Validation of 12 Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2

The rapid identification SARS-CoV-2 virus has become the basis for the control of the COVID-19 outbreak. The rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Rapid antigen tests have gradually replaced the time-consuming and costly RT-PCR. Currently, although several...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of biological methods 2024, Vol.11 (1), p.e99010009
Hauptverfasser: Yu, Minghang, Xiong, Yang, Liang, Pu, Chen, Danying, Zhang, Yuting, Liu, Huan, Zhang, Yuanyuan, Zhao, Xuesen, Jin, Ronghua, Wang, Xi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page e99010009
container_title Journal of biological methods
container_volume 11
creator Yu, Minghang
Xiong, Yang
Liang, Pu
Chen, Danying
Zhang, Yuting
Liu, Huan
Zhang, Yuanyuan
Zhao, Xuesen
Jin, Ronghua
Wang, Xi
description The rapid identification SARS-CoV-2 virus has become the basis for the control of the COVID-19 outbreak. The rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Rapid antigen tests have gradually replaced the time-consuming and costly RT-PCR. Currently, although several RAT kits have been extensively used for the diagnosis of COVID-19, validity data are limited due to the inconsistent sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Meanwhile, WHO does not recommend specific commercial RAT kits. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a method to evaluate the effectiveness of different rapid antigen tests kits. This study aimed to develop an evaluation system for rapid antigen tests to provide an efficient and accurate technique for screening SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kits. Given large number of rapid antigen tests kits available, this study only focused on those that are representative and commonely used in China. By minimzing biases through randomization, concealment, and blinding, we eventually found that the Test 1 had the lowest sensitivity and the Test VI had the highest sensitivity. This study provided an evaluation platform that can potentially serve as a reference for COVID-19 diagnostic strategies.
doi_str_mv 10.14440/jbm.2024.409
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11231045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3078716298</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1899-f8c24b4d1557f4869fd3b1196d9019df48c5881b11d49153932f9ab4d4a837ca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkEtPAjEURhujEYIs3Zou3Qz2NTPtyhDwlZCYALJtOtMWSoYpTgcT_71VHsFVb25Pv957ALjFaIAZY-hhXWwGBBE2YEhcgC6hJEuEQPjyrO6AfghrhBBORYZyeg06lAvOmeBdMF6oymnVOl9DbyEmcKq2TsNh3bqlqeHchDZA6xvYrgwcm9aUR3Y2nM6SkV8k5AZcWVUF0z-cPfDx_DQfvSaT95e30XCSlJgLkVheElYwjdM0t4xnwmpaYCwyHacUOrbKlHMcW5oJnFJBiRUqPmCK07xUtAce97nbXbExujR126hKbhu3Uc239MrJ_ze1W8ml_5IYE4oRS2PC_SGh8Z-7uJvcuFCaqlK18bsgKcp5jjMieESTPVo2PoTG2NM_GMk_-zLal7_2ZbQf-bvz4U700TX9ARJNfdI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3078716298</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of 12 Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Yu, Minghang ; Xiong, Yang ; Liang, Pu ; Chen, Danying ; Zhang, Yuting ; Liu, Huan ; Zhang, Yuanyuan ; Zhao, Xuesen ; Jin, Ronghua ; Wang, Xi</creator><creatorcontrib>Yu, Minghang ; Xiong, Yang ; Liang, Pu ; Chen, Danying ; Zhang, Yuting ; Liu, Huan ; Zhang, Yuanyuan ; Zhao, Xuesen ; Jin, Ronghua ; Wang, Xi</creatorcontrib><description>The rapid identification SARS-CoV-2 virus has become the basis for the control of the COVID-19 outbreak. The rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Rapid antigen tests have gradually replaced the time-consuming and costly RT-PCR. Currently, although several RAT kits have been extensively used for the diagnosis of COVID-19, validity data are limited due to the inconsistent sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Meanwhile, WHO does not recommend specific commercial RAT kits. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a method to evaluate the effectiveness of different rapid antigen tests kits. This study aimed to develop an evaluation system for rapid antigen tests to provide an efficient and accurate technique for screening SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kits. Given large number of rapid antigen tests kits available, this study only focused on those that are representative and commonely used in China. By minimzing biases through randomization, concealment, and blinding, we eventually found that the Test 1 had the lowest sensitivity and the Test VI had the highest sensitivity. This study provided an evaluation platform that can potentially serve as a reference for COVID-19 diagnostic strategies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2326-9901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2326-9901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14440/jbm.2024.409</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38988498</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Journal of Biological Methods</publisher><ispartof>Journal of biological methods, 2024, Vol.11 (1), p.e99010009</ispartof><rights>2024 The Journal of Biological Methods, All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024 The Journal of Biological Methods, All rights reserved. 2024</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231045/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11231045/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,4010,27900,27901,27902,53766,53768</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38988498$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yu, Minghang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Pu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Danying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xuesen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Ronghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xi</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of 12 Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2</title><title>Journal of biological methods</title><addtitle>J Biol Methods</addtitle><description>The rapid identification SARS-CoV-2 virus has become the basis for the control of the COVID-19 outbreak. The rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Rapid antigen tests have gradually replaced the time-consuming and costly RT-PCR. Currently, although several RAT kits have been extensively used for the diagnosis of COVID-19, validity data are limited due to the inconsistent sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Meanwhile, WHO does not recommend specific commercial RAT kits. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a method to evaluate the effectiveness of different rapid antigen tests kits. This study aimed to develop an evaluation system for rapid antigen tests to provide an efficient and accurate technique for screening SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kits. Given large number of rapid antigen tests kits available, this study only focused on those that are representative and commonely used in China. By minimzing biases through randomization, concealment, and blinding, we eventually found that the Test 1 had the lowest sensitivity and the Test VI had the highest sensitivity. This study provided an evaluation platform that can potentially serve as a reference for COVID-19 diagnostic strategies.</description><issn>2326-9901</issn><issn>2326-9901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkEtPAjEURhujEYIs3Zou3Qz2NTPtyhDwlZCYALJtOtMWSoYpTgcT_71VHsFVb25Pv957ALjFaIAZY-hhXWwGBBE2YEhcgC6hJEuEQPjyrO6AfghrhBBORYZyeg06lAvOmeBdMF6oymnVOl9DbyEmcKq2TsNh3bqlqeHchDZA6xvYrgwcm9aUR3Y2nM6SkV8k5AZcWVUF0z-cPfDx_DQfvSaT95e30XCSlJgLkVheElYwjdM0t4xnwmpaYCwyHacUOrbKlHMcW5oJnFJBiRUqPmCK07xUtAce97nbXbExujR126hKbhu3Uc239MrJ_ze1W8ml_5IYE4oRS2PC_SGh8Z-7uJvcuFCaqlK18bsgKcp5jjMieESTPVo2PoTG2NM_GMk_-zLal7_2ZbQf-bvz4U700TX9ARJNfdI</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Yu, Minghang</creator><creator>Xiong, Yang</creator><creator>Liang, Pu</creator><creator>Chen, Danying</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuting</creator><creator>Liu, Huan</creator><creator>Zhang, Yuanyuan</creator><creator>Zhao, Xuesen</creator><creator>Jin, Ronghua</creator><creator>Wang, Xi</creator><general>Journal of Biological Methods</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Validation of 12 Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2</title><author>Yu, Minghang ; Xiong, Yang ; Liang, Pu ; Chen, Danying ; Zhang, Yuting ; Liu, Huan ; Zhang, Yuanyuan ; Zhao, Xuesen ; Jin, Ronghua ; Wang, Xi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1899-f8c24b4d1557f4869fd3b1196d9019df48c5881b11d49153932f9ab4d4a837ca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yu, Minghang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liang, Pu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Danying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Huan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Yuanyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Xuesen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Ronghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xi</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Journal of biological methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yu, Minghang</au><au>Xiong, Yang</au><au>Liang, Pu</au><au>Chen, Danying</au><au>Zhang, Yuting</au><au>Liu, Huan</au><au>Zhang, Yuanyuan</au><au>Zhao, Xuesen</au><au>Jin, Ronghua</au><au>Wang, Xi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of 12 Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2</atitle><jtitle>Journal of biological methods</jtitle><addtitle>J Biol Methods</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>e99010009</spage><pages>e99010009-</pages><issn>2326-9901</issn><eissn>2326-9901</eissn><abstract>The rapid identification SARS-CoV-2 virus has become the basis for the control of the COVID-19 outbreak. The rapid antigen tests for SARS-CoV-2 are quick, widely available, and inexpensive. Rapid antigen tests have gradually replaced the time-consuming and costly RT-PCR. Currently, although several RAT kits have been extensively used for the diagnosis of COVID-19, validity data are limited due to the inconsistent sensitivity and poor reproducibility. Meanwhile, WHO does not recommend specific commercial RAT kits. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a method to evaluate the effectiveness of different rapid antigen tests kits. This study aimed to develop an evaluation system for rapid antigen tests to provide an efficient and accurate technique for screening SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection kits. Given large number of rapid antigen tests kits available, this study only focused on those that are representative and commonely used in China. By minimzing biases through randomization, concealment, and blinding, we eventually found that the Test 1 had the lowest sensitivity and the Test VI had the highest sensitivity. This study provided an evaluation platform that can potentially serve as a reference for COVID-19 diagnostic strategies.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Journal of Biological Methods</pub><pmid>38988498</pmid><doi>10.14440/jbm.2024.409</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2326-9901
ispartof Journal of biological methods, 2024, Vol.11 (1), p.e99010009
issn 2326-9901
2326-9901
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11231045
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
title Validation of 12 Rapid Antigen Tests for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-15T20%3A41%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%2012%20Rapid%20Antigen%20Tests%20for%20the%20Detection%20of%20SARS-CoV-2&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20biological%20methods&rft.au=Yu,%20Minghang&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=e99010009&rft.pages=e99010009-&rft.issn=2326-9901&rft.eissn=2326-9901&rft_id=info:doi/10.14440/jbm.2024.409&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3078716298%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3078716298&rft_id=info:pmid/38988498&rfr_iscdi=true