Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study
Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosum...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bone and mineral research 2024-04, Vol.39 (3), p.202-210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 202 |
container_title | Journal of bone and mineral research |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Jeka, Sławomir Dokoupilová, Eva Kivitz, Alan Żuchowski, Paweł Vogg, Barbara Krivtsova, Natalia Sekhar, Susmit Banerjee, Samik Schwebig, Arnd Poetzl, Johann Body, Jean-Jacques Eastell, Richard |
description | Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jbmr/zjae016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11338045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956682816</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-50c412b8320b07582625387c89907493b64902b7d919ec1e5c571d0574100b0d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkUtv1DAURi0EokNhxxp5yYK0vn7EDhs0qkpbaaQiHmvLce5Qj5I4tZNKZcsfx0OHAitL9vmO7fsR8hrYCbBGnO7aIZ3-2DlkUD8hK1BcVLI28JSsmDGyYlLAEXmR844xVqu6fk6OhJFaawUr8vP8dgl3rsfRI51TcD2NWzqlOMWMHe1wjHkZXEvbEHMYQu8SvfjEJQB1Y0cTbjH9zv4lw0hLeB7KxuSWvDfmGYswFUN-T-cbpJ-vv6w3V2ua56W7f0mebV2f8dVhPSbfPp5_PbusNtcXV2frTeWF5HOlmJfAWyM4a5lWhtdcCaO9aRqmZSPaWjaMt7proEEPqLzS0DGlJbCS6MQx-fDgnZZ2wM7jOCfX2ymFwaV7G12w_5-M4cZ-j3cWQAjDpCqGtwdDircL5tkOIXvsezdiXLLlTZmv4Qbqgr57QH35di5zerwHmN0XZ_fF2UNxBX_z79se4T9NiV9IyZcb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2956682816</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Jeka, Sławomir ; Dokoupilová, Eva ; Kivitz, Alan ; Żuchowski, Paweł ; Vogg, Barbara ; Krivtsova, Natalia ; Sekhar, Susmit ; Banerjee, Samik ; Schwebig, Arnd ; Poetzl, Johann ; Body, Jean-Jacques ; Eastell, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeka, Sławomir ; Dokoupilová, Eva ; Kivitz, Alan ; Żuchowski, Paweł ; Vogg, Barbara ; Krivtsova, Natalia ; Sekhar, Susmit ; Banerjee, Samik ; Schwebig, Arnd ; Poetzl, Johann ; Body, Jean-Jacques ; Eastell, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0884-0431</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1523-4681</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-4681</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jbmr/zjae016</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38477751</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - adverse effects ; Bone Density ; Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use ; Clinical Trial ; Denosumab - adverse effects ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; Osteoporosis - drug therapy ; Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</subject><ispartof>Journal of bone and mineral research, 2024-04, Vol.39 (3), p.202-210</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-50c412b8320b07582625387c89907493b64902b7d919ec1e5c571d0574100b0d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38477751$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeka, Sławomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokoupilová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivitz, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żuchowski, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogg, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krivtsova, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekhar, Susmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Samik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwebig, Arnd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poetzl, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Body, Jean-Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastell, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study</title><title>Journal of bone and mineral research</title><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><description>Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.</description><subject>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - adverse effects</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical Trial</subject><subject>Denosumab - adverse effects</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Osteoporosis - drug therapy</subject><subject>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</subject><issn>0884-0431</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkUtv1DAURi0EokNhxxp5yYK0vn7EDhs0qkpbaaQiHmvLce5Qj5I4tZNKZcsfx0OHAitL9vmO7fsR8hrYCbBGnO7aIZ3-2DlkUD8hK1BcVLI28JSsmDGyYlLAEXmR844xVqu6fk6OhJFaawUr8vP8dgl3rsfRI51TcD2NWzqlOMWMHe1wjHkZXEvbEHMYQu8SvfjEJQB1Y0cTbjH9zv4lw0hLeB7KxuSWvDfmGYswFUN-T-cbpJ-vv6w3V2ua56W7f0mebV2f8dVhPSbfPp5_PbusNtcXV2frTeWF5HOlmJfAWyM4a5lWhtdcCaO9aRqmZSPaWjaMt7proEEPqLzS0DGlJbCS6MQx-fDgnZZ2wM7jOCfX2ymFwaV7G12w_5-M4cZ-j3cWQAjDpCqGtwdDircL5tkOIXvsezdiXLLlTZmv4Qbqgr57QH35di5zerwHmN0XZ_fF2UNxBX_z79se4T9NiV9IyZcb</recordid><startdate>20240419</startdate><enddate>20240419</enddate><creator>Jeka, Sławomir</creator><creator>Dokoupilová, Eva</creator><creator>Kivitz, Alan</creator><creator>Żuchowski, Paweł</creator><creator>Vogg, Barbara</creator><creator>Krivtsova, Natalia</creator><creator>Sekhar, Susmit</creator><creator>Banerjee, Samik</creator><creator>Schwebig, Arnd</creator><creator>Poetzl, Johann</creator><creator>Body, Jean-Jacques</creator><creator>Eastell, Richard</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240419</creationdate><title>Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study</title><author>Jeka, Sławomir ; Dokoupilová, Eva ; Kivitz, Alan ; Żuchowski, Paweł ; Vogg, Barbara ; Krivtsova, Natalia ; Sekhar, Susmit ; Banerjee, Samik ; Schwebig, Arnd ; Poetzl, Johann ; Body, Jean-Jacques ; Eastell, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c342t-50c412b8320b07582625387c89907493b64902b7d919ec1e5c571d0574100b0d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - adverse effects</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical Trial</topic><topic>Denosumab - adverse effects</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Osteoporosis - drug therapy</topic><topic>Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeka, Sławomir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dokoupilová, Eva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kivitz, Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Żuchowski, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogg, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krivtsova, Natalia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sekhar, Susmit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Banerjee, Samik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schwebig, Arnd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poetzl, Johann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Body, Jean-Jacques</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastell, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeka, Sławomir</au><au>Dokoupilová, Eva</au><au>Kivitz, Alan</au><au>Żuchowski, Paweł</au><au>Vogg, Barbara</au><au>Krivtsova, Natalia</au><au>Sekhar, Susmit</au><au>Banerjee, Samik</au><au>Schwebig, Arnd</au><au>Poetzl, Johann</au><au>Body, Jean-Jacques</au><au>Eastell, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bone and mineral research</jtitle><addtitle>J Bone Miner Res</addtitle><date>2024-04-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>202-210</pages><issn>0884-0431</issn><issn>1523-4681</issn><eissn>1523-4681</eissn><abstract>Denosumab is a monoclonal antibody used to reduce risk of fractures in osteoporosis. ROSALIA was a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, integrated phase I/phase III study comparing the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), immunogenicity, and safety of proposed biosimilar denosumab GP2411 with reference denosumab (REF-DMAb) (Prolia®; Amgen). Postmenopausal women with osteoporosis were randomized 1:1 to 2 60-mg doses of GP2411 or REF-DMAb, one at study start and one at week 26. At week 52, the REF-DMAb group was re-randomized 1:1 to a third dose of REF-DMAb or switch to GP2411. The primary efficacy endpoint was percentage change from baseline (%CfB) in LS-BMD at week 52. Secondary efficacy endpoints were %CfB in LS-BMD, FN-BMD, and TH-BMD at weeks 26 and 78 (and week 52 for FN-BMD and TH-BMD). Primary PK and PD endpoints were the area under the serum concentration-time curve extrapolated to infinity and maximum drug serum concentration at week 26, and the area under the effect-time curve of the %CfB in serum CTX at week 26. Secondary PK and PD endpoints included drug serum concentrations and %CfB in serum CTX and P1NP during the study period. Similar efficacy was demonstrated at week 52, with 95% CIs of the difference in %CfB in LS-BMD between treatment groups fully contained within prespecified equivalence margins. Similarity in PK and PD was demonstrated at week 26. Immunogenicity was similar between groups and was not impacted by treatment switch. The rate of new vertebral fractures was comparable. Treatment-emergent adverse events were comparable between groups (63.6% [GP2411/GP2411]; 76.0% [REF-DMAb/REF-DMAb]; 76.6% [REF-DMAb/GP2411]). In conclusion, ROSALIA showed similar efficacy, PK and PD, and comparable safety and immunogenicity of GP2411 to REF-DMAb in postmenopausal osteoporosis.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38477751</pmid><doi>10.1093/jbmr/zjae016</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0884-0431 |
ispartof | Journal of bone and mineral research, 2024-04, Vol.39 (3), p.202-210 |
issn | 0884-0431 1523-4681 1523-4681 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11338045 |
source | MEDLINE; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals - adverse effects Bone Density Bone Density Conservation Agents - therapeutic use Clinical Trial Denosumab - adverse effects Double-Blind Method Female Humans Osteoporosis - drug therapy Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal - drug therapy |
title | Equivalence trial of proposed denosumab biosimilar GP2411 and reference denosumab in postmenopausal osteoporosis: the ROSALIA study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T04%3A11%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Equivalence%20trial%20of%20proposed%20denosumab%20biosimilar%20GP2411%20and%20reference%20denosumab%20in%20postmenopausal%20osteoporosis:%20the%20ROSALIA%20study&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bone%20and%20mineral%20research&rft.au=Jeka,%20S%C5%82awomir&rft.date=2024-04-19&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=202-210&rft.issn=0884-0431&rft.eissn=1523-4681&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jbmr/zjae016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2956682816%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2956682816&rft_id=info:pmid/38477751&rfr_iscdi=true |