Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study
Objective We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization. Background With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical condi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Headache 2023-07, Vol.63 (7), p.917-925 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 925 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 917 |
container_title | Headache |
container_volume | 63 |
creator | Minen, Mia T. George, Alexis Katara, Aarti Lebowitz, Naomi Snyder, Ivy Charlotte Busis, Neil A. Lipchitz, Jessica M. |
description | Objective
We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization.
Background
With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical conditions, there is now the potential for remote symptom monitoring for patients with headache disorders. While patients are asked to utilize headache diaries, clinicians may or may not have access to the data before patient visits, and their perspectives regarding this emerging technology are currently unknown.
Methods
After recruiting participants from the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium Network, the American Headache Society Special Interest Section listservs, and Twitter and Facebook social media platforms, we conducted 20 semi‐structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the United States from various types of institutions and asked them their perspectives on remote access to patient headache diary data. We transcribed the interviews, which were then coded by two independent coders. Themes and sub‐themes were developed using inductive content analysis.
Results
All clinicians felt the RM data needed to be integrated into the electronic medical record. Six themes emerged from the interviews: (i) Clinician perspectives on how RM could be beneficial but at other times could create obstacles/challenges, (ii) operationally, data integration could benefit headache care, (iii) there should be initial logistical considerations for bringing RM into clinical care, (iv) education may need to be provided to both patients and clinicians, (v) there are likely research benefits associated with RM, and (vi) additional suggestions for considering potential integration of RM into practice.
Conclusions
While headache clinicians had mixed opinions on the benefits/challenges that RM presents to patient care, patient satisfaction, and visit time, new ideas emerged that may help advance the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/head.14519 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11238271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2825812488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-bbc5f60a4b581d8202b6d0229f2f798c9842d20332282660f6c3678b00245e9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwwMgS2wQUor_4ths0KgUBqkSG1hbjnPTcZXEqe0Mmh2vwevxJHg6pQIWeOPFPff4sz6EnlNyRst5swXbnVFRU_0ArWjNZCUkJQ_RihDaVKoR6gQ9SemaECKklo_RCW845ZLLFdptyrJ1W8Bu8JN33k7p5_cfeIaYZnDZ7yDhMOFciAhjyIDHMPkcop-ucOjxbLOHKd8uwVA2Yhk73Hkb97iz2b7Fa3yz2MFne7DhlJdu_xQ96u2Q4NndfYq-frj4cr6pLj9__HS-vqycEFpXbevqXhIr2lrRTjHCWtkRxnTP-kYrp5VgHSOcM6aYlKSXjstGtYQwUYMGforeHb3z0o7QuZI02sHM0Y8lnwnWm78nk9-aq7AzlDKuWEOL4dWdIYabBVI2o08OhsFOEJZkysMlGxNKFfTlP-h1WOJU_lco3jDKueaFen2kXAwpRejv01BiDn2aQ5_mts8Cv_gz_z36u8AC0CPwzQ-w_4_KbC7W74_SX7C4ra4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2837213393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Minen, Mia T. ; George, Alexis ; Katara, Aarti ; Lebowitz, Naomi ; Snyder, Ivy Charlotte ; Busis, Neil A. ; Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Minen, Mia T. ; George, Alexis ; Katara, Aarti ; Lebowitz, Naomi ; Snyder, Ivy Charlotte ; Busis, Neil A. ; Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective
We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization.
Background
With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical conditions, there is now the potential for remote symptom monitoring for patients with headache disorders. While patients are asked to utilize headache diaries, clinicians may or may not have access to the data before patient visits, and their perspectives regarding this emerging technology are currently unknown.
Methods
After recruiting participants from the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium Network, the American Headache Society Special Interest Section listservs, and Twitter and Facebook social media platforms, we conducted 20 semi‐structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the United States from various types of institutions and asked them their perspectives on remote access to patient headache diary data. We transcribed the interviews, which were then coded by two independent coders. Themes and sub‐themes were developed using inductive content analysis.
Results
All clinicians felt the RM data needed to be integrated into the electronic medical record. Six themes emerged from the interviews: (i) Clinician perspectives on how RM could be beneficial but at other times could create obstacles/challenges, (ii) operationally, data integration could benefit headache care, (iii) there should be initial logistical considerations for bringing RM into clinical care, (iv) education may need to be provided to both patients and clinicians, (v) there are likely research benefits associated with RM, and (vi) additional suggestions for considering potential integration of RM into practice.
Conclusions
While headache clinicians had mixed opinions on the benefits/challenges that RM presents to patient care, patient satisfaction, and visit time, new ideas emerged that may help advance the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8748</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1526-4610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/head.14519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37313636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Coders ; Content analysis ; Data integration ; Diaries ; Digital media ; Electronic Health Records ; Electronic medical records ; Headache ; Headache - diagnosis ; Headache - therapy ; Headache Disorders - diagnosis ; Headache Disorders - therapy ; Headaches ; Humans ; Medical records ; migraine ; New technology ; Pain ; patient data ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; provider perspective ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative Research ; Remote monitoring ; Remote searching ; Social networks ; Telemedicine ; United States</subject><ispartof>Headache, 2023-07, Vol.63 (7), p.917-925</ispartof><rights>2023 American Headache Society.</rights><rights>2023 American Headache Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-bbc5f60a4b581d8202b6d0229f2f798c9842d20332282660f6c3678b00245e9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-bbc5f60a4b581d8202b6d0229f2f798c9842d20332282660f6c3678b00245e9e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1285-6802 ; 0000-0002-6072-3361 ; 0000-0002-4252-6858 ; 0000-0002-9788-8530 ; 0000-0002-4991-3703 ; 0000-0002-4603-4586</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhead.14519$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhead.14519$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minen, Mia T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katara, Aarti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebowitz, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Ivy Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busis, Neil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><title>Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study</title><title>Headache</title><addtitle>Headache</addtitle><description>Objective
We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization.
Background
With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical conditions, there is now the potential for remote symptom monitoring for patients with headache disorders. While patients are asked to utilize headache diaries, clinicians may or may not have access to the data before patient visits, and their perspectives regarding this emerging technology are currently unknown.
Methods
After recruiting participants from the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium Network, the American Headache Society Special Interest Section listservs, and Twitter and Facebook social media platforms, we conducted 20 semi‐structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the United States from various types of institutions and asked them their perspectives on remote access to patient headache diary data. We transcribed the interviews, which were then coded by two independent coders. Themes and sub‐themes were developed using inductive content analysis.
Results
All clinicians felt the RM data needed to be integrated into the electronic medical record. Six themes emerged from the interviews: (i) Clinician perspectives on how RM could be beneficial but at other times could create obstacles/challenges, (ii) operationally, data integration could benefit headache care, (iii) there should be initial logistical considerations for bringing RM into clinical care, (iv) education may need to be provided to both patients and clinicians, (v) there are likely research benefits associated with RM, and (vi) additional suggestions for considering potential integration of RM into practice.
Conclusions
While headache clinicians had mixed opinions on the benefits/challenges that RM presents to patient care, patient satisfaction, and visit time, new ideas emerged that may help advance the field.</description><subject>Coders</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Data integration</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Headache - diagnosis</subject><subject>Headache - therapy</subject><subject>Headache Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Headache Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Headaches</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>migraine</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>patient data</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>provider perspective</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remote searching</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0017-8748</issn><issn>1526-4610</issn><issn>1526-4610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwwMgS2wQUor_4ths0KgUBqkSG1hbjnPTcZXEqe0Mmh2vwevxJHg6pQIWeOPFPff4sz6EnlNyRst5swXbnVFRU_0ArWjNZCUkJQ_RihDaVKoR6gQ9SemaECKklo_RCW845ZLLFdptyrJ1W8Bu8JN33k7p5_cfeIaYZnDZ7yDhMOFciAhjyIDHMPkcop-ucOjxbLOHKd8uwVA2Yhk73Hkb97iz2b7Fa3yz2MFne7DhlJdu_xQ96u2Q4NndfYq-frj4cr6pLj9__HS-vqycEFpXbevqXhIr2lrRTjHCWtkRxnTP-kYrp5VgHSOcM6aYlKSXjstGtYQwUYMGforeHb3z0o7QuZI02sHM0Y8lnwnWm78nk9-aq7AzlDKuWEOL4dWdIYabBVI2o08OhsFOEJZkysMlGxNKFfTlP-h1WOJU_lco3jDKueaFen2kXAwpRejv01BiDn2aQ5_mts8Cv_gz_z36u8AC0CPwzQ-w_4_KbC7W74_SX7C4ra4</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Minen, Mia T.</creator><creator>George, Alexis</creator><creator>Katara, Aarti</creator><creator>Lebowitz, Naomi</creator><creator>Snyder, Ivy Charlotte</creator><creator>Busis, Neil A.</creator><creator>Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-6802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-3361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-8530</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-3703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-4586</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study</title><author>Minen, Mia T. ; George, Alexis ; Katara, Aarti ; Lebowitz, Naomi ; Snyder, Ivy Charlotte ; Busis, Neil A. ; Lipchitz, Jessica M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-bbc5f60a4b581d8202b6d0229f2f798c9842d20332282660f6c3678b00245e9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Coders</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Data integration</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Headache - diagnosis</topic><topic>Headache - therapy</topic><topic>Headache Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Headache Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Headaches</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>migraine</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>patient data</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>provider perspective</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remote searching</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minen, Mia T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katara, Aarti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebowitz, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Ivy Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busis, Neil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Headache</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minen, Mia T.</au><au>George, Alexis</au><au>Katara, Aarti</au><au>Lebowitz, Naomi</au><au>Snyder, Ivy Charlotte</au><au>Busis, Neil A.</au><au>Lipchitz, Jessica M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study</atitle><jtitle>Headache</jtitle><addtitle>Headache</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>925</epage><pages>917-925</pages><issn>0017-8748</issn><issn>1526-4610</issn><eissn>1526-4610</eissn><abstract>Objective
We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization.
Background
With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical conditions, there is now the potential for remote symptom monitoring for patients with headache disorders. While patients are asked to utilize headache diaries, clinicians may or may not have access to the data before patient visits, and their perspectives regarding this emerging technology are currently unknown.
Methods
After recruiting participants from the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium Network, the American Headache Society Special Interest Section listservs, and Twitter and Facebook social media platforms, we conducted 20 semi‐structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the United States from various types of institutions and asked them their perspectives on remote access to patient headache diary data. We transcribed the interviews, which were then coded by two independent coders. Themes and sub‐themes were developed using inductive content analysis.
Results
All clinicians felt the RM data needed to be integrated into the electronic medical record. Six themes emerged from the interviews: (i) Clinician perspectives on how RM could be beneficial but at other times could create obstacles/challenges, (ii) operationally, data integration could benefit headache care, (iii) there should be initial logistical considerations for bringing RM into clinical care, (iv) education may need to be provided to both patients and clinicians, (v) there are likely research benefits associated with RM, and (vi) additional suggestions for considering potential integration of RM into practice.
Conclusions
While headache clinicians had mixed opinions on the benefits/challenges that RM presents to patient care, patient satisfaction, and visit time, new ideas emerged that may help advance the field.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37313636</pmid><doi>10.1111/head.14519</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-6802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-3361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-8530</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-3703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-4586</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0017-8748 |
ispartof | Headache, 2023-07, Vol.63 (7), p.917-925 |
issn | 0017-8748 1526-4610 1526-4610 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11238271 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Coders Content analysis Data integration Diaries Digital media Electronic Health Records Electronic medical records Headache Headache - diagnosis Headache - therapy Headache Disorders - diagnosis Headache Disorders - therapy Headaches Humans Medical records migraine New technology Pain patient data Patient satisfaction Patients provider perspective Qualitative analysis Qualitative Research Remote monitoring Remote searching Social networks Telemedicine United States |
title | Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A45%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Headache%20clinicians%E2%80%99%20perspectives%20on%20the%20remote%20monitoring%20of%20patients%E2%80%99%20electronic%20diary%20data:%20A%20qualitative%20study&rft.jtitle=Headache&rft.au=Minen,%20Mia%20T.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=925&rft.pages=917-925&rft.issn=0017-8748&rft.eissn=1526-4610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/head.14519&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2825812488%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2837213393&rft_id=info:pmid/37313636&rfr_iscdi=true |