Comparative analyses of short- and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial pharyngeal carcinomas

Endoscopic treatment of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas includes endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; usually performed by endoscopists), and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery (ELPS; primarily performed by otolaryngologists). Few studies have compared the efficacy of the two techniques in tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:DEN open 2025-04, Vol.5 (1), p.e70003
Hauptverfasser: Fukuhara, Motomitsu, Urabe, Yuji, Nakamura, Takeo, Ishibashi, Kazuki, Konishi, Hirona, Mizuno, Junichi, Takasago, Takeshi, Tanaka, Hidenori, Tsuboi, Akiyoshi, Yamashita, Ken, Hiyama, Yuichi, Takigawa, Hidehiko, Kotachi, Takahiro, Yuge, Ryo, Ishikawa, Akira, Taruya, Takayuki, Ueda, Tsutomu, Takeno, Sachio, Oka, Shiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page e70003
container_title DEN open
container_volume 5
creator Fukuhara, Motomitsu
Urabe, Yuji
Nakamura, Takeo
Ishibashi, Kazuki
Konishi, Hirona
Mizuno, Junichi
Takasago, Takeshi
Tanaka, Hidenori
Tsuboi, Akiyoshi
Yamashita, Ken
Hiyama, Yuichi
Takigawa, Hidehiko
Kotachi, Takahiro
Yuge, Ryo
Ishikawa, Akira
Taruya, Takayuki
Ueda, Tsutomu
Takeno, Sachio
Oka, Shiro
description Endoscopic treatment of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas includes endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; usually performed by endoscopists), and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery (ELPS; primarily performed by otolaryngologists). Few studies have compared the efficacy of the two techniques in treating superficial pharyngeal carcinomas. In this study, we compared the outcomes of these two techniques to determine the advantages. We retrospectively examined the short- and long-term outcomes of 93 consecutive patients with superficial pharyngeal carcinoma who either underwent an ESD or ELPS between August 2008 and December 2021. There were 35 lesions among 29 patients and 93 lesions among 71 patients in the ESD and ELPS groups, respectively. The ELPS group had a significantly shorter procedure time (121.2 ± 97.4 min vs. 54.7 ± 40.2 min, p
doi_str_mv 10.1002/deo2.70003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11391100</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3104528214</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e67af039999957948ac54f72aa5fc5acf73ad2447236c5fc38e00cf902588883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkctuFDEQRS0EIlHIhg9AXiKkDn70c4XQCAhSJDbZW467PGPU7Wpc7qD5qXwjnslDQ21cKh_fqvJl7L0UV1II9XkEVFedEEK_YueqHVRVt2J4fZKfsUui34VQjdSyUW_ZmR5U28uuPmcPG5wXm2wO98BttNOegDh6TjtMuSqlkU8Yt1WGNHNcs8O5AHeQ_wJEDnFEcrgEx2m9m1eHZCc-BiJwOWA8vj-BJpv2cYvVsjsmUGBa0xbSnntMJV8g-eBCqZ8gziYXIs6W3rE33k4El0_nBbv9_u12c13d_Prxc_P1pnJlsVxB21kv9HCIphvq3rqm9p2ytvGusc532o6qrjulW1dKugchnB_KF_Ul9AX78ii7lKVgdBBzspNZUpjLUAZtMP_fxLAzW7w3UupBFl-KwscnhYR_VqBs5kAOpslGwJWMlqJuVK9kXdBPj6hLSJTAv_SRwhw8NgePzdHjAn84newFfXZU_wO-Gah7</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3104528214</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative analyses of short- and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial pharyngeal carcinomas</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Fukuhara, Motomitsu ; Urabe, Yuji ; Nakamura, Takeo ; Ishibashi, Kazuki ; Konishi, Hirona ; Mizuno, Junichi ; Takasago, Takeshi ; Tanaka, Hidenori ; Tsuboi, Akiyoshi ; Yamashita, Ken ; Hiyama, Yuichi ; Takigawa, Hidehiko ; Kotachi, Takahiro ; Yuge, Ryo ; Ishikawa, Akira ; Taruya, Takayuki ; Ueda, Tsutomu ; Takeno, Sachio ; Oka, Shiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Motomitsu ; Urabe, Yuji ; Nakamura, Takeo ; Ishibashi, Kazuki ; Konishi, Hirona ; Mizuno, Junichi ; Takasago, Takeshi ; Tanaka, Hidenori ; Tsuboi, Akiyoshi ; Yamashita, Ken ; Hiyama, Yuichi ; Takigawa, Hidehiko ; Kotachi, Takahiro ; Yuge, Ryo ; Ishikawa, Akira ; Taruya, Takayuki ; Ueda, Tsutomu ; Takeno, Sachio ; Oka, Shiro</creatorcontrib><description>Endoscopic treatment of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas includes endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; usually performed by endoscopists), and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery (ELPS; primarily performed by otolaryngologists). Few studies have compared the efficacy of the two techniques in treating superficial pharyngeal carcinomas. In this study, we compared the outcomes of these two techniques to determine the advantages. We retrospectively examined the short- and long-term outcomes of 93 consecutive patients with superficial pharyngeal carcinoma who either underwent an ESD or ELPS between August 2008 and December 2021. There were 35 lesions among 29 patients and 93 lesions among 71 patients in the ESD and ELPS groups, respectively. The ELPS group had a significantly shorter procedure time (121.2 ± 97.4 min vs. 54.7 ± 40.2 min, p&lt;0.01), greater procedure speed (0.10 ± 0.06 min/min vs. 0.30 ± 0.23 min/min, p&lt;0.01), and less laryngeal edema than that of the ESD group. There were no significant differences in the 3-year overall, relapse-free, or disease-specific survival rates between the two groups. Intervention with ESD during ELPS was most commonly required when it was difficult to secure the visual field. There were no differences in batch resection rates or long-term prognoses between the two groups; nevertheless, the ELPS group had a shorter treatment time and less laryngeal edema than the ESD group. However, the treatment of narrow areas, such as the esophageal inlet patch, is a technical limitation of ELPS; thus, ELPS should be combined with ESD techniques.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2692-4609</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2692-4609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/deo2.70003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39268174</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Australia: John Wiley and Sons Inc</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>DEN open, 2025-04, Vol.5 (1), p.e70003</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s). DEN Open published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.</rights><rights>2024 The Author(s). published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e67af039999957948ac54f72aa5fc5acf73ad2447236c5fc38e00cf902588883</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4154-658X ; 0000-0002-1652-0743 ; 0009-0009-9851-8564 ; 0000-0002-1528-1939 ; 0000-0002-3646-5796</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391100/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391100/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39268174$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Motomitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urabe, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Takeo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Hirona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Junichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takasago, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Hidenori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuboi, Akiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiyama, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takigawa, Hidehiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotachi, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuge, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taruya, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeno, Sachio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Shiro</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analyses of short- and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial pharyngeal carcinomas</title><title>DEN open</title><addtitle>DEN Open</addtitle><description>Endoscopic treatment of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas includes endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; usually performed by endoscopists), and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery (ELPS; primarily performed by otolaryngologists). Few studies have compared the efficacy of the two techniques in treating superficial pharyngeal carcinomas. In this study, we compared the outcomes of these two techniques to determine the advantages. We retrospectively examined the short- and long-term outcomes of 93 consecutive patients with superficial pharyngeal carcinoma who either underwent an ESD or ELPS between August 2008 and December 2021. There were 35 lesions among 29 patients and 93 lesions among 71 patients in the ESD and ELPS groups, respectively. The ELPS group had a significantly shorter procedure time (121.2 ± 97.4 min vs. 54.7 ± 40.2 min, p&lt;0.01), greater procedure speed (0.10 ± 0.06 min/min vs. 0.30 ± 0.23 min/min, p&lt;0.01), and less laryngeal edema than that of the ESD group. There were no significant differences in the 3-year overall, relapse-free, or disease-specific survival rates between the two groups. Intervention with ESD during ELPS was most commonly required when it was difficult to secure the visual field. There were no differences in batch resection rates or long-term prognoses between the two groups; nevertheless, the ELPS group had a shorter treatment time and less laryngeal edema than the ESD group. However, the treatment of narrow areas, such as the esophageal inlet patch, is a technical limitation of ELPS; thus, ELPS should be combined with ESD techniques.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2692-4609</issn><issn>2692-4609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkctuFDEQRS0EIlHIhg9AXiKkDn70c4XQCAhSJDbZW467PGPU7Wpc7qD5qXwjnslDQ21cKh_fqvJl7L0UV1II9XkEVFedEEK_YueqHVRVt2J4fZKfsUui34VQjdSyUW_ZmR5U28uuPmcPG5wXm2wO98BttNOegDh6TjtMuSqlkU8Yt1WGNHNcs8O5AHeQ_wJEDnFEcrgEx2m9m1eHZCc-BiJwOWA8vj-BJpv2cYvVsjsmUGBa0xbSnntMJV8g-eBCqZ8gziYXIs6W3rE33k4El0_nBbv9_u12c13d_Prxc_P1pnJlsVxB21kv9HCIphvq3rqm9p2ytvGusc532o6qrjulW1dKugchnB_KF_Ul9AX78ii7lKVgdBBzspNZUpjLUAZtMP_fxLAzW7w3UupBFl-KwscnhYR_VqBs5kAOpslGwJWMlqJuVK9kXdBPj6hLSJTAv_SRwhw8NgePzdHjAn84newFfXZU_wO-Gah7</recordid><startdate>20250401</startdate><enddate>20250401</enddate><creator>Fukuhara, Motomitsu</creator><creator>Urabe, Yuji</creator><creator>Nakamura, Takeo</creator><creator>Ishibashi, Kazuki</creator><creator>Konishi, Hirona</creator><creator>Mizuno, Junichi</creator><creator>Takasago, Takeshi</creator><creator>Tanaka, Hidenori</creator><creator>Tsuboi, Akiyoshi</creator><creator>Yamashita, Ken</creator><creator>Hiyama, Yuichi</creator><creator>Takigawa, Hidehiko</creator><creator>Kotachi, Takahiro</creator><creator>Yuge, Ryo</creator><creator>Ishikawa, Akira</creator><creator>Taruya, Takayuki</creator><creator>Ueda, Tsutomu</creator><creator>Takeno, Sachio</creator><creator>Oka, Shiro</creator><general>John Wiley and Sons Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-658X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-0743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9851-8564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1528-1939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-5796</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20250401</creationdate><title>Comparative analyses of short- and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial pharyngeal carcinomas</title><author>Fukuhara, Motomitsu ; Urabe, Yuji ; Nakamura, Takeo ; Ishibashi, Kazuki ; Konishi, Hirona ; Mizuno, Junichi ; Takasago, Takeshi ; Tanaka, Hidenori ; Tsuboi, Akiyoshi ; Yamashita, Ken ; Hiyama, Yuichi ; Takigawa, Hidehiko ; Kotachi, Takahiro ; Yuge, Ryo ; Ishikawa, Akira ; Taruya, Takayuki ; Ueda, Tsutomu ; Takeno, Sachio ; Oka, Shiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-e67af039999957948ac54f72aa5fc5acf73ad2447236c5fc38e00cf902588883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fukuhara, Motomitsu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urabe, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakamura, Takeo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Kazuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konishi, Hirona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mizuno, Junichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takasago, Takeshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tanaka, Hidenori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsuboi, Akiyoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yamashita, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hiyama, Yuichi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takigawa, Hidehiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotachi, Takahiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yuge, Ryo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ishikawa, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taruya, Takayuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ueda, Tsutomu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takeno, Sachio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oka, Shiro</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>DEN open</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fukuhara, Motomitsu</au><au>Urabe, Yuji</au><au>Nakamura, Takeo</au><au>Ishibashi, Kazuki</au><au>Konishi, Hirona</au><au>Mizuno, Junichi</au><au>Takasago, Takeshi</au><au>Tanaka, Hidenori</au><au>Tsuboi, Akiyoshi</au><au>Yamashita, Ken</au><au>Hiyama, Yuichi</au><au>Takigawa, Hidehiko</au><au>Kotachi, Takahiro</au><au>Yuge, Ryo</au><au>Ishikawa, Akira</au><au>Taruya, Takayuki</au><au>Ueda, Tsutomu</au><au>Takeno, Sachio</au><au>Oka, Shiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative analyses of short- and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial pharyngeal carcinomas</atitle><jtitle>DEN open</jtitle><addtitle>DEN Open</addtitle><date>2025-04-01</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e70003</spage><pages>e70003-</pages><issn>2692-4609</issn><eissn>2692-4609</eissn><abstract>Endoscopic treatment of superficial pharyngeal carcinomas includes endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD; usually performed by endoscopists), and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery (ELPS; primarily performed by otolaryngologists). Few studies have compared the efficacy of the two techniques in treating superficial pharyngeal carcinomas. In this study, we compared the outcomes of these two techniques to determine the advantages. We retrospectively examined the short- and long-term outcomes of 93 consecutive patients with superficial pharyngeal carcinoma who either underwent an ESD or ELPS between August 2008 and December 2021. There were 35 lesions among 29 patients and 93 lesions among 71 patients in the ESD and ELPS groups, respectively. The ELPS group had a significantly shorter procedure time (121.2 ± 97.4 min vs. 54.7 ± 40.2 min, p&lt;0.01), greater procedure speed (0.10 ± 0.06 min/min vs. 0.30 ± 0.23 min/min, p&lt;0.01), and less laryngeal edema than that of the ESD group. There were no significant differences in the 3-year overall, relapse-free, or disease-specific survival rates between the two groups. Intervention with ESD during ELPS was most commonly required when it was difficult to secure the visual field. There were no differences in batch resection rates or long-term prognoses between the two groups; nevertheless, the ELPS group had a shorter treatment time and less laryngeal edema than the ESD group. However, the treatment of narrow areas, such as the esophageal inlet patch, is a technical limitation of ELPS; thus, ELPS should be combined with ESD techniques.</abstract><cop>Australia</cop><pub>John Wiley and Sons Inc</pub><pmid>39268174</pmid><doi>10.1002/deo2.70003</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4154-658X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1652-0743</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9851-8564</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1528-1939</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3646-5796</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2692-4609
ispartof DEN open, 2025-04, Vol.5 (1), p.e70003
issn 2692-4609
2692-4609
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11391100
source Wiley Online Library Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Original
title Comparative analyses of short- and long-term outcomes between endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic laryngo-pharyngeal surgery for superficial pharyngeal carcinomas
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T08%3A25%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analyses%20of%20short-%20and%20long-term%20outcomes%20between%20endoscopic%20submucosal%20dissection%20and%20endoscopic%20laryngo-pharyngeal%20surgery%20for%20superficial%20pharyngeal%20carcinomas&rft.jtitle=DEN%20open&rft.au=Fukuhara,%20Motomitsu&rft.date=2025-04-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e70003&rft.pages=e70003-&rft.issn=2692-4609&rft.eissn=2692-4609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/deo2.70003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3104528214%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3104528214&rft_id=info:pmid/39268174&rfr_iscdi=true