Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker
This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests. 47 healthy part...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of optometry 2024-10, Vol.17 (4), p.100517, Article 100517 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 100517 |
container_title | Journal of optometry |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen Saz-Onrubia, Elena Orduna-Hospital, Elvira Sánchez-Cano, Ana |
description | This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests.
47 healthy participants were included (20 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 21.34±1.77 years. The participants underwent optometric examinations to ensure visual health and exclude any dysfunctions or pathologies. The experimental protocol involved the digitized versions of the DEM and King-Devick tests, monitored with an eye tracker.
The vertical subtests of DEM test showed fewer saccades, longer fixation durations, smaller saccade amplitudes, and slower saccade speeds compared to the horizontal subtest. The King-Devick test exhibited comparable fixation and saccade numbers, while fixation duration slightly increased with test difficulty. Statistically significant differences were found between the tests, but a positive correlation was observed.
Statistically significant differences were observed between the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that they measure similar aspects but are not interchangeable. The DEM test offers more comprehensive information with vertical saccade assessment. Test duration correlates positively with saccade and fixation count, fixation duration, and saccade speed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11246043</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1888429624000050</els_id><sourcerecordid>S1888429624000050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-40b12a44649d0d3c79036253fb98015a92e78f3fcd05c20dc2bbf37ecb89a0023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtOwzAMhiMEYmPwBEioL9DhHNomFwihiZM0xA1cR2majoy2mZKsaG9Px2CCG65s2f5_2x9C5ximGHB-uZy6VXTtlABhQwUyXBygMRZcpJgycjjknPOUEZGP0EkIS4Cc4EIcoxHlAjhQPkZPM9eulLfBdYmrk_jhkt6GtWrS3vhSNUk0IYZty-l1o3zSumgbGzfJOthukaguMRuTRq_0u_Gn6KhWTTBn33GCXu9uX2YP6fz5_nF2M081EVlMGZSYKMZyJiqoqC4E0JxktC4FB5wpQUzBa1rrCjJNoNKkLGtaGF1yoQAInaDrne9qXbam0qYbDmjkyttW-Y10ysq_nc6-yYXrJcaE5cDo4EB3Dtq7ELyp92IMcotXLuUXXrnFK3d4B9XF7717zQ_PYeBqN2CG73trvAzamk6bynqjo6yc_XfBJxADjq0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen ; Saz-Onrubia, Elena ; Orduna-Hospital, Elvira ; Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creator><creatorcontrib>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen ; Saz-Onrubia, Elena ; Orduna-Hospital, Elvira ; Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests.
47 healthy participants were included (20 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 21.34±1.77 years. The participants underwent optometric examinations to ensure visual health and exclude any dysfunctions or pathologies. The experimental protocol involved the digitized versions of the DEM and King-Devick tests, monitored with an eye tracker.
The vertical subtests of DEM test showed fewer saccades, longer fixation durations, smaller saccade amplitudes, and slower saccade speeds compared to the horizontal subtest. The King-Devick test exhibited comparable fixation and saccade numbers, while fixation duration slightly increased with test difficulty. Statistically significant differences were found between the tests, but a positive correlation was observed.
Statistically significant differences were observed between the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that they measure similar aspects but are not interchangeable. The DEM test offers more comprehensive information with vertical saccade assessment. Test duration correlates positively with saccade and fixation count, fixation duration, and saccade speed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1888-4296</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1989-1342</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38908038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Spain: Elsevier España, S.L.U</publisher><subject>Adult ; Developmental eye movement test ; Eye Movements - physiology ; Eye tracker ; Eye-Tracking Technology ; Female ; Fixation, Ocular - physiology ; Fixations ; Humans ; King-Devick test ; Male ; Ocular motility ; Original ; Saccades ; Saccades - physiology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of optometry, 2024-10, Vol.17 (4), p.100517, Article 100517</ispartof><rights>2024 Spanish General Council of Optometry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024 Spanish General Council of Optometry. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. 2024 Spanish General Council of Optometry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-40b12a44649d0d3c79036253fb98015a92e78f3fcd05c20dc2bbf37ecb89a0023</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2710-1875 ; 0000-0002-7471-5362 ; 0000-0002-5621-1937</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11246043/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,882,3537,27905,27906,45976,53772,53774</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38908038$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saz-Onrubia, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orduna-Hospital, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker</title><title>Journal of optometry</title><addtitle>J Optom</addtitle><description>This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests.
47 healthy participants were included (20 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 21.34±1.77 years. The participants underwent optometric examinations to ensure visual health and exclude any dysfunctions or pathologies. The experimental protocol involved the digitized versions of the DEM and King-Devick tests, monitored with an eye tracker.
The vertical subtests of DEM test showed fewer saccades, longer fixation durations, smaller saccade amplitudes, and slower saccade speeds compared to the horizontal subtest. The King-Devick test exhibited comparable fixation and saccade numbers, while fixation duration slightly increased with test difficulty. Statistically significant differences were found between the tests, but a positive correlation was observed.
Statistically significant differences were observed between the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that they measure similar aspects but are not interchangeable. The DEM test offers more comprehensive information with vertical saccade assessment. Test duration correlates positively with saccade and fixation count, fixation duration, and saccade speed.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Developmental eye movement test</subject><subject>Eye Movements - physiology</subject><subject>Eye tracker</subject><subject>Eye-Tracking Technology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</subject><subject>Fixations</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>King-Devick test</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Ocular motility</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Saccades</subject><subject>Saccades - physiology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1888-4296</issn><issn>1989-1342</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kNtOwzAMhiMEYmPwBEioL9DhHNomFwihiZM0xA1cR2majoy2mZKsaG9Px2CCG65s2f5_2x9C5ximGHB-uZy6VXTtlABhQwUyXBygMRZcpJgycjjknPOUEZGP0EkIS4Cc4EIcoxHlAjhQPkZPM9eulLfBdYmrk_jhkt6GtWrS3vhSNUk0IYZty-l1o3zSumgbGzfJOthukaguMRuTRq_0u_Gn6KhWTTBn33GCXu9uX2YP6fz5_nF2M081EVlMGZSYKMZyJiqoqC4E0JxktC4FB5wpQUzBa1rrCjJNoNKkLGtaGF1yoQAInaDrne9qXbam0qYbDmjkyttW-Y10ysq_nc6-yYXrJcaE5cDo4EB3Dtq7ELyp92IMcotXLuUXXrnFK3d4B9XF7717zQ_PYeBqN2CG73trvAzamk6bynqjo6yc_XfBJxADjq0</recordid><startdate>20241001</startdate><enddate>20241001</enddate><creator>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen</creator><creator>Saz-Onrubia, Elena</creator><creator>Orduna-Hospital, Elvira</creator><creator>Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creator><general>Elsevier España, S.L.U</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-1875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-5362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-1937</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241001</creationdate><title>Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker</title><author>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen ; Saz-Onrubia, Elena ; Orduna-Hospital, Elvira ; Sánchez-Cano, Ana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-40b12a44649d0d3c79036253fb98015a92e78f3fcd05c20dc2bbf37ecb89a0023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Developmental eye movement test</topic><topic>Eye Movements - physiology</topic><topic>Eye tracker</topic><topic>Eye-Tracking Technology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fixation, Ocular - physiology</topic><topic>Fixations</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>King-Devick test</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Ocular motility</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Saccades</topic><topic>Saccades - physiology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saz-Onrubia, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orduna-Hospital, Elvira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sánchez-Cano, Ana</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of optometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>López-de-la-Fuente, Carmen</au><au>Saz-Onrubia, Elena</au><au>Orduna-Hospital, Elvira</au><au>Sánchez-Cano, Ana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker</atitle><jtitle>Journal of optometry</jtitle><addtitle>J Optom</addtitle><date>2024-10-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>100517</spage><pages>100517-</pages><artnum>100517</artnum><issn>1888-4296</issn><eissn>1989-1342</eissn><abstract>This study aims to compare eye movements monitored with an eye tracker during two visuo-verbal tests for assessing ocular motility. The study explores the potential of digital assessment and eye tracking technology in enhancing the understanding of ocular motility during these tests.
47 healthy participants were included (20 males, 27 females), with a mean age of 21.34±1.77 years. The participants underwent optometric examinations to ensure visual health and exclude any dysfunctions or pathologies. The experimental protocol involved the digitized versions of the DEM and King-Devick tests, monitored with an eye tracker.
The vertical subtests of DEM test showed fewer saccades, longer fixation durations, smaller saccade amplitudes, and slower saccade speeds compared to the horizontal subtest. The King-Devick test exhibited comparable fixation and saccade numbers, while fixation duration slightly increased with test difficulty. Statistically significant differences were found between the tests, but a positive correlation was observed.
Statistically significant differences were observed between the DEM and King-Devick tests, indicating that they measure similar aspects but are not interchangeable. The DEM test offers more comprehensive information with vertical saccade assessment. Test duration correlates positively with saccade and fixation count, fixation duration, and saccade speed.</abstract><cop>Spain</cop><pub>Elsevier España, S.L.U</pub><pmid>38908038</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2710-1875</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7471-5362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5621-1937</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1888-4296 |
ispartof | Journal of optometry, 2024-10, Vol.17 (4), p.100517, Article 100517 |
issn | 1888-4296 1989-1342 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11246043 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Developmental eye movement test Eye Movements - physiology Eye tracker Eye-Tracking Technology Female Fixation, Ocular - physiology Fixations Humans King-Devick test Male Ocular motility Original Saccades Saccades - physiology Young Adult |
title | Comparison of two visual-verbal tests of ocular motility using an eye-tracker |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A57%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%20visual-verbal%20tests%20of%20ocular%20motility%20using%20an%20eye-tracker&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20optometry&rft.au=L%C3%B3pez-de-la-Fuente,%20Carmen&rft.date=2024-10-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=100517&rft.pages=100517-&rft.artnum=100517&rft.issn=1888-4296&rft.eissn=1989-1342&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.optom.2024.100517&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_pubme%3ES1888429624000050%3C/elsevier_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/38908038&rft_els_id=S1888429624000050&rfr_iscdi=true |