Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of two-stage versus single-stage computed tomography guided localization and resection of pulmonary nodules

Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has been increasingly utilized for lung cancer screening. Localization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) is crucial for resection. Two-stage localization method involves dye injection by radiologists prior to the operation. The significant interval between localiz...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of thoracic disease 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.4137-4145
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Hei Yu Matthew, Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew, Li, Ki Kwong, Chan, Ho Yan Howard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4145
container_issue 7
container_start_page 4137
container_title Journal of thoracic disease
container_volume 16
creator Chen, Hei Yu Matthew
Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew
Li, Ki Kwong
Chan, Ho Yan Howard
description Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has been increasingly utilized for lung cancer screening. Localization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) is crucial for resection. Two-stage localization method involves dye injection by radiologists prior to the operation. The significant interval between localization and resection is associated with a higher risk of marker failure, psychological distress and procedural complications. Single-stage localization and resection procedure under general anesthesia poses unique challenges. The aim of the study is to compare the safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction between the two methods. This is a retrospective study comparing outcomes between two-stage and single-stage pre-operative localization of SPN. The primary study outcome was total operating time. Secondary outcomes included successful lesion localization, complication rate, 30-day readmission, mortality, patient satisfaction, and pain level. A total of 26 and 56 patients were included for the single and two-stage group respectively. Total operative time was significantly longer in the single-stage arm (mean: 188 min) than that of the two-stage arm (mean: 172 min, P
doi_str_mv 10.21037/jtd-24-303
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11320263</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3093174143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-f72222cba03eb7749a4a7bd746deb7163ac21a785cb64d8a013b7f4b178559103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUctO3DAUtSqqgiir7isvkWhavyaerBBCQCshddOurRs_gpETp7YDGv6D_60ZpiN6N7aPzz33cRD6RMlXRgmX3-6LaZhoOOHv0BEjUjZty8TB9s4aKnh3iE5yvic1WsKYlB_QIe-oELwlR-j5yjmvQW--4AzOlg2GyeAZirdTqVDx2YEuPk44OlweY5MLDBY_2JSXjLOfhmB3mI7jvBRrcIljHBLMdxs8LN5UJEQNwT_BVuilQrLZ7mXnJYxxgrTBUzRLsPkjeu8gZHuyO4_R7-urX5ffm9ufNz8uL24bTdcr3jjJaugeCLe9lKIDAbI3UrSmvmnLQTMKcr3SfSvMGgjlvXSipxVadXV9x-j8VXde-tEaXWdOENSc_Fi7URG8-v9n8ndqiA-KUs4Ia3lVON0ppPhnsbmo0WdtQ4DJxiUrTjpOpag-VOrZK1WnmHOybl-HErU1U1UzFRM16YX9-W1re-4_6_hfCoOfAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3093174143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of two-stage versus single-stage computed tomography guided localization and resection of pulmonary nodules</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Chen, Hei Yu Matthew ; Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew ; Li, Ki Kwong ; Chan, Ho Yan Howard</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hei Yu Matthew ; Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew ; Li, Ki Kwong ; Chan, Ho Yan Howard</creatorcontrib><description>Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has been increasingly utilized for lung cancer screening. Localization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) is crucial for resection. Two-stage localization method involves dye injection by radiologists prior to the operation. The significant interval between localization and resection is associated with a higher risk of marker failure, psychological distress and procedural complications. Single-stage localization and resection procedure under general anesthesia poses unique challenges. The aim of the study is to compare the safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction between the two methods. This is a retrospective study comparing outcomes between two-stage and single-stage pre-operative localization of SPN. The primary study outcome was total operating time. Secondary outcomes included successful lesion localization, complication rate, 30-day readmission, mortality, patient satisfaction, and pain level. A total of 26 and 56 patients were included for the single and two-stage group respectively. Total operative time was significantly longer in the single-stage arm (mean: 188 min) than that of the two-stage arm (mean: 172 min, P&lt;0.001) due to the additional time needed for intra-operative localization. Mean satisfaction score was significantly higher in the single-stage group than that of the two-stage group (92 52.69, P=0.004). Pain level assessed by numerical rating scales was better in the single-stage arm compared to the two-stage arm (mean: 8.8 4.85, P=0.007). Single-stage localization and resection resulted in a minor increase in total operative time, higher patient satisfaction and less pain with comparable safety and efficacy to conventional two-stage approach.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-1439</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-6624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21037/jtd-24-303</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39144360</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>China: AME Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Original</subject><ispartof>Journal of thoracic disease, 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.4137-4145</ispartof><rights>2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. 2024 Journal of Thoracic Disease.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-4867-711X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320263/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11320263/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27915,27916,53782,53784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39144360$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hei Yu Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ki Kwong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ho Yan Howard</creatorcontrib><title>Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of two-stage versus single-stage computed tomography guided localization and resection of pulmonary nodules</title><title>Journal of thoracic disease</title><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><description>Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has been increasingly utilized for lung cancer screening. Localization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) is crucial for resection. Two-stage localization method involves dye injection by radiologists prior to the operation. The significant interval between localization and resection is associated with a higher risk of marker failure, psychological distress and procedural complications. Single-stage localization and resection procedure under general anesthesia poses unique challenges. The aim of the study is to compare the safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction between the two methods. This is a retrospective study comparing outcomes between two-stage and single-stage pre-operative localization of SPN. The primary study outcome was total operating time. Secondary outcomes included successful lesion localization, complication rate, 30-day readmission, mortality, patient satisfaction, and pain level. A total of 26 and 56 patients were included for the single and two-stage group respectively. Total operative time was significantly longer in the single-stage arm (mean: 188 min) than that of the two-stage arm (mean: 172 min, P&lt;0.001) due to the additional time needed for intra-operative localization. Mean satisfaction score was significantly higher in the single-stage group than that of the two-stage group (92 52.69, P=0.004). Pain level assessed by numerical rating scales was better in the single-stage arm compared to the two-stage arm (mean: 8.8 4.85, P=0.007). Single-stage localization and resection resulted in a minor increase in total operative time, higher patient satisfaction and less pain with comparable safety and efficacy to conventional two-stage approach.</description><subject>Original</subject><issn>2072-1439</issn><issn>2077-6624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUctO3DAUtSqqgiir7isvkWhavyaerBBCQCshddOurRs_gpETp7YDGv6D_60ZpiN6N7aPzz33cRD6RMlXRgmX3-6LaZhoOOHv0BEjUjZty8TB9s4aKnh3iE5yvic1WsKYlB_QIe-oELwlR-j5yjmvQW--4AzOlg2GyeAZirdTqVDx2YEuPk44OlweY5MLDBY_2JSXjLOfhmB3mI7jvBRrcIljHBLMdxs8LN5UJEQNwT_BVuilQrLZ7mXnJYxxgrTBUzRLsPkjeu8gZHuyO4_R7-urX5ffm9ufNz8uL24bTdcr3jjJaugeCLe9lKIDAbI3UrSmvmnLQTMKcr3SfSvMGgjlvXSipxVadXV9x-j8VXde-tEaXWdOENSc_Fi7URG8-v9n8ndqiA-KUs4Ia3lVON0ppPhnsbmo0WdtQ4DJxiUrTjpOpag-VOrZK1WnmHOybl-HErU1U1UzFRM16YX9-W1re-4_6_hfCoOfAg</recordid><startdate>20240730</startdate><enddate>20240730</enddate><creator>Chen, Hei Yu Matthew</creator><creator>Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew</creator><creator>Li, Ki Kwong</creator><creator>Chan, Ho Yan Howard</creator><general>AME Publishing Company</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-711X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240730</creationdate><title>Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of two-stage versus single-stage computed tomography guided localization and resection of pulmonary nodules</title><author>Chen, Hei Yu Matthew ; Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew ; Li, Ki Kwong ; Chan, Ho Yan Howard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1853-f72222cba03eb7749a4a7bd746deb7163ac21a785cb64d8a013b7f4b178559103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Hei Yu Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ki Kwong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Ho Yan Howard</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Hei Yu Matthew</au><au>Wong, Tsz Ho Andrew</au><au>Li, Ki Kwong</au><au>Chan, Ho Yan Howard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of two-stage versus single-stage computed tomography guided localization and resection of pulmonary nodules</atitle><jtitle>Journal of thoracic disease</jtitle><addtitle>J Thorac Dis</addtitle><date>2024-07-30</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>4137</spage><epage>4145</epage><pages>4137-4145</pages><issn>2072-1439</issn><eissn>2077-6624</eissn><abstract>Low-dose computed tomography (CT) has been increasingly utilized for lung cancer screening. Localization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPN) is crucial for resection. Two-stage localization method involves dye injection by radiologists prior to the operation. The significant interval between localization and resection is associated with a higher risk of marker failure, psychological distress and procedural complications. Single-stage localization and resection procedure under general anesthesia poses unique challenges. The aim of the study is to compare the safety, efficacy and patient satisfaction between the two methods. This is a retrospective study comparing outcomes between two-stage and single-stage pre-operative localization of SPN. The primary study outcome was total operating time. Secondary outcomes included successful lesion localization, complication rate, 30-day readmission, mortality, patient satisfaction, and pain level. A total of 26 and 56 patients were included for the single and two-stage group respectively. Total operative time was significantly longer in the single-stage arm (mean: 188 min) than that of the two-stage arm (mean: 172 min, P&lt;0.001) due to the additional time needed for intra-operative localization. Mean satisfaction score was significantly higher in the single-stage group than that of the two-stage group (92 52.69, P=0.004). Pain level assessed by numerical rating scales was better in the single-stage arm compared to the two-stage arm (mean: 8.8 4.85, P=0.007). Single-stage localization and resection resulted in a minor increase in total operative time, higher patient satisfaction and less pain with comparable safety and efficacy to conventional two-stage approach.</abstract><cop>China</cop><pub>AME Publishing Company</pub><pmid>39144360</pmid><doi>10.21037/jtd-24-303</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4867-711X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-1439
ispartof Journal of thoracic disease, 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.4137-4145
issn 2072-1439
2077-6624
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11320263
source PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Original
title Efficacy, safety and patient satisfaction of two-stage versus single-stage computed tomography guided localization and resection of pulmonary nodules
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T18%3A32%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Efficacy,%20safety%20and%20patient%20satisfaction%20of%20two-stage%20versus%20single-stage%20computed%20tomography%20guided%20localization%20and%20resection%20of%20pulmonary%20nodules&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20thoracic%20disease&rft.au=Chen,%20Hei%20Yu%20Matthew&rft.date=2024-07-30&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=4137&rft.epage=4145&rft.pages=4137-4145&rft.issn=2072-1439&rft.eissn=2077-6624&rft_id=info:doi/10.21037/jtd-24-303&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3093174143%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3093174143&rft_id=info:pmid/39144360&rfr_iscdi=true