Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates
Abstract STUDY QUESTION Does vitrification cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years affect the pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET)? SUMMARY ANSWER Vitrification cryopreservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years is associated with a decrease in the implanta...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Human reproduction (Oxford) 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.1960-1968 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 1968 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 1960 |
| container_title | Human reproduction (Oxford) |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | Zhan, Shaoquan Lin, Chenxing Lin, Qiwang Gan, Jiayu Wang, Chunyan Luo, Yang Liu, Jianqiao Du, Hongzi Liu, Hanyan |
| description | Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Does vitrification cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years affect the pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Vitrification cryopreservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years is associated with a decrease in the implantation rate (IR) and live birth rate (LBR).
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Previous studies have predominantly focused on embryos cryopreserved for relatively short durations (less than 5 years), yet the impact of extended cryopreservation duration on pregnancy outcomes remains a controversial issue. There is a relative scarcity of data regarding the efficacy and safety of storing embryos for 5 years or longer.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This retrospective study involved 36 665 eligible vitrified-thawed embryo transfer cycles from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2022, at a single fertility center in China.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Patients were divided into three groups according to embryo storage time: Group 1 consisted of 31 565 cycles, with storage time of 0–2 years; Group 2 consisted of 4458 cycles, with a storage time of 2–5 years; and Group 3 included 642 cycles, with storage time exceeding 5 years. The main outcome measures were IR and LBR. Secondary outcome variables included rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage, as well as neonatal outcomes. Reproductive outcomes were analyzed as binary variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the effect of preservation time on pregnancy outcomes after correcting for confounding factors. In addition, we also assessed neonatal outcomes, such as large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA).
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
IRs in the three groups (0–2, 2–5, and >5 years) were 37.37%, 39.03%, and 35.78%, respectively (P = 0.017), and LBRs in the three groups were 37.29%, 39.09%, and 34.91%, respectively (P = 0.028). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, compared with the 0–2 years storage group, prolonged embryo vitrification preservation time (2–5 years or >5 years) did not affect secondary outcomes such as rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage (P > 0.05). But cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years reduced the IR (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.69–0.97, P = 0.020) and LBR (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64–0.91, P = 0.002). Multivariate str |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1093/humrep/deae150 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11373376</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/humrep/deae150</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3075701293</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-540aac90b04fd3a6a9bda61aab7f68200621828ab4d7297e4b016d98b1f65f513</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhyhH5CIe04zixkxNCFRSkSlyAqzVOxl2jJE5tZ9G-Dc_Ck5EqSwUnTh7L33zj0c_YSwEXAlp5uV_GSPNlT0iihkdsJyoFRSlreMx2UKqmEEKJM_Yspe8Aa9mop-xMNq2CRusd-_HN5-id7zD7MPE5UqJ42C7B8dsQ-uJuwcHnI7cDphy6Y8qJuxD5GCLxvMeJ179-Hglj4pH6paPE_TgPOOXNg1PPB38gbn3Mex4xU3rOnjgcEr04nefs64f3X64-Fjefrz9dvbspulJDLuoKELsWLFSul6iwtT0qgWi1U00JoErRlA3aqtdlq6my645921jhVO1qIc_Z2807L3akvqMpRxzMHP2I8WgCevPvy-T35jYcjBBSS6nVanh9MsRwt1DKZvSpo2Hdj8KSjARdaxBlK1f0YkO7GFKK5B7mCDD3cZktLnOKa2149ffvHvA_-azAmw0Iy_w_2W8AZaZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3075701293</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Zhan, Shaoquan ; Lin, Chenxing ; Lin, Qiwang ; Gan, Jiayu ; Wang, Chunyan ; Luo, Yang ; Liu, Jianqiao ; Du, Hongzi ; Liu, Hanyan</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Shaoquan ; Lin, Chenxing ; Lin, Qiwang ; Gan, Jiayu ; Wang, Chunyan ; Luo, Yang ; Liu, Jianqiao ; Du, Hongzi ; Liu, Hanyan</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Does vitrification cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years affect the pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Vitrification cryopreservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years is associated with a decrease in the implantation rate (IR) and live birth rate (LBR).
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Previous studies have predominantly focused on embryos cryopreserved for relatively short durations (less than 5 years), yet the impact of extended cryopreservation duration on pregnancy outcomes remains a controversial issue. There is a relative scarcity of data regarding the efficacy and safety of storing embryos for 5 years or longer.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This retrospective study involved 36 665 eligible vitrified-thawed embryo transfer cycles from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2022, at a single fertility center in China.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Patients were divided into three groups according to embryo storage time: Group 1 consisted of 31 565 cycles, with storage time of 0–2 years; Group 2 consisted of 4458 cycles, with a storage time of 2–5 years; and Group 3 included 642 cycles, with storage time exceeding 5 years. The main outcome measures were IR and LBR. Secondary outcome variables included rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage, as well as neonatal outcomes. Reproductive outcomes were analyzed as binary variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the effect of preservation time on pregnancy outcomes after correcting for confounding factors. In addition, we also assessed neonatal outcomes, such as large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA).
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
IRs in the three groups (0–2, 2–5, and >5 years) were 37.37%, 39.03%, and 35.78%, respectively (P = 0.017), and LBRs in the three groups were 37.29%, 39.09%, and 34.91%, respectively (P = 0.028). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, compared with the 0–2 years storage group, prolonged embryo vitrification preservation time (2–5 years or >5 years) did not affect secondary outcomes such as rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage (P > 0.05). But cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years reduced the IR (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.69–0.97, P = 0.020) and LBR (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64–0.91, P = 0.002). Multivariate stratified analysis also showed that prolonging the cryopreservation time of blastocysts (>5 years) reduced the IR (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.98, P = 0.033) and LBR (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.87, P = 0.002). However, no effect on cleavage embryos was observed (P > 0.05). We further conducted stratified analyses based on the number and quality of frozen blastocysts transferred, and the results showed that the FET results after transfers of good-quality blastocysts in the >5 years storage group were negatively affected. However, the storage time of non-good-quality blastocysts was not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes. Regarding the neonatal outcomes (of singletons), embryo vitrification preservation time had no effect on preterm birth rates, fetal birth weight, or neonatal sex ratios. However, as the storage time increased, rates of SGA (5.60%, 4.10%, and 1.18%) decreased, while rates of LGA (5.22%, 6.75%, and 9.47%) increased (P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, the increase in LGA and the decrease in SGA were significantly correlated with the duration of storage time.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
This was a retrospective study using data from a single fertility center, even though the data had been adjusted, our findings still need to be validated in further studies.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
With the full implementation of the two-child policy in China, there may be more patients whose embryos have been frozen for a longer time in the future. Patients should be aware that the IR and LBR of blastocysts are negatively affected when the cryopreservation time is longer than 5 years. Couples may therefore consider shortening the time until FET treatment.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 82101672), Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (No. 2024A03J0180), General Guidance Program for Western Medicine of Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission (No. 20231A011096), and the Medical Key Discipline of Guangzhou (2021–2023). None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-1161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2350</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae150</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38960877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Adult ; Birth Rate ; Blastocyst ; China ; Cryopreservation - methods ; Embryo Implantation ; Embryo Transfer - methods ; Female ; Humans ; Live Birth ; Original ; Pregnancy ; Pregnancy Outcome ; Pregnancy Rate ; Retrospective Studies ; Time Factors ; Vitrification</subject><ispartof>Human reproduction (Oxford), 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.1960-1968</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-540aac90b04fd3a6a9bda61aab7f68200621828ab4d7297e4b016d98b1f65f513</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7045-0950 ; 0000-0001-8261-6068 ; 0009-0002-3799-1760 ; 0000-0002-4061-3333</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38960877$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Shaoquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chenxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Qiwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Jiayu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jianqiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Hongzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hanyan</creatorcontrib><title>Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates</title><title>Human reproduction (Oxford)</title><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><description>Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Does vitrification cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years affect the pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Vitrification cryopreservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years is associated with a decrease in the implantation rate (IR) and live birth rate (LBR).
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Previous studies have predominantly focused on embryos cryopreserved for relatively short durations (less than 5 years), yet the impact of extended cryopreservation duration on pregnancy outcomes remains a controversial issue. There is a relative scarcity of data regarding the efficacy and safety of storing embryos for 5 years or longer.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This retrospective study involved 36 665 eligible vitrified-thawed embryo transfer cycles from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2022, at a single fertility center in China.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Patients were divided into three groups according to embryo storage time: Group 1 consisted of 31 565 cycles, with storage time of 0–2 years; Group 2 consisted of 4458 cycles, with a storage time of 2–5 years; and Group 3 included 642 cycles, with storage time exceeding 5 years. The main outcome measures were IR and LBR. Secondary outcome variables included rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage, as well as neonatal outcomes. Reproductive outcomes were analyzed as binary variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the effect of preservation time on pregnancy outcomes after correcting for confounding factors. In addition, we also assessed neonatal outcomes, such as large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA).
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
IRs in the three groups (0–2, 2–5, and >5 years) were 37.37%, 39.03%, and 35.78%, respectively (P = 0.017), and LBRs in the three groups were 37.29%, 39.09%, and 34.91%, respectively (P = 0.028). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, compared with the 0–2 years storage group, prolonged embryo vitrification preservation time (2–5 years or >5 years) did not affect secondary outcomes such as rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage (P > 0.05). But cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years reduced the IR (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.69–0.97, P = 0.020) and LBR (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64–0.91, P = 0.002). Multivariate stratified analysis also showed that prolonging the cryopreservation time of blastocysts (>5 years) reduced the IR (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.98, P = 0.033) and LBR (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.87, P = 0.002). However, no effect on cleavage embryos was observed (P > 0.05). We further conducted stratified analyses based on the number and quality of frozen blastocysts transferred, and the results showed that the FET results after transfers of good-quality blastocysts in the >5 years storage group were negatively affected. However, the storage time of non-good-quality blastocysts was not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes. Regarding the neonatal outcomes (of singletons), embryo vitrification preservation time had no effect on preterm birth rates, fetal birth weight, or neonatal sex ratios. However, as the storage time increased, rates of SGA (5.60%, 4.10%, and 1.18%) decreased, while rates of LGA (5.22%, 6.75%, and 9.47%) increased (P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, the increase in LGA and the decrease in SGA were significantly correlated with the duration of storage time.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
This was a retrospective study using data from a single fertility center, even though the data had been adjusted, our findings still need to be validated in further studies.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
With the full implementation of the two-child policy in China, there may be more patients whose embryos have been frozen for a longer time in the future. Patients should be aware that the IR and LBR of blastocysts are negatively affected when the cryopreservation time is longer than 5 years. Couples may therefore consider shortening the time until FET treatment.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 82101672), Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (No. 2024A03J0180), General Guidance Program for Western Medicine of Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission (No. 20231A011096), and the Medical Key Discipline of Guangzhou (2021–2023). None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Blastocyst</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cryopreservation - methods</subject><subject>Embryo Implantation</subject><subject>Embryo Transfer - methods</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Live Birth</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Pregnancy Outcome</subject><subject>Pregnancy Rate</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Vitrification</subject><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>TOX</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkcFu1DAQhi0EokvhyhH5CIe04zixkxNCFRSkSlyAqzVOxl2jJE5tZ9G-Dc_Ck5EqSwUnTh7L33zj0c_YSwEXAlp5uV_GSPNlT0iihkdsJyoFRSlreMx2UKqmEEKJM_Yspe8Aa9mop-xMNq2CRusd-_HN5-id7zD7MPE5UqJ42C7B8dsQ-uJuwcHnI7cDphy6Y8qJuxD5GCLxvMeJ179-Hglj4pH6paPE_TgPOOXNg1PPB38gbn3Mex4xU3rOnjgcEr04nefs64f3X64-Fjefrz9dvbspulJDLuoKELsWLFSul6iwtT0qgWi1U00JoErRlA3aqtdlq6my645921jhVO1qIc_Z2807L3akvqMpRxzMHP2I8WgCevPvy-T35jYcjBBSS6nVanh9MsRwt1DKZvSpo2Hdj8KSjARdaxBlK1f0YkO7GFKK5B7mCDD3cZktLnOKa2149ffvHvA_-azAmw0Iy_w_2W8AZaZE</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Zhan, Shaoquan</creator><creator>Lin, Chenxing</creator><creator>Lin, Qiwang</creator><creator>Gan, Jiayu</creator><creator>Wang, Chunyan</creator><creator>Luo, Yang</creator><creator>Liu, Jianqiao</creator><creator>Du, Hongzi</creator><creator>Liu, Hanyan</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>TOX</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7045-0950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-6068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3799-1760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4061-3333</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates</title><author>Zhan, Shaoquan ; Lin, Chenxing ; Lin, Qiwang ; Gan, Jiayu ; Wang, Chunyan ; Luo, Yang ; Liu, Jianqiao ; Du, Hongzi ; Liu, Hanyan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-540aac90b04fd3a6a9bda61aab7f68200621828ab4d7297e4b016d98b1f65f513</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Blastocyst</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cryopreservation - methods</topic><topic>Embryo Implantation</topic><topic>Embryo Transfer - methods</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Live Birth</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Pregnancy Outcome</topic><topic>Pregnancy Rate</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Vitrification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhan, Shaoquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Chenxing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lin, Qiwang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gan, Jiayu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chunyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jianqiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Hongzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hanyan</creatorcontrib><collection>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhan, Shaoquan</au><au>Lin, Chenxing</au><au>Lin, Qiwang</au><au>Gan, Jiayu</au><au>Wang, Chunyan</au><au>Luo, Yang</au><au>Liu, Jianqiao</au><au>Du, Hongzi</au><au>Liu, Hanyan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates</atitle><jtitle>Human reproduction (Oxford)</jtitle><addtitle>Hum Reprod</addtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1960</spage><epage>1968</epage><pages>1960-1968</pages><issn>0268-1161</issn><issn>1460-2350</issn><eissn>1460-2350</eissn><abstract>Abstract
STUDY QUESTION
Does vitrification cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years affect the pregnancy outcomes after frozen embryo transfer (FET)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Vitrification cryopreservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years is associated with a decrease in the implantation rate (IR) and live birth rate (LBR).
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Previous studies have predominantly focused on embryos cryopreserved for relatively short durations (less than 5 years), yet the impact of extended cryopreservation duration on pregnancy outcomes remains a controversial issue. There is a relative scarcity of data regarding the efficacy and safety of storing embryos for 5 years or longer.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This retrospective study involved 36 665 eligible vitrified-thawed embryo transfer cycles from 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2022, at a single fertility center in China.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
Patients were divided into three groups according to embryo storage time: Group 1 consisted of 31 565 cycles, with storage time of 0–2 years; Group 2 consisted of 4458 cycles, with a storage time of 2–5 years; and Group 3 included 642 cycles, with storage time exceeding 5 years. The main outcome measures were IR and LBR. Secondary outcome variables included rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage, as well as neonatal outcomes. Reproductive outcomes were analyzed as binary variables. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to explore the effect of preservation time on pregnancy outcomes after correcting for confounding factors. In addition, we also assessed neonatal outcomes, such as large for gestational age (LGA) and small for gestational age (SGA).
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
IRs in the three groups (0–2, 2–5, and >5 years) were 37.37%, 39.03%, and 35.78%, respectively (P = 0.017), and LBRs in the three groups were 37.29%, 39.09%, and 34.91%, respectively (P = 0.028). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, compared with the 0–2 years storage group, prolonged embryo vitrification preservation time (2–5 years or >5 years) did not affect secondary outcomes such as rates of biochemical pregnancy, multiple pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, and miscarriage (P > 0.05). But cryopreservation of embryos for more than 5 years reduced the IR (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.82, 95% CI 0.69–0.97, P = 0.020) and LBR (aOR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64–0.91, P = 0.002). Multivariate stratified analysis also showed that prolonging the cryopreservation time of blastocysts (>5 years) reduced the IR (aOR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62–0.98, P = 0.033) and LBR (aOR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.87, P = 0.002). However, no effect on cleavage embryos was observed (P > 0.05). We further conducted stratified analyses based on the number and quality of frozen blastocysts transferred, and the results showed that the FET results after transfers of good-quality blastocysts in the >5 years storage group were negatively affected. However, the storage time of non-good-quality blastocysts was not significantly associated with pregnancy outcomes. Regarding the neonatal outcomes (of singletons), embryo vitrification preservation time had no effect on preterm birth rates, fetal birth weight, or neonatal sex ratios. However, as the storage time increased, rates of SGA (5.60%, 4.10%, and 1.18%) decreased, while rates of LGA (5.22%, 6.75%, and 9.47%) increased (P < 0.05). After adjusting for confounding factors, the increase in LGA and the decrease in SGA were significantly correlated with the duration of storage time.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
This was a retrospective study using data from a single fertility center, even though the data had been adjusted, our findings still need to be validated in further studies.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
With the full implementation of the two-child policy in China, there may be more patients whose embryos have been frozen for a longer time in the future. Patients should be aware that the IR and LBR of blastocysts are negatively affected when the cryopreservation time is longer than 5 years. Couples may therefore consider shortening the time until FET treatment.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
This study was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 82101672), Science and Technology Projects in Guangzhou (No. 2024A03J0180), General Guidance Program for Western Medicine of Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission (No. 20231A011096), and the Medical Key Discipline of Guangzhou (2021–2023). None of the authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38960877</pmid><doi>10.1093/humrep/deae150</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7045-0950</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8261-6068</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-3799-1760</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4061-3333</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0268-1161 |
| ispartof | Human reproduction (Oxford), 2024-09, Vol.39 (9), p.1960-1968 |
| issn | 0268-1161 1460-2350 1460-2350 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11373376 |
| source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); MEDLINE |
| subjects | Adult Birth Rate Blastocyst China Cryopreservation - methods Embryo Implantation Embryo Transfer - methods Female Humans Live Birth Original Pregnancy Pregnancy Outcome Pregnancy Rate Retrospective Studies Time Factors Vitrification |
| title | Vitrification preservation of good-quality blastocysts for more than 5 years reduces implantation and live birth rates |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T22%3A32%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Vitrification%20preservation%20of%20good-quality%20blastocysts%20for%20more%20than%205%C2%A0years%20reduces%20implantation%20and%20live%20birth%20rates&rft.jtitle=Human%20reproduction%20(Oxford)&rft.au=Zhan,%20Shaoquan&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1960&rft.epage=1968&rft.pages=1960-1968&rft.issn=0268-1161&rft.eissn=1460-2350&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/humrep/deae150&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3075701293%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3075701293&rft_id=info:pmid/38960877&rft_oup_id=10.1093/humrep/deae150&rfr_iscdi=true |