Effects of technological running shoes versus barefoot running on the intrinsic foot muscles, ankle mobility, and dynamic control: a novel cross-sectional research
•Tech footwear linked to reduced foot muscle vs. barefoot.•Barefoot group shows significantly higher ankle dorsiflexion ROM.•No significant dynamic balance differences found between groups. Technological running shoes have become increasingly popular, leading to improvements in performance. However,...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista brasileira de fisioterapia (São Carlos (São Paulo, Brazil)) Brazil)), 2024-07, Vol.28 (4), p.101092, Article 101092 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Tech footwear linked to reduced foot muscle vs. barefoot.•Barefoot group shows significantly higher ankle dorsiflexion ROM.•No significant dynamic balance differences found between groups.
Technological running shoes have become increasingly popular, leading to improvements in performance. However, their long-term effects on foot musculature and joint mobility have not been thoroughly studied.
To compare the activation of the intrinsic foot muscles between runners wearing technological footwear and barefoot runners. Secondary objectives included assessing ankle dorsiflexion (DF) range of motion (ROM) and dynamic postural control in both groups.
A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 22 technological footwear runners and 22 barefoot runners. Ultrasonography was used to measure the thickness of the plantar fascia (PF) and the quadratus plantae (QP), abductor digiti minimus (ADM), abductor hallucis (AH), and flexor hallucis longus (FHL) muscles. Ankle mobility and dynamic postural control were also recorded.
Ultrasonography measurements showed statistically significant differences for PF thickness (mean difference [MD]: -0.10 cm; 95% CI: -0.13, -0.05 cm), QP cross-sectional area (CSA) (MD: -0.45 cm2; 95% CI: -0.77, -0.12 cm2), ADM CSA (MD: -0.49 cm2; 95% CI: -0.70, -0.17 cm2), and FHL thickness (MD: 0.82 cm; 95% CI: 0.53, 1.09 cm), with all measurements being lower in the group wearing technological footwear compared to the barefoot runners. Ankle DF ROM was also significantly greater for the barefoot runners (MD: -5.1°; 95% CI: -8.6, -1.7°).
These findings suggest potential implications for the foot musculature and ankle mobility in runners using technological footwear. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1413-3555 1809-9246 1809-9246 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101092 |