Voter Support for Policies Associated With Child Health as National Campaign Priorities

Policies that are associated with child health are rarely included in platforms of candidates for national political office. Candidates may underrecognize voter support for such priorities or perceive that such policy issues are not sufficiently divisive to appeal to partisan voters. Key policy ques...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JAMA health forum 2024-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e243305
Hauptverfasser: Patrick, Stephen W, Loch, Sarah F, McNeer, Elizabeth, Davis, Matthew M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page e243305
container_title JAMA health forum
container_volume 5
creator Patrick, Stephen W
Loch, Sarah F
McNeer, Elizabeth
Davis, Matthew M
description Policies that are associated with child health are rarely included in platforms of candidates for national political office. Candidates may underrecognize voter support for such priorities or perceive that such policy issues are not sufficiently divisive to appeal to partisan voters. Key policy questions associated with child health may be considered by the next Congress, including the consistency of Medicaid coverage across states and restoring the recently lapsed refundable child tax credit. To examine voter support for candidates regarding policies that are associated with child health. This nationally representative survey of registered US voters 18 years or older was conducted from March to April 2024 and included a survey-based randomized experiment to evaluate the association of message framing with voter support. Messages conveying distinct rationales for Medicaid reform and refundable child tax credit. Likely or definite support for candidates. In this sample (unweighted N = 2014; 1015 women [51.0%]), most respondents indicated they would likely or definitely vote for candidates who expressed strong support for all tested policies: extreme risk protection order (79.5%), school threat assessment (73.1%), expanded childcare (69.6%), refundable child tax credit (66.6%), federalization of Medicaid (66.0%), paid parental leave (65.5%), free school meals (65.6%), safe firearm storage and enforcement (62.9%), preventing Medicaid disenrollment for children younger than 6 years (61.9%), universal free preschool (61.6%), and summer nutrition programs (57.9%). More women than men expressed support for all tested policies. Strong majorities of Democrat and Independent voters would support candidates who endorsed child-focused policies; fewer than 50% of Republican voters expressed such support, except for the extreme risk protection order and school threat assessment. Variations in framing language regarding consistent Medicaid coverage across states were not associated with amplified or diminished voter support. Framing the refundable child tax credit as benefiting "hard-working" vs "low-income" families garnered significantly more support among men (67.0% vs 59.0%), privately insured individuals (72.0% vs 64.4%), and Republicans (54.6% vs 43.0%; all P 
doi_str_mv 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11437383</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3110408453</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-39a5239cc37e4652aace8c0825812968c6c74bbb14569568aa715dc930bfc5613</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkd9LHDEQx0OpVFH_hZK--XJnktlkkyeRo1VB6oG2PobZXM6N7G7WJFvwv-9dz4r6NAPz_THwIeQbZ3POGD99xB5bj11p1zFN_VwwUc0BmPxEDoTSZsa4Vp_f7PvkOOdHxpiQnKsavpB9MAAcanZA7n_H4hO9ncYxpkI3kXQZu-CCz_Q85-gCFr-i96G0dNGGbkUv_3VTzPQnlhAH7OgC-xHDw0CXKcQUysZ8RPbW2GV__DIPya8f3-8Wl7Prm4urxfn1zAmjywwMSgHGOah9paRAdF47poXUXBilnXJ11TQNr6QyUmnEmsuVM8CatZOKwyE52-WOU9P7lfNDSdjZMYUe07ONGOz7yxBa-xD_WM4rqEHDJuHkJSHFp8nnYvuQne86HHycsgXOWcV0JbdSs5O6FHNOfv3aw5ndwrEf4NgtHLuFs_F-ffvoq_M_CvgL3Y6Q2g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3110408453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Voter Support for Policies Associated With Child Health as National Campaign Priorities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Patrick, Stephen W ; Loch, Sarah F ; McNeer, Elizabeth ; Davis, Matthew M</creator><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Stephen W ; Loch, Sarah F ; McNeer, Elizabeth ; Davis, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><description>Policies that are associated with child health are rarely included in platforms of candidates for national political office. Candidates may underrecognize voter support for such priorities or perceive that such policy issues are not sufficiently divisive to appeal to partisan voters. Key policy questions associated with child health may be considered by the next Congress, including the consistency of Medicaid coverage across states and restoring the recently lapsed refundable child tax credit. To examine voter support for candidates regarding policies that are associated with child health. This nationally representative survey of registered US voters 18 years or older was conducted from March to April 2024 and included a survey-based randomized experiment to evaluate the association of message framing with voter support. Messages conveying distinct rationales for Medicaid reform and refundable child tax credit. Likely or definite support for candidates. In this sample (unweighted N = 2014; 1015 women [51.0%]), most respondents indicated they would likely or definitely vote for candidates who expressed strong support for all tested policies: extreme risk protection order (79.5%), school threat assessment (73.1%), expanded childcare (69.6%), refundable child tax credit (66.6%), federalization of Medicaid (66.0%), paid parental leave (65.5%), free school meals (65.6%), safe firearm storage and enforcement (62.9%), preventing Medicaid disenrollment for children younger than 6 years (61.9%), universal free preschool (61.6%), and summer nutrition programs (57.9%). More women than men expressed support for all tested policies. Strong majorities of Democrat and Independent voters would support candidates who endorsed child-focused policies; fewer than 50% of Republican voters expressed such support, except for the extreme risk protection order and school threat assessment. Variations in framing language regarding consistent Medicaid coverage across states were not associated with amplified or diminished voter support. Framing the refundable child tax credit as benefiting "hard-working" vs "low-income" families garnered significantly more support among men (67.0% vs 59.0%), privately insured individuals (72.0% vs 64.4%), and Republicans (54.6% vs 43.0%; all P &lt; .05). The study results suggest that most voters favor candidates who strongly support policies that are associated with child health. Voter support differs substantively by gender and political party affiliation and may be associated with language choices in messaging about policy change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2689-0186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2689-0186</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39331370</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Medical Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Child ; Child Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Comments ; Female ; Health and the 2024 US Election ; Health Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Humans ; Male ; Medicaid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence ; Middle Aged ; Online Only ; Original Investigation ; Politics ; Public Opinion ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; United States ; Voting</subject><ispartof>JAMA health forum, 2024-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e243305</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2024 Patrick SW et al. .</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-39a5239cc37e4652aace8c0825812968c6c74bbb14569568aa715dc930bfc5613</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,864,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39331370$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loch, Sarah F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeer, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><title>Voter Support for Policies Associated With Child Health as National Campaign Priorities</title><title>JAMA health forum</title><addtitle>JAMA Health Forum</addtitle><description>Policies that are associated with child health are rarely included in platforms of candidates for national political office. Candidates may underrecognize voter support for such priorities or perceive that such policy issues are not sufficiently divisive to appeal to partisan voters. Key policy questions associated with child health may be considered by the next Congress, including the consistency of Medicaid coverage across states and restoring the recently lapsed refundable child tax credit. To examine voter support for candidates regarding policies that are associated with child health. This nationally representative survey of registered US voters 18 years or older was conducted from March to April 2024 and included a survey-based randomized experiment to evaluate the association of message framing with voter support. Messages conveying distinct rationales for Medicaid reform and refundable child tax credit. Likely or definite support for candidates. In this sample (unweighted N = 2014; 1015 women [51.0%]), most respondents indicated they would likely or definitely vote for candidates who expressed strong support for all tested policies: extreme risk protection order (79.5%), school threat assessment (73.1%), expanded childcare (69.6%), refundable child tax credit (66.6%), federalization of Medicaid (66.0%), paid parental leave (65.5%), free school meals (65.6%), safe firearm storage and enforcement (62.9%), preventing Medicaid disenrollment for children younger than 6 years (61.9%), universal free preschool (61.6%), and summer nutrition programs (57.9%). More women than men expressed support for all tested policies. Strong majorities of Democrat and Independent voters would support candidates who endorsed child-focused policies; fewer than 50% of Republican voters expressed such support, except for the extreme risk protection order and school threat assessment. Variations in framing language regarding consistent Medicaid coverage across states were not associated with amplified or diminished voter support. Framing the refundable child tax credit as benefiting "hard-working" vs "low-income" families garnered significantly more support among men (67.0% vs 59.0%), privately insured individuals (72.0% vs 64.4%), and Republicans (54.6% vs 43.0%; all P &lt; .05). The study results suggest that most voters favor candidates who strongly support policies that are associated with child health. Voter support differs substantively by gender and political party affiliation and may be associated with language choices in messaging about policy change.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Comments</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health and the 2024 US Election</subject><subject>Health Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medicaid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Online Only</subject><subject>Original Investigation</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Public Opinion</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Voting</subject><issn>2689-0186</issn><issn>2689-0186</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkd9LHDEQx0OpVFH_hZK--XJnktlkkyeRo1VB6oG2PobZXM6N7G7WJFvwv-9dz4r6NAPz_THwIeQbZ3POGD99xB5bj11p1zFN_VwwUc0BmPxEDoTSZsa4Vp_f7PvkOOdHxpiQnKsavpB9MAAcanZA7n_H4hO9ncYxpkI3kXQZu-CCz_Q85-gCFr-i96G0dNGGbkUv_3VTzPQnlhAH7OgC-xHDw0CXKcQUysZ8RPbW2GV__DIPya8f3-8Wl7Prm4urxfn1zAmjywwMSgHGOah9paRAdF47poXUXBilnXJ11TQNr6QyUmnEmsuVM8CatZOKwyE52-WOU9P7lfNDSdjZMYUe07ONGOz7yxBa-xD_WM4rqEHDJuHkJSHFp8nnYvuQne86HHycsgXOWcV0JbdSs5O6FHNOfv3aw5ndwrEf4NgtHLuFs_F-ffvoq_M_CvgL3Y6Q2g</recordid><startdate>20240906</startdate><enddate>20240906</enddate><creator>Patrick, Stephen W</creator><creator>Loch, Sarah F</creator><creator>McNeer, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Davis, Matthew M</creator><general>American Medical Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240906</creationdate><title>Voter Support for Policies Associated With Child Health as National Campaign Priorities</title><author>Patrick, Stephen W ; Loch, Sarah F ; McNeer, Elizabeth ; Davis, Matthew M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-39a5239cc37e4652aace8c0825812968c6c74bbb14569568aa715dc930bfc5613</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child Health - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Comments</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health and the 2024 US Election</topic><topic>Health Policy - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medicaid - legislation &amp; jurisprudence</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Online Only</topic><topic>Original Investigation</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Public Opinion</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Voting</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Patrick, Stephen W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loch, Sarah F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNeer, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Matthew M</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>JAMA health forum</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Patrick, Stephen W</au><au>Loch, Sarah F</au><au>McNeer, Elizabeth</au><au>Davis, Matthew M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Voter Support for Policies Associated With Child Health as National Campaign Priorities</atitle><jtitle>JAMA health forum</jtitle><addtitle>JAMA Health Forum</addtitle><date>2024-09-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e243305</spage><pages>e243305-</pages><issn>2689-0186</issn><eissn>2689-0186</eissn><abstract>Policies that are associated with child health are rarely included in platforms of candidates for national political office. Candidates may underrecognize voter support for such priorities or perceive that such policy issues are not sufficiently divisive to appeal to partisan voters. Key policy questions associated with child health may be considered by the next Congress, including the consistency of Medicaid coverage across states and restoring the recently lapsed refundable child tax credit. To examine voter support for candidates regarding policies that are associated with child health. This nationally representative survey of registered US voters 18 years or older was conducted from March to April 2024 and included a survey-based randomized experiment to evaluate the association of message framing with voter support. Messages conveying distinct rationales for Medicaid reform and refundable child tax credit. Likely or definite support for candidates. In this sample (unweighted N = 2014; 1015 women [51.0%]), most respondents indicated they would likely or definitely vote for candidates who expressed strong support for all tested policies: extreme risk protection order (79.5%), school threat assessment (73.1%), expanded childcare (69.6%), refundable child tax credit (66.6%), federalization of Medicaid (66.0%), paid parental leave (65.5%), free school meals (65.6%), safe firearm storage and enforcement (62.9%), preventing Medicaid disenrollment for children younger than 6 years (61.9%), universal free preschool (61.6%), and summer nutrition programs (57.9%). More women than men expressed support for all tested policies. Strong majorities of Democrat and Independent voters would support candidates who endorsed child-focused policies; fewer than 50% of Republican voters expressed such support, except for the extreme risk protection order and school threat assessment. Variations in framing language regarding consistent Medicaid coverage across states were not associated with amplified or diminished voter support. Framing the refundable child tax credit as benefiting "hard-working" vs "low-income" families garnered significantly more support among men (67.0% vs 59.0%), privately insured individuals (72.0% vs 64.4%), and Republicans (54.6% vs 43.0%; all P &lt; .05). The study results suggest that most voters favor candidates who strongly support policies that are associated with child health. Voter support differs substantively by gender and political party affiliation and may be associated with language choices in messaging about policy change.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Medical Association</pub><pmid>39331370</pmid><doi>10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2689-0186
ispartof JAMA health forum, 2024-09, Vol.5 (9), p.e243305
issn 2689-0186
2689-0186
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11437383
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Child
Child Health - legislation & jurisprudence
Comments
Female
Health and the 2024 US Election
Health Policy - legislation & jurisprudence
Humans
Male
Medicaid - legislation & jurisprudence
Middle Aged
Online Only
Original Investigation
Politics
Public Opinion
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Voting
title Voter Support for Policies Associated With Child Health as National Campaign Priorities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T03%3A31%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Voter%20Support%20for%20Policies%20Associated%20With%20Child%20Health%20as%20National%20Campaign%20Priorities&rft.jtitle=JAMA%20health%20forum&rft.au=Patrick,%20Stephen%20W&rft.date=2024-09-06&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e243305&rft.pages=e243305-&rft.issn=2689-0186&rft.eissn=2689-0186&rft_id=info:doi/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.3305&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3110408453%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3110408453&rft_id=info:pmid/39331370&rfr_iscdi=true