Validation of the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool
Cognitive-affective processes, including hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety, may contribute to chronic laryngeal symptoms and are potentially modifiable; however, a validated instrument to assess these constructs is lacking. The aims of this study were to develop and validate the Laryngeal...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology 2024-07, Vol.22 (7), p.1395-1403.e3 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1403.e3 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 1395 |
container_title | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Krause, Amanda J. Taft, Tiffany Greytak, Madeline Burger, Zoe C. Walsh, Erin Weissbrod, Philip Pandolfino, John E. Yadlapati, Rena |
description | Cognitive-affective processes, including hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety, may contribute to chronic laryngeal symptoms and are potentially modifiable; however, a validated instrument to assess these constructs is lacking. The aims of this study were to develop and validate the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool (LCAT) instrument.
This 2-phase single-center prospective study enrolled participants from November 2021 to June 2023. In the initial phase 1:1 patient cognitive interviews and multidisciplinary team consensus were conducted to develop the LCAT. In the second phase asymptomatic and symptomatic participants completed a series of questionnaires to examine psychometric properties of the LCAT.
A total of 268 participants were included: 8 in the initial phase and 260 in the validation phase (56 asymptomatic; 204 symptomatic). A 15-item LCAT was developed. In the validation phase, mean total LCAT and hypervigilance/anxiety subscores were significantly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic participants (P < .01). The LCAT had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.942) and split-half reliability (Guttman = 0.853). Using a median split, a score of 33 or greater was defined as elevated.
The 15-item LCAT evaluates laryngeal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety among patients with laryngeal symptoms. It has excellent reliability and construct validity. The LCAT highlights burdensome cognitive-affective processes that can accordingly help tailor treatments.
[Display omitted] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11193647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1542356524001009</els_id><sourcerecordid>2929132115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-89a0790526e564f02b9eb5de1c508d322b30cfb37a202611b10f408d3f85cd623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_gBfJ0Uvizn4kDR6kFL-g4KV6XTab2XZLmtVsWvDfu6W16MXTvDDvvDPzEHIFNAMK-e0yM_NFxigTGYWMMn5EBiAFS4sCxPFec5nLM3IewpJSVoqyOCVnfMRplHJAxLtuXK1759vE26RfYDLV3Vc7R90kEz9vXe82mI6tRbNVycz75oKcWN0EvNzXIXl7fJhNntPp69PLZDxNjZCsT0elpkVJJctR5sJSVpVYyRrBSDqqOWMVp8ZWvNDxhRygAmrFtmNH0tQ540Nyv8v9WFcrrA22facb9dG5VbxRee3U307rFmruNwoASp6LIibc7BM6_7nG0KuVCwabRrfo10GxkpXAGYCMVthZTedD6NAe9gBVW9xqqSJutcWtKKiIO85c_z7wMPHDNxrudgaMmDYOOxWMw9Zg7boIVNXe_RP_DY9bj2Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2929132115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validation of the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Krause, Amanda J. ; Taft, Tiffany ; Greytak, Madeline ; Burger, Zoe C. ; Walsh, Erin ; Weissbrod, Philip ; Pandolfino, John E. ; Yadlapati, Rena</creator><creatorcontrib>Krause, Amanda J. ; Taft, Tiffany ; Greytak, Madeline ; Burger, Zoe C. ; Walsh, Erin ; Weissbrod, Philip ; Pandolfino, John E. ; Yadlapati, Rena</creatorcontrib><description>Cognitive-affective processes, including hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety, may contribute to chronic laryngeal symptoms and are potentially modifiable; however, a validated instrument to assess these constructs is lacking. The aims of this study were to develop and validate the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool (LCAT) instrument.
This 2-phase single-center prospective study enrolled participants from November 2021 to June 2023. In the initial phase 1:1 patient cognitive interviews and multidisciplinary team consensus were conducted to develop the LCAT. In the second phase asymptomatic and symptomatic participants completed a series of questionnaires to examine psychometric properties of the LCAT.
A total of 268 participants were included: 8 in the initial phase and 260 in the validation phase (56 asymptomatic; 204 symptomatic). A 15-item LCAT was developed. In the validation phase, mean total LCAT and hypervigilance/anxiety subscores were significantly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic participants (P < .01). The LCAT had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.942) and split-half reliability (Guttman = 0.853). Using a median split, a score of 33 or greater was defined as elevated.
The 15-item LCAT evaluates laryngeal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety among patients with laryngeal symptoms. It has excellent reliability and construct validity. The LCAT highlights burdensome cognitive-affective processes that can accordingly help tailor treatments.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1542-3565</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1542-7714</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1542-7714</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.023</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38309495</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux ; Laryngopharyngeal Reflux ; Patient-Reported Outcome Measures ; Psychosocial Functioning</subject><ispartof>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024-07, Vol.22 (7), p.1395-1403.e3</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-89a0790526e564f02b9eb5de1c508d322b30cfb37a202611b10f408d3f85cd623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-89a0790526e564f02b9eb5de1c508d322b30cfb37a202611b10f408d3f85cd623</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9792-0417</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356524001009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38309495$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krause, Amanda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taft, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greytak, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Zoe C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weissbrod, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandolfino, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadlapati, Rena</creatorcontrib><title>Validation of the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool</title><title>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</title><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><description>Cognitive-affective processes, including hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety, may contribute to chronic laryngeal symptoms and are potentially modifiable; however, a validated instrument to assess these constructs is lacking. The aims of this study were to develop and validate the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool (LCAT) instrument.
This 2-phase single-center prospective study enrolled participants from November 2021 to June 2023. In the initial phase 1:1 patient cognitive interviews and multidisciplinary team consensus were conducted to develop the LCAT. In the second phase asymptomatic and symptomatic participants completed a series of questionnaires to examine psychometric properties of the LCAT.
A total of 268 participants were included: 8 in the initial phase and 260 in the validation phase (56 asymptomatic; 204 symptomatic). A 15-item LCAT was developed. In the validation phase, mean total LCAT and hypervigilance/anxiety subscores were significantly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic participants (P < .01). The LCAT had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.942) and split-half reliability (Guttman = 0.853). Using a median split, a score of 33 or greater was defined as elevated.
The 15-item LCAT evaluates laryngeal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety among patients with laryngeal symptoms. It has excellent reliability and construct validity. The LCAT highlights burdensome cognitive-affective processes that can accordingly help tailor treatments.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Gastroesophageal Reflux</subject><subject>Laryngopharyngeal Reflux</subject><subject>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures</subject><subject>Psychosocial Functioning</subject><issn>1542-3565</issn><issn>1542-7714</issn><issn>1542-7714</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1Lw0AQhhdRtFZ_gBfJ0Uvizn4kDR6kFL-g4KV6XTab2XZLmtVsWvDfu6W16MXTvDDvvDPzEHIFNAMK-e0yM_NFxigTGYWMMn5EBiAFS4sCxPFec5nLM3IewpJSVoqyOCVnfMRplHJAxLtuXK1759vE26RfYDLV3Vc7R90kEz9vXe82mI6tRbNVycz75oKcWN0EvNzXIXl7fJhNntPp69PLZDxNjZCsT0elpkVJJctR5sJSVpVYyRrBSDqqOWMVp8ZWvNDxhRygAmrFtmNH0tQ540Nyv8v9WFcrrA22facb9dG5VbxRee3U307rFmruNwoASp6LIibc7BM6_7nG0KuVCwabRrfo10GxkpXAGYCMVthZTedD6NAe9gBVW9xqqSJutcWtKKiIO85c_z7wMPHDNxrudgaMmDYOOxWMw9Zg7boIVNXe_RP_DY9bj2Y</recordid><startdate>20240701</startdate><enddate>20240701</enddate><creator>Krause, Amanda J.</creator><creator>Taft, Tiffany</creator><creator>Greytak, Madeline</creator><creator>Burger, Zoe C.</creator><creator>Walsh, Erin</creator><creator>Weissbrod, Philip</creator><creator>Pandolfino, John E.</creator><creator>Yadlapati, Rena</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-0417</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240701</creationdate><title>Validation of the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool</title><author>Krause, Amanda J. ; Taft, Tiffany ; Greytak, Madeline ; Burger, Zoe C. ; Walsh, Erin ; Weissbrod, Philip ; Pandolfino, John E. ; Yadlapati, Rena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c452t-89a0790526e564f02b9eb5de1c508d322b30cfb37a202611b10f408d3f85cd623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Gastroesophageal Reflux</topic><topic>Laryngopharyngeal Reflux</topic><topic>Patient-Reported Outcome Measures</topic><topic>Psychosocial Functioning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krause, Amanda J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taft, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greytak, Madeline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burger, Zoe C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walsh, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weissbrod, Philip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pandolfino, John E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yadlapati, Rena</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krause, Amanda J.</au><au>Taft, Tiffany</au><au>Greytak, Madeline</au><au>Burger, Zoe C.</au><au>Walsh, Erin</au><au>Weissbrod, Philip</au><au>Pandolfino, John E.</au><au>Yadlapati, Rena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validation of the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool</atitle><jtitle>Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol</addtitle><date>2024-07-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1395</spage><epage>1403.e3</epage><pages>1395-1403.e3</pages><issn>1542-3565</issn><issn>1542-7714</issn><eissn>1542-7714</eissn><abstract>Cognitive-affective processes, including hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety, may contribute to chronic laryngeal symptoms and are potentially modifiable; however, a validated instrument to assess these constructs is lacking. The aims of this study were to develop and validate the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool (LCAT) instrument.
This 2-phase single-center prospective study enrolled participants from November 2021 to June 2023. In the initial phase 1:1 patient cognitive interviews and multidisciplinary team consensus were conducted to develop the LCAT. In the second phase asymptomatic and symptomatic participants completed a series of questionnaires to examine psychometric properties of the LCAT.
A total of 268 participants were included: 8 in the initial phase and 260 in the validation phase (56 asymptomatic; 204 symptomatic). A 15-item LCAT was developed. In the validation phase, mean total LCAT and hypervigilance/anxiety subscores were significantly higher in symptomatic versus asymptomatic participants (P < .01). The LCAT had excellent internal consistency (α = 0.942) and split-half reliability (Guttman = 0.853). Using a median split, a score of 33 or greater was defined as elevated.
The 15-item LCAT evaluates laryngeal hypervigilance and symptom-specific anxiety among patients with laryngeal symptoms. It has excellent reliability and construct validity. The LCAT highlights burdensome cognitive-affective processes that can accordingly help tailor treatments.
[Display omitted]</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38309495</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.023</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9792-0417</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1542-3565 |
ispartof | Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024-07, Vol.22 (7), p.1395-1403.e3 |
issn | 1542-3565 1542-7714 1542-7714 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11193647 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Gastroesophageal Reflux Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Psychosocial Functioning |
title | Validation of the Laryngeal Cognitive-Affective Tool |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T11%3A29%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validation%20of%20the%20Laryngeal%20Cognitive-Affective%20Tool&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20gastroenterology%20and%20hepatology&rft.au=Krause,%20Amanda%20J.&rft.date=2024-07-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1395&rft.epage=1403.e3&rft.pages=1395-1403.e3&rft.issn=1542-3565&rft.eissn=1542-7714&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.01.023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E2929132115%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2929132115&rft_id=info:pmid/38309495&rft_els_id=S1542356524001009&rfr_iscdi=true |