Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank

To support the development of appraisal tools for assessing the quality of in vitro studies, we developed a method for literature-based discovery of study assessment criteria, used the method to create an item bank of assessment criteria of potential relevance to in vitro studies, and analyzed the i...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Toxicological sciences 2024-10, Vol.201 (2), p.240-253
Hauptverfasser: Whaley, Paul, Blain, Robyn B, Draper, Derek, Rooney, Andrew A, Walker, Vickie R, Wattam, Stephen, Wright, Rob, Hooijmans, Carlijn R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 253
container_issue 2
container_start_page 240
container_title Toxicological sciences
container_volume 201
creator Whaley, Paul
Blain, Robyn B
Draper, Derek
Rooney, Andrew A
Walker, Vickie R
Wattam, Stephen
Wright, Rob
Hooijmans, Carlijn R
description To support the development of appraisal tools for assessing the quality of in vitro studies, we developed a method for literature-based discovery of study assessment criteria, used the method to create an item bank of assessment criteria of potential relevance to in vitro studies, and analyzed the item bank to discern and critique current approaches for appraisal of in vitro studies. We searched four research indexes and included any document that identified itself as an appraisal tool for in vitro studies, was a systematic review that included a critical appraisal step, or was a reporting checklist for in vitro studies. We abstracted, normalized, and categorized all criteria applied by the included appraisal tools to create an "item bank" database of issues relevant to the assessment of in vitro studies. The resulting item bank consists of 676 unique appraisal concepts from 67 appraisal tools. We believe this item bank is the single most comprehensive resource of its type to date, should be of high utility for future tool development exercises, and provides a robust methodology for grounding tool development in the existing literature. Although we set out to develop an item bank specifically targeting in vitro studies, we found that many of the assessment concepts we discovered are readily applicable to other study designs. Item banks can be of significant value as a resource; however, there are important challenges in developing, maintaining, and extending them of which researchers should be aware.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/toxsci/kfae083
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11424884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3076018783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-7a4cfc1257e9ca365aa3145fa0a5b85f570842faeb347969fb06c74d50e1d1873</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUU1PAjEQbYxGEL16ND16Adptt9v1Ygzxg4TEi56b2W4LFXaL7ULk31sDEj3NZObNezPzELqmZERJycad_4rajZcWDJHsBPVTVQxJmZWnh1wQSXroIsYPQigVpDxHPSZLwVme9dFsWpu2c3bn2jmGGE2MTSpgHVxnggNsfcCuxVvXBY9jt6mdiXcYcGO6ha8xtDVOyAZX0C4v0ZmFVTRXhzhA70-Pb5OX4ez1eTp5mA11xkQ3LIBrq2mWF6bUwEQOwCjPLRDIK5nbvCCSZ-miivGiFKWtiNAFr3NiaE1lwQbofs-73lSNqXVaOMBKrYNrIOyUB6f-d1q3UHO_VZTyjEvJE8PtgSH4z42JnWpc1Ga1gtb4TVSMFIIkKckSdLSH6uBjDMYedShRPx6ovQfq4EEauPm73RH--3T2DSP3hos</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3076018783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford Journals</source><creator>Whaley, Paul ; Blain, Robyn B ; Draper, Derek ; Rooney, Andrew A ; Walker, Vickie R ; Wattam, Stephen ; Wright, Rob ; Hooijmans, Carlijn R</creator><creatorcontrib>Whaley, Paul ; Blain, Robyn B ; Draper, Derek ; Rooney, Andrew A ; Walker, Vickie R ; Wattam, Stephen ; Wright, Rob ; Hooijmans, Carlijn R</creatorcontrib><description>To support the development of appraisal tools for assessing the quality of in vitro studies, we developed a method for literature-based discovery of study assessment criteria, used the method to create an item bank of assessment criteria of potential relevance to in vitro studies, and analyzed the item bank to discern and critique current approaches for appraisal of in vitro studies. We searched four research indexes and included any document that identified itself as an appraisal tool for in vitro studies, was a systematic review that included a critical appraisal step, or was a reporting checklist for in vitro studies. We abstracted, normalized, and categorized all criteria applied by the included appraisal tools to create an "item bank" database of issues relevant to the assessment of in vitro studies. The resulting item bank consists of 676 unique appraisal concepts from 67 appraisal tools. We believe this item bank is the single most comprehensive resource of its type to date, should be of high utility for future tool development exercises, and provides a robust methodology for grounding tool development in the existing literature. Although we set out to develop an item bank specifically targeting in vitro studies, we found that many of the assessment concepts we discovered are readily applicable to other study designs. Item banks can be of significant value as a resource; however, there are important challenges in developing, maintaining, and extending them of which researchers should be aware.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1096-6080</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1096-0929</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0929</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfae083</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38964352</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Animals ; Databases, Factual ; Emerging Technologies, Methods, and Models ; Humans ; In Vitro Techniques ; Research Design</subject><ispartof>Toxicological sciences, 2024-10, Vol.201 (2), p.240-253</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Toxicology. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-7a4cfc1257e9ca365aa3145fa0a5b85f570842faeb347969fb06c74d50e1d1873</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0208-686X ; 0000-0002-1756-5185 ; 0000-0001-6435-5714 ; 0000-0003-4021-0785 ; 0000-0002-1859-5554</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38964352$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Whaley, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blain, Robyn B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draper, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, Andrew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Vickie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wattam, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooijmans, Carlijn R</creatorcontrib><title>Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank</title><title>Toxicological sciences</title><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><description>To support the development of appraisal tools for assessing the quality of in vitro studies, we developed a method for literature-based discovery of study assessment criteria, used the method to create an item bank of assessment criteria of potential relevance to in vitro studies, and analyzed the item bank to discern and critique current approaches for appraisal of in vitro studies. We searched four research indexes and included any document that identified itself as an appraisal tool for in vitro studies, was a systematic review that included a critical appraisal step, or was a reporting checklist for in vitro studies. We abstracted, normalized, and categorized all criteria applied by the included appraisal tools to create an "item bank" database of issues relevant to the assessment of in vitro studies. The resulting item bank consists of 676 unique appraisal concepts from 67 appraisal tools. We believe this item bank is the single most comprehensive resource of its type to date, should be of high utility for future tool development exercises, and provides a robust methodology for grounding tool development in the existing literature. Although we set out to develop an item bank specifically targeting in vitro studies, we found that many of the assessment concepts we discovered are readily applicable to other study designs. Item banks can be of significant value as a resource; however, there are important challenges in developing, maintaining, and extending them of which researchers should be aware.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Databases, Factual</subject><subject>Emerging Technologies, Methods, and Models</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>In Vitro Techniques</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><issn>1096-6080</issn><issn>1096-0929</issn><issn>1096-0929</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVUU1PAjEQbYxGEL16ND16Adptt9v1Ygzxg4TEi56b2W4LFXaL7ULk31sDEj3NZObNezPzELqmZERJycad_4rajZcWDJHsBPVTVQxJmZWnh1wQSXroIsYPQigVpDxHPSZLwVme9dFsWpu2c3bn2jmGGE2MTSpgHVxnggNsfcCuxVvXBY9jt6mdiXcYcGO6ha8xtDVOyAZX0C4v0ZmFVTRXhzhA70-Pb5OX4ez1eTp5mA11xkQ3LIBrq2mWF6bUwEQOwCjPLRDIK5nbvCCSZ-miivGiFKWtiNAFr3NiaE1lwQbofs-73lSNqXVaOMBKrYNrIOyUB6f-d1q3UHO_VZTyjEvJE8PtgSH4z42JnWpc1Ga1gtb4TVSMFIIkKckSdLSH6uBjDMYedShRPx6ovQfq4EEauPm73RH--3T2DSP3hos</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>Whaley, Paul</creator><creator>Blain, Robyn B</creator><creator>Draper, Derek</creator><creator>Rooney, Andrew A</creator><creator>Walker, Vickie R</creator><creator>Wattam, Stephen</creator><creator>Wright, Rob</creator><creator>Hooijmans, Carlijn R</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-686X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-5185</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-5714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4021-0785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1859-5554</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank</title><author>Whaley, Paul ; Blain, Robyn B ; Draper, Derek ; Rooney, Andrew A ; Walker, Vickie R ; Wattam, Stephen ; Wright, Rob ; Hooijmans, Carlijn R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-7a4cfc1257e9ca365aa3145fa0a5b85f570842faeb347969fb06c74d50e1d1873</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Databases, Factual</topic><topic>Emerging Technologies, Methods, and Models</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>In Vitro Techniques</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Whaley, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blain, Robyn B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Draper, Derek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rooney, Andrew A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Vickie R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wattam, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, Rob</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooijmans, Carlijn R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Toxicological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Whaley, Paul</au><au>Blain, Robyn B</au><au>Draper, Derek</au><au>Rooney, Andrew A</au><au>Walker, Vickie R</au><au>Wattam, Stephen</au><au>Wright, Rob</au><au>Hooijmans, Carlijn R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank</atitle><jtitle>Toxicological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Toxicol Sci</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>201</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>240</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>240-253</pages><issn>1096-6080</issn><issn>1096-0929</issn><eissn>1096-0929</eissn><abstract>To support the development of appraisal tools for assessing the quality of in vitro studies, we developed a method for literature-based discovery of study assessment criteria, used the method to create an item bank of assessment criteria of potential relevance to in vitro studies, and analyzed the item bank to discern and critique current approaches for appraisal of in vitro studies. We searched four research indexes and included any document that identified itself as an appraisal tool for in vitro studies, was a systematic review that included a critical appraisal step, or was a reporting checklist for in vitro studies. We abstracted, normalized, and categorized all criteria applied by the included appraisal tools to create an "item bank" database of issues relevant to the assessment of in vitro studies. The resulting item bank consists of 676 unique appraisal concepts from 67 appraisal tools. We believe this item bank is the single most comprehensive resource of its type to date, should be of high utility for future tool development exercises, and provides a robust methodology for grounding tool development in the existing literature. Although we set out to develop an item bank specifically targeting in vitro studies, we found that many of the assessment concepts we discovered are readily applicable to other study designs. Item banks can be of significant value as a resource; however, there are important challenges in developing, maintaining, and extending them of which researchers should be aware.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38964352</pmid><doi>10.1093/toxsci/kfae083</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0208-686X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1756-5185</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6435-5714</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4021-0785</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1859-5554</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1096-6080
ispartof Toxicological sciences, 2024-10, Vol.201 (2), p.240-253
issn 1096-6080
1096-0929
1096-0929
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11424884
source MEDLINE; Oxford Journals
subjects Animals
Databases, Factual
Emerging Technologies, Methods, and Models
Humans
In Vitro Techniques
Research Design
title Identifying assessment criteria for in vitro studies: a method and item bank
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T15%3A38%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Identifying%20assessment%20criteria%20for%20in%20vitro%20studies:%20a%20method%20and%20item%20bank&rft.jtitle=Toxicological%20sciences&rft.au=Whaley,%20Paul&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=201&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=240&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=240-253&rft.issn=1096-6080&rft.eissn=1096-0929&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/toxsci/kfae083&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3076018783%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3076018783&rft_id=info:pmid/38964352&rfr_iscdi=true