Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes

Objective To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality. Data Sources and Study Setting A national sample of nursing homes during 201...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health services research 2024-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Mukamel, Dana B., Ladd, Heather, Saliba, Debra, Konetzka, R. Tamara
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title Health services research
container_volume 59
creator Mukamel, Dana B.
Ladd, Heather
Saliba, Debra
Konetzka, R. Tamara
description Objective To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality. Data Sources and Study Setting A national sample of nursing homes during 2017–2019 (pre‐COVID). Data included the Payroll‐Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long‐Term Care Focus. Study Design Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long‐term facility‐level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident‐day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Hospital‐based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded. Principal Findings We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low‐census dementia facilities, although, high‐ and low‐dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome. Conclusions These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low‐ and high‐dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low‐ and high‐dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low‐ and high‐dementia census facilities.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1475-6773.14270
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11250382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A805666190</galeid><sourcerecordid>A805666190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6680-3a5ca64c5746612116ba532ae012104a1019f14c61f5e765886f80f7131baa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFktGL1DAQxoso3nr67JsUBFHY7mWaJk1flGM974SFA733kM1Ouzna5Gxa9f570-u6bmXRFho6-c2XmcwXRS-BLCA8Z5DlLOF5TheQpTl5FM32kcfRjBDIkwLS7CR65v0tIURQkT2NTqgAxhnQWfT-IzZoO6Pmse1bj7HvVFkaW81jZTfxFlXdbWPXd9o16GNjH7CwH2-HwPPoSalqjy9262l08-niZnmVrK4vPy_PV4nmXJCEKqYVzzTLM84hBeBrxWiqkIQfkikgUJSQaQ4lw5wzIXgpSJkDhbVSQE-jD6PsXb9ucKNDxa2q5V1rGtXeS6eMnO5Ys5WV-y4BUkaoSIPC251C67716DvZGK-xrpVF13uZFkSEi8rSIqCv_0JvXd_a0J6kRBAhoEjpH6pSNUpjSxcO1oOoPBeE8dBnQQKVHKEqtBiqdBZLE8ITfnGED-8GG6OPJrybJASmw59dpXrvpbhc_auYHatdXWOFMgxseT3l3xzwoxW8q_vOOOun4PwAXPfBH-jDx5tq2_mxlgl-NuK6dd63WO4HCUQOtpaDieVgYvlg65Dx6nD-e_63jwPAR-BHuJ_7_-nJq4uvX0blXzh1-pM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3080881923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Mukamel, Dana B. ; Ladd, Heather ; Saliba, Debra ; Konetzka, R. Tamara</creator><creatorcontrib>Mukamel, Dana B. ; Ladd, Heather ; Saliba, Debra ; Konetzka, R. Tamara</creatorcontrib><description>Objective To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality. Data Sources and Study Setting A national sample of nursing homes during 2017–2019 (pre‐COVID). Data included the Payroll‐Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long‐Term Care Focus. Study Design Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long‐term facility‐level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident‐day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Hospital‐based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded. Principal Findings We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low‐census dementia facilities, although, high‐ and low‐dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome. Conclusions These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low‐ and high‐dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low‐ and high‐dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low‐ and high‐dementia census facilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9124</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14270</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38156513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Analysis ; Antipsychotic drugs ; Antipsychotics ; Bedsores ; Census ; Censuses ; Clinical outcomes ; Company distribution practices ; Data collection ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Development and progression ; Distribution ; Emergency medical services ; Evaluation ; Extraction ; Health aspects ; Health status ; Independent variables ; Linear analysis ; Long-term care of the sick ; Medical care ; Medical care quality ; Medical personnel ; Medicare ; Missing data ; Nurses ; Nursing homes ; Officials and employees ; outcomes ; policy ; Pressure effects ; Pressure ulcers ; quality ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; Registered nurses ; Regression analysis ; Services ; Staffing ; Workforce ; Workforce planning</subject><ispartof>Health services research, 2024-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6680-3a5ca64c5746612116ba532ae012104a1019f14c61f5e765886f80f7131baa13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3016-1318 ; 0000-0003-4147-5785</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1475-6773.14270$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1475-6773.14270$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38156513$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mukamel, Dana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konetzka, R. Tamara</creatorcontrib><title>Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes</title><title>Health services research</title><addtitle>Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>Objective To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality. Data Sources and Study Setting A national sample of nursing homes during 2017–2019 (pre‐COVID). Data included the Payroll‐Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long‐Term Care Focus. Study Design Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long‐term facility‐level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident‐day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Hospital‐based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded. Principal Findings We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low‐census dementia facilities, although, high‐ and low‐dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome. Conclusions These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low‐ and high‐dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low‐ and high‐dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low‐ and high‐dementia census facilities.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antipsychotic drugs</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Bedsores</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Company distribution practices</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Linear analysis</subject><subject>Long-term care of the sick</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Officials and employees</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Pressure effects</subject><subject>Pressure ulcers</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Registered nurses</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Staffing</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFktGL1DAQxoso3nr67JsUBFHY7mWaJk1flGM974SFA733kM1Ouzna5Gxa9f570-u6bmXRFho6-c2XmcwXRS-BLCA8Z5DlLOF5TheQpTl5FM32kcfRjBDIkwLS7CR65v0tIURQkT2NTqgAxhnQWfT-IzZoO6Pmse1bj7HvVFkaW81jZTfxFlXdbWPXd9o16GNjH7CwH2-HwPPoSalqjy9262l08-niZnmVrK4vPy_PV4nmXJCEKqYVzzTLM84hBeBrxWiqkIQfkikgUJSQaQ4lw5wzIXgpSJkDhbVSQE-jD6PsXb9ucKNDxa2q5V1rGtXeS6eMnO5Ys5WV-y4BUkaoSIPC251C67716DvZGK-xrpVF13uZFkSEi8rSIqCv_0JvXd_a0J6kRBAhoEjpH6pSNUpjSxcO1oOoPBeE8dBnQQKVHKEqtBiqdBZLE8ITfnGED-8GG6OPJrybJASmw59dpXrvpbhc_auYHatdXWOFMgxseT3l3xzwoxW8q_vOOOun4PwAXPfBH-jDx5tq2_mxlgl-NuK6dd63WO4HCUQOtpaDieVgYvlg65Dx6nD-e_63jwPAR-BHuJ_7_-nJq4uvX0blXzh1-pM</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Mukamel, Dana B.</creator><creator>Ladd, Heather</creator><creator>Saliba, Debra</creator><creator>Konetzka, R. Tamara</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Health Research and Educational Trust</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3016-1318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-5785</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes</title><author>Mukamel, Dana B. ; Ladd, Heather ; Saliba, Debra ; Konetzka, R. Tamara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6680-3a5ca64c5746612116ba532ae012104a1019f14c61f5e765886f80f7131baa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antipsychotic drugs</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Bedsores</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Company distribution practices</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Linear analysis</topic><topic>Long-term care of the sick</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Officials and employees</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Pressure effects</topic><topic>Pressure ulcers</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Registered nurses</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Staffing</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mukamel, Dana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konetzka, R. Tamara</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mukamel, Dana B.</au><au>Ladd, Heather</au><au>Saliba, Debra</au><au>Konetzka, R. Tamara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes</atitle><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle><addtitle>Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>1-n/a</pages><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><eissn>1475-6773</eissn><abstract>Objective To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality. Data Sources and Study Setting A national sample of nursing homes during 2017–2019 (pre‐COVID). Data included the Payroll‐Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long‐Term Care Focus. Study Design Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long‐term facility‐level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident‐day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics. Data Collection/Extraction Methods Hospital‐based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded. Principal Findings We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low‐census dementia facilities, although, high‐ and low‐dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome. Conclusions These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low‐ and high‐dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low‐ and high‐dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low‐ and high‐dementia census facilities.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38156513</pmid><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.14270</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3016-1318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-5785</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-9124
ispartof Health services research, 2024-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1-n/a
issn 0017-9124
1475-6773
1475-6773
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11250382
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Activities of daily living
Analysis
Antipsychotic drugs
Antipsychotics
Bedsores
Census
Censuses
Clinical outcomes
Company distribution practices
Data collection
Dementia
Dementia disorders
Development and progression
Distribution
Emergency medical services
Evaluation
Extraction
Health aspects
Health status
Independent variables
Linear analysis
Long-term care of the sick
Medical care
Medical care quality
Medical personnel
Medicare
Missing data
Nurses
Nursing homes
Officials and employees
outcomes
policy
Pressure effects
Pressure ulcers
quality
Quality management
Quality of care
Registered nurses
Regression analysis
Services
Staffing
Workforce
Workforce planning
title Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dementia,%20nurse%20staffing,%20and%20health%20outcomes%20in%20nursing%20homes&rft.jtitle=Health%20services%20research&rft.au=Mukamel,%20Dana%20B.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=1-n/a&rft.issn=0017-9124&rft.eissn=1475-6773&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14270&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA805666190%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3080881923&rft_id=info:pmid/38156513&rft_galeid=A805666190&rfr_iscdi=true