Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study

Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and mineral research 2024-04, Vol.39 (3), p.202-210
Hauptverfasser: Jeka, Sławomir, Dokoupilová, Eva, Kivitz, Alan, Żuchowski, Paweł, Vogg, Barbara, Krivtsova, Natalia, Sekhar, Susmit, Banerjee, Samik, Schwebig, Arnd, Poetzl, Johann, Body, Jean-Jacques, Eastell, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue 3
container_start_page 202
container_title Journal of bone and mineral research
container_volume 39
creator Jeka, Sławomir
Dokoupilová, Eva
Kivitz, Alan
Żuchowski, Paweł
Vogg, Barbara
Krivtsova, Natalia
Sekhar, Susmit
Banerjee, Samik
Schwebig, Arnd
Poetzl, Johann
Body, Jean-Jacques
Eastell, Richard
description Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jbmr/zjae016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11338045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956682816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-50c412b8320b07582625387c89907493b64902b7d919ec1e5c571d0574100b0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtv1DAURi0EokNhxxp5yYK0vn7EDhs0qkpbaaQiHmvLce5Qj5I4tZNKZcsfx0OHAitL9vmO7fsR8hrYCbBGnO7aIZ3-2DlkUD8hK1BcVLI28JSsmDGyYlLAEXmR844xVqu6fk6OhJFaawUr8vP8dgl3rsfRI51TcD2NWzqlOMWMHe1wjHkZXEvbEHMYQu8SvfjEJQB1Y0cTbjH9zv4lw0hLeB7KxuSWvDfmGYswFUN-T-cbpJ-vv6w3V2ua56W7f0mebV2f8dVhPSbfPp5_PbusNtcXV2frTeWF5HOlmJfAWyM4a5lWhtdcCaO9aRqmZSPaWjaMt7proEEPqLzS0DGlJbCS6MQx-fDgnZZ2wM7jOCfX2ymFwaV7G12w_5-M4cZ-j3cWQAjDpCqGtwdDircL5tkOIXvsezdiXLLlTZmv4Qbqgr57QH35di5zerwHmN0XZ_fF2UNxBX_z79se4T9NiV9IyZcb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956682816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jeka, Sławomir ; Dokoupilová, Eva ; Kivitz, Alan ; Żuchowski, Paweł ; Vogg, Barbara ; Krivtsova, Natalia ; Sekhar, Susmit ; Banerjee, Samik ; Schwebig, Arnd ; Poetzl, Johann ; Body, Jean-Jacques ; Eastell, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeka, Sławomir ; Dokoupilová, Eva ; Kivitz, Alan ; Żuchowski, Paweł ; Vogg, Barbara ; Krivtsova, Natalia ; Sekhar, Susmit ; Banerjee, Samik ; Schwebig, Arnd ; Poetzl, Johann ; Body, Jean-Jacques ; Eastell, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-0431</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1523-4681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38477751</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - adverse effects ; Bone Density ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use ; Clinical Trial ; Denosumab - adverse effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Osteoporosis - drug therapy ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and mineral research, 2024-04, Vol.39 (3), p.202-210</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-50c412b8320b07582625387c89907493b64902b7d919ec1e5c571d0574100b0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38477751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeka, Sławomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokoupilová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivitz, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żuchowski, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogg, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krivtsova, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekhar, Susmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Samik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwebig, Arnd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poetzl, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Body, Jean-Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastell, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study</title><title>Journal of bone and mineral research</title><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><description>Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.</description><subject>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Trial</subject><subject>Denosumab - adverse effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</subject><issn>0884-0431</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtv1DAURi0EokNhxxp5yYK0vn7EDhs0qkpbaaQiHmvLce5Qj5I4tZNKZcsfx0OHAitL9vmO7fsR8hrYCbBGnO7aIZ3-2DlkUD8hK1BcVLI28JSsmDGyYlLAEXmR844xVqu6fk6OhJFaawUr8vP8dgl3rsfRI51TcD2NWzqlOMWMHe1wjHkZXEvbEHMYQu8SvfjEJQB1Y0cTbjH9zv4lw0hLeB7KxuSWvDfmGYswFUN-T-cbpJ-vv6w3V2ua56W7f0mebV2f8dVhPSbfPp5_PbusNtcXV2frTeWF5HOlmJfAWyM4a5lWhtdcCaO9aRqmZSPaWjaMt7proEEPqLzS0DGlJbCS6MQx-fDgnZZ2wM7jOCfX2ymFwaV7G12w_5-M4cZ-j3cWQAjDpCqGtwdDircL5tkOIXvsezdiXLLlTZmv4Qbqgr57QH35di5zerwHmN0XZ_fF2UNxBX_z79se4T9NiV9IyZcb</recordid><startdate>20240419</startdate><enddate>20240419</enddate><creator>Jeka, Sławomir</creator><creator>Dokoupilová, Eva</creator><creator>Kivitz, Alan</creator><creator>Żuchowski, Paweł</creator><creator>Vogg, Barbara</creator><creator>Krivtsova, Natalia</creator><creator>Sekhar, Susmit</creator><creator>Banerjee, Samik</creator><creator>Schwebig, Arnd</creator><creator>Poetzl, Johann</creator><creator>Body, Jean-Jacques</creator><creator>Eastell, Richard</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240419</creationdate><title>Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study</title><author>Jeka, Sławomir ; Dokoupilová, Eva ; Kivitz, Alan ; Żuchowski, Paweł ; Vogg, Barbara ; Krivtsova, Natalia ; Sekhar, Susmit ; Banerjee, Samik ; Schwebig, Arnd ; Poetzl, Johann ; Body, Jean-Jacques ; Eastell, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-50c412b8320b07582625387c89907493b64902b7d919ec1e5c571d0574100b0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Trial</topic><topic>Denosumab - adverse effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeka, Sławomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokoupilová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivitz, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żuchowski, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogg, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krivtsova, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekhar, Susmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Samik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwebig, Arnd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poetzl, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Body, Jean-Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastell, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeka, Sławomir</au><au>Dokoupilová, Eva</au><au>Kivitz, Alan</au><au>Żuchowski, Paweł</au><au>Vogg, Barbara</au><au>Krivtsova, Natalia</au><au>Sekhar, Susmit</au><au>Banerjee, Samik</au><au>Schwebig, Arnd</au><au>Poetzl, Johann</au><au>Body, Jean-Jacques</au><au>Eastell, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><date>2024-04-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>202-210</pages><issn>0884-0431</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><eissn>1523-4681</eissn><abstract>Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38477751</pmid><doi>10.1093/jbmr/zjae016</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0884-0431
ispartof Journal of bone and mineral research, 2024-04, Vol.39 (3), p.202-210
issn 0884-0431
1523-4681
1523-4681
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11338045
source MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - adverse effects
Bone Density
Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use
Clinical Trial
Denosumab - adverse effects
Double-Blind Method
Female
Humans
Osteoporosis - drug therapy
Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy
title Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A11%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equivalence%20trial%20of%20proposed%20denosumab%20biosimilar%20GP2411%20and%20reference%20denosumab%20in%20postmenopausal%20osteoporosis:%20the%20ROSALIA%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20mineral%20research&rft.au=Jeka,%20S%C5%82awomir&rft.date=2024-04-19&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=202-210&rft.issn=0884-0431&rft.eissn=1523-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jbmr/zjae016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2956682816%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956682816&rft_id=info:pmid/38477751&rfr_iscdi=true