Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME), a chronic microvascular complication of diabetes, is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can restore the normal macular structure and reduce macular edema, whereas internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is used to treat trac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World journal of clinical cases 2024-07, Vol.12 (21), p.4491-4498
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Lei, Chen, Chun-Jie, Wang, Ming-Li, Huang, Yong, Fang, Li-Jian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 4498
container_issue 21
container_start_page 4491
container_title World journal of clinical cases
container_volume 12
creator Wang, Lei
Chen, Chun-Jie
Wang, Ming-Li
Huang, Yong
Fang, Li-Jian
description Diabetic macular edema (DME), a chronic microvascular complication of diabetes, is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can restore the normal macular structure and reduce macular edema, whereas internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is used to treat tractional macular diseases. Despite the advantages, there is limited research on the combined effects of PPV with ILM peeling. To observe the effects of PPV combined with ILM peeling on postoperative central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cystoid macular edema (CME) volume, and complications in patients with DME. Eighty-one patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with DME at the Beijing Shanqu Liangxiang Hospital between January and December 2022 were randomly divided to undergo PPV alone (control group: 41 patients, 47 eyes) or PPV + ILM peeling (stripping group: 40 patients, 45 eyes); a single surgeon performed all surgeries. The two groups were compared preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Preoperatively, both groups had comparable values of CMT, BCVA, and CME volume ( > 0.05). After surgery (both 1 and 3 months), both groups showed significant reductions in CMT, BCVA, and CME volume compared to preoperative levels, with the stripping group showing more significant reductions compared to the control group ( < 0.05). Further repeated-measures ANOVA analysis for within-group differences revealed significant effects of group and time, and interaction effects for CMT, BCVA, and CME volume ( < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between the groups (retinal detachment: control = 2, stripping = 1; endophthalmitis: Control = 4, stripping = 1; no cases of secondary glaucoma or macular holes; = 0.296, = 0.587). PPV with ILM peeling can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients with DME, reduce CMT, and improve CME with fewer complications.
doi_str_mv 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4491
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11235485</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3085688849</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1991-712a98daffcffd78f5e01860dc5f71ef64eea8df4c6318147f430f88f383de683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkcFOHDEMhiPUChDlBXqocuxlt_EkM-OcqgpRqITUS3uOsokDQZPMNpldxNs3CxTRky3b_29bH2MfQayh0xq_PNw7t95Dt44drJXScMROOynGFepBvHuTn7DzWu-FEACih0EesxOpxShQ4SnLlyGQWyqfA9_HpbR8To_czWkTM3n-EJc7HvNCJduJTzHFJeZbnihtis3Et0TToRAz39olUm5WTxof7YaW6HiybjfZwslTsh_Y-2CnSucv8Yz9_n756-J6dfPz6sfFt5uVA61hNUJnNXobggvBjxh6EoCD8K4PI1AYFJFFH5QbJCCoMSgpAmKQKD0NKM_Y12ff7W6TyLt2V7GT2ZaYbHk0s43m_06Od-Z23huATvYK--bw-cWhzH92VBeTYnU0Te3reVeNFNgPiKh0G-2eR12Zay0UXveAME-wzAGWabBMg2UOsJro09sLXyX_0Mi_CC-VTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3085688849</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema</title><source>Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Wang, Lei ; Chen, Chun-Jie ; Wang, Ming-Li ; Huang, Yong ; Fang, Li-Jian</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei ; Chen, Chun-Jie ; Wang, Ming-Li ; Huang, Yong ; Fang, Li-Jian</creatorcontrib><description>Diabetic macular edema (DME), a chronic microvascular complication of diabetes, is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can restore the normal macular structure and reduce macular edema, whereas internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is used to treat tractional macular diseases. Despite the advantages, there is limited research on the combined effects of PPV with ILM peeling. To observe the effects of PPV combined with ILM peeling on postoperative central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cystoid macular edema (CME) volume, and complications in patients with DME. Eighty-one patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with DME at the Beijing Shanqu Liangxiang Hospital between January and December 2022 were randomly divided to undergo PPV alone (control group: 41 patients, 47 eyes) or PPV + ILM peeling (stripping group: 40 patients, 45 eyes); a single surgeon performed all surgeries. The two groups were compared preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Preoperatively, both groups had comparable values of CMT, BCVA, and CME volume ( &gt; 0.05). After surgery (both 1 and 3 months), both groups showed significant reductions in CMT, BCVA, and CME volume compared to preoperative levels, with the stripping group showing more significant reductions compared to the control group ( &lt; 0.05). Further repeated-measures ANOVA analysis for within-group differences revealed significant effects of group and time, and interaction effects for CMT, BCVA, and CME volume ( &lt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between the groups (retinal detachment: control = 2, stripping = 1; endophthalmitis: Control = 4, stripping = 1; no cases of secondary glaucoma or macular holes; = 0.296, = 0.587). PPV with ILM peeling can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients with DME, reduce CMT, and improve CME with fewer complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2307-8960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2307-8960</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4491</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39070848</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</publisher><subject>Retrospective Study</subject><ispartof>World journal of clinical cases, 2024-07, Vol.12 (21), p.4491-4498</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1991-712a98daffcffd78f5e01860dc5f71ef64eea8df4c6318147f430f88f383de683</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235485/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11235485/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39070848$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chun-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ming-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Li-Jian</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema</title><title>World journal of clinical cases</title><addtitle>World J Clin Cases</addtitle><description>Diabetic macular edema (DME), a chronic microvascular complication of diabetes, is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can restore the normal macular structure and reduce macular edema, whereas internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is used to treat tractional macular diseases. Despite the advantages, there is limited research on the combined effects of PPV with ILM peeling. To observe the effects of PPV combined with ILM peeling on postoperative central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cystoid macular edema (CME) volume, and complications in patients with DME. Eighty-one patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with DME at the Beijing Shanqu Liangxiang Hospital between January and December 2022 were randomly divided to undergo PPV alone (control group: 41 patients, 47 eyes) or PPV + ILM peeling (stripping group: 40 patients, 45 eyes); a single surgeon performed all surgeries. The two groups were compared preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Preoperatively, both groups had comparable values of CMT, BCVA, and CME volume ( &gt; 0.05). After surgery (both 1 and 3 months), both groups showed significant reductions in CMT, BCVA, and CME volume compared to preoperative levels, with the stripping group showing more significant reductions compared to the control group ( &lt; 0.05). Further repeated-measures ANOVA analysis for within-group differences revealed significant effects of group and time, and interaction effects for CMT, BCVA, and CME volume ( &lt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between the groups (retinal detachment: control = 2, stripping = 1; endophthalmitis: Control = 4, stripping = 1; no cases of secondary glaucoma or macular holes; = 0.296, = 0.587). PPV with ILM peeling can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients with DME, reduce CMT, and improve CME with fewer complications.</description><subject>Retrospective Study</subject><issn>2307-8960</issn><issn>2307-8960</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkcFOHDEMhiPUChDlBXqocuxlt_EkM-OcqgpRqITUS3uOsokDQZPMNpldxNs3CxTRky3b_29bH2MfQayh0xq_PNw7t95Dt44drJXScMROOynGFepBvHuTn7DzWu-FEACih0EesxOpxShQ4SnLlyGQWyqfA9_HpbR8To_czWkTM3n-EJc7HvNCJduJTzHFJeZbnihtis3Et0TToRAz39olUm5WTxof7YaW6HiybjfZwslTsh_Y-2CnSucv8Yz9_n756-J6dfPz6sfFt5uVA61hNUJnNXobggvBjxh6EoCD8K4PI1AYFJFFH5QbJCCoMSgpAmKQKD0NKM_Y12ff7W6TyLt2V7GT2ZaYbHk0s43m_06Od-Z23huATvYK--bw-cWhzH92VBeTYnU0Te3reVeNFNgPiKh0G-2eR12Zay0UXveAME-wzAGWabBMg2UOsJro09sLXyX_0Mi_CC-VTw</recordid><startdate>20240726</startdate><enddate>20240726</enddate><creator>Wang, Lei</creator><creator>Chen, Chun-Jie</creator><creator>Wang, Ming-Li</creator><creator>Huang, Yong</creator><creator>Fang, Li-Jian</creator><general>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240726</creationdate><title>Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema</title><author>Wang, Lei ; Chen, Chun-Jie ; Wang, Ming-Li ; Huang, Yong ; Fang, Li-Jian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1991-712a98daffcffd78f5e01860dc5f71ef64eea8df4c6318147f430f88f383de683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Retrospective Study</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Lei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Chun-Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Ming-Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fang, Li-Jian</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>World journal of clinical cases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Lei</au><au>Chen, Chun-Jie</au><au>Wang, Ming-Li</au><au>Huang, Yong</au><au>Fang, Li-Jian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema</atitle><jtitle>World journal of clinical cases</jtitle><addtitle>World J Clin Cases</addtitle><date>2024-07-26</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>4491</spage><epage>4498</epage><pages>4491-4498</pages><issn>2307-8960</issn><eissn>2307-8960</eissn><abstract>Diabetic macular edema (DME), a chronic microvascular complication of diabetes, is a leading cause of visual impairment and blindness. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) can restore the normal macular structure and reduce macular edema, whereas internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling is used to treat tractional macular diseases. Despite the advantages, there is limited research on the combined effects of PPV with ILM peeling. To observe the effects of PPV combined with ILM peeling on postoperative central macular thickness (CMT), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), cystoid macular edema (CME) volume, and complications in patients with DME. Eighty-one patients (92 eyes) diagnosed with DME at the Beijing Shanqu Liangxiang Hospital between January and December 2022 were randomly divided to undergo PPV alone (control group: 41 patients, 47 eyes) or PPV + ILM peeling (stripping group: 40 patients, 45 eyes); a single surgeon performed all surgeries. The two groups were compared preoperatively and 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Preoperatively, both groups had comparable values of CMT, BCVA, and CME volume ( &gt; 0.05). After surgery (both 1 and 3 months), both groups showed significant reductions in CMT, BCVA, and CME volume compared to preoperative levels, with the stripping group showing more significant reductions compared to the control group ( &lt; 0.05). Further repeated-measures ANOVA analysis for within-group differences revealed significant effects of group and time, and interaction effects for CMT, BCVA, and CME volume ( &lt; 0.05). There were no significant differences in the incidence of complications between the groups (retinal detachment: control = 2, stripping = 1; endophthalmitis: Control = 4, stripping = 1; no cases of secondary glaucoma or macular holes; = 0.296, = 0.587). PPV with ILM peeling can significantly improve the visual acuity of patients with DME, reduce CMT, and improve CME with fewer complications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Baishideng Publishing Group Inc</pub><pmid>39070848</pmid><doi>10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4491</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2307-8960
ispartof World journal of clinical cases, 2024-07, Vol.12 (21), p.4491-4498
issn 2307-8960
2307-8960
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11235485
source Baishideng "World Journal of" online journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Retrospective Study
title Effects of vitrectomy combined with internal limiting membrane peeling in patients with diabetic macular edema
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-19T14%3A16%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20vitrectomy%20combined%20with%20internal%20limiting%20membrane%20peeling%20in%20patients%20with%20diabetic%20macular%20edema&rft.jtitle=World%20journal%20of%20clinical%20cases&rft.au=Wang,%20Lei&rft.date=2024-07-26&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=4491&rft.epage=4498&rft.pages=4491-4498&rft.issn=2307-8960&rft.eissn=2307-8960&rft_id=info:doi/10.12998/wjcc.v12.i21.4491&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3085688849%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3085688849&rft_id=info:pmid/39070848&rfr_iscdi=true