Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes
Objective To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality. Data Sources and Study Setting A national sample of nursing homes during 201...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health services research 2024-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Health services research |
container_volume | 59 |
creator | Mukamel, Dana B. Ladd, Heather Saliba, Debra Konetzka, R. Tamara |
description | Objective
To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality.
Data Sources and Study Setting
A national sample of nursing homes during 2017–2019 (pre‐COVID). Data included the Payroll‐Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long‐Term Care Focus.
Study Design
Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long‐term facility‐level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident‐day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Hospital‐based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded.
Principal Findings
We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low‐census dementia facilities, although, high‐ and low‐dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low‐ and high‐dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low‐ and high‐dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low‐ and high‐dementia census facilities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/1475-6773.14270 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11250382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A805666190</galeid><sourcerecordid>A805666190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6680-3a5ca64c5746612116ba532ae012104a1019f14c61f5e765886f80f7131baa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFktGL1DAQxoso3nr67JsUBFHY7mWaJk1flGM974SFA733kM1Ouzna5Gxa9f570-u6bmXRFho6-c2XmcwXRS-BLCA8Z5DlLOF5TheQpTl5FM32kcfRjBDIkwLS7CR65v0tIURQkT2NTqgAxhnQWfT-IzZoO6Pmse1bj7HvVFkaW81jZTfxFlXdbWPXd9o16GNjH7CwH2-HwPPoSalqjy9262l08-niZnmVrK4vPy_PV4nmXJCEKqYVzzTLM84hBeBrxWiqkIQfkikgUJSQaQ4lw5wzIXgpSJkDhbVSQE-jD6PsXb9ucKNDxa2q5V1rGtXeS6eMnO5Ys5WV-y4BUkaoSIPC251C67716DvZGK-xrpVF13uZFkSEi8rSIqCv_0JvXd_a0J6kRBAhoEjpH6pSNUpjSxcO1oOoPBeE8dBnQQKVHKEqtBiqdBZLE8ITfnGED-8GG6OPJrybJASmw59dpXrvpbhc_auYHatdXWOFMgxseT3l3xzwoxW8q_vOOOun4PwAXPfBH-jDx5tq2_mxlgl-NuK6dd63WO4HCUQOtpaDieVgYvlg65Dx6nD-e_63jwPAR-BHuJ_7_-nJq4uvX0blXzh1-pM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3080881923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Mukamel, Dana B. ; Ladd, Heather ; Saliba, Debra ; Konetzka, R. Tamara</creator><creatorcontrib>Mukamel, Dana B. ; Ladd, Heather ; Saliba, Debra ; Konetzka, R. Tamara</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality.
Data Sources and Study Setting
A national sample of nursing homes during 2017–2019 (pre‐COVID). Data included the Payroll‐Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long‐Term Care Focus.
Study Design
Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long‐term facility‐level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident‐day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Hospital‐based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded.
Principal Findings
We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low‐census dementia facilities, although, high‐ and low‐dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low‐ and high‐dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low‐ and high‐dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low‐ and high‐dementia census facilities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-9124</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-6773</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.14270</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38156513</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Activities of daily living ; Analysis ; Antipsychotic drugs ; Antipsychotics ; Bedsores ; Census ; Censuses ; Clinical outcomes ; Company distribution practices ; Data collection ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Development and progression ; Distribution ; Emergency medical services ; Evaluation ; Extraction ; Health aspects ; Health status ; Independent variables ; Linear analysis ; Long-term care of the sick ; Medical care ; Medical care quality ; Medical personnel ; Medicare ; Missing data ; Nurses ; Nursing homes ; Officials and employees ; outcomes ; policy ; Pressure effects ; Pressure ulcers ; quality ; Quality management ; Quality of care ; Registered nurses ; Regression analysis ; Services ; Staffing ; Workforce ; Workforce planning</subject><ispartof>Health services research, 2024-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.</rights><rights>2023 The Authors. Health Services Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Health Research and Educational Trust.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Health Research and Educational Trust</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c6680-3a5ca64c5746612116ba532ae012104a1019f14c61f5e765886f80f7131baa13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3016-1318 ; 0000-0003-4147-5785</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1475-6773.14270$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1475-6773.14270$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38156513$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mukamel, Dana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konetzka, R. Tamara</creatorcontrib><title>Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes</title><title>Health services research</title><addtitle>Health Serv Res</addtitle><description>Objective
To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality.
Data Sources and Study Setting
A national sample of nursing homes during 2017–2019 (pre‐COVID). Data included the Payroll‐Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long‐Term Care Focus.
Study Design
Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long‐term facility‐level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident‐day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Hospital‐based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded.
Principal Findings
We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low‐census dementia facilities, although, high‐ and low‐dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low‐ and high‐dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low‐ and high‐dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low‐ and high‐dementia census facilities.</description><subject>Activities of daily living</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Antipsychotic drugs</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Bedsores</subject><subject>Census</subject><subject>Censuses</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Company distribution practices</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Development and progression</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health status</subject><subject>Independent variables</subject><subject>Linear analysis</subject><subject>Long-term care of the sick</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medicare</subject><subject>Missing data</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Officials and employees</subject><subject>outcomes</subject><subject>policy</subject><subject>Pressure effects</subject><subject>Pressure ulcers</subject><subject>quality</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Registered nurses</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Services</subject><subject>Staffing</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><subject>Workforce planning</subject><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFktGL1DAQxoso3nr67JsUBFHY7mWaJk1flGM974SFA733kM1Ouzna5Gxa9f570-u6bmXRFho6-c2XmcwXRS-BLCA8Z5DlLOF5TheQpTl5FM32kcfRjBDIkwLS7CR65v0tIURQkT2NTqgAxhnQWfT-IzZoO6Pmse1bj7HvVFkaW81jZTfxFlXdbWPXd9o16GNjH7CwH2-HwPPoSalqjy9262l08-niZnmVrK4vPy_PV4nmXJCEKqYVzzTLM84hBeBrxWiqkIQfkikgUJSQaQ4lw5wzIXgpSJkDhbVSQE-jD6PsXb9ucKNDxa2q5V1rGtXeS6eMnO5Ys5WV-y4BUkaoSIPC251C67716DvZGK-xrpVF13uZFkSEi8rSIqCv_0JvXd_a0J6kRBAhoEjpH6pSNUpjSxcO1oOoPBeE8dBnQQKVHKEqtBiqdBZLE8ITfnGED-8GG6OPJrybJASmw59dpXrvpbhc_auYHatdXWOFMgxseT3l3xzwoxW8q_vOOOun4PwAXPfBH-jDx5tq2_mxlgl-NuK6dd63WO4HCUQOtpaDieVgYvlg65Dx6nD-e_63jwPAR-BHuJ_7_-nJq4uvX0blXzh1-pM</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Mukamel, Dana B.</creator><creator>Ladd, Heather</creator><creator>Saliba, Debra</creator><creator>Konetzka, R. Tamara</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Health Research and Educational Trust</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3016-1318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-5785</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes</title><author>Mukamel, Dana B. ; Ladd, Heather ; Saliba, Debra ; Konetzka, R. Tamara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c6680-3a5ca64c5746612116ba532ae012104a1019f14c61f5e765886f80f7131baa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Activities of daily living</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Antipsychotic drugs</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Bedsores</topic><topic>Census</topic><topic>Censuses</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Company distribution practices</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Development and progression</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health status</topic><topic>Independent variables</topic><topic>Linear analysis</topic><topic>Long-term care of the sick</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medicare</topic><topic>Missing data</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Officials and employees</topic><topic>outcomes</topic><topic>policy</topic><topic>Pressure effects</topic><topic>Pressure ulcers</topic><topic>quality</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Registered nurses</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Services</topic><topic>Staffing</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><topic>Workforce planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mukamel, Dana B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladd, Heather</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saliba, Debra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Konetzka, R. Tamara</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mukamel, Dana B.</au><au>Ladd, Heather</au><au>Saliba, Debra</au><au>Konetzka, R. Tamara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes</atitle><jtitle>Health services research</jtitle><addtitle>Health Serv Res</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>1-n/a</pages><issn>0017-9124</issn><issn>1475-6773</issn><eissn>1475-6773</eissn><abstract>Objective
To estimate and contrast the relationships between nurse staffing and health outcomes in nursing homes with low and high dementia census, to understand the association of staffing hours with dementia care quality.
Data Sources and Study Setting
A national sample of nursing homes during 2017–2019 (pre‐COVID). Data included the Payroll‐Based Journal, Medicare Claims, Nursing Home Care Compare, and Long‐Term Care Focus.
Study Design
Retrospective, regression analyses. We estimated separate linear models predicting six long‐term facility‐level outcomes. Independent variables included staffing hours per resident‐day (HPRD) interacted with the facility percentage of dementia residents, controlling for other resident and facility characteristics.
Data Collection/Extraction Methods
Hospital‐based nursing homes, those with fewer than 30% dementia residents, and missing data were excluded.
Principal Findings
We found that registered nurses and certified nurse assistants HPRDs were likely to exhibit positive returns in terms of outcomes throughout most of the range of HPRD for both high and low‐census dementia facilities, although, high‐ and low‐dementia facilities differed in most outcome rates at all staffing levels. Average predicted antipsychotics and activities of daily living as functions of HPRD were worse in higher dementia facilities, independent movement, and hospitalizations did not differ significantly, and Emergency Rooms and pressure sores were worse in lower dementia facilities. Average marginal effects were not statistically different [CI included zero] between the high and low dementia facilities for any outcome.
Conclusions
These findings suggest that increasing staffing will improve outcomes by similar increments in both low‐ and high‐dementia facilities for all outcomes. However, at any given level of staffing, absolute differences in outcomes between low‐ and high‐dementia facilities remain, suggesting that additional staffing alone will not suffice to close these gaps. Further studies are required to identify opportunities for improvement in performance for both low‐ and high‐dementia census facilities.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>38156513</pmid><doi>10.1111/1475-6773.14270</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3016-1318</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4147-5785</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-9124 |
ispartof | Health services research, 2024-08, Vol.59 (4), p.1-n/a |
issn | 0017-9124 1475-6773 1475-6773 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11250382 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
subjects | Activities of daily living Analysis Antipsychotic drugs Antipsychotics Bedsores Census Censuses Clinical outcomes Company distribution practices Data collection Dementia Dementia disorders Development and progression Distribution Emergency medical services Evaluation Extraction Health aspects Health status Independent variables Linear analysis Long-term care of the sick Medical care Medical care quality Medical personnel Medicare Missing data Nurses Nursing homes Officials and employees outcomes policy Pressure effects Pressure ulcers quality Quality management Quality of care Registered nurses Regression analysis Services Staffing Workforce Workforce planning |
title | Dementia, nurse staffing, and health outcomes in nursing homes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A28%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dementia,%20nurse%20staffing,%20and%20health%20outcomes%20in%20nursing%20homes&rft.jtitle=Health%20services%20research&rft.au=Mukamel,%20Dana%20B.&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=1-n/a&rft.issn=0017-9124&rft.eissn=1475-6773&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-6773.14270&rft_dat=%3Cgale_pubme%3EA805666190%3C/gale_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3080881923&rft_id=info:pmid/38156513&rft_galeid=A805666190&rfr_iscdi=true |