Near vision data and near correction requirements from community eye health programmes in nine countries
Background Recent estimates of global prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia range from 510 to 826 million. There is a shortage of primary data regarding Near Visual Impairment (NVI) magnitude. Methods Near visual acuity (NVA) and NVI data was collected from over 388,000 people aged 35 or over across...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eye (London) 2024-08, Vol.38 (11), p.2150-2155 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2155 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 2150 |
container_title | Eye (London) |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Katibeh, Marzieh Watts, Elanor Gichangi, Michael Latorre-Arteaga, Sergio Bolster, Nigel M. Bastawrous, Andrew |
description | Background
Recent estimates of global prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia range from 510 to 826 million. There is a shortage of primary data regarding Near Visual Impairment (NVI) magnitude.
Methods
Near visual acuity (NVA) and NVI data was collected from over 388,000 people aged 35 or over across 9 countries, within Community Eye Health programmes between January 2022 and June 2023. In Kenya (
n
= 34,328), dioptric power of required near correction was also recorded, and any association with age, gender or level of NVA was assessed via linear regression model.
Results
146,801 of 388,939 people failed initial near vision screening (37.74%, 95% CI 37.59–37.89%), with significantly higher prevalence of NVI in Sub-Saharan Africa than South Asia. Of those with distance acuity 6/12 or better, 27.97% failed (95% CI 27.81–28.13%) with evidence of difference between genders (
p
|
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41433-023-02910-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11269744</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2917860194</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2ec68f364e454f44644ee7f0d7a646e72c88ffda95acc493a635c4393b472b923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhBbpAlth0E_DPjZOsUFW1gFTBhkrdWR7nZsZVbE_tpNK8PQ5TSumChWXJ5_PxPT6EnHD2kTPZfsrAQcqKiWV1nFXwgqw4NKqqoYaXZMW6mlVCiJsj8ibnW8aK2LDX5Ei2opatUiuy_Y4m0XuXXQy0N5OhJvQ0LIc2poR2WoSEd7NL6DFMmQ4p-iJ6Pwc37SnukW7RjNOW7lLcJOM9ZuoCDS5g4eYwJYf5LXk1mDHju4f9mFxfXvw8_1pd_fjy7fzsqrIg1FQJtKodpAIsEQYABYDYDKxvjAKFjbBtOwy96WpjLXTSKFlbkJ1cQyPWnZDH5PPBdzevPfa2jJzMqHfJeZP2Ohqn_1WC2-pNvNecC9U1AMXh9MEhxbsZ86S9yxbH0QSMc9blq5tWMd4t6Idn6G2cUyj5tGQtcFaKkIUSB8qmmHPC4XEazvTSpD40qUuT-neTerF-_zTH45U_1RVAHoBcpLDB9Pft_9j-Aog8q28</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3084105453</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Near vision data and near correction requirements from community eye health programmes in nine countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Katibeh, Marzieh ; Watts, Elanor ; Gichangi, Michael ; Latorre-Arteaga, Sergio ; Bolster, Nigel M. ; Bastawrous, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Katibeh, Marzieh ; Watts, Elanor ; Gichangi, Michael ; Latorre-Arteaga, Sergio ; Bolster, Nigel M. ; Bastawrous, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Recent estimates of global prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia range from 510 to 826 million. There is a shortage of primary data regarding Near Visual Impairment (NVI) magnitude.
Methods
Near visual acuity (NVA) and NVI data was collected from over 388,000 people aged 35 or over across 9 countries, within Community Eye Health programmes between January 2022 and June 2023. In Kenya (
n
= 34,328), dioptric power of required near correction was also recorded, and any association with age, gender or level of NVA was assessed via linear regression model.
Results
146,801 of 388,939 people failed initial near vision screening (37.74%, 95% CI 37.59–37.89%), with significantly higher prevalence of NVI in Sub-Saharan Africa than South Asia. Of those with distance acuity 6/12 or better, 27.97% failed (95% CI 27.81–28.13%) with evidence of difference between genders (
p
< 0.001): 30.77% of women vs. 24.47% of men. The most commonly required dioptric powers of correction were +2.00D, +2.50D and +3.00D, and required power correlated with age and NVA.
Conclusions
NVI remains common among Community Eye Health programme participants aged 35 and over. Data from large scale programmes such as these provide an opportunity to contribute to more accurate epidemiological estimates, and to guide future research, resource planning and intervention, ideally with improved standardisation of testing in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-222X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-5454</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41433-023-02910-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38253866</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>692/699/3161/3174 ; 692/700/228 ; 692/700/478/174 ; Acuity ; Adult ; Aged ; Community Health Services - organization & administration ; Epidemiology ; Eye ; Eyeglasses - statistics & numerical data ; Female ; Humans ; Laboratory Medicine ; Male ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Middle Aged ; Ophthalmology ; Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology ; Presbyopia - epidemiology ; Presbyopia - physiopathology ; Presbyopia - therapy ; Prevalence ; Surgery ; Surgical Oncology ; Vision ; Vision Screening ; Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><ispartof>Eye (London), 2024-08, Vol.38 (11), p.2150-2155</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s).</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2ec68f364e454f44644ee7f0d7a646e72c88ffda95acc493a635c4393b472b923</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1704-5857 ; 0000-0001-6607-1723 ; 0009-0001-2642-1116</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41433-023-02910-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41433-023-02910-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38253866$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Katibeh, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Elanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gichangi, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latorre-Arteaga, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Nigel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastawrous, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Near vision data and near correction requirements from community eye health programmes in nine countries</title><title>Eye (London)</title><addtitle>Eye</addtitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><description>Background
Recent estimates of global prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia range from 510 to 826 million. There is a shortage of primary data regarding Near Visual Impairment (NVI) magnitude.
Methods
Near visual acuity (NVA) and NVI data was collected from over 388,000 people aged 35 or over across 9 countries, within Community Eye Health programmes between January 2022 and June 2023. In Kenya (
n
= 34,328), dioptric power of required near correction was also recorded, and any association with age, gender or level of NVA was assessed via linear regression model.
Results
146,801 of 388,939 people failed initial near vision screening (37.74%, 95% CI 37.59–37.89%), with significantly higher prevalence of NVI in Sub-Saharan Africa than South Asia. Of those with distance acuity 6/12 or better, 27.97% failed (95% CI 27.81–28.13%) with evidence of difference between genders (
p
< 0.001): 30.77% of women vs. 24.47% of men. The most commonly required dioptric powers of correction were +2.00D, +2.50D and +3.00D, and required power correlated with age and NVA.
Conclusions
NVI remains common among Community Eye Health programme participants aged 35 and over. Data from large scale programmes such as these provide an opportunity to contribute to more accurate epidemiological estimates, and to guide future research, resource planning and intervention, ideally with improved standardisation of testing in the future.</description><subject>692/699/3161/3174</subject><subject>692/700/228</subject><subject>692/700/478/174</subject><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Community Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eyeglasses - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Laboratory Medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</subject><subject>Presbyopia - epidemiology</subject><subject>Presbyopia - physiopathology</subject><subject>Presbyopia - therapy</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Oncology</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Vision Screening</subject><subject>Visual Acuity - physiology</subject><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokPhBbpAlth0E_DPjZOsUFW1gFTBhkrdWR7nZsZVbE_tpNK8PQ5TSumChWXJ5_PxPT6EnHD2kTPZfsrAQcqKiWV1nFXwgqw4NKqqoYaXZMW6mlVCiJsj8ibnW8aK2LDX5Ei2opatUiuy_Y4m0XuXXQy0N5OhJvQ0LIc2poR2WoSEd7NL6DFMmQ4p-iJ6Pwc37SnukW7RjNOW7lLcJOM9ZuoCDS5g4eYwJYf5LXk1mDHju4f9mFxfXvw8_1pd_fjy7fzsqrIg1FQJtKodpAIsEQYABYDYDKxvjAKFjbBtOwy96WpjLXTSKFlbkJ1cQyPWnZDH5PPBdzevPfa2jJzMqHfJeZP2Ohqn_1WC2-pNvNecC9U1AMXh9MEhxbsZ86S9yxbH0QSMc9blq5tWMd4t6Idn6G2cUyj5tGQtcFaKkIUSB8qmmHPC4XEazvTSpD40qUuT-neTerF-_zTH45U_1RVAHoBcpLDB9Pft_9j-Aog8q28</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Katibeh, Marzieh</creator><creator>Watts, Elanor</creator><creator>Gichangi, Michael</creator><creator>Latorre-Arteaga, Sergio</creator><creator>Bolster, Nigel M.</creator><creator>Bastawrous, Andrew</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1704-5857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6607-1723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2642-1116</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>Near vision data and near correction requirements from community eye health programmes in nine countries</title><author>Katibeh, Marzieh ; Watts, Elanor ; Gichangi, Michael ; Latorre-Arteaga, Sergio ; Bolster, Nigel M. ; Bastawrous, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-2ec68f364e454f44644ee7f0d7a646e72c88ffda95acc493a635c4393b472b923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>692/699/3161/3174</topic><topic>692/700/228</topic><topic>692/700/478/174</topic><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Community Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eyeglasses - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Laboratory Medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology</topic><topic>Presbyopia - epidemiology</topic><topic>Presbyopia - physiopathology</topic><topic>Presbyopia - therapy</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Oncology</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Vision Screening</topic><topic>Visual Acuity - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Katibeh, Marzieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Watts, Elanor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gichangi, Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latorre-Arteaga, Sergio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolster, Nigel M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bastawrous, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Katibeh, Marzieh</au><au>Watts, Elanor</au><au>Gichangi, Michael</au><au>Latorre-Arteaga, Sergio</au><au>Bolster, Nigel M.</au><au>Bastawrous, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Near vision data and near correction requirements from community eye health programmes in nine countries</atitle><jtitle>Eye (London)</jtitle><stitle>Eye</stitle><addtitle>Eye (Lond)</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2150</spage><epage>2155</epage><pages>2150-2155</pages><issn>0950-222X</issn><issn>1476-5454</issn><eissn>1476-5454</eissn><abstract>Background
Recent estimates of global prevalence of uncorrected presbyopia range from 510 to 826 million. There is a shortage of primary data regarding Near Visual Impairment (NVI) magnitude.
Methods
Near visual acuity (NVA) and NVI data was collected from over 388,000 people aged 35 or over across 9 countries, within Community Eye Health programmes between January 2022 and June 2023. In Kenya (
n
= 34,328), dioptric power of required near correction was also recorded, and any association with age, gender or level of NVA was assessed via linear regression model.
Results
146,801 of 388,939 people failed initial near vision screening (37.74%, 95% CI 37.59–37.89%), with significantly higher prevalence of NVI in Sub-Saharan Africa than South Asia. Of those with distance acuity 6/12 or better, 27.97% failed (95% CI 27.81–28.13%) with evidence of difference between genders (
p
< 0.001): 30.77% of women vs. 24.47% of men. The most commonly required dioptric powers of correction were +2.00D, +2.50D and +3.00D, and required power correlated with age and NVA.
Conclusions
NVI remains common among Community Eye Health programme participants aged 35 and over. Data from large scale programmes such as these provide an opportunity to contribute to more accurate epidemiological estimates, and to guide future research, resource planning and intervention, ideally with improved standardisation of testing in the future.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><pmid>38253866</pmid><doi>10.1038/s41433-023-02910-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1704-5857</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6607-1723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2642-1116</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-222X |
ispartof | Eye (London), 2024-08, Vol.38 (11), p.2150-2155 |
issn | 0950-222X 1476-5454 1476-5454 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11269744 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 692/699/3161/3174 692/700/228 692/700/478/174 Acuity Adult Aged Community Health Services - organization & administration Epidemiology Eye Eyeglasses - statistics & numerical data Female Humans Laboratory Medicine Male Medical screening Medicine Medicine & Public Health Middle Aged Ophthalmology Pharmaceutical Sciences/Technology Presbyopia - epidemiology Presbyopia - physiopathology Presbyopia - therapy Prevalence Surgery Surgical Oncology Vision Vision Screening Visual Acuity - physiology |
title | Near vision data and near correction requirements from community eye health programmes in nine countries |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T18%3A14%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Near%20vision%20data%20and%20near%20correction%20requirements%20from%20community%20eye%20health%20programmes%20in%20nine%20countries&rft.jtitle=Eye%20(London)&rft.au=Katibeh,%20Marzieh&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2150&rft.epage=2155&rft.pages=2150-2155&rft.issn=0950-222X&rft.eissn=1476-5454&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41433-023-02910-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2917860194%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3084105453&rft_id=info:pmid/38253866&rfr_iscdi=true |