Comparison of a Reduced Needle With a Thin Tip and a Standard Thin Needle (Same Width Overall) for Oocyte Retrieval

At our facility, oocyte retrieval had previously been performed with a 20-gauge standard needle that is uniformly thin overall (tSN); but recently, we have instead started using reduced needles, with a 20-gauge tip and 17-gauge body (RN). Until now, there have been comparisons between RN and thick s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e62787
Hauptverfasser: Nakabayashi, Akira, Hashimoto, Yuriko, Horibe, Yu, Hashimoto, Tomomi, Murata, Shuko, Kakogawa, Jun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page e62787
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 16
creator Nakabayashi, Akira
Hashimoto, Yuriko
Horibe, Yu
Hashimoto, Tomomi
Murata, Shuko
Kakogawa, Jun
description At our facility, oocyte retrieval had previously been performed with a 20-gauge standard needle that is uniformly thin overall (tSN); but recently, we have instead started using reduced needles, with a 20-gauge tip and 17-gauge body (RN). Until now, there have been comparisons between RN and thick standard needles, but there have been no comparisons between RN and tSN. The purpose of this study was to compare oocyte retrieval outcomes using RN with tSN.  Information on oocyte retrieval was extracted from the medical records of 304 cycles performed at our facility from January 2020 to December 2023. The oocyte retrieval outcomes of the two types of needles were compared retrospectively with respect to age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), procedure time, additional sedatives, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes fertilized, oocyte recovery rate, and fertilization rate. When AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL, the procedure time was 9.3 ± 3.7 and 12.1 ± 4.6 minutes in the RN and tSN groups, respectively ( < 0.001), and the need for additional sedatives was also significantly different: 54.0% in the RN group and 78.5% in the tSN group ( = 0.002). The oocyte recovery rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 65.3% and 61.2%, respectively ( = 0.046), and the fertilization rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 56.8% and 66.8%, respectively ( < 0.001). There were no significant differences by age, AMH, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, or number of oocytes fertilized. Without diminished ovarian reserve, RN reduced procedure time and the need for additional sedatives compared to tSN. In addition, the number of oocytes fertilized per oocyte retrieval remained the same, indicating that oocyte retrieval performance was not affected.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.62787
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11260229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3083218166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-46122c32ecbff889b75ec7a43c0c6f3b67700f05f34d1750226840801a4a79673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1rGzEQxUVJaUKaW89F0EsKcTqS1pL2FIJpPiDU0Lj0KGTtqFbYXTnSriH_feTaDWlOI8385vGGR8gnBudKTetvbkw45nPJlVbvyBFnUk8009XBq_chOcn5AQAYKA4KPpBDUYOQrIIjkmexW9sUcuxp9NTSn9iMDhv6A7Fpkf4Ow6p0F6vQ00VYU9s35Xs_lGpTs-vv0dN7220XmrIx32CybfuV-pjoPLqnAYvykAJubPuRvPe2zXiyr8fk19X3xexmcje_vp1d3k2cABgmlWScO8HRLb3Xul6qKTplK-HASS-WUikAD1MvqoapKXAudQUamK2sqqUSx-Rip7selx02DvuhmDLrFDqbnky0wfw_6cPK_IkbwxiXRa4uCqd7hRQfR8yD6UJ22La2xzhmI0ALzjSTsqBf3qAPcUx9uW9LSSUF51tLZzvKpZhzQv_ihoHZJmp2iZq_iRb88-sLXuB_-YlnJDWbdw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3086763227</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of a Reduced Needle With a Thin Tip and a Standard Thin Needle (Same Width Overall) for Oocyte Retrieval</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Nakabayashi, Akira ; Hashimoto, Yuriko ; Horibe, Yu ; Hashimoto, Tomomi ; Murata, Shuko ; Kakogawa, Jun</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakabayashi, Akira ; Hashimoto, Yuriko ; Horibe, Yu ; Hashimoto, Tomomi ; Murata, Shuko ; Kakogawa, Jun</creatorcontrib><description>At our facility, oocyte retrieval had previously been performed with a 20-gauge standard needle that is uniformly thin overall (tSN); but recently, we have instead started using reduced needles, with a 20-gauge tip and 17-gauge body (RN). Until now, there have been comparisons between RN and thick standard needles, but there have been no comparisons between RN and tSN. The purpose of this study was to compare oocyte retrieval outcomes using RN with tSN.  Information on oocyte retrieval was extracted from the medical records of 304 cycles performed at our facility from January 2020 to December 2023. The oocyte retrieval outcomes of the two types of needles were compared retrospectively with respect to age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), procedure time, additional sedatives, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes fertilized, oocyte recovery rate, and fertilization rate. When AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL, the procedure time was 9.3 ± 3.7 and 12.1 ± 4.6 minutes in the RN and tSN groups, respectively ( &lt; 0.001), and the need for additional sedatives was also significantly different: 54.0% in the RN group and 78.5% in the tSN group ( = 0.002). The oocyte recovery rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 65.3% and 61.2%, respectively ( = 0.046), and the fertilization rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 56.8% and 66.8%, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). There were no significant differences by age, AMH, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, or number of oocytes fertilized. Without diminished ovarian reserve, RN reduced procedure time and the need for additional sedatives compared to tSN. In addition, the number of oocytes fertilized per oocyte retrieval remained the same, indicating that oocyte retrieval performance was not affected.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.62787</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39036140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Age ; Anesthesia ; Follicles ; Obstetrics/Gynecology ; Ovaries ; Pain ; Sperm ; Vagina</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e62787</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024, Nakabayashi et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, Nakabayashi et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, Nakabayashi et al. 2024 Nakabayashi et al.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-46122c32ecbff889b75ec7a43c0c6f3b67700f05f34d1750226840801a4a79673</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11260229/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11260229/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39036140$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakabayashi, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Yuriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horibe, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Tomomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Shuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakogawa, Jun</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of a Reduced Needle With a Thin Tip and a Standard Thin Needle (Same Width Overall) for Oocyte Retrieval</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>At our facility, oocyte retrieval had previously been performed with a 20-gauge standard needle that is uniformly thin overall (tSN); but recently, we have instead started using reduced needles, with a 20-gauge tip and 17-gauge body (RN). Until now, there have been comparisons between RN and thick standard needles, but there have been no comparisons between RN and tSN. The purpose of this study was to compare oocyte retrieval outcomes using RN with tSN.  Information on oocyte retrieval was extracted from the medical records of 304 cycles performed at our facility from January 2020 to December 2023. The oocyte retrieval outcomes of the two types of needles were compared retrospectively with respect to age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), procedure time, additional sedatives, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes fertilized, oocyte recovery rate, and fertilization rate. When AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL, the procedure time was 9.3 ± 3.7 and 12.1 ± 4.6 minutes in the RN and tSN groups, respectively ( &lt; 0.001), and the need for additional sedatives was also significantly different: 54.0% in the RN group and 78.5% in the tSN group ( = 0.002). The oocyte recovery rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 65.3% and 61.2%, respectively ( = 0.046), and the fertilization rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 56.8% and 66.8%, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). There were no significant differences by age, AMH, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, or number of oocytes fertilized. Without diminished ovarian reserve, RN reduced procedure time and the need for additional sedatives compared to tSN. In addition, the number of oocytes fertilized per oocyte retrieval remained the same, indicating that oocyte retrieval performance was not affected.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Follicles</subject><subject>Obstetrics/Gynecology</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Sperm</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1rGzEQxUVJaUKaW89F0EsKcTqS1pL2FIJpPiDU0Lj0KGTtqFbYXTnSriH_feTaDWlOI8385vGGR8gnBudKTetvbkw45nPJlVbvyBFnUk8009XBq_chOcn5AQAYKA4KPpBDUYOQrIIjkmexW9sUcuxp9NTSn9iMDhv6A7Fpkf4Ow6p0F6vQ00VYU9s35Xs_lGpTs-vv0dN7220XmrIx32CybfuV-pjoPLqnAYvykAJubPuRvPe2zXiyr8fk19X3xexmcje_vp1d3k2cABgmlWScO8HRLb3Xul6qKTplK-HASS-WUikAD1MvqoapKXAudQUamK2sqqUSx-Rip7selx02DvuhmDLrFDqbnky0wfw_6cPK_IkbwxiXRa4uCqd7hRQfR8yD6UJ22La2xzhmI0ALzjSTsqBf3qAPcUx9uW9LSSUF51tLZzvKpZhzQv_ihoHZJmp2iZq_iRb88-sLXuB_-YlnJDWbdw</recordid><startdate>20240620</startdate><enddate>20240620</enddate><creator>Nakabayashi, Akira</creator><creator>Hashimoto, Yuriko</creator><creator>Horibe, Yu</creator><creator>Hashimoto, Tomomi</creator><creator>Murata, Shuko</creator><creator>Kakogawa, Jun</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><general>Cureus</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240620</creationdate><title>Comparison of a Reduced Needle With a Thin Tip and a Standard Thin Needle (Same Width Overall) for Oocyte Retrieval</title><author>Nakabayashi, Akira ; Hashimoto, Yuriko ; Horibe, Yu ; Hashimoto, Tomomi ; Murata, Shuko ; Kakogawa, Jun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c300t-46122c32ecbff889b75ec7a43c0c6f3b67700f05f34d1750226840801a4a79673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Follicles</topic><topic>Obstetrics/Gynecology</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Sperm</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakabayashi, Akira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Yuriko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horibe, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hashimoto, Tomomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murata, Shuko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kakogawa, Jun</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakabayashi, Akira</au><au>Hashimoto, Yuriko</au><au>Horibe, Yu</au><au>Hashimoto, Tomomi</au><au>Murata, Shuko</au><au>Kakogawa, Jun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of a Reduced Needle With a Thin Tip and a Standard Thin Needle (Same Width Overall) for Oocyte Retrieval</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2024-06-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e62787</spage><pages>e62787-</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>At our facility, oocyte retrieval had previously been performed with a 20-gauge standard needle that is uniformly thin overall (tSN); but recently, we have instead started using reduced needles, with a 20-gauge tip and 17-gauge body (RN). Until now, there have been comparisons between RN and thick standard needles, but there have been no comparisons between RN and tSN. The purpose of this study was to compare oocyte retrieval outcomes using RN with tSN.  Information on oocyte retrieval was extracted from the medical records of 304 cycles performed at our facility from January 2020 to December 2023. The oocyte retrieval outcomes of the two types of needles were compared retrospectively with respect to age, anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), procedure time, additional sedatives, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, number of oocytes fertilized, oocyte recovery rate, and fertilization rate. When AMH ≥ 1.2 ng/mL, the procedure time was 9.3 ± 3.7 and 12.1 ± 4.6 minutes in the RN and tSN groups, respectively ( &lt; 0.001), and the need for additional sedatives was also significantly different: 54.0% in the RN group and 78.5% in the tSN group ( = 0.002). The oocyte recovery rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 65.3% and 61.2%, respectively ( = 0.046), and the fertilization rate was significantly different between the RN and tSN groups at 56.8% and 66.8%, respectively ( &lt; 0.001). There were no significant differences by age, AMH, number of follicles punctured, number of oocytes retrieved, or number of oocytes fertilized. Without diminished ovarian reserve, RN reduced procedure time and the need for additional sedatives compared to tSN. In addition, the number of oocytes fertilized per oocyte retrieval remained the same, indicating that oocyte retrieval performance was not affected.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>39036140</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.62787</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-06, Vol.16 (6), p.e62787
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11260229
source PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Age
Anesthesia
Follicles
Obstetrics/Gynecology
Ovaries
Pain
Sperm
Vagina
title Comparison of a Reduced Needle With a Thin Tip and a Standard Thin Needle (Same Width Overall) for Oocyte Retrieval
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T02%3A50%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20a%20Reduced%20Needle%20With%20a%20Thin%20Tip%20and%20a%20Standard%20Thin%20Needle%20(Same%20Width%20Overall)%20for%20Oocyte%20Retrieval&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=Nakabayashi,%20Akira&rft.date=2024-06-20&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e62787&rft.pages=e62787-&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.62787&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3083218166%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3086763227&rft_id=info:pmid/39036140&rfr_iscdi=true