Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker

This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests. 47 healthy part...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of optometry 2024-10, Vol.17 (4), p.100517, Article 100517
Hauptverfasser: López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen, Saz-Onrubia, Elena, Orduna-Hospital, Elvira, Sánchez-Cano, Ana
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 100517
container_title Journal of optometry
container_volume 17
creator López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen
Saz-Onrubia, Elena
Orduna-Hospital, Elvira
Sánchez-Cano, Ana
description This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests. 47 healthy participants were included (20 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 21.34±1.77 years. The participants underwent optometric examinations to ensure visual health and exclude any dysfunctions or pathologies. The experimental protocol involved the digitized versions of the DEM and King-Devick tests, monitored with an eye tracker. The vertical subtests of DEM test showed fewer saccades, longer fixation durations, smaller saccade amplitudes, and slower saccade speeds compared to the horizontal subtest. The King-Devick test exhibited comparable fixation and saccade numbers, while fixation duration slightly increased with test difficulty. Statistically significant differences were found between the tests, but a positive correlation was observed. Statistically significant differences were observed between the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that they measure similar aspects but are not interchangeable. The DEM test offers more comprehensive information with vertical saccade assessment. Test duration correlates positively with saccade and fixation count, fixation duration, and saccade speed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11246043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1888429624000050</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1888429624000050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-40b12a44649d0d3c79036253fb98015a92e78f3fcd05c20dc2bbf37ecb89a0023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtOwzAMhiMEYmPwBEioL9DhHNomFwihiZM0xA1cR2majoy2mZKsaG9Px2CCG65s2f5_2x9C5ximGHB-uZy6VXTtlABhQwUyXBygMRZcpJgycjjknPOUEZGP0EkIS4Cc4EIcoxHlAjhQPkZPM9eulLfBdYmrk_jhkt6GtWrS3vhSNUk0IYZty-l1o3zSumgbGzfJOthukaguMRuTRq_0u_Gn6KhWTTBn33GCXu9uX2YP6fz5_nF2M081EVlMGZSYKMZyJiqoqC4E0JxktC4FB5wpQUzBa1rrCjJNoNKkLGtaGF1yoQAInaDrne9qXbam0qYbDmjkyttW-Y10ysq_nc6-yYXrJcaE5cDo4EB3Dtq7ELyp92IMcotXLuUXXrnFK3d4B9XF7717zQ_PYeBqN2CG73trvAzamk6bynqjo6yc_XfBJxADjq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen ; Saz-Onrubia, Elena ; Orduna-Hospital, Elvira ; Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen ; Saz-Onrubia, Elena ; Orduna-Hospital, Elvira ; Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests. 47 healthy participants were included (20 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 21.34±1.77 years. The participants underwent optometric examinations to ensure visual health and exclude any dysfunctions or pathologies. The experimental protocol involved the digitized versions of the DEM and King-Devick tests, monitored with an eye tracker. The vertical subtests of DEM test showed fewer saccades, longer fixation durations, smaller saccade amplitudes, and slower saccade speeds compared to the horizontal subtest. The King-Devick test exhibited comparable fixation and saccade numbers, while fixation duration slightly increased with test difficulty. Statistically significant differences were found between the tests, but a positive correlation was observed. Statistically significant differences were observed between the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that they measure similar aspects but are not interchangeable. The DEM test offers more comprehensive information with vertical saccade assessment. Test duration correlates positively with saccade and fixation count, fixation duration, and saccade speed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1888-4296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1989-1342</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38908038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Elsevier España, S.L.U</publisher><subject>Adult ; Developmental eye movement test ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Eye tracker ; Eye-Tracking Technology ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Fixations ; Humans ; King-Devick test ; Male ; Ocular motility ; Original ; Saccades ; Saccades - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of optometry, 2024-10, Vol.17 (4), p.100517, Article 100517</ispartof><rights>2024 Spanish General Council of Optometry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2024 Spanish General Council of Optometry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-40b12a44649d0d3c79036253fb98015a92e78f3fcd05c20dc2bbf37ecb89a0023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2710-1875 ; 0000-0002-7471-5362 ; 0000-0002-5621-1937</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246043/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38908038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saz-Onrubia, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orduna-Hospital, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker</title><title>Journal of optometry</title><addtitle>J Optom</addtitle><description>This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests. 47 healthy participants were included (20 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 21.34±1.77 years. The participants underwent optometric examinations to ensure visual health and exclude any dysfunctions or pathologies. The experimental protocol involved the digitized versions of the DEM and King-Devick tests, monitored with an eye tracker. The vertical subtests of DEM test showed fewer saccades, longer fixation durations, smaller saccade amplitudes, and slower saccade speeds compared to the horizontal subtest. The King-Devick test exhibited comparable fixation and saccade numbers, while fixation duration slightly increased with test difficulty. Statistically significant differences were found between the tests, but a positive correlation was observed. Statistically significant differences were observed between the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that they measure similar aspects but are not interchangeable. The DEM test offers more comprehensive information with vertical saccade assessment. Test duration correlates positively with saccade and fixation count, fixation duration, and saccade speed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Developmental eye movement test</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Eye tracker</subject><subject>Eye-Tracking Technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Fixations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>King-Devick test</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Ocular motility</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Saccades</subject><subject>Saccades - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1888-4296</issn><issn>1989-1342</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kNtOwzAMhiMEYmPwBEioL9DhHNomFwihiZM0xA1cR2majoy2mZKsaG9Px2CCG65s2f5_2x9C5ximGHB-uZy6VXTtlABhQwUyXBygMRZcpJgycjjknPOUEZGP0EkIS4Cc4EIcoxHlAjhQPkZPM9eulLfBdYmrk_jhkt6GtWrS3vhSNUk0IYZty-l1o3zSumgbGzfJOthukaguMRuTRq_0u_Gn6KhWTTBn33GCXu9uX2YP6fz5_nF2M081EVlMGZSYKMZyJiqoqC4E0JxktC4FB5wpQUzBa1rrCjJNoNKkLGtaGF1yoQAInaDrne9qXbam0qYbDmjkyttW-Y10ysq_nc6-yYXrJcaE5cDo4EB3Dtq7ELyp92IMcotXLuUXXrnFK3d4B9XF7717zQ_PYeBqN2CG73trvAzamk6bynqjo6yc_XfBJxADjq0</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen</creator><creator>Saz-Onrubia, Elena</creator><creator>Orduna-Hospital, Elvira</creator><creator>Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creator><general>Elsevier España, S.L.U</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-1875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-5362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-1937</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker</title><author>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen ; Saz-Onrubia, Elena ; Orduna-Hospital, Elvira ; Sánchez-Cano, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-40b12a44649d0d3c79036253fb98015a92e78f3fcd05c20dc2bbf37ecb89a0023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Developmental eye movement test</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Eye tracker</topic><topic>Eye-Tracking Technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Fixations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>King-Devick test</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Ocular motility</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Saccades</topic><topic>Saccades - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saz-Onrubia, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orduna-Hospital, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of optometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen</au><au>Saz-Onrubia, Elena</au><au>Orduna-Hospital, Elvira</au><au>Sánchez-Cano, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker</atitle><jtitle>Journal of optometry</jtitle><addtitle>J Optom</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>100517</spage><pages>100517-</pages><artnum>100517</artnum><issn>1888-4296</issn><eissn>1989-1342</eissn><abstract>This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests. 47 healthy participants were included (20 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 21.34±1.77 years. The participants underwent optometric examinations to ensure visual health and exclude any dysfunctions or pathologies. The experimental protocol involved the digitized versions of the DEM and King-Devick tests, monitored with an eye tracker. The vertical subtests of DEM test showed fewer saccades, longer fixation durations, smaller saccade amplitudes, and slower saccade speeds compared to the horizontal subtest. The King-Devick test exhibited comparable fixation and saccade numbers, while fixation duration slightly increased with test difficulty. Statistically significant differences were found between the tests, but a positive correlation was observed. Statistically significant differences were observed between the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that they measure similar aspects but are not interchangeable. The DEM test offers more comprehensive information with vertical saccade assessment. Test duration correlates positively with saccade and fixation count, fixation duration, and saccade speed.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Elsevier España, S.L.U</pub><pmid>38908038</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-1875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-5362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-1937</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1888-4296
ispartof Journal of optometry, 2024-10, Vol.17 (4), p.100517, Article 100517
issn 1888-4296
1989-1342
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11246043
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Developmental eye movement test
Eye Movements - physiology
Eye tracker
Eye-Tracking Technology
Female
Fixation, Ocular - physiology
Fixations
Humans
King-Devick test
Male
Ocular motility
Original
Saccades
Saccades - physiology
Young Adult
title Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20visual-verbal%20tests%20of%20ocular%20motility%20using%20an%20eye-tracker&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20optometry&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-de-la-Fuente,%20Carmen&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=100517&rft.pages=100517-&rft.artnum=100517&rft.issn=1888-4296&rft.eissn=1989-1342&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES1888429624000050%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/38908038&rft_els_id=S1888429624000050&rfr_iscdi=true