A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers
Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e63551 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | e63551 |
container_title | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Singh, Ashwini P Sayeli, Vinay K Gera, Sadhana Rao, G Hari J |
description | Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds") portal. The objectives of the study areto evaluate the usefulness of BCBR and the content and conduct of the BCBR program using a questionnaire among medical postgraduates and teachers. The study design used was a cross-sectional study and collected data from 392 participants who completed the BCBR program. A validated questionnaire was utilized to gather information on participant demographics, reasons for enrolment, satisfaction with course material, assignments, technical issues during exams, and perceived usefulness of the course. Results The study found a predominance of postgraduate students among participants (65.31%), reflecting their inclination towards research. Primary reasons for enrolment included institutional requirements and eligibility criteria to appear for the final postgraduate examination. Most participants utilized both videos and lecture hand-outs. This course facilitated its participants to improve their ability to conduct research by 89.03%. Feedback suggested a need for improvement in course content, particularly in simplifying statistical concepts and incorporating more interactive sessions and practical demonstrations. Conclusion The findings highlight the effectiveness of the BCBR program to up-skill the ability of participants to perform research. Overall, the study offers valuable feedback about the BCBR course. |
doi_str_mv | 10.7759/cureus.63551 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289653</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3086789350</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-7db329ee765bcd04832efef2d8b86c3de4121945925329a73583777bcef14c6f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkctLxDAQxoMoKurNswS8eLCaR9OkJ9ldfIGi-DiHNJ3uRrqNJq3gf2_WXUU9zTDz42Pm-xDap-RESlGe2iHAEE8KLgRdQ9uMFipTVOXrv_ottBfjCyGEEsmIJJtoi5dESVrk2yiO8CT4GLNHsL3znWnxYz_UH_j83bSD6V03xf0M8NhEZ_HEDyECdh0eOz-H2tnEP0AEE-wMj-Y-0ber8b2P_TSYOolAxKar8RMYO4MQd9FGY9oIe6u6g54vzp8mV9nN3eX1ZHSTWU5In8m64qwEkIWobE1yxRk00LBaVaqwvIacMlrmomQicUZyobiUsrLQ0NwWDd9BZ0vd16FKx1ro-mBa_Rrc3IQP7Y3Tfzedm-mpf9eUMlUWgieFo5VC8G8DxF7PXbTQtqYDP0TNiSpKoXJGEnr4D31JZiU_l5RUJRcL6nhJ2YXpAZqfayjRi0T1MlH9lWjCD35_8AN_58c_AacXni8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086789350</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Singh, Ashwini P ; Sayeli, Vinay K ; Gera, Sadhana ; Rao, G Hari J</creator><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ashwini P ; Sayeli, Vinay K ; Gera, Sadhana ; Rao, G Hari J</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds") portal. The objectives of the study areto evaluate the usefulness of BCBR and the content and conduct of the BCBR program using a questionnaire among medical postgraduates and teachers. The study design used was a cross-sectional study and collected data from 392 participants who completed the BCBR program. A validated questionnaire was utilized to gather information on participant demographics, reasons for enrolment, satisfaction with course material, assignments, technical issues during exams, and perceived usefulness of the course. Results The study found a predominance of postgraduate students among participants (65.31%), reflecting their inclination towards research. Primary reasons for enrolment included institutional requirements and eligibility criteria to appear for the final postgraduate examination. Most participants utilized both videos and lecture hand-outs. This course facilitated its participants to improve their ability to conduct research by 89.03%. Feedback suggested a need for improvement in course content, particularly in simplifying statistical concepts and incorporating more interactive sessions and practical demonstrations. Conclusion The findings highlight the effectiveness of the BCBR program to up-skill the ability of participants to perform research. Overall, the study offers valuable feedback about the BCBR course.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.63551</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39087164</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Biomedical research ; College professors ; Cross-sectional studies ; Education ; Epidemiology ; Feedback ; Graduate students ; Instructional design ; Likert scale ; Medical Education ; Medical research ; Online instruction ; Population ; Questionnaires ; Research methodology ; Self interest ; Teaching ; Validation studies ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e63551</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024, Singh et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, Singh et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, Singh et al. 2024 Singh et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-7db329ee765bcd04832efef2d8b86c3de4121945925329a73583777bcef14c6f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289653/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11289653/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39087164$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ashwini P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayeli, Vinay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gera, Sadhana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, G Hari J</creatorcontrib><title>A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds") portal. The objectives of the study areto evaluate the usefulness of BCBR and the content and conduct of the BCBR program using a questionnaire among medical postgraduates and teachers. The study design used was a cross-sectional study and collected data from 392 participants who completed the BCBR program. A validated questionnaire was utilized to gather information on participant demographics, reasons for enrolment, satisfaction with course material, assignments, technical issues during exams, and perceived usefulness of the course. Results The study found a predominance of postgraduate students among participants (65.31%), reflecting their inclination towards research. Primary reasons for enrolment included institutional requirements and eligibility criteria to appear for the final postgraduate examination. Most participants utilized both videos and lecture hand-outs. This course facilitated its participants to improve their ability to conduct research by 89.03%. Feedback suggested a need for improvement in course content, particularly in simplifying statistical concepts and incorporating more interactive sessions and practical demonstrations. Conclusion The findings highlight the effectiveness of the BCBR program to up-skill the ability of participants to perform research. Overall, the study offers valuable feedback about the BCBR course.</description><subject>Biomedical research</subject><subject>College professors</subject><subject>Cross-sectional studies</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Graduate students</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medical Education</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Online instruction</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Self interest</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkctLxDAQxoMoKurNswS8eLCaR9OkJ9ldfIGi-DiHNJ3uRrqNJq3gf2_WXUU9zTDz42Pm-xDap-RESlGe2iHAEE8KLgRdQ9uMFipTVOXrv_ottBfjCyGEEsmIJJtoi5dESVrk2yiO8CT4GLNHsL3znWnxYz_UH_j83bSD6V03xf0M8NhEZ_HEDyECdh0eOz-H2tnEP0AEE-wMj-Y-0ber8b2P_TSYOolAxKar8RMYO4MQd9FGY9oIe6u6g54vzp8mV9nN3eX1ZHSTWU5In8m64qwEkIWobE1yxRk00LBaVaqwvIacMlrmomQicUZyobiUsrLQ0NwWDd9BZ0vd16FKx1ro-mBa_Rrc3IQP7Y3Tfzedm-mpf9eUMlUWgieFo5VC8G8DxF7PXbTQtqYDP0TNiSpKoXJGEnr4D31JZiU_l5RUJRcL6nhJ2YXpAZqfayjRi0T1MlH9lWjCD35_8AN_58c_AacXni8</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Singh, Ashwini P</creator><creator>Sayeli, Vinay K</creator><creator>Gera, Sadhana</creator><creator>Rao, G Hari J</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers</title><author>Singh, Ashwini P ; Sayeli, Vinay K ; Gera, Sadhana ; Rao, G Hari J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-7db329ee765bcd04832efef2d8b86c3de4121945925329a73583777bcef14c6f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biomedical research</topic><topic>College professors</topic><topic>Cross-sectional studies</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Graduate students</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medical Education</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Online instruction</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Self interest</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Singh, Ashwini P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sayeli, Vinay K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gera, Sadhana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rao, G Hari J</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Singh, Ashwini P</au><au>Sayeli, Vinay K</au><au>Gera, Sadhana</au><au>Rao, G Hari J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>e63551</spage><pages>e63551-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>Introduction and methodology This study aims to give feedback on the Basic Course in Biomedical Research (BCBR) program, an initiative of the National Medical Council (NMC) in collaboration with the National Institute of Epidemiology (ICMR-NIE) using the SWAYAM ("Study Webs of Active-Learning for Young Aspiring Minds") portal. The objectives of the study areto evaluate the usefulness of BCBR and the content and conduct of the BCBR program using a questionnaire among medical postgraduates and teachers. The study design used was a cross-sectional study and collected data from 392 participants who completed the BCBR program. A validated questionnaire was utilized to gather information on participant demographics, reasons for enrolment, satisfaction with course material, assignments, technical issues during exams, and perceived usefulness of the course. Results The study found a predominance of postgraduate students among participants (65.31%), reflecting their inclination towards research. Primary reasons for enrolment included institutional requirements and eligibility criteria to appear for the final postgraduate examination. Most participants utilized both videos and lecture hand-outs. This course facilitated its participants to improve their ability to conduct research by 89.03%. Feedback suggested a need for improvement in course content, particularly in simplifying statistical concepts and incorporating more interactive sessions and practical demonstrations. Conclusion The findings highlight the effectiveness of the BCBR program to up-skill the ability of participants to perform research. Overall, the study offers valuable feedback about the BCBR course.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>39087164</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.63551</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2168-8184 |
ispartof | Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-07, Vol.16 (7), p.e63551 |
issn | 2168-8184 2168-8184 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289653 |
source | PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access |
subjects | Biomedical research College professors Cross-sectional studies Education Epidemiology Feedback Graduate students Instructional design Likert scale Medical Education Medical research Online instruction Population Questionnaires Research methodology Self interest Teaching Validation studies Validity |
title | A Cross-Sectional Study Evaluating the Basic Course in Biomedical Research Among Medical Postgraduates and Teachers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A59%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Cross-Sectional%20Study%20Evaluating%20the%20Basic%20Course%20in%20Biomedical%20Research%20Among%20Medical%20Postgraduates%20and%20Teachers&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Singh,%20Ashwini%20P&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=e63551&rft.pages=e63551-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.63551&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3086789350%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086789350&rft_id=info:pmid/39087164&rfr_iscdi=true |