Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study

Objective We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization. Background With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical condi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Headache 2023-07, Vol.63 (7), p.917-925
Hauptverfasser: Minen, Mia T., George, Alexis, Katara, Aarti, Lebowitz, Naomi, Snyder, Ivy Charlotte, Busis, Neil A., Lipchitz, Jessica M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 925
container_issue 7
container_start_page 917
container_title Headache
container_volume 63
creator Minen, Mia T.
George, Alexis
Katara, Aarti
Lebowitz, Naomi
Snyder, Ivy Charlotte
Busis, Neil A.
Lipchitz, Jessica M.
description Objective We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization. Background With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical conditions, there is now the potential for remote symptom monitoring for patients with headache disorders. While patients are asked to utilize headache diaries, clinicians may or may not have access to the data before patient visits, and their perspectives regarding this emerging technology are currently unknown. Methods After recruiting participants from the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium Network, the American Headache Society Special Interest Section listservs, and Twitter and Facebook social media platforms, we conducted 20 semi‐structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the United States from various types of institutions and asked them their perspectives on remote access to patient headache diary data. We transcribed the interviews, which were then coded by two independent coders. Themes and sub‐themes were developed using inductive content analysis. Results All clinicians felt the RM data needed to be integrated into the electronic medical record. Six themes emerged from the interviews: (i) Clinician perspectives on how RM could be beneficial but at other times could create obstacles/challenges, (ii) operationally, data integration could benefit headache care, (iii) there should be initial logistical considerations for bringing RM into clinical care, (iv) education may need to be provided to both patients and clinicians, (v) there are likely research benefits associated with RM, and (vi) additional suggestions for considering potential integration of RM into practice. Conclusions While headache clinicians had mixed opinions on the benefits/challenges that RM presents to patient care, patient satisfaction, and visit time, new ideas emerged that may help advance the field.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/head.14519
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11238271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2825812488</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-bbc5f60a4b581d8202b6d0229f2f798c9842d20332282660f6c3678b00245e9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwwMgS2wQUor_4ths0KgUBqkSG1hbjnPTcZXEqe0Mmh2vwevxJHg6pQIWeOPFPff4sz6EnlNyRst5swXbnVFRU_0ArWjNZCUkJQ_RihDaVKoR6gQ9SemaECKklo_RCW845ZLLFdptyrJ1W8Bu8JN33k7p5_cfeIaYZnDZ7yDhMOFciAhjyIDHMPkcop-ucOjxbLOHKd8uwVA2Yhk73Hkb97iz2b7Fa3yz2MFne7DhlJdu_xQ96u2Q4NndfYq-frj4cr6pLj9__HS-vqycEFpXbevqXhIr2lrRTjHCWtkRxnTP-kYrp5VgHSOcM6aYlKSXjstGtYQwUYMGforeHb3z0o7QuZI02sHM0Y8lnwnWm78nk9-aq7AzlDKuWEOL4dWdIYabBVI2o08OhsFOEJZkysMlGxNKFfTlP-h1WOJU_lco3jDKueaFen2kXAwpRejv01BiDn2aQ5_mts8Cv_gz_z36u8AC0CPwzQ-w_4_KbC7W74_SX7C4ra4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2837213393</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Minen, Mia T. ; George, Alexis ; Katara, Aarti ; Lebowitz, Naomi ; Snyder, Ivy Charlotte ; Busis, Neil A. ; Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Minen, Mia T. ; George, Alexis ; Katara, Aarti ; Lebowitz, Naomi ; Snyder, Ivy Charlotte ; Busis, Neil A. ; Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><description>Objective We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization. Background With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical conditions, there is now the potential for remote symptom monitoring for patients with headache disorders. While patients are asked to utilize headache diaries, clinicians may or may not have access to the data before patient visits, and their perspectives regarding this emerging technology are currently unknown. Methods After recruiting participants from the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium Network, the American Headache Society Special Interest Section listservs, and Twitter and Facebook social media platforms, we conducted 20 semi‐structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the United States from various types of institutions and asked them their perspectives on remote access to patient headache diary data. We transcribed the interviews, which were then coded by two independent coders. Themes and sub‐themes were developed using inductive content analysis. Results All clinicians felt the RM data needed to be integrated into the electronic medical record. Six themes emerged from the interviews: (i) Clinician perspectives on how RM could be beneficial but at other times could create obstacles/challenges, (ii) operationally, data integration could benefit headache care, (iii) there should be initial logistical considerations for bringing RM into clinical care, (iv) education may need to be provided to both patients and clinicians, (v) there are likely research benefits associated with RM, and (vi) additional suggestions for considering potential integration of RM into practice. Conclusions While headache clinicians had mixed opinions on the benefits/challenges that RM presents to patient care, patient satisfaction, and visit time, new ideas emerged that may help advance the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0017-8748</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1526-4610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4610</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/head.14519</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37313636</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Coders ; Content analysis ; Data integration ; Diaries ; Digital media ; Electronic Health Records ; Electronic medical records ; Headache ; Headache - diagnosis ; Headache - therapy ; Headache Disorders - diagnosis ; Headache Disorders - therapy ; Headaches ; Humans ; Medical records ; migraine ; New technology ; Pain ; patient data ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; provider perspective ; Qualitative analysis ; Qualitative Research ; Remote monitoring ; Remote searching ; Social networks ; Telemedicine ; United States</subject><ispartof>Headache, 2023-07, Vol.63 (7), p.917-925</ispartof><rights>2023 American Headache Society.</rights><rights>2023 American Headache Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-bbc5f60a4b581d8202b6d0229f2f798c9842d20332282660f6c3678b00245e9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-bbc5f60a4b581d8202b6d0229f2f798c9842d20332282660f6c3678b00245e9e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1285-6802 ; 0000-0002-6072-3361 ; 0000-0002-4252-6858 ; 0000-0002-9788-8530 ; 0000-0002-4991-3703 ; 0000-0002-4603-4586</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fhead.14519$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fhead.14519$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Minen, Mia T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katara, Aarti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebowitz, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Ivy Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busis, Neil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><title>Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study</title><title>Headache</title><addtitle>Headache</addtitle><description>Objective We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization. Background With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical conditions, there is now the potential for remote symptom monitoring for patients with headache disorders. While patients are asked to utilize headache diaries, clinicians may or may not have access to the data before patient visits, and their perspectives regarding this emerging technology are currently unknown. Methods After recruiting participants from the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium Network, the American Headache Society Special Interest Section listservs, and Twitter and Facebook social media platforms, we conducted 20 semi‐structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the United States from various types of institutions and asked them their perspectives on remote access to patient headache diary data. We transcribed the interviews, which were then coded by two independent coders. Themes and sub‐themes were developed using inductive content analysis. Results All clinicians felt the RM data needed to be integrated into the electronic medical record. Six themes emerged from the interviews: (i) Clinician perspectives on how RM could be beneficial but at other times could create obstacles/challenges, (ii) operationally, data integration could benefit headache care, (iii) there should be initial logistical considerations for bringing RM into clinical care, (iv) education may need to be provided to both patients and clinicians, (v) there are likely research benefits associated with RM, and (vi) additional suggestions for considering potential integration of RM into practice. Conclusions While headache clinicians had mixed opinions on the benefits/challenges that RM presents to patient care, patient satisfaction, and visit time, new ideas emerged that may help advance the field.</description><subject>Coders</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Data integration</subject><subject>Diaries</subject><subject>Digital media</subject><subject>Electronic Health Records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Headache</subject><subject>Headache - diagnosis</subject><subject>Headache - therapy</subject><subject>Headache Disorders - diagnosis</subject><subject>Headache Disorders - therapy</subject><subject>Headaches</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>migraine</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>patient data</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>provider perspective</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Remote monitoring</subject><subject>Remote searching</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0017-8748</issn><issn>1526-4610</issn><issn>1526-4610</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAURi0EokNhwwMgS2wQUor_4ths0KgUBqkSG1hbjnPTcZXEqe0Mmh2vwevxJHg6pQIWeOPFPff4sz6EnlNyRst5swXbnVFRU_0ArWjNZCUkJQ_RihDaVKoR6gQ9SemaECKklo_RCW845ZLLFdptyrJ1W8Bu8JN33k7p5_cfeIaYZnDZ7yDhMOFciAhjyIDHMPkcop-ucOjxbLOHKd8uwVA2Yhk73Hkb97iz2b7Fa3yz2MFne7DhlJdu_xQ96u2Q4NndfYq-frj4cr6pLj9__HS-vqycEFpXbevqXhIr2lrRTjHCWtkRxnTP-kYrp5VgHSOcM6aYlKSXjstGtYQwUYMGforeHb3z0o7QuZI02sHM0Y8lnwnWm78nk9-aq7AzlDKuWEOL4dWdIYabBVI2o08OhsFOEJZkysMlGxNKFfTlP-h1WOJU_lco3jDKueaFen2kXAwpRejv01BiDn2aQ5_mts8Cv_gz_z36u8AC0CPwzQ-w_4_KbC7W74_SX7C4ra4</recordid><startdate>202307</startdate><enddate>202307</enddate><creator>Minen, Mia T.</creator><creator>George, Alexis</creator><creator>Katara, Aarti</creator><creator>Lebowitz, Naomi</creator><creator>Snyder, Ivy Charlotte</creator><creator>Busis, Neil A.</creator><creator>Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-6802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-3361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-8530</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-3703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-4586</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202307</creationdate><title>Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study</title><author>Minen, Mia T. ; George, Alexis ; Katara, Aarti ; Lebowitz, Naomi ; Snyder, Ivy Charlotte ; Busis, Neil A. ; Lipchitz, Jessica M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4499-bbc5f60a4b581d8202b6d0229f2f798c9842d20332282660f6c3678b00245e9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Coders</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Data integration</topic><topic>Diaries</topic><topic>Digital media</topic><topic>Electronic Health Records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Headache</topic><topic>Headache - diagnosis</topic><topic>Headache - therapy</topic><topic>Headache Disorders - diagnosis</topic><topic>Headache Disorders - therapy</topic><topic>Headaches</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>migraine</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>patient data</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>provider perspective</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Remote monitoring</topic><topic>Remote searching</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Minen, Mia T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>George, Alexis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katara, Aarti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lebowitz, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snyder, Ivy Charlotte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Busis, Neil A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lipchitz, Jessica M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Headache</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Minen, Mia T.</au><au>George, Alexis</au><au>Katara, Aarti</au><au>Lebowitz, Naomi</au><au>Snyder, Ivy Charlotte</au><au>Busis, Neil A.</au><au>Lipchitz, Jessica M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study</atitle><jtitle>Headache</jtitle><addtitle>Headache</addtitle><date>2023-07</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>917</spage><epage>925</epage><pages>917-925</pages><issn>0017-8748</issn><issn>1526-4610</issn><eissn>1526-4610</eissn><abstract>Objective We assessed headache clinicians’ viewpoints on potential remote access to patients’ digital headache diary data and the practicalities of data utilization. Background With the ubiquitous nature of electronic medical records and the existence of remote monitoring (RM) for many medical conditions, there is now the potential for remote symptom monitoring for patients with headache disorders. While patients are asked to utilize headache diaries, clinicians may or may not have access to the data before patient visits, and their perspectives regarding this emerging technology are currently unknown. Methods After recruiting participants from the National Institutes of Health Pain Consortium Network, the American Headache Society Special Interest Section listservs, and Twitter and Facebook social media platforms, we conducted 20 semi‐structured qualitative interviews of headache providers across the United States from various types of institutions and asked them their perspectives on remote access to patient headache diary data. We transcribed the interviews, which were then coded by two independent coders. Themes and sub‐themes were developed using inductive content analysis. Results All clinicians felt the RM data needed to be integrated into the electronic medical record. Six themes emerged from the interviews: (i) Clinician perspectives on how RM could be beneficial but at other times could create obstacles/challenges, (ii) operationally, data integration could benefit headache care, (iii) there should be initial logistical considerations for bringing RM into clinical care, (iv) education may need to be provided to both patients and clinicians, (v) there are likely research benefits associated with RM, and (vi) additional suggestions for considering potential integration of RM into practice. Conclusions While headache clinicians had mixed opinions on the benefits/challenges that RM presents to patient care, patient satisfaction, and visit time, new ideas emerged that may help advance the field.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>37313636</pmid><doi>10.1111/head.14519</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1285-6802</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6072-3361</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4252-6858</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9788-8530</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-3703</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4603-4586</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0017-8748
ispartof Headache, 2023-07, Vol.63 (7), p.917-925
issn 0017-8748
1526-4610
1526-4610
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11238271
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Coders
Content analysis
Data integration
Diaries
Digital media
Electronic Health Records
Electronic medical records
Headache
Headache - diagnosis
Headache - therapy
Headache Disorders - diagnosis
Headache Disorders - therapy
Headaches
Humans
Medical records
migraine
New technology
Pain
patient data
Patient satisfaction
Patients
provider perspective
Qualitative analysis
Qualitative Research
Remote monitoring
Remote searching
Social networks
Telemedicine
United States
title Headache clinicians’ perspectives on the remote monitoring of patients’ electronic diary data: A qualitative study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A45%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Headache%20clinicians%E2%80%99%20perspectives%20on%20the%20remote%20monitoring%20of%20patients%E2%80%99%20electronic%20diary%20data:%20A%20qualitative%20study&rft.jtitle=Headache&rft.au=Minen,%20Mia%20T.&rft.date=2023-07&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=917&rft.epage=925&rft.pages=917-925&rft.issn=0017-8748&rft.eissn=1526-4610&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/head.14519&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2825812488%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2837213393&rft_id=info:pmid/37313636&rfr_iscdi=true