Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study

Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.488-496
Hauptverfasser: Ishibashi, Fumiaki, Suzuki, Sho, Mochida, Kentaro, Nagai, Mizuki, Kobayashi, Konomi, Kawakami, Tomohiro, Morishita, Tetsuo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 496
container_issue 6
container_start_page 488
container_title The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology
container_volume 35
creator Ishibashi, Fumiaki
Suzuki, Sho
Mochida, Kentaro
Nagai, Mizuki
Kobayashi, Konomi
Kawakami, Tomohiro
Morishita, Tetsuo
description Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P < .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P < .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.
doi_str_mv 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11232077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A800703782</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_c8a82e0c74b64baf83cf9d3b559a46fe</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A800703782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-d397t-8303b3b47311bbda2cd648a065d99be4d9be07571d8d061085647f268b5160bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkuLUzEYhg-iOHV061ICLnTTmvvFjZQ6amHESnV9yO20KadJ5yRV-oP8n6btKDPgQkISePO-z5cvpGmeIzhhiOE3ZbOaYIjpBBMG5YNmhBGVY8aheNiMEIFwTBWVF82TnDcQEok4ftxcEIUQVQiOml9X0aVs0y7k8iqDpS4hd9qWkCL4GcoalLUH85j9cJIWa509SB2YpT7FU_AA5hlosEjFxxJ0D77udR9KlaMLVpc0gK7OY2DwtlTDIvWHHXjviz_VeQumYDGknY_5GFva6gOfdbHrEFdgWfbu8LR51Ok--2e3-2Xz_cPVt9mn8fWXj_PZ9HrsiBJlLAkkhhgqCELGOI2t41RqyJlTynjq6gIFE8hJBzmCknEqOsylYYhD05HLZn7muqQ37W4IWz0c2qRDexLSsGp1fQjb-9ZKLbGHVlDDqdGdJLZTjhjGlKa885X17sza7c3WO1tfZ9D9Pej9kxjW7Sr9aBHCBEMhKuH1LWFIN3ufS7sN2fq-19GnfW4JVJATIRir1pdn60rXu4XYpYq0R3s7FUooKBQn1TX5h6sO57fBpui7UPWphFBAIiT-38DdCi_uNv232z8fjvwG4InZmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090637755</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Suzuki, Sho ; Mochida, Kentaro ; Nagai, Mizuki ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Morishita, Tetsuo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Suzuki, Sho ; Mochida, Kentaro ; Nagai, Mizuki ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Morishita, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><description>Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P &lt; .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P &lt; .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1300-4948</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2148-5607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2148-5607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5152/tjg.2024.23508</identifier><identifier>PMID: 39114910</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Turkey: AVES</publisher><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis ; Adult ; Aged ; Colonic Polyps - diagnosis ; Colonoscopy ; Colonoscopy - standards ; Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Comparative analysis ; Diagnosis ; Female ; Gastrointestinal Endoscopy ; Humans ; Influence ; Inspection ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Original ; Personal Satisfaction ; Physicians ; Practice ; Propensity Score ; Psychological aspects ; Quality control ; Quality control equipment ; Quality Indicators, Health Care ; Quality management ; Rectal polyps ; Satisfaction</subject><ispartof>The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.488-496</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 AVES</rights><rights>2024 authors 2024 authors</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232077/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11232077/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,27926,27927,53793,53795</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/39114910$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mochida, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Mizuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morishita, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><title>Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study</title><title>The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology</title><addtitle>Turk J Gastroenterol</addtitle><description>Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P &lt; .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P &lt; .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.</description><subject>Adenoma - diagnosis</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</subject><subject>Colonoscopy</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - standards</subject><subject>Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Influence</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Personal Satisfaction</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Propensity Score</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Quality control equipment</subject><subject>Quality Indicators, Health Care</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Rectal polyps</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><issn>1300-4948</issn><issn>2148-5607</issn><issn>2148-5607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkkuLUzEYhg-iOHV061ICLnTTmvvFjZQ6amHESnV9yO20KadJ5yRV-oP8n6btKDPgQkISePO-z5cvpGmeIzhhiOE3ZbOaYIjpBBMG5YNmhBGVY8aheNiMEIFwTBWVF82TnDcQEok4ftxcEIUQVQiOml9X0aVs0y7k8iqDpS4hd9qWkCL4GcoalLUH85j9cJIWa509SB2YpT7FU_AA5hlosEjFxxJ0D77udR9KlaMLVpc0gK7OY2DwtlTDIvWHHXjviz_VeQumYDGknY_5GFva6gOfdbHrEFdgWfbu8LR51Ok--2e3-2Xz_cPVt9mn8fWXj_PZ9HrsiBJlLAkkhhgqCELGOI2t41RqyJlTynjq6gIFE8hJBzmCknEqOsylYYhD05HLZn7muqQ37W4IWz0c2qRDexLSsGp1fQjb-9ZKLbGHVlDDqdGdJLZTjhjGlKa885X17sza7c3WO1tfZ9D9Pej9kxjW7Sr9aBHCBEMhKuH1LWFIN3ufS7sN2fq-19GnfW4JVJATIRir1pdn60rXu4XYpYq0R3s7FUooKBQn1TX5h6sO57fBpui7UPWphFBAIiT-38DdCi_uNv232z8fjvwG4InZmQ</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creator><creator>Suzuki, Sho</creator><creator>Mochida, Kentaro</creator><creator>Nagai, Mizuki</creator><creator>Kobayashi, Konomi</creator><creator>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creator><creator>Morishita, Tetsuo</creator><general>AVES</general><general>Turkish Society of Gastroenterology</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>IAO</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study</title><author>Ishibashi, Fumiaki ; Suzuki, Sho ; Mochida, Kentaro ; Nagai, Mizuki ; Kobayashi, Konomi ; Kawakami, Tomohiro ; Morishita, Tetsuo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-d397t-8303b3b47311bbda2cd648a065d99be4d9be07571d8d061085647f268b5160bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adenoma - diagnosis</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Colonic Polyps - diagnosis</topic><topic>Colonoscopy</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - standards</topic><topic>Colonoscopy - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal Endoscopy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Influence</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Personal Satisfaction</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Propensity Score</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Quality control equipment</topic><topic>Quality Indicators, Health Care</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Rectal polyps</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Sho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mochida, Kentaro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagai, Mizuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kobayashi, Konomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kawakami, Tomohiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morishita, Tetsuo</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Gale Academic OneFile</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ishibashi, Fumiaki</au><au>Suzuki, Sho</au><au>Mochida, Kentaro</au><au>Nagai, Mizuki</au><au>Kobayashi, Konomi</au><au>Kawakami, Tomohiro</au><au>Morishita, Tetsuo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study</atitle><jtitle>The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology</jtitle><addtitle>Turk J Gastroenterol</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>488</spage><epage>496</epage><pages>488-496</pages><issn>1300-4948</issn><issn>2148-5607</issn><eissn>2148-5607</eissn><abstract>Quality indicators during the insertion phase of colonoscopy require exploration. Unsatisfactory insertion experiences cause endoscopist psychophysiological fatigue and affect the quality of their inspection. This comparative study used propensity score matching (PSM) to determine whether endoscopist satisfaction during scope insertion was related to polyp detection rate (PDR). Patients who underwent colonoscopy screening between April 2019 and December 2022 were enrolled in this study. The endoscopist satisfaction score (high and low) during the insertion phase in each examination was recorded based on the level of fatigue and presence of paradoxical scope movement. All examinations were classified into 2 groups: a high and a low satisfaction score group. After PSM with potential confounding factors related to polyp detection (endoscopist, insertion and withdrawal time, and sedative agent use), the PDR and adenoma detection rate (ADR) were compared. Overall, 4142 patients (average age, 54.1 years old; 54.4% male) underwent colonoscopies performed by twelve experienced endoscopists. Analysis using a logistic regression model revealed that a high satisfaction score during the insertion phase was an independent predictor of polyp detection (P &lt; .001, odds ratio 1.79, 95% CI 1.41-2.33), whereas insertion time was not. After PSM, 513 patients from both groups were eligible for comparison. Polyp detection rate and ADR were significantly higher in the high-satisfaction group than in the low-satisfaction group (49.5% vs. 36.6%, P &lt; .001; 35.1% vs. 27.1%, P = .007). The endoscopists' level of satisfaction with the insertion phase was shown to be a potential predictor of PDR in screening colonoscopy.</abstract><cop>Turkey</cop><pub>AVES</pub><pmid>39114910</pmid><doi>10.5152/tjg.2024.23508</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1300-4948
ispartof The Turkish Journal of Gastroenterology, 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.488-496
issn 1300-4948
2148-5607
2148-5607
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11232077
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Adenoma - diagnosis
Adult
Aged
Colonic Polyps - diagnosis
Colonoscopy
Colonoscopy - standards
Colonoscopy - statistics & numerical data
Colorectal Neoplasms - diagnosis
Comparative analysis
Diagnosis
Female
Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
Humans
Influence
Inspection
Male
Middle Aged
Original
Personal Satisfaction
Physicians
Practice
Propensity Score
Psychological aspects
Quality control
Quality control equipment
Quality Indicators, Health Care
Quality management
Rectal polyps
Satisfaction
title Endoscopist's Satisfaction with the Insertion Phase of Colonoscopy Is a Potential Quality Indicator for Colorectal Polyp Detection: A Propensity Score Matching Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T07%3A29%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Endoscopist's%20Satisfaction%20with%20the%20Insertion%20Phase%20of%20Colonoscopy%20Is%20a%20Potential%20Quality%20Indicator%20for%20Colorectal%20Polyp%20Detection:%20A%20Propensity%20Score%20Matching%20Study&rft.jtitle=The%20Turkish%20Journal%20of%20Gastroenterology&rft.au=Ishibashi,%20Fumiaki&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=488&rft.epage=496&rft.pages=488-496&rft.issn=1300-4948&rft.eissn=2148-5607&rft_id=info:doi/10.5152/tjg.2024.23508&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA800703782%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090637755&rft_id=info:pmid/39114910&rft_galeid=A800703782&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_c8a82e0c74b64baf83cf9d3b559a46fe&rfr_iscdi=true