Preferences for Follow-Up Procedures among Patients Lost to Follow-Up after Smoking Cessation Intervention among Therapists-An Interview Study

Achieving high follow-up rates after smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) is a general challenge. The aim of this study was to identify preferences among patients and therapists for improving follow-up rates and to assess smoking status at 6 months among patients lost to follow-up. From the Danish...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of environmental research and public health 2024-06, Vol.21 (6), p.726
Hauptverfasser: Wärjerstam, Sanne, Dew-Hattens, Camilla, Rasmussen, Mette, Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal, Raffing, Rie, Tønnesen, Hanne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page 726
container_title International journal of environmental research and public health
container_volume 21
creator Wärjerstam, Sanne
Dew-Hattens, Camilla
Rasmussen, Mette
Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal
Raffing, Rie
Tønnesen, Hanne
description Achieving high follow-up rates after smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) is a general challenge. The aim of this study was to identify preferences among patients and therapists for improving follow-up rates and to assess smoking status at 6 months among patients lost to follow-up. From the Danish STOPbase for Tobacco and Nicotine, which collects data on SCI across health care, 20 representative patients lost to follow-up by routine procedures were identified together with 11 therapists. All participated in individual semi-structured phone interviews, which for patients also included 6-month smoking status. Deductive and inductive analyses were performed. Four themes emerged from the analyses with several subthemes, all regarding contacts. Both patients and therapists preferred to intensify the follow-up process by boosting it with additional attempts and using voice messages, e-mail and/or SMS, calling at specified times of the day and avoiding calls from unknown numbers. In addition, some patients mentioned that they were busy or were not carrying their mobile devices at the time of a call as a barrier. Some therapists mentioned that barriers could include an expectation of relapse, but also a poor mental state, the time of day and patient fear of public systems. Among the patients originally lost to follow-up, 35% (95% CI 16%-59%) experienced continuous smoking cessation for 6 months, and the overall national rate was 22% (21.6-23.3%). In conclusion, both patients and therapists preferred intensified follow-up. The 6-month smoking status for patients lost to follow-up seemed to be similar to that of the routinely followed-up patients. These findings will be examined experimentally in a larger study.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/ijerph21060726
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11203566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3072331741</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1806-7f2d35a117a25eca49ba66dc1b33b024a550c7ee81f9c1a2c6018e8c053f93f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUtLxDAUhYMovrcuJeDGTTWPNklXIoOPgQEHHNclk946GdumJu2If8LfbHRU1NXNvefL4SQXoSNKzjjPybldgu8WjBJBJBMbaJcKQZJUELr5eaaJVEzuoL0QloRwlYp8G-1wlTOVS7aL3qYeKvDQGgi4ch5fu7p2L8lDh6feGSgHHwXduPYRT3Vvoe0DnrjQ4979YnXVg8f3jXuyERxBCJF1LR63cb6Klz6atctsAV53NvQhufwGLLzg-34oXw_QVqXrAIdfdR_Nrq9mo9tkcnczHl1Oko4qIhJZsZJnmlKpWQZGp_lcC1EaOud8Tliqs4wYCaBolRuqmYn_oUAZkvEq5xXfRxdr226YN1CaGNDruui8bbR_LZy2xV-ltYvi0a0KShnhmRDR4fTLwbvnAUJfNDYYqGvdghtCweM6FEml-kBP_qFLN_g2Pu-T4pzKlEbq-Heknyzfq-LvDrmZtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072331741</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preferences for Follow-Up Procedures among Patients Lost to Follow-Up after Smoking Cessation Intervention among Therapists-An Interview Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wärjerstam, Sanne ; Dew-Hattens, Camilla ; Rasmussen, Mette ; Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal ; Raffing, Rie ; Tønnesen, Hanne</creator><creatorcontrib>Wärjerstam, Sanne ; Dew-Hattens, Camilla ; Rasmussen, Mette ; Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal ; Raffing, Rie ; Tønnesen, Hanne</creatorcontrib><description>Achieving high follow-up rates after smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) is a general challenge. The aim of this study was to identify preferences among patients and therapists for improving follow-up rates and to assess smoking status at 6 months among patients lost to follow-up. From the Danish STOPbase for Tobacco and Nicotine, which collects data on SCI across health care, 20 representative patients lost to follow-up by routine procedures were identified together with 11 therapists. All participated in individual semi-structured phone interviews, which for patients also included 6-month smoking status. Deductive and inductive analyses were performed. Four themes emerged from the analyses with several subthemes, all regarding contacts. Both patients and therapists preferred to intensify the follow-up process by boosting it with additional attempts and using voice messages, e-mail and/or SMS, calling at specified times of the day and avoiding calls from unknown numbers. In addition, some patients mentioned that they were busy or were not carrying their mobile devices at the time of a call as a barrier. Some therapists mentioned that barriers could include an expectation of relapse, but also a poor mental state, the time of day and patient fear of public systems. Among the patients originally lost to follow-up, 35% (95% CI 16%-59%) experienced continuous smoking cessation for 6 months, and the overall national rate was 22% (21.6-23.3%). In conclusion, both patients and therapists preferred intensified follow-up. The 6-month smoking status for patients lost to follow-up seemed to be similar to that of the routinely followed-up patients. These findings will be examined experimentally in a larger study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1661-7827</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1660-4601</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21060726</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38928972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Switzerland: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Data collection ; Denmark ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Informed consent ; Interviews ; Interviews as Topic ; Lost to Follow-Up ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Patient Preference ; Patients ; Registration ; Smoking - epidemiology ; Smoking - psychology ; Smoking cessation ; Smoking Cessation - methods ; Smoking Cessation - psychology ; Therapists ; Tobacco</subject><ispartof>International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024-06, Vol.21 (6), p.726</ispartof><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-6809-4504 ; 0000-0003-2847-1544 ; 0000-0002-7161-3416</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11203566/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11203566/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38928972$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wärjerstam, Sanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dew-Hattens, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffing, Rie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tønnesen, Hanne</creatorcontrib><title>Preferences for Follow-Up Procedures among Patients Lost to Follow-Up after Smoking Cessation Intervention among Therapists-An Interview Study</title><title>International journal of environmental research and public health</title><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><description>Achieving high follow-up rates after smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) is a general challenge. The aim of this study was to identify preferences among patients and therapists for improving follow-up rates and to assess smoking status at 6 months among patients lost to follow-up. From the Danish STOPbase for Tobacco and Nicotine, which collects data on SCI across health care, 20 representative patients lost to follow-up by routine procedures were identified together with 11 therapists. All participated in individual semi-structured phone interviews, which for patients also included 6-month smoking status. Deductive and inductive analyses were performed. Four themes emerged from the analyses with several subthemes, all regarding contacts. Both patients and therapists preferred to intensify the follow-up process by boosting it with additional attempts and using voice messages, e-mail and/or SMS, calling at specified times of the day and avoiding calls from unknown numbers. In addition, some patients mentioned that they were busy or were not carrying their mobile devices at the time of a call as a barrier. Some therapists mentioned that barriers could include an expectation of relapse, but also a poor mental state, the time of day and patient fear of public systems. Among the patients originally lost to follow-up, 35% (95% CI 16%-59%) experienced continuous smoking cessation for 6 months, and the overall national rate was 22% (21.6-23.3%). In conclusion, both patients and therapists preferred intensified follow-up. The 6-month smoking status for patients lost to follow-up seemed to be similar to that of the routinely followed-up patients. These findings will be examined experimentally in a larger study.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Informed consent</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Interviews as Topic</subject><subject>Lost to Follow-Up</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Patient Preference</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Smoking - epidemiology</subject><subject>Smoking - psychology</subject><subject>Smoking cessation</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - methods</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation - psychology</subject><subject>Therapists</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUtLxDAUhYMovrcuJeDGTTWPNklXIoOPgQEHHNclk946GdumJu2If8LfbHRU1NXNvefL4SQXoSNKzjjPybldgu8WjBJBJBMbaJcKQZJUELr5eaaJVEzuoL0QloRwlYp8G-1wlTOVS7aL3qYeKvDQGgi4ch5fu7p2L8lDh6feGSgHHwXduPYRT3Vvoe0DnrjQ4979YnXVg8f3jXuyERxBCJF1LR63cb6Klz6atctsAV53NvQhufwGLLzg-34oXw_QVqXrAIdfdR_Nrq9mo9tkcnczHl1Oko4qIhJZsZJnmlKpWQZGp_lcC1EaOud8Tliqs4wYCaBolRuqmYn_oUAZkvEq5xXfRxdr226YN1CaGNDruui8bbR_LZy2xV-ltYvi0a0KShnhmRDR4fTLwbvnAUJfNDYYqGvdghtCweM6FEml-kBP_qFLN_g2Pu-T4pzKlEbq-Heknyzfq-LvDrmZtg</recordid><startdate>20240603</startdate><enddate>20240603</enddate><creator>Wärjerstam, Sanne</creator><creator>Dew-Hattens, Camilla</creator><creator>Rasmussen, Mette</creator><creator>Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal</creator><creator>Raffing, Rie</creator><creator>Tønnesen, Hanne</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><general>MDPI</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-4504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-1544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-3416</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240603</creationdate><title>Preferences for Follow-Up Procedures among Patients Lost to Follow-Up after Smoking Cessation Intervention among Therapists-An Interview Study</title><author>Wärjerstam, Sanne ; Dew-Hattens, Camilla ; Rasmussen, Mette ; Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal ; Raffing, Rie ; Tønnesen, Hanne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1806-7f2d35a117a25eca49ba66dc1b33b024a550c7ee81f9c1a2c6018e8c053f93f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Informed consent</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Interviews as Topic</topic><topic>Lost to Follow-Up</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Patient Preference</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Smoking - epidemiology</topic><topic>Smoking - psychology</topic><topic>Smoking cessation</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - methods</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation - psychology</topic><topic>Therapists</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wärjerstam, Sanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dew-Hattens, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rasmussen, Mette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raffing, Rie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tønnesen, Hanne</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wärjerstam, Sanne</au><au>Dew-Hattens, Camilla</au><au>Rasmussen, Mette</au><au>Heitmann, Berit Lilienthal</au><au>Raffing, Rie</au><au>Tønnesen, Hanne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preferences for Follow-Up Procedures among Patients Lost to Follow-Up after Smoking Cessation Intervention among Therapists-An Interview Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of environmental research and public health</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Environ Res Public Health</addtitle><date>2024-06-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>726</spage><pages>726-</pages><issn>1661-7827</issn><issn>1660-4601</issn><eissn>1660-4601</eissn><abstract>Achieving high follow-up rates after smoking cessation interventions (SCIs) is a general challenge. The aim of this study was to identify preferences among patients and therapists for improving follow-up rates and to assess smoking status at 6 months among patients lost to follow-up. From the Danish STOPbase for Tobacco and Nicotine, which collects data on SCI across health care, 20 representative patients lost to follow-up by routine procedures were identified together with 11 therapists. All participated in individual semi-structured phone interviews, which for patients also included 6-month smoking status. Deductive and inductive analyses were performed. Four themes emerged from the analyses with several subthemes, all regarding contacts. Both patients and therapists preferred to intensify the follow-up process by boosting it with additional attempts and using voice messages, e-mail and/or SMS, calling at specified times of the day and avoiding calls from unknown numbers. In addition, some patients mentioned that they were busy or were not carrying their mobile devices at the time of a call as a barrier. Some therapists mentioned that barriers could include an expectation of relapse, but also a poor mental state, the time of day and patient fear of public systems. Among the patients originally lost to follow-up, 35% (95% CI 16%-59%) experienced continuous smoking cessation for 6 months, and the overall national rate was 22% (21.6-23.3%). In conclusion, both patients and therapists preferred intensified follow-up. The 6-month smoking status for patients lost to follow-up seemed to be similar to that of the routinely followed-up patients. These findings will be examined experimentally in a larger study.</abstract><cop>Switzerland</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><pmid>38928972</pmid><doi>10.3390/ijerph21060726</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6809-4504</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-1544</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7161-3416</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1661-7827
ispartof International journal of environmental research and public health, 2024-06, Vol.21 (6), p.726
issn 1661-7827
1660-4601
1660-4601
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11203566
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Adult
Aged
Data collection
Denmark
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Informed consent
Interviews
Interviews as Topic
Lost to Follow-Up
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Preference
Patients
Registration
Smoking - epidemiology
Smoking - psychology
Smoking cessation
Smoking Cessation - methods
Smoking Cessation - psychology
Therapists
Tobacco
title Preferences for Follow-Up Procedures among Patients Lost to Follow-Up after Smoking Cessation Intervention among Therapists-An Interview Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T19%3A36%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preferences%20for%20Follow-Up%20Procedures%20among%20Patients%20Lost%20to%20Follow-Up%20after%20Smoking%20Cessation%20Intervention%20among%20Therapists-An%20Interview%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20environmental%20research%20and%20public%20health&rft.au=W%C3%A4rjerstam,%20Sanne&rft.date=2024-06-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=726&rft.pages=726-&rft.issn=1661-7827&rft.eissn=1660-4601&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/ijerph21060726&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3072331741%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072331741&rft_id=info:pmid/38928972&rfr_iscdi=true