Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010–2013

Background Perinatal services exist today as a dyad of maternal and neonatal care. When perinatal care is fragmented or unavailable, excess morbidity and mortality may occur in pregnant women and newborns. Objective The objective of the study was to describe spatial relationships between women of re...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2017-02, Vol.216 (2), p.185.e1-185.e10
Hauptverfasser: Brantley, Mary D., MPH, Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH, Goodman, David A., PhD, MS, Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH, Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 185.e10
container_issue 2
container_start_page 185.e1
container_title American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
container_volume 216
creator Brantley, Mary D., MPH
Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH
Goodman, David A., PhD, MS
Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH
Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP
description Background Perinatal services exist today as a dyad of maternal and neonatal care. When perinatal care is fragmented or unavailable, excess morbidity and mortality may occur in pregnant women and newborns. Objective The objective of the study was to describe spatial relationships between women of reproductive age, individual perinatal subspecialists (maternal-fetal medicine and neonatology), and obstetric and neonatal critical care facilities in the United States to identify gaps in health care access. Study Design We used geographic visualization and conducted surface interpolation, nearest neighbor, and proximity analyses. Source data included 2010 US Census, October 2013 National Provider Index, 2012 American Hospital Association, 2012 National Center for Health Statistics Natality File, and the 2011 American Academy of Pediatrics directory. Results In October 2013, there were 2.5 neonatologists for every maternal-fetal medicine specialist in the United States. In 2012 there were 1.4 level III or higher neonatal intensive care units for every level III obstetric unit (hereafter, obstetric critical care unit). Nationally, 87% of women of reproductive age live within 50 miles of both an obstetric critical care unit and a neonatal intensive care unit. However, 18% of obstetric critical care units had no neonatal intensive care unit, and 20% of neonatal intensive care units had no obstetric critical care unit within a 10 mile radius. Additionally, 26% of obstetric critical care units had no maternal-fetal medicine specialist practicing within 10 miles of the facility, and 4% of neonatal intensive care units had no neonatologist practicing within 10 miles. Conclusion Gaps in access and discordance between the availability of level III or higher obstetric and neonatal care may affect the delivery of risk-appropriate care for high-risk maternal fetal dyads. Further study is needed to understand the importance of these gaps and discordance on maternal and neonatal outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.011
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289569</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0002937816309061</els_id><sourcerecordid>1835529976</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-47545f91a2b2e9e7d9a63d28b95390e14a6c871363c8a52ec1120aedd6c719113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Us1uEzEQthCIhsILcEB75NANHjtrrxECoYo_qRJIpWdr4p0EL5t1ajtF5cQ78IY8CV5SIuDAaf6--Tyebxh7CHwOHNSTfo59WM9F8UtizgFusRlwo2vVqvY2m3HORW2kbo_YvZT6KRRG3GVHQmstNYgZcx8o-hEzDlWktQ8jDv4r5uI8rbBaU0jbEpXqlacvVVhV2wPeRZ-9mxyMdFJdjD5TV51nzJROqjIV__HtezHyPruzwiHRgxt7zC5ev_p4-rY-e__m3enLs9otlM71QjeLZmUAxVKQId0ZVLIT7dI00nCCBSrXapBKuhYbQQ5AcKSuU06DAZDH7MWed7tbbqhzNOaIg91Gv8F4bQN6-3dl9J_sOlzZQtSaRpnC8PiGIYbLHaVsNz45GgYcKeyShVY2jTBGqwIVe6iLIaVIq8M7wO0kj-3tJI-d5Jly_NeEj_6c8NDyW48CeLYHUNlTWXm0yXkaHXU-ksu2C_7__M__aXeDHyeRPtM1pT7sYhG4_MMmYbk9ny5iug9QkhuuQP4EZNi2Uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1835529976</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010–2013</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Brantley, Mary D., MPH ; Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH ; Goodman, David A., PhD, MS ; Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH ; Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP</creator><creatorcontrib>Brantley, Mary D., MPH ; Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH ; Goodman, David A., PhD, MS ; Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH ; Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP</creatorcontrib><description>Background Perinatal services exist today as a dyad of maternal and neonatal care. When perinatal care is fragmented or unavailable, excess morbidity and mortality may occur in pregnant women and newborns. Objective The objective of the study was to describe spatial relationships between women of reproductive age, individual perinatal subspecialists (maternal-fetal medicine and neonatology), and obstetric and neonatal critical care facilities in the United States to identify gaps in health care access. Study Design We used geographic visualization and conducted surface interpolation, nearest neighbor, and proximity analyses. Source data included 2010 US Census, October 2013 National Provider Index, 2012 American Hospital Association, 2012 National Center for Health Statistics Natality File, and the 2011 American Academy of Pediatrics directory. Results In October 2013, there were 2.5 neonatologists for every maternal-fetal medicine specialist in the United States. In 2012 there were 1.4 level III or higher neonatal intensive care units for every level III obstetric unit (hereafter, obstetric critical care unit). Nationally, 87% of women of reproductive age live within 50 miles of both an obstetric critical care unit and a neonatal intensive care unit. However, 18% of obstetric critical care units had no neonatal intensive care unit, and 20% of neonatal intensive care units had no obstetric critical care unit within a 10 mile radius. Additionally, 26% of obstetric critical care units had no maternal-fetal medicine specialist practicing within 10 miles of the facility, and 4% of neonatal intensive care units had no neonatologist practicing within 10 miles. Conclusion Gaps in access and discordance between the availability of level III or higher obstetric and neonatal care may affect the delivery of risk-appropriate care for high-risk maternal fetal dyads. Further study is needed to understand the importance of these gaps and discordance on maternal and neonatal outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9378</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6868</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.011</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27773712</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Critical Care ; Female ; Geographic Mapping ; geospatial ; Health Resources ; Health Services Accessibility ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Intensive Care Units ; Intensive Care Units, Neonatal ; neonatal ; Neonatology ; obstetric ; Obstetrics ; Obstetrics and Gynecology ; perinatal ; Perinatal Care ; Perinatology ; Pregnancy ; Spatial Analysis ; United States</subject><ispartof>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017-02, Vol.216 (2), p.185.e1-185.e10</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-47545f91a2b2e9e7d9a63d28b95390e14a6c871363c8a52ec1120aedd6c719113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-47545f91a2b2e9e7d9a63d28b95390e14a6c871363c8a52ec1120aedd6c719113</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002937816309061$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27773712$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brantley, Mary D., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, David A., PhD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP</creatorcontrib><title>Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010–2013</title><title>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</title><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Background Perinatal services exist today as a dyad of maternal and neonatal care. When perinatal care is fragmented or unavailable, excess morbidity and mortality may occur in pregnant women and newborns. Objective The objective of the study was to describe spatial relationships between women of reproductive age, individual perinatal subspecialists (maternal-fetal medicine and neonatology), and obstetric and neonatal critical care facilities in the United States to identify gaps in health care access. Study Design We used geographic visualization and conducted surface interpolation, nearest neighbor, and proximity analyses. Source data included 2010 US Census, October 2013 National Provider Index, 2012 American Hospital Association, 2012 National Center for Health Statistics Natality File, and the 2011 American Academy of Pediatrics directory. Results In October 2013, there were 2.5 neonatologists for every maternal-fetal medicine specialist in the United States. In 2012 there were 1.4 level III or higher neonatal intensive care units for every level III obstetric unit (hereafter, obstetric critical care unit). Nationally, 87% of women of reproductive age live within 50 miles of both an obstetric critical care unit and a neonatal intensive care unit. However, 18% of obstetric critical care units had no neonatal intensive care unit, and 20% of neonatal intensive care units had no obstetric critical care unit within a 10 mile radius. Additionally, 26% of obstetric critical care units had no maternal-fetal medicine specialist practicing within 10 miles of the facility, and 4% of neonatal intensive care units had no neonatologist practicing within 10 miles. Conclusion Gaps in access and discordance between the availability of level III or higher obstetric and neonatal care may affect the delivery of risk-appropriate care for high-risk maternal fetal dyads. Further study is needed to understand the importance of these gaps and discordance on maternal and neonatal outcomes.</description><subject>Critical Care</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Geographic Mapping</subject><subject>geospatial</subject><subject>Health Resources</subject><subject>Health Services Accessibility</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units</subject><subject>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</subject><subject>neonatal</subject><subject>Neonatology</subject><subject>obstetric</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Obstetrics and Gynecology</subject><subject>perinatal</subject><subject>Perinatal Care</subject><subject>Perinatology</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Spatial Analysis</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Us1uEzEQthCIhsILcEB75NANHjtrrxECoYo_qRJIpWdr4p0EL5t1ajtF5cQ78IY8CV5SIuDAaf6--Tyebxh7CHwOHNSTfo59WM9F8UtizgFusRlwo2vVqvY2m3HORW2kbo_YvZT6KRRG3GVHQmstNYgZcx8o-hEzDlWktQ8jDv4r5uI8rbBaU0jbEpXqlacvVVhV2wPeRZ-9mxyMdFJdjD5TV51nzJROqjIV__HtezHyPruzwiHRgxt7zC5ev_p4-rY-e__m3enLs9otlM71QjeLZmUAxVKQId0ZVLIT7dI00nCCBSrXapBKuhYbQQ5AcKSuU06DAZDH7MWed7tbbqhzNOaIg91Gv8F4bQN6-3dl9J_sOlzZQtSaRpnC8PiGIYbLHaVsNz45GgYcKeyShVY2jTBGqwIVe6iLIaVIq8M7wO0kj-3tJI-d5Jly_NeEj_6c8NDyW48CeLYHUNlTWXm0yXkaHXU-ksu2C_7__M__aXeDHyeRPtM1pT7sYhG4_MMmYbk9ny5iug9QkhuuQP4EZNi2Uw</recordid><startdate>20170201</startdate><enddate>20170201</enddate><creator>Brantley, Mary D., MPH</creator><creator>Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH</creator><creator>Goodman, David A., PhD, MS</creator><creator>Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH</creator><creator>Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170201</creationdate><title>Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010–2013</title><author>Brantley, Mary D., MPH ; Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH ; Goodman, David A., PhD, MS ; Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH ; Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c467t-47545f91a2b2e9e7d9a63d28b95390e14a6c871363c8a52ec1120aedd6c719113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Critical Care</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Geographic Mapping</topic><topic>geospatial</topic><topic>Health Resources</topic><topic>Health Services Accessibility</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units</topic><topic>Intensive Care Units, Neonatal</topic><topic>neonatal</topic><topic>Neonatology</topic><topic>obstetric</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Obstetrics and Gynecology</topic><topic>perinatal</topic><topic>Perinatal Care</topic><topic>Perinatology</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Spatial Analysis</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brantley, Mary D., MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodman, David A., PhD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brantley, Mary D., MPH</au><au>Davis, Nicole L., PhD, MPH</au><au>Goodman, David A., PhD, MS</au><au>Callaghan, William M., MD, MPH</au><au>Barfield, Wanda D., MD, MPH, FAAP</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010–2013</atitle><jtitle>American journal of obstetrics and gynecology</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2017-02-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>216</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>185.e1</spage><epage>185.e10</epage><pages>185.e1-185.e10</pages><issn>0002-9378</issn><issn>1097-6868</issn><eissn>1097-6868</eissn><abstract>Background Perinatal services exist today as a dyad of maternal and neonatal care. When perinatal care is fragmented or unavailable, excess morbidity and mortality may occur in pregnant women and newborns. Objective The objective of the study was to describe spatial relationships between women of reproductive age, individual perinatal subspecialists (maternal-fetal medicine and neonatology), and obstetric and neonatal critical care facilities in the United States to identify gaps in health care access. Study Design We used geographic visualization and conducted surface interpolation, nearest neighbor, and proximity analyses. Source data included 2010 US Census, October 2013 National Provider Index, 2012 American Hospital Association, 2012 National Center for Health Statistics Natality File, and the 2011 American Academy of Pediatrics directory. Results In October 2013, there were 2.5 neonatologists for every maternal-fetal medicine specialist in the United States. In 2012 there were 1.4 level III or higher neonatal intensive care units for every level III obstetric unit (hereafter, obstetric critical care unit). Nationally, 87% of women of reproductive age live within 50 miles of both an obstetric critical care unit and a neonatal intensive care unit. However, 18% of obstetric critical care units had no neonatal intensive care unit, and 20% of neonatal intensive care units had no obstetric critical care unit within a 10 mile radius. Additionally, 26% of obstetric critical care units had no maternal-fetal medicine specialist practicing within 10 miles of the facility, and 4% of neonatal intensive care units had no neonatologist practicing within 10 miles. Conclusion Gaps in access and discordance between the availability of level III or higher obstetric and neonatal care may affect the delivery of risk-appropriate care for high-risk maternal fetal dyads. Further study is needed to understand the importance of these gaps and discordance on maternal and neonatal outcomes.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27773712</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.011</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9378
ispartof American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2017-02, Vol.216 (2), p.185.e1-185.e10
issn 0002-9378
1097-6868
1097-6868
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11289569
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Critical Care
Female
Geographic Mapping
geospatial
Health Resources
Health Services Accessibility
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Intensive Care Units
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal
neonatal
Neonatology
obstetric
Obstetrics
Obstetrics and Gynecology
perinatal
Perinatal Care
Perinatology
Pregnancy
Spatial Analysis
United States
title Perinatal regionalization: a geospatial view of perinatal critical care, United States, 2010–2013
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T10%3A43%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perinatal%20regionalization:%20a%20geospatial%20view%20of%20perinatal%20critical%20care,%20United%20States,%202010%E2%80%932013&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20obstetrics%20and%20gynecology&rft.au=Brantley,%20Mary%20D.,%20MPH&rft.date=2017-02-01&rft.volume=216&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=185.e1&rft.epage=185.e10&rft.pages=185.e1-185.e10&rft.issn=0002-9378&rft.eissn=1097-6868&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.10.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1835529976%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1835529976&rft_id=info:pmid/27773712&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0002937816309061&rfr_iscdi=true