Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell

This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anae...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:RSC advances 2024-07, Vol.14 (32), p.22962-22973
Hauptverfasser: Nwanebu, Emmanuel, Jezernik, Mara, Lawson, Christopher, Bruant, Guillaume, Tartakovsky, Boris
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 22973
container_issue 32
container_start_page 22962
container_title RSC advances
container_volume 14
creator Nwanebu, Emmanuel
Jezernik, Mara
Lawson, Christopher
Bruant, Guillaume
Tartakovsky, Boris
description This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L−1 as CO32−). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH4 production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH4 volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (Lc d)−1 and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (Lc d)−1, respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria (Clostridium carboxidivorans, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium autoethanogenum, and Eubacterium limosum) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (Lc d)−1. However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production.
doi_str_mv 10.1039/d4ra03906h
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11290334</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3086956956</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-c265f110ad1561d0a8a832d0fb39968988764403a3de90be3c415f1de44a51ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUMFKxDAQDaLgsu7FLwh48VJNmjTbnEQWdRcWvOi5TJN0m6VtapIK-_dmdQ_q8GBmeG8evEHompI7Spi819xD6kS0Z2iWEy6ynAh5_mu-RIsQ9iSVKGgu6Ax1m34EFbFrsILYOm0VHtcYBo1r62Da9WaIEK0bcAIokxbzTa_WHI_e6Ul9szaxuLfKu9pCh01nVPQuHIbYmmADVqbrrtBFA10wi1Ofo_fnp7fVOtu-vmxWj9tszFkZM5WLoqGUgKaFoJpACSXLNWlqJqUoZVkuBeeEAdNGktowxWk60IZzKKjRbI4efnzHqe6NVimCh64ave3BHyoHtvrLDLatdu6zojSXhDGeHG5PDt59TCbEqrfhGAEG46ZQMVIKWRyRpDf_pHs3-SHlO6qWlMj0avYFcfeAAg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3087109512</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Nwanebu, Emmanuel ; Jezernik, Mara ; Lawson, Christopher ; Bruant, Guillaume ; Tartakovsky, Boris</creator><creatorcontrib>Nwanebu, Emmanuel ; Jezernik, Mara ; Lawson, Christopher ; Bruant, Guillaume ; Tartakovsky, Boris</creatorcontrib><description>This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L−1 as CO32−). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH4 production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH4 volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (Lc d)−1 and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (Lc d)−1, respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria (Clostridium carboxidivorans, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium autoethanogenum, and Eubacterium limosum) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (Lc d)−1. However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-2069</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-2069</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/d4ra03906h</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Bacteria ; Biofilms ; Carbon dioxide ; Carboxylic acids ; Cathodes ; Chemistry ; Gene sequencing ; Microorganisms</subject><ispartof>RSC advances, 2024-07, Vol.14 (32), p.22962-22973</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2024</rights><rights>This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.</rights><rights>This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 The Royal Society of Chemistry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290334/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11290334/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,860,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nwanebu, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jezernik, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruant, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartakovsky, Boris</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell</title><title>RSC advances</title><description>This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L−1 as CO32−). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH4 production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH4 volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (Lc d)−1 and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (Lc d)−1, respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria (Clostridium carboxidivorans, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium autoethanogenum, and Eubacterium limosum) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (Lc d)−1. However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production.</description><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Carboxylic acids</subject><subject>Cathodes</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><issn>2046-2069</issn><issn>2046-2069</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdUMFKxDAQDaLgsu7FLwh48VJNmjTbnEQWdRcWvOi5TJN0m6VtapIK-_dmdQ_q8GBmeG8evEHompI7Spi819xD6kS0Z2iWEy6ynAh5_mu-RIsQ9iSVKGgu6Ax1m34EFbFrsILYOm0VHtcYBo1r62Da9WaIEK0bcAIokxbzTa_WHI_e6Ul9szaxuLfKu9pCh01nVPQuHIbYmmADVqbrrtBFA10wi1Ofo_fnp7fVOtu-vmxWj9tszFkZM5WLoqGUgKaFoJpACSXLNWlqJqUoZVkuBeeEAdNGktowxWk60IZzKKjRbI4efnzHqe6NVimCh64ave3BHyoHtvrLDLatdu6zojSXhDGeHG5PDt59TCbEqrfhGAEG46ZQMVIKWRyRpDf_pHs3-SHlO6qWlMj0avYFcfeAAg</recordid><startdate>20240719</startdate><enddate>20240719</enddate><creator>Nwanebu, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Jezernik, Mara</creator><creator>Lawson, Christopher</creator><creator>Bruant, Guillaume</creator><creator>Tartakovsky, Boris</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><general>The Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240719</creationdate><title>Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell</title><author>Nwanebu, Emmanuel ; Jezernik, Mara ; Lawson, Christopher ; Bruant, Guillaume ; Tartakovsky, Boris</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p238t-c265f110ad1561d0a8a832d0fb39968988764403a3de90be3c415f1de44a51ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Carboxylic acids</topic><topic>Cathodes</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nwanebu, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jezernik, Mara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawson, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bruant, Guillaume</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tartakovsky, Boris</creatorcontrib><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>RSC advances</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nwanebu, Emmanuel</au><au>Jezernik, Mara</au><au>Lawson, Christopher</au><au>Bruant, Guillaume</au><au>Tartakovsky, Boris</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell</atitle><jtitle>RSC advances</jtitle><date>2024-07-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>32</issue><spage>22962</spage><epage>22973</epage><pages>22962-22973</pages><issn>2046-2069</issn><eissn>2046-2069</eissn><abstract>This study compares carbon dioxide conversion in carbonate-fed microbial electrosynthesis (MES) cells operated at low (5.3), neutral (7) and high (8) pH levels and inoculated either with wild-type or bioaugmented mixed microbial populations. Two 100 mL (cathode volume) MES cells inoculated with anaerobic digester sludge were operated with a continuous supply of carbonate solution (5 g L−1 as CO32−). Acetate production was highest at low pH, however CH4 production still persisted, possibly due to pH gradients within the cathodic biofilm, resulting in acetate and CH4 volumetric (per cathode compartment volume) production rates of 1.0 ± 0.1 g (Lc d)−1 and 0.84 ± 0.05 L (Lc d)−1, respectively. To enhance production of carboxylic acids, four strains of acetogenic bacteria (Clostridium carboxidivorans, Clostridium ljungdahlii, Clostridium autoethanogenum, and Eubacterium limosum) were added to both MES cells. In the bioaugmented MES cells, acetate production increased to 2.0 g (Lc d)−1. However, production of other carboxylic acids such as butyrate and caproate was insignificant. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene sequencing of cathodic biofilm and suspended biomass suggested a low density of introduced acetogenic bacteria implying that selective pressure rather than bioaugmentation led to improved acetate production.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/d4ra03906h</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-2069
ispartof RSC advances, 2024-07, Vol.14 (32), p.22962-22973
issn 2046-2069
2046-2069
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11290334
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Bacteria
Biofilms
Carbon dioxide
Carboxylic acids
Cathodes
Chemistry
Gene sequencing
Microorganisms
title Impact of cathodic pH and bioaugmentation on acetate and CH4 production in a microbial electrosynthesis cell
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T02%3A28%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20cathodic%20pH%20and%20bioaugmentation%20on%20acetate%20and%20CH4%20production%20in%20a%20microbial%20electrosynthesis%20cell&rft.jtitle=RSC%20advances&rft.au=Nwanebu,%20Emmanuel&rft.date=2024-07-19&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=32&rft.spage=22962&rft.epage=22973&rft.pages=22962-22973&rft.issn=2046-2069&rft.eissn=2046-2069&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/d4ra03906h&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3086956956%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3087109512&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true