De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection

This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancers 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.3168
Hauptverfasser: Tinterri, Corrado, Barbieri, Erika, Sagona, Andrea, Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone, Gentile, Damiano
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 18
container_start_page 3168
container_title Cancers
container_volume 16
creator Tinterri, Corrado
Barbieri, Erika
Sagona, Andrea
Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone
Gentile, Damiano
description This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%). SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/cancers16183168
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11430603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810842197</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810842197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g333t-6e0a9f2c31bf2ed3f89ac5c03b1f64231b592acb3691b3b08cbb120e091ee4183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9v0zAYxiMEYlPZmRuyxIVLhp03TR0uqMvGH6naJq2cI8d5k7pK7GA7HfmofBvcMliHsA-2Xv_8-HlsR9FrRs8BcvpeCi3ROpYxDizjz6LThC6SOMvy9PnR_CQ6c25LQwNgi2zxMjqBHGDOUnoa_bzE-MpJ0QmvjCamIcsfquuEncjdaFsMo9Kk6JRWAeomcm1qjG-NU17tkFxYFM6T4uCE3AYR1N6RdSh7rMm98htyjUbU23EntCfrDVoxTB9IYfpBWHEQWRndxmu0PbkZvTQ9ur2Pu6CkNHZkNfXD5nAuuVBmcBPZhdSje3R6RFwq51Dus7yKXjSic3j2MM6ib5-u1sWXeHXz-WuxXMUtAPg4QyryJpHAqibBGhqeCzmXFCrWZGkSyvM8EbKCLGcVVJTLqmIJRZozxDTc_Cz6-Ft3GKseaxlsW9GVg1V98FYaocqnK1ptytbsSsZSoFl4lFn07kHBmu8jOl_2ykkM2TSa0ZXAGM0pB6ABffsPujWj1SHfgQLOOaSPVCs6LJVuTDhY7kXLJWeUpwnLF4E6_w8Veo29kkZjo0L9yYY3x0n_Rvzzm-AXmc_Rew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3110388834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tinterri, Corrado ; Barbieri, Erika ; Sagona, Andrea ; Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone ; Gentile, Damiano</creator><creatorcontrib>Tinterri, Corrado ; Barbieri, Erika ; Sagona, Andrea ; Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone ; Gentile, Damiano</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%). SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183168</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39335140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adjuvant treatment ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Comparative analysis ; Development and progression ; Dissection ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mammography ; Medical prognosis ; Metastasis ; Multivariate analysis ; Neoadjuvant therapy ; Oncology, Experimental ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Pertuzumab ; Population studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Survival ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.3168</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8861-5223 ; 0000-0002-1014-0141</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430603/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430603/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39335140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tinterri, Corrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagona, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentile, Damiano</creatorcontrib><title>De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%). SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.</description><subject>Adjuvant treatment</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pertuzumab</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9v0zAYxiMEYlPZmRuyxIVLhp03TR0uqMvGH6naJq2cI8d5k7pK7GA7HfmofBvcMliHsA-2Xv_8-HlsR9FrRs8BcvpeCi3ROpYxDizjz6LThC6SOMvy9PnR_CQ6c25LQwNgi2zxMjqBHGDOUnoa_bzE-MpJ0QmvjCamIcsfquuEncjdaFsMo9Kk6JRWAeomcm1qjG-NU17tkFxYFM6T4uCE3AYR1N6RdSh7rMm98htyjUbU23EntCfrDVoxTB9IYfpBWHEQWRndxmu0PbkZvTQ9ur2Pu6CkNHZkNfXD5nAuuVBmcBPZhdSje3R6RFwq51Dus7yKXjSic3j2MM6ib5-u1sWXeHXz-WuxXMUtAPg4QyryJpHAqibBGhqeCzmXFCrWZGkSyvM8EbKCLGcVVJTLqmIJRZozxDTc_Cz6-Ft3GKseaxlsW9GVg1V98FYaocqnK1ptytbsSsZSoFl4lFn07kHBmu8jOl_2ykkM2TSa0ZXAGM0pB6ABffsPujWj1SHfgQLOOaSPVCs6LJVuTDhY7kXLJWeUpwnLF4E6_w8Veo29kkZjo0L9yYY3x0n_Rvzzm-AXmc_Rew</recordid><startdate>20240915</startdate><enddate>20240915</enddate><creator>Tinterri, Corrado</creator><creator>Barbieri, Erika</creator><creator>Sagona, Andrea</creator><creator>Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone</creator><creator>Gentile, Damiano</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-5223</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-0141</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240915</creationdate><title>De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection</title><author>Tinterri, Corrado ; Barbieri, Erika ; Sagona, Andrea ; Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone ; Gentile, Damiano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g333t-6e0a9f2c31bf2ed3f89ac5c03b1f64231b592acb3691b3b08cbb120e091ee4183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant treatment</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pertuzumab</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tinterri, Corrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagona, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentile, Damiano</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tinterri, Corrado</au><au>Barbieri, Erika</au><au>Sagona, Andrea</au><au>Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone</au><au>Gentile, Damiano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-09-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>3168</spage><pages>3168-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups. Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%). SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39335140</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers16183168</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-5223</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-0141</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6694
ispartof Cancers, 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.3168
issn 2072-6694
2072-6694
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11430603
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central
subjects Adjuvant treatment
Biopsy
Breast cancer
Cancer
Cancer patients
Cancer therapies
Care and treatment
Chemotherapy
Comparative analysis
Development and progression
Dissection
Lymph nodes
Lymphatic system
Magnetic resonance imaging
Mammography
Medical prognosis
Metastasis
Multivariate analysis
Neoadjuvant therapy
Oncology, Experimental
Patient outcomes
Patients
Pertuzumab
Population studies
Surgeons
Surgery
Survival
Tumors
title De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=De-Escalation%20of%20Axillary%20Surgery%20in%20Clinically%20Node-Positive%20Breast%20Cancer%20Patients%20Treated%20with%20Neoadjuvant%20Therapy:%20Comparative%20Long-Term%20Outcomes%20of%20Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Biopsy%20versus%20Axillary%20Lymph%20Node%20Dissection&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Tinterri,%20Corrado&rft.date=2024-09-15&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=3168&rft.pages=3168-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers16183168&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA810842197%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3110388834&rft_id=info:pmid/39335140&rft_galeid=A810842197&rfr_iscdi=true