RfY87fjf7pkt_Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An In Vitro Study</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Busi, Sravanthy ; Nagarathna, P J ; Deoghare, Anushka ; Parakh, Keyura ; Lokhande, Rashmi S ; Malladi, Swati</creator><creatorcontrib>Busi, Sravanthy ; Nagarathna, P J ; Deoghare, Anushka ; Parakh, Keyura ; Lokhande, Rashmi S ; Malladi, Swati</creatorcontrib><description>Pediatric rotary systems have the advantage of improved canal centricity and conservative canal preparation with better obturation quality. Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files are two exclusive pediatric rotary file systems that were introduced in recent times. The aim of the present study is to compare and evaluate the dentine thickness, centering ability, canal transportation, and instrumentation time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). A total of 40 extracted human primary molar teeth with a minimum 7 mm root length were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups: group I, Pro AF Baby Gold; group II, Pedoflex files. Teeth were imaged preoperatively with CBCT, then root canal preparation was done in both groups with respective files, followed by postoperative CBCT imaging to evaluate the dentin thickness, centering ability, and canal transportation of both groups. Instrumentation time was noted using a stopwatch. There is a statistically significant difference in the instrumentation time; Pedoflex took a shorter time when compared to Pro AF Baby Gold files. Regarding canal transportation, there was no significant difference between the two files, with Pedoflex showing a better value than the other files. Regarding centering ability, there was no significant difference between the two files, with Pro AF Baby Gold having a better value than the other files ( &lt; 0.001). From the findings of our present study, it was found that both systems were able to effectively shape curved root canals in terms of canal transportation and centering ability. Busi S, PJ N, Deoghare A, Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):892-897.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0974-7052</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0975-1904</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2929</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39372350</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>India: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024-08, Vol.17 (8), p.892-897</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024; The Author(s).</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024; The Author(s). 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2079-37581ed8aa2bb0e8b2b88cb4d93318c790dd418c1bbd36e1e604d5a989216acb3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5225-9303 ; 0000-0003-3356-3689</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451867/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11451867/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39372350$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Busi, Sravanthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarathna, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deoghare, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parakh, Keyura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lokhande, Rashmi S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malladi, Swati</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An In Vitro Study</title><title>International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry</title><addtitle>Int J Clin Pediatr Dent</addtitle><description>Pediatric rotary systems have the advantage of improved canal centricity and conservative canal preparation with better obturation quality. Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files are two exclusive pediatric rotary file systems that were introduced in recent times. The aim of the present study is to compare and evaluate the dentine thickness, centering ability, canal transportation, and instrumentation time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). A total of 40 extracted human primary molar teeth with a minimum 7 mm root length were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups: group I, Pro AF Baby Gold; group II, Pedoflex files. Teeth were imaged preoperatively with CBCT, then root canal preparation was done in both groups with respective files, followed by postoperative CBCT imaging to evaluate the dentin thickness, centering ability, and canal transportation of both groups. Instrumentation time was noted using a stopwatch. There is a statistically significant difference in the instrumentation time; Pedoflex took a shorter time when compared to Pro AF Baby Gold files. Regarding canal transportation, there was no significant difference between the two files, with Pedoflex showing a better value than the other files. Regarding centering ability, there was no significant difference between the two files, with Pro AF Baby Gold having a better value than the other files ( &lt; 0.001). From the findings of our present study, it was found that both systems were able to effectively shape curved root canals in terms of canal transportation and centering ability. Busi S, PJ N, Deoghare A, Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):892-897.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>0974-7052</issn><issn>0975-1904</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUt1u2yAUtqZNa9X1FSoeoN7AYGN2M6VZ01WqtGhzd4vAkJTMBgtwNT_23mDEbqvuisPhfD_Al2UXCH4sISw_HYb84EZvRRdyBFMnL1jB3mSnkNEyRwySt3NNcgrL4iQ7D8FISAglRVXT99kJZpgWuISn2d_rR9GNIhpngbAKrF0_CG9C2rod-KptNBY0D6b9bXUIl2CdOtobuwcraToTp9QSyQhovLBhcD7OXJcz2a0N0Y99giwCjen1kXbrHVhtwJWQE7hxnZqHt1q5Xaf_gI3pdABJdutNL_wEfjgXF5UA7sNRWySfVoMrLfrZ8Ri1Ao3r3d6LIZkFqzQ8BRM-pyrZAL9MTJo_46imD9m7XWLS50_rWXa_uW7W3_K77ze369Vd3haQshzTskZa1UIUUkJdy0LWdSuJYhijuqUMKkVSgaRUuNJIV5CoUrCaFagSrcRn2ZeFdxhlr1WbXsGLjg_LpbgThv9_Ys0D37tHjhApUV3RxFAtDK13IXi9ewEjyI9B4IeBPweBz0HgxyAk4MVr6RfY87fjf7pkt_Y</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Busi, Sravanthy</creator><creator>Nagarathna, P J</creator><creator>Deoghare, Anushka</creator><creator>Parakh, Keyura</creator><creator>Lokhande, Rashmi S</creator><creator>Malladi, Swati</creator><general>Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-9303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-3689</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An In Vitro Study</title><author>Busi, Sravanthy ; Nagarathna, P J ; Deoghare, Anushka ; Parakh, Keyura ; Lokhande, Rashmi S ; Malladi, Swati</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2079-37581ed8aa2bb0e8b2b88cb4d93318c790dd418c1bbd36e1e604d5a989216acb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Busi, Sravanthy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagarathna, P J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deoghare, Anushka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parakh, Keyura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lokhande, Rashmi S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Malladi, Swati</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Busi, Sravanthy</au><au>Nagarathna, P J</au><au>Deoghare, Anushka</au><au>Parakh, Keyura</au><au>Lokhande, Rashmi S</au><au>Malladi, Swati</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An In Vitro Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Clin Pediatr Dent</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>892</spage><epage>897</epage><pages>892-897</pages><issn>0974-7052</issn><eissn>0975-1904</eissn><abstract>Pediatric rotary systems have the advantage of improved canal centricity and conservative canal preparation with better obturation quality. Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files are two exclusive pediatric rotary file systems that were introduced in recent times. The aim of the present study is to compare and evaluate the dentine thickness, centering ability, canal transportation, and instrumentation time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex files using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). A total of 40 extracted human primary molar teeth with a minimum 7 mm root length were included in the study and randomly divided into two groups: group I, Pro AF Baby Gold; group II, Pedoflex files. Teeth were imaged preoperatively with CBCT, then root canal preparation was done in both groups with respective files, followed by postoperative CBCT imaging to evaluate the dentin thickness, centering ability, and canal transportation of both groups. Instrumentation time was noted using a stopwatch. There is a statistically significant difference in the instrumentation time; Pedoflex took a shorter time when compared to Pro AF Baby Gold files. Regarding canal transportation, there was no significant difference between the two files, with Pedoflex showing a better value than the other files. Regarding centering ability, there was no significant difference between the two files, with Pro AF Baby Gold having a better value than the other files ( &lt; 0.001). From the findings of our present study, it was found that both systems were able to effectively shape curved root canals in terms of canal transportation and centering ability. Busi S, PJ N, Deoghare A, Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2024;17(8):892-897.</abstract><cop>India</cop><pub>Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers</pub><pmid>39372350</pmid><doi>10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2929</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5225-9303</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3356-3689</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0974-7052
ispartof International journal of clinical pediatric dentistry, 2024-08, Vol.17 (8), p.892-897
issn 0974-7052
0975-1904
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11451867
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Original Research
title Evaluation and Comparison of Dentin Thickness, Centering Ability, Canal Transportation, and Instrumentation Time of Pro AF Baby Gold and Pedoflex Files in Primary Root Canals Using a Cone Beam Computed Tomographic Analysis: An In Vitro Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T02%3A38%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20and%20Comparison%20of%20Dentin%20Thickness,%20Centering%20Ability,%20Canal%20Transportation,%20and%20Instrumentation%20Time%20of%20Pro%20AF%20Baby%20Gold%20and%20Pedoflex%20Files%20in%20Primary%20Root%20Canals%20Using%20a%20Cone%20Beam%20Computed%20Tomographic%20Analysis:%20An%20In%20Vitro%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20clinical%20pediatric%20dentistry&rft.au=Busi,%20Sravanthy&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=892&rft.epage=897&rft.pages=892-897&rft.issn=0974-7052&rft.eissn=0975-1904&rft_id=info:doi/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2929&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E39372350%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/39372350&rfr_iscdi=true