Assessment of serum tumor markers CEA, CA-125, and CA19-9 as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer management

Conventional tumor markers may serve as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. This study analyzed whether three tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA-125) held associations with radiographic and clinical outcomes in NSCLC. It constituted a single-center study of NSCLC patients trea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oncotarget 2024-06, Vol.15, p.381-388
Hauptverfasser: Strum, Scott, Vincent, Mark, Gipson, Meghan, McArthur, Eric, Breadner, Daniel
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 388
container_issue
container_start_page 381
container_title Oncotarget
container_volume 15
creator Strum, Scott
Vincent, Mark
Gipson, Meghan
McArthur, Eric
Breadner, Daniel
description Conventional tumor markers may serve as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. This study analyzed whether three tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA-125) held associations with radiographic and clinical outcomes in NSCLC. It constituted a single-center study of NSCLC patients treated with systemic therapy at the London Regional Cancer Program. Serum tumor markers were analyzed for differences in radiographic responses (RECIST v1.1 or iRECIST), associations with clinical characteristics, and all-cause mortality. A total of 533 NSCLC patients were screened, of which 165 met inclusion criteria. A subset of 92 patients had paired tumor markers and radiographic scans. From the latter population, median (IQR) fold-change from nadir to progression was 2.13 (IQR 1.24-3.02; < 0.001) for CEA, 1.46 (IQR 1.13-2.18; < 0.001) for CA19-9, and 1.53 (IQR 0.96-2.12; < 0.001) for CA-125. Median (IQR) fold-change from baseline to radiographic response was 0.50 (IQR 0.27, 0.95; < 0.001) for CEA, 1.08 (IQR 0.74, 1.61; = 0.99) for CA19-9, and 0.47 (IQR 0.18, 1.26; = 0.008) for CA-125. In conclusion, tumor markers are positioned to be used as adjunct tools in clinical decision making, especially for their associations with radiographic response (CEA/CA-125) or progression (CEA/CA-125/CA-19-9).
doi_str_mv 10.18632/oncotarget.28566
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11174826</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068753277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1556-e224fdb2ca459bf1d89be43283a372b9e184ef24b865e8fe4bf84f039273fe223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmjsB3BBOXJYR_PVJCdUVeNDmsQFzlXaOqWjTUbTIvHv6cRAwwf7lWy_j2yErki8Iiph9Na70g-mr2FYUSWS5ARdEM11RIVgp0d6hhYhbOMpBJeK6nM0Y0rJOJb0Ark0BAihAzdgb3GAfuzwMHa-x53p36EPOFunS5ylEaFiiY2rJk10pLEJ2FTb0ZVDwI3DzrsodKZtcQlTakdX49K4EvZOztSwZ1yiM2vaAItDnaPX-_VL9hhtnh-esnQT7YgQSQSUclsVtDRc6MKSSukCOKOKGSZpoYEoDpbyQiUClAVeWMVtzDSVzE7LbI7ufnx3Y9FBVU7o3rT5rm-mq75yb5r8f8c1b3ntP3NCiOSKJpPDzcGh9x8jhCHvmrC_zDjwY8hZnCgpGJVyGr0-hv1Rfr_MvgH3rYEs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068753277</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of serum tumor markers CEA, CA-125, and CA19-9 as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer management</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Strum, Scott ; Vincent, Mark ; Gipson, Meghan ; McArthur, Eric ; Breadner, Daniel</creator><creatorcontrib>Strum, Scott ; Vincent, Mark ; Gipson, Meghan ; McArthur, Eric ; Breadner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><description>Conventional tumor markers may serve as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. This study analyzed whether three tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA-125) held associations with radiographic and clinical outcomes in NSCLC. It constituted a single-center study of NSCLC patients treated with systemic therapy at the London Regional Cancer Program. Serum tumor markers were analyzed for differences in radiographic responses (RECIST v1.1 or iRECIST), associations with clinical characteristics, and all-cause mortality. A total of 533 NSCLC patients were screened, of which 165 met inclusion criteria. A subset of 92 patients had paired tumor markers and radiographic scans. From the latter population, median (IQR) fold-change from nadir to progression was 2.13 (IQR 1.24-3.02; &lt; 0.001) for CEA, 1.46 (IQR 1.13-2.18; &lt; 0.001) for CA19-9, and 1.53 (IQR 0.96-2.12; &lt; 0.001) for CA-125. Median (IQR) fold-change from baseline to radiographic response was 0.50 (IQR 0.27, 0.95; &lt; 0.001) for CEA, 1.08 (IQR 0.74, 1.61; = 0.99) for CA19-9, and 0.47 (IQR 0.18, 1.26; = 0.008) for CA-125. In conclusion, tumor markers are positioned to be used as adjunct tools in clinical decision making, especially for their associations with radiographic response (CEA/CA-125) or progression (CEA/CA-125/CA-19-9).</description><identifier>ISSN: 1949-2553</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1949-2553</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.28566</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38870072</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Impact Journals LLC</publisher><subject>Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Biomarkers, Tumor - blood ; CA-125 Antigen - blood ; CA-19-9 Antigen - blood ; Carcinoembryonic Antigen - blood ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology ; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Lung Neoplasms - blood ; Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Research Paper</subject><ispartof>Oncotarget, 2024-06, Vol.15, p.381-388</ispartof><rights>Copyright: © 2024 Strum et al.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11174826/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11174826/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38870072$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Strum, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gipson, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breadner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of serum tumor markers CEA, CA-125, and CA19-9 as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer management</title><title>Oncotarget</title><addtitle>Oncotarget</addtitle><description>Conventional tumor markers may serve as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. This study analyzed whether three tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA-125) held associations with radiographic and clinical outcomes in NSCLC. It constituted a single-center study of NSCLC patients treated with systemic therapy at the London Regional Cancer Program. Serum tumor markers were analyzed for differences in radiographic responses (RECIST v1.1 or iRECIST), associations with clinical characteristics, and all-cause mortality. A total of 533 NSCLC patients were screened, of which 165 met inclusion criteria. A subset of 92 patients had paired tumor markers and radiographic scans. From the latter population, median (IQR) fold-change from nadir to progression was 2.13 (IQR 1.24-3.02; &lt; 0.001) for CEA, 1.46 (IQR 1.13-2.18; &lt; 0.001) for CA19-9, and 1.53 (IQR 0.96-2.12; &lt; 0.001) for CA-125. Median (IQR) fold-change from baseline to radiographic response was 0.50 (IQR 0.27, 0.95; &lt; 0.001) for CEA, 1.08 (IQR 0.74, 1.61; = 0.99) for CA19-9, and 0.47 (IQR 0.18, 1.26; = 0.008) for CA-125. In conclusion, tumor markers are positioned to be used as adjunct tools in clinical decision making, especially for their associations with radiographic response (CEA/CA-125) or progression (CEA/CA-125/CA-19-9).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</subject><subject>CA-125 Antigen - blood</subject><subject>CA-19-9 Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Carcinoembryonic Antigen - blood</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - blood</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Research Paper</subject><issn>1949-2553</issn><issn>1949-2553</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkE1PwzAMhiMEYmjsB3BBOXJYR_PVJCdUVeNDmsQFzlXaOqWjTUbTIvHv6cRAwwf7lWy_j2yErki8Iiph9Na70g-mr2FYUSWS5ARdEM11RIVgp0d6hhYhbOMpBJeK6nM0Y0rJOJb0Ark0BAihAzdgb3GAfuzwMHa-x53p36EPOFunS5ylEaFiiY2rJk10pLEJ2FTb0ZVDwI3DzrsodKZtcQlTakdX49K4EvZOztSwZ1yiM2vaAItDnaPX-_VL9hhtnh-esnQT7YgQSQSUclsVtDRc6MKSSukCOKOKGSZpoYEoDpbyQiUClAVeWMVtzDSVzE7LbI7ufnx3Y9FBVU7o3rT5rm-mq75yb5r8f8c1b3ntP3NCiOSKJpPDzcGh9x8jhCHvmrC_zDjwY8hZnCgpGJVyGr0-hv1Rfr_MvgH3rYEs</recordid><startdate>20240613</startdate><enddate>20240613</enddate><creator>Strum, Scott</creator><creator>Vincent, Mark</creator><creator>Gipson, Meghan</creator><creator>McArthur, Eric</creator><creator>Breadner, Daniel</creator><general>Impact Journals LLC</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240613</creationdate><title>Assessment of serum tumor markers CEA, CA-125, and CA19-9 as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer management</title><author>Strum, Scott ; Vincent, Mark ; Gipson, Meghan ; McArthur, Eric ; Breadner, Daniel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1556-e224fdb2ca459bf1d89be43283a372b9e184ef24b865e8fe4bf84f039273fe223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Biomarkers, Tumor - blood</topic><topic>CA-125 Antigen - blood</topic><topic>CA-19-9 Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Carcinoembryonic Antigen - blood</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - blood</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Research Paper</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Strum, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vincent, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gipson, Meghan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McArthur, Eric</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breadner, Daniel</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Oncotarget</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Strum, Scott</au><au>Vincent, Mark</au><au>Gipson, Meghan</au><au>McArthur, Eric</au><au>Breadner, Daniel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of serum tumor markers CEA, CA-125, and CA19-9 as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer management</atitle><jtitle>Oncotarget</jtitle><addtitle>Oncotarget</addtitle><date>2024-06-13</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>15</volume><spage>381</spage><epage>388</epage><pages>381-388</pages><issn>1949-2553</issn><eissn>1949-2553</eissn><abstract>Conventional tumor markers may serve as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) management. This study analyzed whether three tumor markers (CEA, CA19-9, and CA-125) held associations with radiographic and clinical outcomes in NSCLC. It constituted a single-center study of NSCLC patients treated with systemic therapy at the London Regional Cancer Program. Serum tumor markers were analyzed for differences in radiographic responses (RECIST v1.1 or iRECIST), associations with clinical characteristics, and all-cause mortality. A total of 533 NSCLC patients were screened, of which 165 met inclusion criteria. A subset of 92 patients had paired tumor markers and radiographic scans. From the latter population, median (IQR) fold-change from nadir to progression was 2.13 (IQR 1.24-3.02; &lt; 0.001) for CEA, 1.46 (IQR 1.13-2.18; &lt; 0.001) for CA19-9, and 1.53 (IQR 0.96-2.12; &lt; 0.001) for CA-125. Median (IQR) fold-change from baseline to radiographic response was 0.50 (IQR 0.27, 0.95; &lt; 0.001) for CEA, 1.08 (IQR 0.74, 1.61; = 0.99) for CA19-9, and 0.47 (IQR 0.18, 1.26; = 0.008) for CA-125. In conclusion, tumor markers are positioned to be used as adjunct tools in clinical decision making, especially for their associations with radiographic response (CEA/CA-125) or progression (CEA/CA-125/CA-19-9).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Impact Journals LLC</pub><pmid>38870072</pmid><doi>10.18632/oncotarget.28566</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1949-2553
ispartof Oncotarget, 2024-06, Vol.15, p.381-388
issn 1949-2553
1949-2553
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11174826
source MEDLINE; PubMed Central Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free E- Journals
subjects Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biomarkers, Tumor - blood
CA-125 Antigen - blood
CA-19-9 Antigen - blood
Carcinoembryonic Antigen - blood
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - blood
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnosis
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - therapy
Female
Humans
Lung Neoplasms - blood
Lung Neoplasms - diagnosis
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Research Paper
title Assessment of serum tumor markers CEA, CA-125, and CA19-9 as adjuncts in non-small cell lung cancer management
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T05%3A56%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20serum%20tumor%20markers%20CEA,%20CA-125,%20and%20CA19-9%20as%20adjuncts%20in%20non-small%20cell%20lung%20cancer%20management&rft.jtitle=Oncotarget&rft.au=Strum,%20Scott&rft.date=2024-06-13&rft.volume=15&rft.spage=381&rft.epage=388&rft.pages=381-388&rft.issn=1949-2553&rft.eissn=1949-2553&rft_id=info:doi/10.18632/oncotarget.28566&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3068753277%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068753277&rft_id=info:pmid/38870072&rfr_iscdi=true