Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis

Use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) in cases of stent thrombosis (ST) is recommended and tailored treatment appears reasonable. Nevertheless, data supporting such a strategy are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of ICI in the management of ST. The unadjusted study pop...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical medicine 2024-08, Vol.13 (16), p.4667
Hauptverfasser: Karamasis, Grigoris V, Katsikis, Athanasios, Konstantinou, Klio, Clesham, Gerald J, Kelly, Paul A, Jagathesan, Rohan, Prati, Francesco, Bourantas, Christos V, Davies, John R, Keeble, Thomas R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 16
container_start_page 4667
container_title Journal of clinical medicine
container_volume 13
creator Karamasis, Grigoris V
Katsikis, Athanasios
Konstantinou, Klio
Clesham, Gerald J
Kelly, Paul A
Jagathesan, Rohan
Prati, Francesco
Bourantas, Christos V
Davies, John R
Keeble, Thomas R
description Use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) in cases of stent thrombosis (ST) is recommended and tailored treatment appears reasonable. Nevertheless, data supporting such a strategy are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of ICI in the management of ST. The unadjusted study population was consecutive patients with definite ST presenting in a single tertiary cardiac centre and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The presumed major mechanism of ST was assigned according to the real-time ICI interpretation by the PCI operator. Propensity score matching was performed with regard to ICI use to form the adjusted population and Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to compare survival free of cardiac death (CD) or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The unadjusted population included 130 ST patients, with the majority presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (88%) and very late ST (86%). ICI was performed in 45 patients, of whom optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed in 30 cases. When the individual ST mechanisms were viewed as groups, there was an interaction observed between type of treatment (stent vs. non-stent) and ST mechanism, with non-stent treatment being more prevalent in cases of underexpansion, malapposition, in-stent restenosis and mechanism uncertainty. After application of matching, two groups of 30 patients were formed. ICI-guided management resulted in better survival free of CD-TLR at 2 years (93% vs. 73%, = 0.037). Intracoronary imaging guidance during PCI for ST had a direct impact on management (stent vs. non-stent) and resulted in a lower event rate at mid-term follow-up when propensity matched analysis was applied.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/jcm13164667
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11355795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3099143230</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-6956f777ac6152dd2ccc5335768a53e16d7202e3bdbe148d72df414f3ece0f7c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc9LwzAUx4MobsydvEvBiyDTJK9t2pPI8Mdg6sF5DmmadhltMpNW8L83c1Om75L38j58-T6-CJ0SfAWQ4-uVbAmQNE5TdoCGFDM2wZDB4V4_QGPvVzhUlsWUsGM0gJyGCedD9DxttNFSNNGsXQvZRbaKZqZzQlpnjXCf4V_U2tSRNlG3VNGTMKJWrTLf6Gu3aRZLZ9vCeu1P0FElGq_Gu3eE3u7vFtPHyfzlYTa9nU8kzbNukuZJWjHGhExJQsuSSikTgISlmUhAkbRkFFMFRVkoEmdhKquYxBUoqXDFJIzQzVZ33RetKqXaWG742uk2eOZWaP53Y_SS1_aDEwJJwvIkKFzsFJx975XveKu9VE0jjLK954DznMRAAQf0_B-6sr0z4b4NFcRiRligLreUdNZ7p6pfNwTzTVZ8L6tAn-0f8Mv-JANfCIuPFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3097954717</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis</title><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Karamasis, Grigoris V ; Katsikis, Athanasios ; Konstantinou, Klio ; Clesham, Gerald J ; Kelly, Paul A ; Jagathesan, Rohan ; Prati, Francesco ; Bourantas, Christos V ; Davies, John R ; Keeble, Thomas R</creator><creatorcontrib>Karamasis, Grigoris V ; Katsikis, Athanasios ; Konstantinou, Klio ; Clesham, Gerald J ; Kelly, Paul A ; Jagathesan, Rohan ; Prati, Francesco ; Bourantas, Christos V ; Davies, John R ; Keeble, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><description>Use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) in cases of stent thrombosis (ST) is recommended and tailored treatment appears reasonable. Nevertheless, data supporting such a strategy are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of ICI in the management of ST. The unadjusted study population was consecutive patients with definite ST presenting in a single tertiary cardiac centre and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The presumed major mechanism of ST was assigned according to the real-time ICI interpretation by the PCI operator. Propensity score matching was performed with regard to ICI use to form the adjusted population and Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to compare survival free of cardiac death (CD) or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The unadjusted population included 130 ST patients, with the majority presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (88%) and very late ST (86%). ICI was performed in 45 patients, of whom optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed in 30 cases. When the individual ST mechanisms were viewed as groups, there was an interaction observed between type of treatment (stent vs. non-stent) and ST mechanism, with non-stent treatment being more prevalent in cases of underexpansion, malapposition, in-stent restenosis and mechanism uncertainty. After application of matching, two groups of 30 patients were formed. ICI-guided management resulted in better survival free of CD-TLR at 2 years (93% vs. 73%, = 0.037). Intracoronary imaging guidance during PCI for ST had a direct impact on management (stent vs. non-stent) and resulted in a lower event rate at mid-term follow-up when propensity matched analysis was applied.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-0383</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jcm13164667</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39200809</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acute coronary syndromes ; Angioplasty ; Cardiovascular disease ; Catheters ; Classification ; Contemporary literature ; Dissection ; Heart attacks ; Thrombosis ; Variables</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-08, Vol.13 (16), p.4667</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-6956f777ac6152dd2ccc5335768a53e16d7202e3bdbe148d72df414f3ece0f7c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6206-8930 ; 0000-0001-8695-7994 ; 0000-0002-4560-7629</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11355795/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11355795/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27923,27924,53790,53792</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39200809$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karamasis, Grigoris V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsikis, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinou, Klio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clesham, Gerald J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Paul A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagathesan, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourantas, Christos V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeble, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis</title><title>Journal of clinical medicine</title><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><description>Use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) in cases of stent thrombosis (ST) is recommended and tailored treatment appears reasonable. Nevertheless, data supporting such a strategy are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of ICI in the management of ST. The unadjusted study population was consecutive patients with definite ST presenting in a single tertiary cardiac centre and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The presumed major mechanism of ST was assigned according to the real-time ICI interpretation by the PCI operator. Propensity score matching was performed with regard to ICI use to form the adjusted population and Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to compare survival free of cardiac death (CD) or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The unadjusted population included 130 ST patients, with the majority presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (88%) and very late ST (86%). ICI was performed in 45 patients, of whom optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed in 30 cases. When the individual ST mechanisms were viewed as groups, there was an interaction observed between type of treatment (stent vs. non-stent) and ST mechanism, with non-stent treatment being more prevalent in cases of underexpansion, malapposition, in-stent restenosis and mechanism uncertainty. After application of matching, two groups of 30 patients were formed. ICI-guided management resulted in better survival free of CD-TLR at 2 years (93% vs. 73%, = 0.037). Intracoronary imaging guidance during PCI for ST had a direct impact on management (stent vs. non-stent) and resulted in a lower event rate at mid-term follow-up when propensity matched analysis was applied.</description><subject>Acute coronary syndromes</subject><subject>Angioplasty</subject><subject>Cardiovascular disease</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Contemporary literature</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Heart attacks</subject><subject>Thrombosis</subject><subject>Variables</subject><issn>2077-0383</issn><issn>2077-0383</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc9LwzAUx4MobsydvEvBiyDTJK9t2pPI8Mdg6sF5DmmadhltMpNW8L83c1Om75L38j58-T6-CJ0SfAWQ4-uVbAmQNE5TdoCGFDM2wZDB4V4_QGPvVzhUlsWUsGM0gJyGCedD9DxttNFSNNGsXQvZRbaKZqZzQlpnjXCf4V_U2tSRNlG3VNGTMKJWrTLf6Gu3aRZLZ9vCeu1P0FElGq_Gu3eE3u7vFtPHyfzlYTa9nU8kzbNukuZJWjHGhExJQsuSSikTgISlmUhAkbRkFFMFRVkoEmdhKquYxBUoqXDFJIzQzVZ33RetKqXaWG742uk2eOZWaP53Y_SS1_aDEwJJwvIkKFzsFJx975XveKu9VE0jjLK954DznMRAAQf0_B-6sr0z4b4NFcRiRligLreUdNZ7p6pfNwTzTVZ8L6tAn-0f8Mv-JANfCIuPFA</recordid><startdate>20240809</startdate><enddate>20240809</enddate><creator>Karamasis, Grigoris V</creator><creator>Katsikis, Athanasios</creator><creator>Konstantinou, Klio</creator><creator>Clesham, Gerald J</creator><creator>Kelly, Paul A</creator><creator>Jagathesan, Rohan</creator><creator>Prati, Francesco</creator><creator>Bourantas, Christos V</creator><creator>Davies, John R</creator><creator>Keeble, Thomas R</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-8930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-7994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-7629</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240809</creationdate><title>Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis</title><author>Karamasis, Grigoris V ; Katsikis, Athanasios ; Konstantinou, Klio ; Clesham, Gerald J ; Kelly, Paul A ; Jagathesan, Rohan ; Prati, Francesco ; Bourantas, Christos V ; Davies, John R ; Keeble, Thomas R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-6956f777ac6152dd2ccc5335768a53e16d7202e3bdbe148d72df414f3ece0f7c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acute coronary syndromes</topic><topic>Angioplasty</topic><topic>Cardiovascular disease</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Contemporary literature</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Heart attacks</topic><topic>Thrombosis</topic><topic>Variables</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karamasis, Grigoris V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsikis, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konstantinou, Klio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clesham, Gerald J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Paul A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jagathesan, Rohan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prati, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bourantas, Christos V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davies, John R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keeble, Thomas R</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karamasis, Grigoris V</au><au>Katsikis, Athanasios</au><au>Konstantinou, Klio</au><au>Clesham, Gerald J</au><au>Kelly, Paul A</au><au>Jagathesan, Rohan</au><au>Prati, Francesco</au><au>Bourantas, Christos V</au><au>Davies, John R</au><au>Keeble, Thomas R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical medicine</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Med</addtitle><date>2024-08-09</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>16</issue><spage>4667</spage><pages>4667-</pages><issn>2077-0383</issn><eissn>2077-0383</eissn><abstract>Use of intracoronary imaging (ICI) in cases of stent thrombosis (ST) is recommended and tailored treatment appears reasonable. Nevertheless, data supporting such a strategy are lacking. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical impact of ICI in the management of ST. The unadjusted study population was consecutive patients with definite ST presenting in a single tertiary cardiac centre and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The presumed major mechanism of ST was assigned according to the real-time ICI interpretation by the PCI operator. Propensity score matching was performed with regard to ICI use to form the adjusted population and Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to compare survival free of cardiac death (CD) or target lesion revascularization (TLR). The unadjusted population included 130 ST patients, with the majority presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (88%) and very late ST (86%). ICI was performed in 45 patients, of whom optical coherence tomography (OCT) was performed in 30 cases. When the individual ST mechanisms were viewed as groups, there was an interaction observed between type of treatment (stent vs. non-stent) and ST mechanism, with non-stent treatment being more prevalent in cases of underexpansion, malapposition, in-stent restenosis and mechanism uncertainty. After application of matching, two groups of 30 patients were formed. ICI-guided management resulted in better survival free of CD-TLR at 2 years (93% vs. 73%, = 0.037). Intracoronary imaging guidance during PCI for ST had a direct impact on management (stent vs. non-stent) and resulted in a lower event rate at mid-term follow-up when propensity matched analysis was applied.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>39200809</pmid><doi>10.3390/jcm13164667</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6206-8930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8695-7994</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4560-7629</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2077-0383
ispartof Journal of clinical medicine, 2024-08, Vol.13 (16), p.4667
issn 2077-0383
2077-0383
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11355795
source PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Acute coronary syndromes
Angioplasty
Cardiovascular disease
Catheters
Classification
Contemporary literature
Dissection
Heart attacks
Thrombosis
Variables
title Clinical Impact of Intracoronary Imaging in the Management of Stent Thrombosis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A24%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Impact%20of%20Intracoronary%20Imaging%20in%20the%20Management%20of%20Stent%20Thrombosis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20medicine&rft.au=Karamasis,%20Grigoris%20V&rft.date=2024-08-09&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=16&rft.spage=4667&rft.pages=4667-&rft.issn=2077-0383&rft.eissn=2077-0383&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jcm13164667&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3099143230%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3097954717&rft_id=info:pmid/39200809&rfr_iscdi=true