Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell
This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anae...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | RSC advances 2024-07, Vol.14 (32), p.22962-22973 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 22973 |
---|---|
container_issue | 32 |
container_start_page | 22962 |
container_title | RSC advances |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Nwanebu, Emmanuel Jezernik, Mara Lawson, Christopher Bruant, Guillaume Tartakovsky, Boris |
description | This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L−1 as CO32−). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH4 production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH4 volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (Lc d)−1 and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (Lc d)−1, respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria (Clostridium carboxidivorans, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium autoethanogenum, and Eubacterium limosum) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (Lc d)−1. However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/d4ra03906h |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11290334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3086956956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-c265f110ad1561d0a8a832d0fb39968988764403a3de90be3c415f1de44a51ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMFKxDAQDaLgsu7FLwh48VJNmjTbnEQWdRcWvOi5TJN0m6VtapIK-_dmdQ_q8GBmeG8evEHompI7Spi819xD6kS0Z2iWEy6ynAh5_mu-RIsQ9iSVKGgu6Ax1m34EFbFrsILYOm0VHtcYBo1r62Da9WaIEK0bcAIokxbzTa_WHI_e6Ul9szaxuLfKu9pCh01nVPQuHIbYmmADVqbrrtBFA10wi1Ofo_fnp7fVOtu-vmxWj9tszFkZM5WLoqGUgKaFoJpACSXLNWlqJqUoZVkuBeeEAdNGktowxWk60IZzKKjRbI4efnzHqe6NVimCh64ave3BHyoHtvrLDLatdu6zojSXhDGeHG5PDt59TCbEqrfhGAEG46ZQMVIKWRyRpDf_pHs3-SHlO6qWlMj0avYFcfeAAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087109512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Nwanebu, Emmanuel ; Jezernik, Mara ; Lawson, Christopher ; Bruant, Guillaume ; Tartakovsky, Boris</creator><creatorcontrib>Nwanebu, Emmanuel ; Jezernik, Mara ; Lawson, Christopher ; Bruant, Guillaume ; Tartakovsky, Boris</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L−1 as CO32−). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH4 production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH4 volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (Lc d)−1 and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (Lc d)−1, respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria (Clostridium carboxidivorans, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium autoethanogenum, and Eubacterium limosum) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (Lc d)−1. However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-2069</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-2069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d4ra03906h</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biofilms ; Carbon dioxide ; Carboxylic acids ; Cathodes ; Chemistry ; Gene sequencing ; Microorganisms</subject><ispartof>RSC advances, 2024-07, Vol.14 (32), p.22962-22973</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2024</rights><rights>This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.</rights><rights>This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 The Royal Society of Chemistry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290334/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290334/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nwanebu, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jezernik, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruant, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartakovsky, Boris</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell</title><title>RSC advances</title><description>This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L−1 as CO32−). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH4 production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH4 volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (Lc d)−1 and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (Lc d)−1, respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria (Clostridium carboxidivorans, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium autoethanogenum, and Eubacterium limosum) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (Lc d)−1. However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carboxylic acids</subject><subject>Cathodes</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><issn>2046-2069</issn><issn>2046-2069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUMFKxDAQDaLgsu7FLwh48VJNmjTbnEQWdRcWvOi5TJN0m6VtapIK-_dmdQ_q8GBmeG8evEHompI7Spi819xD6kS0Z2iWEy6ynAh5_mu-RIsQ9iSVKGgu6Ax1m34EFbFrsILYOm0VHtcYBo1r62Da9WaIEK0bcAIokxbzTa_WHI_e6Ul9szaxuLfKu9pCh01nVPQuHIbYmmADVqbrrtBFA10wi1Ofo_fnp7fVOtu-vmxWj9tszFkZM5WLoqGUgKaFoJpACSXLNWlqJqUoZVkuBeeEAdNGktowxWk60IZzKKjRbI4efnzHqe6NVimCh64ave3BHyoHtvrLDLatdu6zojSXhDGeHG5PDt59TCbEqrfhGAEG46ZQMVIKWRyRpDf_pHs3-SHlO6qWlMj0avYFcfeAAg</recordid><startdate>20240719</startdate><enddate>20240719</enddate><creator>Nwanebu, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Jezernik, Mara</creator><creator>Lawson, Christopher</creator><creator>Bruant, Guillaume</creator><creator>Tartakovsky, Boris</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><general>The Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240719</creationdate><title>Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell</title><author>Nwanebu, Emmanuel ; Jezernik, Mara ; Lawson, Christopher ; Bruant, Guillaume ; Tartakovsky, Boris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-c265f110ad1561d0a8a832d0fb39968988764403a3de90be3c415f1de44a51ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carboxylic acids</topic><topic>Cathodes</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nwanebu, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jezernik, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruant, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartakovsky, Boris</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>RSC advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nwanebu, Emmanuel</au><au>Jezernik, Mara</au><au>Lawson, Christopher</au><au>Bruant, Guillaume</au><au>Tartakovsky, Boris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell</atitle><jtitle>RSC advances</jtitle><date>2024-07-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>22962</spage><epage>22973</epage><pages>22962-22973</pages><issn>2046-2069</issn><eissn>2046-2069</eissn><abstract>This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L−1 as CO32−). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH4 production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH4 volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (Lc d)−1 and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (Lc d)−1, respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria (Clostridium carboxidivorans, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium autoethanogenum, and Eubacterium limosum) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (Lc d)−1. However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/d4ra03906h</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2046-2069 |
ispartof | RSC advances, 2024-07, Vol.14 (32), p.22962-22973 |
issn | 2046-2069 2046-2069 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11290334 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Bacteria Biofilms Carbon dioxide Carboxylic acids Cathodes Chemistry Gene sequencing Microorganisms |
title | Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A28%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20cathodic%20pH%20and%20bioaugmentation%20on%20acetate%20and%20CH4%20production%20in%20a%20microbial%20electrosynthesis%20cell&rft.jtitle=RSC%20advances&rft.au=Nwanebu,%20Emmanuel&rft.date=2024-07-19&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=22962&rft.epage=22973&rft.pages=22962-22973&rft.issn=2046-2069&rft.eissn=2046-2069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d4ra03906h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3086956956%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087109512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |