De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection
This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancers 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.3168 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 18 |
container_start_page | 3168 |
container_title | Cancers |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Tinterri, Corrado Barbieri, Erika Sagona, Andrea Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone Gentile, Damiano |
description | This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%).
SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/cancers16183168 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11430603</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A810842197</galeid><sourcerecordid>A810842197</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g333t-6e0a9f2c31bf2ed3f89ac5c03b1f64231b592acb3691b3b08cbb120e091ee4183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkk9v0zAYxiMEYlPZmRuyxIVLhp03TR0uqMvGH6naJq2cI8d5k7pK7GA7HfmofBvcMliHsA-2Xv_8-HlsR9FrRs8BcvpeCi3ROpYxDizjz6LThC6SOMvy9PnR_CQ6c25LQwNgi2zxMjqBHGDOUnoa_bzE-MpJ0QmvjCamIcsfquuEncjdaFsMo9Kk6JRWAeomcm1qjG-NU17tkFxYFM6T4uCE3AYR1N6RdSh7rMm98htyjUbU23EntCfrDVoxTB9IYfpBWHEQWRndxmu0PbkZvTQ9ur2Pu6CkNHZkNfXD5nAuuVBmcBPZhdSje3R6RFwq51Dus7yKXjSic3j2MM6ib5-u1sWXeHXz-WuxXMUtAPg4QyryJpHAqibBGhqeCzmXFCrWZGkSyvM8EbKCLGcVVJTLqmIJRZozxDTc_Cz6-Ft3GKseaxlsW9GVg1V98FYaocqnK1ptytbsSsZSoFl4lFn07kHBmu8jOl_2ykkM2TSa0ZXAGM0pB6ABffsPujWj1SHfgQLOOaSPVCs6LJVuTDhY7kXLJWeUpwnLF4E6_w8Veo29kkZjo0L9yYY3x0n_Rvzzm-AXmc_Rew</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3110388834</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Tinterri, Corrado ; Barbieri, Erika ; Sagona, Andrea ; Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone ; Gentile, Damiano</creator><creatorcontrib>Tinterri, Corrado ; Barbieri, Erika ; Sagona, Andrea ; Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone ; Gentile, Damiano</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%).
SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6694</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/cancers16183168</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39335140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adjuvant treatment ; Biopsy ; Breast cancer ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Cancer therapies ; Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Comparative analysis ; Development and progression ; Dissection ; Lymph nodes ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Mammography ; Medical prognosis ; Metastasis ; Multivariate analysis ; Neoadjuvant therapy ; Oncology, Experimental ; Patient outcomes ; Patients ; Pertuzumab ; Population studies ; Surgeons ; Surgery ; Survival ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancers, 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.3168</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-8861-5223 ; 0000-0002-1014-0141</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430603/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11430603/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39335140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tinterri, Corrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagona, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentile, Damiano</creatorcontrib><title>De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection</title><title>Cancers</title><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><description>This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%).
SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.</description><subject>Adjuvant treatment</subject><subject>Biopsy</subject><subject>Breast cancer</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Cancer therapies</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Lymph nodes</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Multivariate analysis</subject><subject>Neoadjuvant therapy</subject><subject>Oncology, Experimental</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pertuzumab</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Surgeons</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>2072-6694</issn><issn>2072-6694</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkk9v0zAYxiMEYlPZmRuyxIVLhp03TR0uqMvGH6naJq2cI8d5k7pK7GA7HfmofBvcMliHsA-2Xv_8-HlsR9FrRs8BcvpeCi3ROpYxDizjz6LThC6SOMvy9PnR_CQ6c25LQwNgi2zxMjqBHGDOUnoa_bzE-MpJ0QmvjCamIcsfquuEncjdaFsMo9Kk6JRWAeomcm1qjG-NU17tkFxYFM6T4uCE3AYR1N6RdSh7rMm98htyjUbU23EntCfrDVoxTB9IYfpBWHEQWRndxmu0PbkZvTQ9ur2Pu6CkNHZkNfXD5nAuuVBmcBPZhdSje3R6RFwq51Dus7yKXjSic3j2MM6ib5-u1sWXeHXz-WuxXMUtAPg4QyryJpHAqibBGhqeCzmXFCrWZGkSyvM8EbKCLGcVVJTLqmIJRZozxDTc_Cz6-Ft3GKseaxlsW9GVg1V98FYaocqnK1ptytbsSsZSoFl4lFn07kHBmu8jOl_2ykkM2TSa0ZXAGM0pB6ABffsPujWj1SHfgQLOOaSPVCs6LJVuTDhY7kXLJWeUpwnLF4E6_w8Veo29kkZjo0L9yYY3x0n_Rvzzm-AXmc_Rew</recordid><startdate>20240915</startdate><enddate>20240915</enddate><creator>Tinterri, Corrado</creator><creator>Barbieri, Erika</creator><creator>Sagona, Andrea</creator><creator>Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone</creator><creator>Gentile, Damiano</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-5223</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-0141</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240915</creationdate><title>De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection</title><author>Tinterri, Corrado ; Barbieri, Erika ; Sagona, Andrea ; Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone ; Gentile, Damiano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g333t-6e0a9f2c31bf2ed3f89ac5c03b1f64231b592acb3691b3b08cbb120e091ee4183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adjuvant treatment</topic><topic>Biopsy</topic><topic>Breast cancer</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Cancer therapies</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Lymph nodes</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Multivariate analysis</topic><topic>Neoadjuvant therapy</topic><topic>Oncology, Experimental</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pertuzumab</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Surgeons</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tinterri, Corrado</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbieri, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sagona, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gentile, Damiano</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tinterri, Corrado</au><au>Barbieri, Erika</au><au>Sagona, Andrea</au><au>Di Maria Grimaldi, Simone</au><au>Gentile, Damiano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection</atitle><jtitle>Cancers</jtitle><addtitle>Cancers (Basel)</addtitle><date>2024-09-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>18</issue><spage>3168</spage><pages>3168-</pages><issn>2072-6694</issn><eissn>2072-6694</eissn><abstract>This study compares the long-term outcomes of axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) versus sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in clinically node-positive (cN+) breast cancer (BC) patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy (NAT).
We conducted a retrospective analysis of 322 cN+ BC patients who became clinically node-negative (ycN0) post-NAT. Patients were categorized based on the final type of axillary surgery performed: ALND or SLNB. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), overall survival (OS), and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) were evaluated and compared between the two groups.
Patients in the SLNB group had significantly better 3-, 5-, and 10-year RFS, DDFS, OS, and BCSS compared to those in the ALND group. The SLNB group also had a higher proportion of patients achieving pathologic complete response (pCR). Multivariate analysis identified pCR, ypN0 status, and SLNB as favorable prognostic factors for all survival metrics. Axillary recurrence rates were low for both groups (0.6-2.1%).
SLNB may be a safe and effective alternative to ALND for selected cN+ BC patients who convert to ycN0 after NAT. These findings suggest that careful patient selection is crucial, and further research is needed to validate these results in more comparable populations.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39335140</pmid><doi>10.3390/cancers16183168</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8861-5223</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1014-0141</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2072-6694 |
ispartof | Cancers, 2024-09, Vol.16 (18), p.3168 |
issn | 2072-6694 2072-6694 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11430603 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adjuvant treatment Biopsy Breast cancer Cancer Cancer patients Cancer therapies Care and treatment Chemotherapy Comparative analysis Development and progression Dissection Lymph nodes Lymphatic system Magnetic resonance imaging Mammography Medical prognosis Metastasis Multivariate analysis Neoadjuvant therapy Oncology, Experimental Patient outcomes Patients Pertuzumab Population studies Surgeons Surgery Survival Tumors |
title | De-Escalation of Axillary Surgery in Clinically Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Therapy: Comparative Long-Term Outcomes of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy versus Axillary Lymph Node Dissection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A19%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=De-Escalation%20of%20Axillary%20Surgery%20in%20Clinically%20Node-Positive%20Breast%20Cancer%20Patients%20Treated%20with%20Neoadjuvant%20Therapy:%20Comparative%20Long-Term%20Outcomes%20of%20Sentinel%20Lymph%20Node%20Biopsy%20versus%20Axillary%20Lymph%20Node%20Dissection&rft.jtitle=Cancers&rft.au=Tinterri,%20Corrado&rft.date=2024-09-15&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=18&rft.spage=3168&rft.pages=3168-&rft.issn=2072-6694&rft.eissn=2072-6694&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/cancers16183168&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA810842197%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3110388834&rft_id=info:pmid/39335140&rft_galeid=A810842197&rfr_iscdi=true |