Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study
Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.488-496 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 496 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 488 |
container_title | The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Ishibashi, Fumiaki Suzuki, Sho Mochida, Kentaro Nagai, Mizuki Kobayashi, Konomi Kawakami, Tomohiro Morishita, Tetsuo |
description | Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11232077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A800703782</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c8a82e0c74b64baf83cf9d3b559a46fe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A800703782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d397t-8303b3b47311bbda2cd648a065d99be4d9be07571d8d061085647f268b5160bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLUzEYhg-iOHV061ICLnTTmvvFjZQ6amHESnV9yO20KadJ5yRV-oP8n6btKDPgQkISePO-z5cvpGmeIzhhiOE3ZbOaYIjpBBMG5YNmhBGVY8aheNiMEIFwTBWVF82TnDcQEok4ftxcEIUQVQiOml9X0aVs0y7k8iqDpS4hd9qWkCL4GcoalLUH85j9cJIWa509SB2YpT7FU_AA5hlosEjFxxJ0D77udR9KlaMLVpc0gK7OY2DwtlTDIvWHHXjviz_VeQumYDGknY_5GFva6gOfdbHrEFdgWfbu8LR51Ok--2e3-2Xz_cPVt9mn8fWXj_PZ9HrsiBJlLAkkhhgqCELGOI2t41RqyJlTynjq6gIFE8hJBzmCknEqOsylYYhD05HLZn7muqQ37W4IWz0c2qRDexLSsGp1fQjb-9ZKLbGHVlDDqdGdJLZTjhjGlKa885X17sza7c3WO1tfZ9D9Pej9kxjW7Sr9aBHCBEMhKuH1LWFIN3ufS7sN2fq-19GnfW4JVJATIRir1pdn60rXu4XYpYq0R3s7FUooKBQn1TX5h6sO57fBpui7UPWphFBAIiT-38DdCi_uNv232z8fjvwG4InZmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090637755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Suzuki, Sho ; Mochida, Kentaro ; Nagai, Mizuki ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Morishita, Tetsuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Suzuki, Sho ; Mochida, Kentaro ; Nagai, Mizuki ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Morishita, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><description>Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-4948</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2148-5607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2148-5607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39114910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: AVES</publisher><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis ; Adult ; Aged ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Colonoscopy ; Colonoscopy - standards ; Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Comparative analysis ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ; Humans ; Influence ; Inspection ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Personal Satisfaction ; Physicians ; Practice ; Propensity Score ; Psychological aspects ; Quality control ; Quality control equipment ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Quality management ; Rectal polyps ; Satisfaction</subject><ispartof>The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.488-496</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 AVES</rights><rights>2024 authors 2024 authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232077/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232077/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39114910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mochida, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Mizuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morishita, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study</title><title>The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology</title><addtitle>Turk J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.</description><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality control equipment</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Rectal polyps</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><issn>1300-4948</issn><issn>2148-5607</issn><issn>2148-5607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLUzEYhg-iOHV061ICLnTTmvvFjZQ6amHESnV9yO20KadJ5yRV-oP8n6btKDPgQkISePO-z5cvpGmeIzhhiOE3ZbOaYIjpBBMG5YNmhBGVY8aheNiMEIFwTBWVF82TnDcQEok4ftxcEIUQVQiOml9X0aVs0y7k8iqDpS4hd9qWkCL4GcoalLUH85j9cJIWa509SB2YpT7FU_AA5hlosEjFxxJ0D77udR9KlaMLVpc0gK7OY2DwtlTDIvWHHXjviz_VeQumYDGknY_5GFva6gOfdbHrEFdgWfbu8LR51Ok--2e3-2Xz_cPVt9mn8fWXj_PZ9HrsiBJlLAkkhhgqCELGOI2t41RqyJlTynjq6gIFE8hJBzmCknEqOsylYYhD05HLZn7muqQ37W4IWz0c2qRDexLSsGp1fQjb-9ZKLbGHVlDDqdGdJLZTjhjGlKa885X17sza7c3WO1tfZ9D9Pej9kxjW7Sr9aBHCBEMhKuH1LWFIN3ufS7sN2fq-19GnfW4JVJATIRir1pdn60rXu4XYpYq0R3s7FUooKBQn1TX5h6sO57fBpui7UPWphFBAIiT-38DdCi_uNv232z8fjvwG4InZmQ</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creator><creator>Suzuki, Sho</creator><creator>Mochida, Kentaro</creator><creator>Nagai, Mizuki</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Konomi</creator><creator>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Morishita, Tetsuo</creator><general>AVES</general><general>Turkish Society of Gastroenterology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study</title><author>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Suzuki, Sho ; Mochida, Kentaro ; Nagai, Mizuki ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Morishita, Tetsuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d397t-8303b3b47311bbda2cd648a065d99be4d9be07571d8d061085647f268b5160bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality control equipment</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Rectal polyps</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mochida, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Mizuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morishita, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</au><au>Suzuki, Sho</au><au>Mochida, Kentaro</au><au>Nagai, Mizuki</au><au>Kobayashi, Konomi</au><au>Kawakami, Tomohiro</au><au>Morishita, Tetsuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study</atitle><jtitle>The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>488</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>488-496</pages><issn>1300-4948</issn><issn>2148-5607</issn><eissn>2148-5607</eissn><abstract>Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>AVES</pub><pmid>39114910</pmid><doi>10.5152/tjg.2024.23508</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1300-4948 |
ispartof | The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.488-496 |
issn | 1300-4948 2148-5607 2148-5607 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11232077 |
source | MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adenoma - diagnosis Adult Aged Colonic Polyps - diagnosis Colonoscopy Colonoscopy - standards Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis Comparative analysis Diagnosis Female Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Humans Influence Inspection Male Middle Aged Original Personal Satisfaction Physicians Practice Propensity Score Psychological aspects Quality control Quality control equipment Quality Indicators, Health Care Quality management Rectal polyps Satisfaction |
title | Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A29%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopist's%20Satisfaction%20with%20the%20Insertion%20Phase%20of%20Colonoscopy%20Is%20a%20Potential%20Quality%20Indicator%20for%20Colorectal%20Polyp%20Detection:%20A%20Propensity%20Score%20Matching%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Turkish%20Journal%20of%20Gastroenterology&rft.au=Ishibashi,%20Fumiaki&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=488&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=488-496&rft.issn=1300-4948&rft.eissn=2148-5607&rft_id=info:doi/10.5152/tjg.2024.23508&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA800703782%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090637755&rft_id=info:pmid/39114910&rft_galeid=A800703782&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c8a82e0c74b64baf83cf9d3b559a46fe&rfr_iscdi=true |