A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers

Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning f...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e63551
Hauptverfasser: Singh, Ashwini P, Sayeli, Vinay K, Gera, Sadhana, Rao, G Hari J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 7
container_start_page e63551
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 16
creator Singh, Ashwini P
Sayeli, Vinay K
Gera, Sadhana
Rao, G Hari J
description Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds") portal. The objectives of the study areto evaluate the usefulness of BCBR and the content and conduct of the BCBR program using a questionnaire among medical postgraduates and teachers. The study design used was a cross-sectional study and collected data from 392 participants who completed the BCBR program. A validated questionnaire was utilized to gather information on participant demographics, reasons for enrolment, satisfaction with course material, assignments, technical issues during exams, and perceived usefulness of the course. Results The study found a predominance of postgraduate students among participants (65.31%), reflecting their inclination towards research. Primary reasons for enrolment included institutional requirements and eligibility criteria to appear for the final postgraduate examination. Most participants utilized both videos and lecture hand-outs. This course facilitated its participants to improve their ability to conduct research by 89.03%. Feedback suggested a need for improvement in course content, particularly in simplifying statistical concepts and incorporating more interactive sessions and practical demonstrations. Conclusion The findings highlight the effectiveness of the BCBR program to up-skill the ability of participants to perform research. Overall, the study offers valuable feedback about the BCBR course.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.63551
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3086789350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-7db329ee765bcd04832efef2d8b86c3de4121945925329a73583777bcef14c6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctLxDAQxoMoKurNswS8eLCaR9OkJ9ldfIGi-DiHNJ3uRrqNJq3gf2_WXUU9zTDz42Pm-xDap-RESlGe2iHAEE8KLgRdQ9uMFipTVOXrv_ottBfjCyGEEsmIJJtoi5dESVrk2yiO8CT4GLNHsL3znWnxYz_UH_j83bSD6V03xf0M8NhEZ_HEDyECdh0eOz-H2tnEP0AEE-wMj-Y-0ber8b2P_TSYOolAxKar8RMYO4MQd9FGY9oIe6u6g54vzp8mV9nN3eX1ZHSTWU5In8m64qwEkIWobE1yxRk00LBaVaqwvIacMlrmomQicUZyobiUsrLQ0NwWDd9BZ0vd16FKx1ro-mBa_Rrc3IQP7Y3Tfzedm-mpf9eUMlUWgieFo5VC8G8DxF7PXbTQtqYDP0TNiSpKoXJGEnr4D31JZiU_l5RUJRcL6nhJ2YXpAZqfayjRi0T1MlH9lWjCD35_8AN_58c_AacXni8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086789350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Singh, Ashwini P ; Sayeli, Vinay K ; Gera, Sadhana ; Rao, G Hari J</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ashwini P ; Sayeli, Vinay K ; Gera, Sadhana ; Rao, G Hari J</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds") portal. The objectives of the study areto evaluate the usefulness of BCBR and the content and conduct of the BCBR program using a questionnaire among medical postgraduates and teachers. The study design used was a cross-sectional study and collected data from 392 participants who completed the BCBR program. A validated questionnaire was utilized to gather information on participant demographics, reasons for enrolment, satisfaction with course material, assignments, technical issues during exams, and perceived usefulness of the course. Results The study found a predominance of postgraduate students among participants (65.31%), reflecting their inclination towards research. Primary reasons for enrolment included institutional requirements and eligibility criteria to appear for the final postgraduate examination. Most participants utilized both videos and lecture hand-outs. This course facilitated its participants to improve their ability to conduct research by 89.03%. Feedback suggested a need for improvement in course content, particularly in simplifying statistical concepts and incorporating more interactive sessions and practical demonstrations. Conclusion The findings highlight the effectiveness of the BCBR program to up-skill the ability of participants to perform research. Overall, the study offers valuable feedback about the BCBR course.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39087164</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Biomedical research ; College professors ; Cross-sectional studies ; Education ; Epidemiology ; Feedback ; Graduate students ; Instructional design ; Likert scale ; Medical Education ; Medical research ; Online instruction ; Population ; Questionnaires ; Research methodology ; Self interest ; Teaching ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e63551</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024, Singh et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, Singh et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, Singh et al. 2024 Singh et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-7db329ee765bcd04832efef2d8b86c3de4121945925329a73583777bcef14c6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289653/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289653/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39087164$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ashwini P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayeli, Vinay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gera, Sadhana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, G Hari J</creatorcontrib><title>A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds") portal. The objectives of the study areto evaluate the usefulness of BCBR and the content and conduct of the BCBR program using a questionnaire among medical postgraduates and teachers. The study design used was a cross-sectional study and collected data from 392 participants who completed the BCBR program. A validated questionnaire was utilized to gather information on participant demographics, reasons for enrolment, satisfaction with course material, assignments, technical issues during exams, and perceived usefulness of the course. Results The study found a predominance of postgraduate students among participants (65.31%), reflecting their inclination towards research. Primary reasons for enrolment included institutional requirements and eligibility criteria to appear for the final postgraduate examination. Most participants utilized both videos and lecture hand-outs. This course facilitated its participants to improve their ability to conduct research by 89.03%. Feedback suggested a need for improvement in course content, particularly in simplifying statistical concepts and incorporating more interactive sessions and practical demonstrations. Conclusion The findings highlight the effectiveness of the BCBR program to up-skill the ability of participants to perform research. Overall, the study offers valuable feedback about the BCBR course.</description><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Graduate students</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctLxDAQxoMoKurNswS8eLCaR9OkJ9ldfIGi-DiHNJ3uRrqNJq3gf2_WXUU9zTDz42Pm-xDap-RESlGe2iHAEE8KLgRdQ9uMFipTVOXrv_ottBfjCyGEEsmIJJtoi5dESVrk2yiO8CT4GLNHsL3znWnxYz_UH_j83bSD6V03xf0M8NhEZ_HEDyECdh0eOz-H2tnEP0AEE-wMj-Y-0ber8b2P_TSYOolAxKar8RMYO4MQd9FGY9oIe6u6g54vzp8mV9nN3eX1ZHSTWU5In8m64qwEkIWobE1yxRk00LBaVaqwvIacMlrmomQicUZyobiUsrLQ0NwWDd9BZ0vd16FKx1ro-mBa_Rrc3IQP7Y3Tfzedm-mpf9eUMlUWgieFo5VC8G8DxF7PXbTQtqYDP0TNiSpKoXJGEnr4D31JZiU_l5RUJRcL6nhJ2YXpAZqfayjRi0T1MlH9lWjCD35_8AN_58c_AacXni8</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Singh, Ashwini P</creator><creator>Sayeli, Vinay K</creator><creator>Gera, Sadhana</creator><creator>Rao, G Hari J</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers</title><author>Singh, Ashwini P ; Sayeli, Vinay K ; Gera, Sadhana ; Rao, G Hari J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-7db329ee765bcd04832efef2d8b86c3de4121945925329a73583777bcef14c6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Graduate students</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ashwini P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayeli, Vinay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gera, Sadhana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, G Hari J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Ashwini P</au><au>Sayeli, Vinay K</au><au>Gera, Sadhana</au><au>Rao, G Hari J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e63551</spage><pages>e63551-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds") portal. The objectives of the study areto evaluate the usefulness of BCBR and the content and conduct of the BCBR program using a questionnaire among medical postgraduates and teachers. The study design used was a cross-sectional study and collected data from 392 participants who completed the BCBR program. A validated questionnaire was utilized to gather information on participant demographics, reasons for enrolment, satisfaction with course material, assignments, technical issues during exams, and perceived usefulness of the course. Results The study found a predominance of postgraduate students among participants (65.31%), reflecting their inclination towards research. Primary reasons for enrolment included institutional requirements and eligibility criteria to appear for the final postgraduate examination. Most participants utilized both videos and lecture hand-outs. This course facilitated its participants to improve their ability to conduct research by 89.03%. Feedback suggested a need for improvement in course content, particularly in simplifying statistical concepts and incorporating more interactive sessions and practical demonstrations. Conclusion The findings highlight the effectiveness of the BCBR program to up-skill the ability of participants to perform research. Overall, the study offers valuable feedback about the BCBR course.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>39087164</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.63551</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e63551
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289653
source PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Biomedical research
College professors
Cross-sectional studies
Education
Epidemiology
Feedback
Graduate students
Instructional design
Likert scale
Medical Education
Medical research
Online instruction
Population
Questionnaires
Research methodology
Self interest
Teaching
Validation studies
Validity
title A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A59%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cross-Sectional%20Study%20Evaluating%20the%20Basic%20Course%20in%20Biomedical%20Research%20Among%20Medical%20Postgraduates%20and%20Teachers&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Singh,%20Ashwini%20P&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e63551&rft.pages=e63551-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.63551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3086789350%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086789350&rft_id=info:pmid/39087164&rfr_iscdi=true