Ipsilateral or contralateral boosting of mice with mRNA vaccines confers equivalent immunity and protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain

Boosting with mRNA vaccines encoding variant-matched spike proteins has been implemented to mitigate their reduced efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nonetheless, in humans, it remains unclear whether boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral arm with respect to the priming doses impa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of virology 2024-09, Vol.98 (9), p.e0057424
Hauptverfasser: Ying, Baoling, Liang, Chieh-Yu, Desai, Pritesh, Scheaffer, Suzanne M, Elbashir, Sayda M, Edwards, Darin K, Thackray, Larissa B, Diamond, Michael S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page e0057424
container_title Journal of virology
container_volume 98
creator Ying, Baoling
Liang, Chieh-Yu
Desai, Pritesh
Scheaffer, Suzanne M
Elbashir, Sayda M
Edwards, Darin K
Thackray, Larissa B
Diamond, Michael S
description Boosting with mRNA vaccines encoding variant-matched spike proteins has been implemented to mitigate their reduced efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nonetheless, in humans, it remains unclear whether boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral arm with respect to the priming doses impacts immunity and protection. Here, we boosted K18-hACE2 mice with either monovalent mRNA-1273 (Wuhan-1 spike) or bivalent mRNA-1273.214 (Wuhan-1 + BA.1 spike) vaccine in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg after a two-dose priming series with mRNA-1273. Boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg elicited equivalent levels of serum IgG and neutralizing antibody responses against Wuhan-1 and BA.1. While contralateral boosting with mRNA vaccines resulted in the expansion of spike-specific B and T cells beyond the ipsilateral draining lymph node (DLN) to the contralateral DLN, administration of a third mRNA vaccine dose at either site resulted in similar levels of antigen-specific germinal center B cells, plasmablasts/plasma cells, T follicular helper cells, and CD8 T cells in the DLNs and the spleen. Furthermore, ipsilateral and contralateral boosting with mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273.214 vaccines conferred similar homologous or heterologous immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 virus challenge with equivalent reductions in viral RNA and infectious virus in the nasal turbinates and lungs. Collectively, our data show limited differences in B and T cell immune responses after ipsilateral and contralateral site boosting by mRNA vaccines that do not substantively impact protection against an Omicron strain.IMPORTANCESequential boosting with mRNA vaccines has been an effective strategy to overcome waning immunity and neutralization escape by emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, it remains unclear how the site of boosting relative to the primary vaccination series shapes optimal immune responses or breadth of protection against variants. In K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, we observed that intramuscular boosting with historical monovalent or variant-matched bivalent vaccines in the ipsilateral or contralateral limb elicited comparable levels of serum spike-specific antibody and antigen-specific B and T cell responses. Moreover, boosting on either side conferred equivalent protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge strain. Our data in mice suggest that the site of intramuscular boosting with an mRNA vaccine does not substantially impact immunity or protection agai
doi_str_mv 10.1128/jvi.00574-24
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11406931</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3097853809</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-66f46b77531779c8912fc3cab2b4a3212784d0f1f43eaa2f829e7574368186523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtrGzEUhUVpaJy0u66Lli1kUr1mRloVY_oIhASStnQn7sgaR2ZGciSNS35F_3KV2AntIisJ3aPvcs5B6C0lp5Qy-XG9daeE1K2omHiBZpQoWdU1FS_RjBDGqprLX4foKKU1IVSIRrxCh1xRJVhNZujP2Sa5AbKNMOAQsQk-l-v-oQshZedXOPR4dMbi3y7f4PHqYo63YIzzNt3_6G1M2N5ObguD9Rm7cZy8y3cY_BJvYsjWZBc8hhU4nzIGfD2_uq4W4WfF8GUBxzJMZa_zr9FBD0Oyb_bnMfrx5fP3xbfq_PLr2WJ-XgEnTa6aphdN17Y1p22rjFSU9YYb6FgngDPKWimWpKe94BaA9ZIp25aMeCOpbGrGj9GnHXczdaNdGvtgW2-iGyHe6QBO_z_x7kavwlZTKkijOC2E93tCDLeTTVmPLhk7DOBtmJLmRLWyhE9UkZ7spMVoStH2T3so0fcl6lKifihRM1HkH3ZySCPT6zBFX6J4TvvuXx9P4MeG-V8luqeC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097853809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ipsilateral or contralateral boosting of mice with mRNA vaccines confers equivalent immunity and protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ying, Baoling ; Liang, Chieh-Yu ; Desai, Pritesh ; Scheaffer, Suzanne M ; Elbashir, Sayda M ; Edwards, Darin K ; Thackray, Larissa B ; Diamond, Michael S</creator><contributor>Subbarao, Kanta</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ying, Baoling ; Liang, Chieh-Yu ; Desai, Pritesh ; Scheaffer, Suzanne M ; Elbashir, Sayda M ; Edwards, Darin K ; Thackray, Larissa B ; Diamond, Michael S ; Subbarao, Kanta</creatorcontrib><description>Boosting with mRNA vaccines encoding variant-matched spike proteins has been implemented to mitigate their reduced efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nonetheless, in humans, it remains unclear whether boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral arm with respect to the priming doses impacts immunity and protection. Here, we boosted K18-hACE2 mice with either monovalent mRNA-1273 (Wuhan-1 spike) or bivalent mRNA-1273.214 (Wuhan-1 + BA.1 spike) vaccine in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg after a two-dose priming series with mRNA-1273. Boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg elicited equivalent levels of serum IgG and neutralizing antibody responses against Wuhan-1 and BA.1. While contralateral boosting with mRNA vaccines resulted in the expansion of spike-specific B and T cells beyond the ipsilateral draining lymph node (DLN) to the contralateral DLN, administration of a third mRNA vaccine dose at either site resulted in similar levels of antigen-specific germinal center B cells, plasmablasts/plasma cells, T follicular helper cells, and CD8 T cells in the DLNs and the spleen. Furthermore, ipsilateral and contralateral boosting with mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273.214 vaccines conferred similar homologous or heterologous immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 virus challenge with equivalent reductions in viral RNA and infectious virus in the nasal turbinates and lungs. Collectively, our data show limited differences in B and T cell immune responses after ipsilateral and contralateral site boosting by mRNA vaccines that do not substantively impact protection against an Omicron strain.IMPORTANCESequential boosting with mRNA vaccines has been an effective strategy to overcome waning immunity and neutralization escape by emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, it remains unclear how the site of boosting relative to the primary vaccination series shapes optimal immune responses or breadth of protection against variants. In K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, we observed that intramuscular boosting with historical monovalent or variant-matched bivalent vaccines in the ipsilateral or contralateral limb elicited comparable levels of serum spike-specific antibody and antigen-specific B and T cell responses. Moreover, boosting on either side conferred equivalent protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge strain. Our data in mice suggest that the site of intramuscular boosting with an mRNA vaccine does not substantially impact immunity or protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-538X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1098-5514</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-5514</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00574-24</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39194250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Society for Microbiology</publisher><subject>2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 - immunology ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - genetics ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - immunology ; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - metabolism ; Animals ; Antibodies, Neutralizing - blood ; Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology ; Antibodies, Viral - blood ; Antibodies, Viral - immunology ; B-Lymphocytes - immunology ; COVID-19 - immunology ; COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control ; COVID-19 - virology ; COVID-19 Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage ; COVID-19 Vaccines - immunology ; Editor’s Pick ; Female ; Humans ; Immunization, Secondary ; Immunoglobulin G - blood ; Immunoglobulin G - immunology ; Mice ; mRNA Vaccines - immunology ; SARS-CoV-2 - immunology ; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - genetics ; Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology ; T-Lymphocytes - immunology ; Vaccines and Antiviral Agents ; Virology</subject><ispartof>Journal of virology, 2024-09, Vol.98 (9), p.e0057424</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 Ying et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Ying et al. 2024 Ying et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-66f46b77531779c8912fc3cab2b4a3212784d0f1f43eaa2f829e7574368186523</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2065-2941 ; 0000-0002-8791-3165 ; 0000-0002-9344-9004</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406931/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11406931/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39194250$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Subbarao, Kanta</contributor><creatorcontrib>Ying, Baoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Chieh-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Pritesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheaffer, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbashir, Sayda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Darin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thackray, Larissa B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamond, Michael S</creatorcontrib><title>Ipsilateral or contralateral boosting of mice with mRNA vaccines confers equivalent immunity and protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain</title><title>Journal of virology</title><addtitle>J Virol</addtitle><addtitle>J Virol</addtitle><description>Boosting with mRNA vaccines encoding variant-matched spike proteins has been implemented to mitigate their reduced efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nonetheless, in humans, it remains unclear whether boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral arm with respect to the priming doses impacts immunity and protection. Here, we boosted K18-hACE2 mice with either monovalent mRNA-1273 (Wuhan-1 spike) or bivalent mRNA-1273.214 (Wuhan-1 + BA.1 spike) vaccine in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg after a two-dose priming series with mRNA-1273. Boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg elicited equivalent levels of serum IgG and neutralizing antibody responses against Wuhan-1 and BA.1. While contralateral boosting with mRNA vaccines resulted in the expansion of spike-specific B and T cells beyond the ipsilateral draining lymph node (DLN) to the contralateral DLN, administration of a third mRNA vaccine dose at either site resulted in similar levels of antigen-specific germinal center B cells, plasmablasts/plasma cells, T follicular helper cells, and CD8 T cells in the DLNs and the spleen. Furthermore, ipsilateral and contralateral boosting with mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273.214 vaccines conferred similar homologous or heterologous immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 virus challenge with equivalent reductions in viral RNA and infectious virus in the nasal turbinates and lungs. Collectively, our data show limited differences in B and T cell immune responses after ipsilateral and contralateral site boosting by mRNA vaccines that do not substantively impact protection against an Omicron strain.IMPORTANCESequential boosting with mRNA vaccines has been an effective strategy to overcome waning immunity and neutralization escape by emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, it remains unclear how the site of boosting relative to the primary vaccination series shapes optimal immune responses or breadth of protection against variants. In K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, we observed that intramuscular boosting with historical monovalent or variant-matched bivalent vaccines in the ipsilateral or contralateral limb elicited comparable levels of serum spike-specific antibody and antigen-specific B and T cell responses. Moreover, boosting on either side conferred equivalent protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge strain. Our data in mice suggest that the site of intramuscular boosting with an mRNA vaccine does not substantially impact immunity or protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.</description><subject>2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 - immunology</subject><subject>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - genetics</subject><subject>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - immunology</subject><subject>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - metabolism</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Antibodies, Neutralizing - blood</subject><subject>Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - blood</subject><subject>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</subject><subject>B-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - immunology</subject><subject>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>COVID-19 - virology</subject><subject>COVID-19 Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>COVID-19 Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>Editor’s Pick</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immunization, Secondary</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - blood</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</subject><subject>Mice</subject><subject>mRNA Vaccines - immunology</subject><subject>SARS-CoV-2 - immunology</subject><subject>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - genetics</subject><subject>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology</subject><subject>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</subject><subject>Vaccines and Antiviral Agents</subject><subject>Virology</subject><issn>0022-538X</issn><issn>1098-5514</issn><issn>1098-5514</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtrGzEUhUVpaJy0u66Lli1kUr1mRloVY_oIhASStnQn7sgaR2ZGciSNS35F_3KV2AntIisJ3aPvcs5B6C0lp5Qy-XG9daeE1K2omHiBZpQoWdU1FS_RjBDGqprLX4foKKU1IVSIRrxCh1xRJVhNZujP2Sa5AbKNMOAQsQk-l-v-oQshZedXOPR4dMbi3y7f4PHqYo63YIzzNt3_6G1M2N5ObguD9Rm7cZy8y3cY_BJvYsjWZBc8hhU4nzIGfD2_uq4W4WfF8GUBxzJMZa_zr9FBD0Oyb_bnMfrx5fP3xbfq_PLr2WJ-XgEnTa6aphdN17Y1p22rjFSU9YYb6FgngDPKWimWpKe94BaA9ZIp25aMeCOpbGrGj9GnHXczdaNdGvtgW2-iGyHe6QBO_z_x7kavwlZTKkijOC2E93tCDLeTTVmPLhk7DOBtmJLmRLWyhE9UkZ7spMVoStH2T3so0fcl6lKifihRM1HkH3ZySCPT6zBFX6J4TvvuXx9P4MeG-V8luqeC</recordid><startdate>20240917</startdate><enddate>20240917</enddate><creator>Ying, Baoling</creator><creator>Liang, Chieh-Yu</creator><creator>Desai, Pritesh</creator><creator>Scheaffer, Suzanne M</creator><creator>Elbashir, Sayda M</creator><creator>Edwards, Darin K</creator><creator>Thackray, Larissa B</creator><creator>Diamond, Michael S</creator><general>American Society for Microbiology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2065-2941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-3165</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-9004</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240917</creationdate><title>Ipsilateral or contralateral boosting of mice with mRNA vaccines confers equivalent immunity and protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain</title><author>Ying, Baoling ; Liang, Chieh-Yu ; Desai, Pritesh ; Scheaffer, Suzanne M ; Elbashir, Sayda M ; Edwards, Darin K ; Thackray, Larissa B ; Diamond, Michael S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a306t-66f46b77531779c8912fc3cab2b4a3212784d0f1f43eaa2f829e7574368186523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 - immunology</topic><topic>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - genetics</topic><topic>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - immunology</topic><topic>Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - metabolism</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Antibodies, Neutralizing - blood</topic><topic>Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - blood</topic><topic>Antibodies, Viral - immunology</topic><topic>B-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - immunology</topic><topic>COVID-19 - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>COVID-19 - virology</topic><topic>COVID-19 Vaccines - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>COVID-19 Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>Editor’s Pick</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immunization, Secondary</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - blood</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G - immunology</topic><topic>Mice</topic><topic>mRNA Vaccines - immunology</topic><topic>SARS-CoV-2 - immunology</topic><topic>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - genetics</topic><topic>Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology</topic><topic>T-Lymphocytes - immunology</topic><topic>Vaccines and Antiviral Agents</topic><topic>Virology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ying, Baoling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Chieh-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Desai, Pritesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scheaffer, Suzanne M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elbashir, Sayda M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Edwards, Darin K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thackray, Larissa B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diamond, Michael S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of virology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ying, Baoling</au><au>Liang, Chieh-Yu</au><au>Desai, Pritesh</au><au>Scheaffer, Suzanne M</au><au>Elbashir, Sayda M</au><au>Edwards, Darin K</au><au>Thackray, Larissa B</au><au>Diamond, Michael S</au><au>Subbarao, Kanta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ipsilateral or contralateral boosting of mice with mRNA vaccines confers equivalent immunity and protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain</atitle><jtitle>Journal of virology</jtitle><stitle>J Virol</stitle><addtitle>J Virol</addtitle><date>2024-09-17</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>e0057424</spage><pages>e0057424-</pages><issn>0022-538X</issn><issn>1098-5514</issn><eissn>1098-5514</eissn><abstract>Boosting with mRNA vaccines encoding variant-matched spike proteins has been implemented to mitigate their reduced efficacy against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. Nonetheless, in humans, it remains unclear whether boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral arm with respect to the priming doses impacts immunity and protection. Here, we boosted K18-hACE2 mice with either monovalent mRNA-1273 (Wuhan-1 spike) or bivalent mRNA-1273.214 (Wuhan-1 + BA.1 spike) vaccine in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg after a two-dose priming series with mRNA-1273. Boosting in the ipsilateral or contralateral leg elicited equivalent levels of serum IgG and neutralizing antibody responses against Wuhan-1 and BA.1. While contralateral boosting with mRNA vaccines resulted in the expansion of spike-specific B and T cells beyond the ipsilateral draining lymph node (DLN) to the contralateral DLN, administration of a third mRNA vaccine dose at either site resulted in similar levels of antigen-specific germinal center B cells, plasmablasts/plasma cells, T follicular helper cells, and CD8 T cells in the DLNs and the spleen. Furthermore, ipsilateral and contralateral boosting with mRNA-1273 or mRNA-1273.214 vaccines conferred similar homologous or heterologous immune protection against SARS-CoV-2 BA.1 virus challenge with equivalent reductions in viral RNA and infectious virus in the nasal turbinates and lungs. Collectively, our data show limited differences in B and T cell immune responses after ipsilateral and contralateral site boosting by mRNA vaccines that do not substantively impact protection against an Omicron strain.IMPORTANCESequential boosting with mRNA vaccines has been an effective strategy to overcome waning immunity and neutralization escape by emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. However, it remains unclear how the site of boosting relative to the primary vaccination series shapes optimal immune responses or breadth of protection against variants. In K18-hACE2 transgenic mice, we observed that intramuscular boosting with historical monovalent or variant-matched bivalent vaccines in the ipsilateral or contralateral limb elicited comparable levels of serum spike-specific antibody and antigen-specific B and T cell responses. Moreover, boosting on either side conferred equivalent protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron challenge strain. Our data in mice suggest that the site of intramuscular boosting with an mRNA vaccine does not substantially impact immunity or protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Society for Microbiology</pub><pmid>39194250</pmid><doi>10.1128/jvi.00574-24</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2065-2941</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8791-3165</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9344-9004</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-538X
ispartof Journal of virology, 2024-09, Vol.98 (9), p.e0057424
issn 0022-538X
1098-5514
1098-5514
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11406931
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central
subjects 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 - immunology
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - genetics
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - immunology
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 - metabolism
Animals
Antibodies, Neutralizing - blood
Antibodies, Neutralizing - immunology
Antibodies, Viral - blood
Antibodies, Viral - immunology
B-Lymphocytes - immunology
COVID-19 - immunology
COVID-19 - prevention & control
COVID-19 - virology
COVID-19 Vaccines - administration & dosage
COVID-19 Vaccines - immunology
Editor’s Pick
Female
Humans
Immunization, Secondary
Immunoglobulin G - blood
Immunoglobulin G - immunology
Mice
mRNA Vaccines - immunology
SARS-CoV-2 - immunology
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - genetics
Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus - immunology
T-Lymphocytes - immunology
Vaccines and Antiviral Agents
Virology
title Ipsilateral or contralateral boosting of mice with mRNA vaccines confers equivalent immunity and protection against a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron strain
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T06%3A50%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ipsilateral%20or%20contralateral%20boosting%20of%20mice%20with%20mRNA%20vaccines%20confers%20equivalent%20immunity%20and%20protection%20against%20a%20SARS-CoV-2%20Omicron%20strain&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20virology&rft.au=Ying,%20Baoling&rft.date=2024-09-17&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=e0057424&rft.pages=e0057424-&rft.issn=0022-538X&rft.eissn=1098-5514&rft_id=info:doi/10.1128/jvi.00574-24&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3097853809%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097853809&rft_id=info:pmid/39194250&rfr_iscdi=true