Individual Differences in Addition Strategy Choice: A Psychometric Evaluation

The strategy choice model (SCM) is a highly influential theory of human problem-solving. One strength of this theory is the allowance for both item and person variance to contribute to problem-solving outcomes, but this central tenet of the model has not been empirically tested. Explanatory item res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of educational psychology 2019-04, Vol.111 (3), p.414-433
Hauptverfasser: Rhodes, Katherine T, Lukowski, Sarah, Branum-Martin, Lee, Opfer, John, Geary, David C, Petrill, Stephen A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 433
container_issue 3
container_start_page 414
container_title Journal of educational psychology
container_volume 111
creator Rhodes, Katherine T
Lukowski, Sarah
Branum-Martin, Lee
Opfer, John
Geary, David C
Petrill, Stephen A
description The strategy choice model (SCM) is a highly influential theory of human problem-solving. One strength of this theory is the allowance for both item and person variance to contribute to problem-solving outcomes, but this central tenet of the model has not been empirically tested. Explanatory item response theory (EIRT) provides an ideal approach to testing this core feature of SCM, as it allows for simultaneous estimation of both item and person effects on problem-solving outcomes. We used EIRT to test and confirm this central tenet of the SCM for adolescents' (n = 376) solving of addition problems. The approach also allowed us to identify the strategy choices of adolescents who still struggle with basic arithmetic. The synthesis of SCM theory and EIRT modeling has implications for more fully investigating the sources of individual differences in students' problem solving, and for identifying problem-solving patterns associated with poor academic achievement. Educational Impact and Implications Statement Strategy usage may be an important avenue for the identification and treatment of mathematics difficulties. The current study examined individual differences in strategic problem-solving behavior with a sample of adolescent problem-solvers. Results indicate that even in adolescence there are meaningful individual differences in how students solve addition problems, including some adolescents who continue to rely on immature counting strategies. Those adolescents who still relied on immature counting strategies were also struggling with broad mathematical achievement. These struggling students can be identified with a brief addition strategy assessment, and our results suggest that they may benefit from mastering more developmentally mature strategies. For students with mathematical difficulties, simply advancing to developmentally mature strategy selection may be an important intervention goal, one which is often overlooked in educational settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/edu0000294
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11360214</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1334400</ericid><sourcerecordid>2238526857</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a494t-9873bfee81763508afc5db8a4fa1462e96f15e0423aa351ad4f2b40c3c023eb53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuP0zAQgC0EYruFC3dQJC4IEfAric0FVd0CixaBBJytiTPeepXGXTup1H-Pqy7lccAXy55P8_oIecLoa0ZF8wa7iebDtbxHZkwLXXLW1PfJLP_xkta1OCPnKd1kRuTHQ3ImNGesafiMfL4cOr_z3QR9ceGdw4iDxVT4oVh0nR99GIpvY4QRr_fFch28xbfFovia9nYdNjhGb4vVDvoJDugj8sBBn_Dx3T0nP96vvi8_lldfPlwuF1clSC3HUqtGtA5R5TZFRRU4W3WtAumAyZqjrh2rkEouAETFoJOOt5JaYSkX2FZiTt4d826ndoOdxSG32Jtt9BuIexPAm78jg1-b67AzjImaciZzhhd3GWK4nTCNZuOTxb6HAcOUjKBaKypZLjgnz_9Bb8IUhzyf4Vyoiteqav5LMcaVrpVSmXp5pGwMKUV0p54ZNQeZ5rfMDD_7c8oT-steBp4eAcwaTuHVJyaElFn2nLw6xmELZpuVQRy97THZKWbP46FYXgkzwsi8k59G37I6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2112896888</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Individual Differences in Addition Strategy Choice: A Psychometric Evaluation</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Rhodes, Katherine T ; Lukowski, Sarah ; Branum-Martin, Lee ; Opfer, John ; Geary, David C ; Petrill, Stephen A</creator><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Katherine T ; Lukowski, Sarah ; Branum-Martin, Lee ; Opfer, John ; Geary, David C ; Petrill, Stephen A ; Graham, Steve</creatorcontrib><description>The strategy choice model (SCM) is a highly influential theory of human problem-solving. One strength of this theory is the allowance for both item and person variance to contribute to problem-solving outcomes, but this central tenet of the model has not been empirically tested. Explanatory item response theory (EIRT) provides an ideal approach to testing this core feature of SCM, as it allows for simultaneous estimation of both item and person effects on problem-solving outcomes. We used EIRT to test and confirm this central tenet of the SCM for adolescents' (n = 376) solving of addition problems. The approach also allowed us to identify the strategy choices of adolescents who still struggle with basic arithmetic. The synthesis of SCM theory and EIRT modeling has implications for more fully investigating the sources of individual differences in students' problem solving, and for identifying problem-solving patterns associated with poor academic achievement. Educational Impact and Implications Statement Strategy usage may be an important avenue for the identification and treatment of mathematics difficulties. The current study examined individual differences in strategic problem-solving behavior with a sample of adolescent problem-solvers. Results indicate that even in adolescence there are meaningful individual differences in how students solve addition problems, including some adolescents who continue to rely on immature counting strategies. Those adolescents who still relied on immature counting strategies were also struggling with broad mathematical achievement. These struggling students can be identified with a brief addition strategy assessment, and our results suggest that they may benefit from mastering more developmentally mature strategies. For students with mathematical difficulties, simply advancing to developmentally mature strategy selection may be an important intervention goal, one which is often overlooked in educational settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0663</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2176</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/edu0000294</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39211772</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Accuracy ; Addition ; Adolescent Development ; Adolescents ; Arithmetic ; Choice Behavior ; Cognition ; Educational psychology ; Estimating techniques ; Estimation ; Female ; Human ; Individual Differences ; Item Response Theory ; Learning Problems ; Learning Strategies ; Male ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Instruction ; Problem Solving ; Psychometrics ; Quantitative psychology ; Responses ; Strategies ; Time</subject><ispartof>Journal of educational psychology, 2019-04, Vol.111 (3), p.414-433</ispartof><rights>2018 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2018, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Apr 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a494t-9873bfee81763508afc5db8a4fa1462e96f15e0423aa351ad4f2b40c3c023eb53</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-3689-0669 ; 0000-0003-0389-5121</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1334400$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39211772$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Graham, Steve</contributor><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Katherine T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukowski, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branum-Martin, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opfer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geary, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrill, Stephen A</creatorcontrib><title>Individual Differences in Addition Strategy Choice: A Psychometric Evaluation</title><title>Journal of educational psychology</title><addtitle>J Educ Psychol</addtitle><description>The strategy choice model (SCM) is a highly influential theory of human problem-solving. One strength of this theory is the allowance for both item and person variance to contribute to problem-solving outcomes, but this central tenet of the model has not been empirically tested. Explanatory item response theory (EIRT) provides an ideal approach to testing this core feature of SCM, as it allows for simultaneous estimation of both item and person effects on problem-solving outcomes. We used EIRT to test and confirm this central tenet of the SCM for adolescents' (n = 376) solving of addition problems. The approach also allowed us to identify the strategy choices of adolescents who still struggle with basic arithmetic. The synthesis of SCM theory and EIRT modeling has implications for more fully investigating the sources of individual differences in students' problem solving, and for identifying problem-solving patterns associated with poor academic achievement. Educational Impact and Implications Statement Strategy usage may be an important avenue for the identification and treatment of mathematics difficulties. The current study examined individual differences in strategic problem-solving behavior with a sample of adolescent problem-solvers. Results indicate that even in adolescence there are meaningful individual differences in how students solve addition problems, including some adolescents who continue to rely on immature counting strategies. Those adolescents who still relied on immature counting strategies were also struggling with broad mathematical achievement. These struggling students can be identified with a brief addition strategy assessment, and our results suggest that they may benefit from mastering more developmentally mature strategies. For students with mathematical difficulties, simply advancing to developmentally mature strategy selection may be an important intervention goal, one which is often overlooked in educational settings.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Addition</subject><subject>Adolescent Development</subject><subject>Adolescents</subject><subject>Arithmetic</subject><subject>Choice Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Estimating techniques</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Individual Differences</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Learning Problems</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Strategies</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>0022-0663</issn><issn>1939-2176</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUuP0zAQgC0EYruFC3dQJC4IEfAric0FVd0CixaBBJytiTPeepXGXTup1H-Pqy7lccAXy55P8_oIecLoa0ZF8wa7iebDtbxHZkwLXXLW1PfJLP_xkta1OCPnKd1kRuTHQ3ImNGesafiMfL4cOr_z3QR9ceGdw4iDxVT4oVh0nR99GIpvY4QRr_fFch28xbfFovia9nYdNjhGb4vVDvoJDugj8sBBn_Dx3T0nP96vvi8_lldfPlwuF1clSC3HUqtGtA5R5TZFRRU4W3WtAumAyZqjrh2rkEouAETFoJOOt5JaYSkX2FZiTt4d826ndoOdxSG32Jtt9BuIexPAm78jg1-b67AzjImaciZzhhd3GWK4nTCNZuOTxb6HAcOUjKBaKypZLjgnz_9Bb8IUhzyf4Vyoiteqav5LMcaVrpVSmXp5pGwMKUV0p54ZNQeZ5rfMDD_7c8oT-steBp4eAcwaTuHVJyaElFn2nLw6xmELZpuVQRy97THZKWbP46FYXgkzwsi8k59G37I6</recordid><startdate>20190401</startdate><enddate>20190401</enddate><creator>Rhodes, Katherine T</creator><creator>Lukowski, Sarah</creator><creator>Branum-Martin, Lee</creator><creator>Opfer, John</creator><creator>Geary, David C</creator><creator>Petrill, Stephen A</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3689-0669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-5121</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190401</creationdate><title>Individual Differences in Addition Strategy Choice: A Psychometric Evaluation</title><author>Rhodes, Katherine T ; Lukowski, Sarah ; Branum-Martin, Lee ; Opfer, John ; Geary, David C ; Petrill, Stephen A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a494t-9873bfee81763508afc5db8a4fa1462e96f15e0423aa351ad4f2b40c3c023eb53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Addition</topic><topic>Adolescent Development</topic><topic>Adolescents</topic><topic>Arithmetic</topic><topic>Choice Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Estimating techniques</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Individual Differences</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Learning Problems</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Strategies</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rhodes, Katherine T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lukowski, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Branum-Martin, Lee</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opfer, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geary, David C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petrill, Stephen A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rhodes, Katherine T</au><au>Lukowski, Sarah</au><au>Branum-Martin, Lee</au><au>Opfer, John</au><au>Geary, David C</au><au>Petrill, Stephen A</au><au>Graham, Steve</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1334400</ericid><atitle>Individual Differences in Addition Strategy Choice: A Psychometric Evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of educational psychology</jtitle><addtitle>J Educ Psychol</addtitle><date>2019-04-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>111</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>414</spage><epage>433</epage><pages>414-433</pages><issn>0022-0663</issn><eissn>1939-2176</eissn><abstract>The strategy choice model (SCM) is a highly influential theory of human problem-solving. One strength of this theory is the allowance for both item and person variance to contribute to problem-solving outcomes, but this central tenet of the model has not been empirically tested. Explanatory item response theory (EIRT) provides an ideal approach to testing this core feature of SCM, as it allows for simultaneous estimation of both item and person effects on problem-solving outcomes. We used EIRT to test and confirm this central tenet of the SCM for adolescents' (n = 376) solving of addition problems. The approach also allowed us to identify the strategy choices of adolescents who still struggle with basic arithmetic. The synthesis of SCM theory and EIRT modeling has implications for more fully investigating the sources of individual differences in students' problem solving, and for identifying problem-solving patterns associated with poor academic achievement. Educational Impact and Implications Statement Strategy usage may be an important avenue for the identification and treatment of mathematics difficulties. The current study examined individual differences in strategic problem-solving behavior with a sample of adolescent problem-solvers. Results indicate that even in adolescence there are meaningful individual differences in how students solve addition problems, including some adolescents who continue to rely on immature counting strategies. Those adolescents who still relied on immature counting strategies were also struggling with broad mathematical achievement. These struggling students can be identified with a brief addition strategy assessment, and our results suggest that they may benefit from mastering more developmentally mature strategies. For students with mathematical difficulties, simply advancing to developmentally mature strategy selection may be an important intervention goal, one which is often overlooked in educational settings.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>39211772</pmid><doi>10.1037/edu0000294</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3689-0669</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0389-5121</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-0663
ispartof Journal of educational psychology, 2019-04, Vol.111 (3), p.414-433
issn 0022-0663
1939-2176
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11360214
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Academic Achievement
Accuracy
Addition
Adolescent Development
Adolescents
Arithmetic
Choice Behavior
Cognition
Educational psychology
Estimating techniques
Estimation
Female
Human
Individual Differences
Item Response Theory
Learning Problems
Learning Strategies
Male
Mathematics
Mathematics Instruction
Problem Solving
Psychometrics
Quantitative psychology
Responses
Strategies
Time
title Individual Differences in Addition Strategy Choice: A Psychometric Evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T19%3A00%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Individual%20Differences%20in%20Addition%20Strategy%20Choice:%20A%20Psychometric%20Evaluation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20educational%20psychology&rft.au=Rhodes,%20Katherine%20T&rft.date=2019-04-01&rft.volume=111&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=414&rft.epage=433&rft.pages=414-433&rft.issn=0022-0663&rft.eissn=1939-2176&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/edu0000294&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2238526857%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2112896888&rft_id=info:pmid/39211772&rft_ericid=EJ1334400&rfr_iscdi=true