The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals

Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working mem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PsyCh journal 2024-06, Vol.13 (3), p.477-485
Hauptverfasser: Liu, Mingfan, Cheng, Chen, Xu, Yating, Zeng, Lirong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 485
container_issue 3
container_start_page 477
container_title PsyCh journal
container_volume 13
creator Liu, Mingfan
Cheng, Chen
Xu, Yating
Zeng, Lirong
description Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention to emotional faces in both high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) groups by manipulating WM load through the inclusion of forward counting in multiples of two (low load) or backward counting in multiples of seven (high load) within a modified flanker task. In the flanker task, emotional faces (angry, happy, or neutral faces) were used as targets and distractors. A total of 70 participants (34 HSA participants; 36 LSA participants) completed the flanker task in the laboratory. The results showed that the HSA individuals performed worse when responding to angry targets. Relative to LSA individuals, HSA individuals showed interference from angry distractors in the flanker task, resulting in significantly lower accuracy in identifying angry targets compared to happy targets. These results were unaffected by the manipulation of WM load. The findings imply HSA individuals have impaired attentional control, and that their threat‐related attentional bias relies more on the bottom‐up automatic attentional process.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/pchj.736
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11169755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3067205369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-41675ebeb7cc222a435dd72d8be7055c2de821861bf5601723f99d1b1f8535ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoKir4CyTgxs1oHk1mZiVSfCLoQtchk9zY1OmkJtPW_ntTqkUXZnNvbj7OPeEgdEzJOSWEXUzNaHxecrmF9hkZyIIwSbY3vWB76CilMcmnorLi1S7a4xWr86XcR-OXEWBwDkyPg8OLEN9994YnMAlxidugLQ4dTtBmwM8B676Hrvd51gecoVWrW-y0gYRdiDgF4_NAd58e-iX2nfVzb2e6TYdox-UCR9_1AL3eXL8M74rHp9v74dVjYQaEyGKQfQlooCmNYYzpARfWlsxWDZRECMMsVIxWkjZOSEJLxl1dW9pQVwkudMMP0OVadzprJmBN9ht1q6bRT3RcqqC9-vvS-ZF6C3NFKZV1KURWOP1WiOFjBqlX4zCL-Z9JcSJLRgSXdabO1pSJIaUIbrOCErVKRq2SUTmZjJ78trQBf3LIQLEGFr6F5b9C6nl497AS_AJJ5pnC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3067205369</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liu, Mingfan ; Cheng, Chen ; Xu, Yating ; Zeng, Lirong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingfan ; Cheng, Chen ; Xu, Yating ; Zeng, Lirong</creatorcontrib><description>Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention to emotional faces in both high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) groups by manipulating WM load through the inclusion of forward counting in multiples of two (low load) or backward counting in multiples of seven (high load) within a modified flanker task. In the flanker task, emotional faces (angry, happy, or neutral faces) were used as targets and distractors. A total of 70 participants (34 HSA participants; 36 LSA participants) completed the flanker task in the laboratory. The results showed that the HSA individuals performed worse when responding to angry targets. Relative to LSA individuals, HSA individuals showed interference from angry distractors in the flanker task, resulting in significantly lower accuracy in identifying angry targets compared to happy targets. These results were unaffected by the manipulation of WM load. The findings imply HSA individuals have impaired attentional control, and that their threat‐related attentional bias relies more on the bottom‐up automatic attentional process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-0252</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pchj.736</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38298167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety ; Attention - physiology ; Attentional Bias - physiology ; emotional face ; Emotions - physiology ; Facial Expression ; Facial Recognition - physiology ; Female ; flanker task ; Humans ; Male ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Original ; Phobia, Social ; selective attention ; Social anxiety ; working memory load ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PsyCh journal, 2024-06, Vol.13 (3), p.477-485</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-41675ebeb7cc222a435dd72d8be7055c2de821861bf5601723f99d1b1f8535ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3010-7290</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169755/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169755/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1411,11542,27903,27904,45553,45554,46030,46454,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38298167$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yating</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Lirong</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals</title><title>PsyCh journal</title><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><description>Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention to emotional faces in both high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) groups by manipulating WM load through the inclusion of forward counting in multiples of two (low load) or backward counting in multiples of seven (high load) within a modified flanker task. In the flanker task, emotional faces (angry, happy, or neutral faces) were used as targets and distractors. A total of 70 participants (34 HSA participants; 36 LSA participants) completed the flanker task in the laboratory. The results showed that the HSA individuals performed worse when responding to angry targets. Relative to LSA individuals, HSA individuals showed interference from angry distractors in the flanker task, resulting in significantly lower accuracy in identifying angry targets compared to happy targets. These results were unaffected by the manipulation of WM load. The findings imply HSA individuals have impaired attentional control, and that their threat‐related attentional bias relies more on the bottom‐up automatic attentional process.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Attentional Bias - physiology</subject><subject>emotional face</subject><subject>Emotions - physiology</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Facial Recognition - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>flanker task</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Phobia, Social</subject><subject>selective attention</subject><subject>Social anxiety</subject><subject>working memory load</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2046-0252</issn><issn>2046-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoKir4CyTgxs1oHk1mZiVSfCLoQtchk9zY1OmkJtPW_ntTqkUXZnNvbj7OPeEgdEzJOSWEXUzNaHxecrmF9hkZyIIwSbY3vWB76CilMcmnorLi1S7a4xWr86XcR-OXEWBwDkyPg8OLEN9994YnMAlxidugLQ4dTtBmwM8B676Hrvd51gecoVWrW-y0gYRdiDgF4_NAd58e-iX2nfVzb2e6TYdox-UCR9_1AL3eXL8M74rHp9v74dVjYQaEyGKQfQlooCmNYYzpARfWlsxWDZRECMMsVIxWkjZOSEJLxl1dW9pQVwkudMMP0OVadzprJmBN9ht1q6bRT3RcqqC9-vvS-ZF6C3NFKZV1KURWOP1WiOFjBqlX4zCL-Z9JcSJLRgSXdabO1pSJIaUIbrOCErVKRq2SUTmZjJ78trQBf3LIQLEGFr6F5b9C6nl497AS_AJJ5pnC</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Liu, Mingfan</creator><creator>Cheng, Chen</creator><creator>Xu, Yating</creator><creator>Zeng, Lirong</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3010-7290</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals</title><author>Liu, Mingfan ; Cheng, Chen ; Xu, Yating ; Zeng, Lirong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-41675ebeb7cc222a435dd72d8be7055c2de821861bf5601723f99d1b1f8535ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Attentional Bias - physiology</topic><topic>emotional face</topic><topic>Emotions - physiology</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Facial Recognition - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>flanker task</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Phobia, Social</topic><topic>selective attention</topic><topic>Social anxiety</topic><topic>working memory load</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yating</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Lirong</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Mingfan</au><au>Cheng, Chen</au><au>Xu, Yating</au><au>Zeng, Lirong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals</atitle><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>477-485</pages><issn>2046-0252</issn><eissn>2046-0260</eissn><abstract>Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention to emotional faces in both high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) groups by manipulating WM load through the inclusion of forward counting in multiples of two (low load) or backward counting in multiples of seven (high load) within a modified flanker task. In the flanker task, emotional faces (angry, happy, or neutral faces) were used as targets and distractors. A total of 70 participants (34 HSA participants; 36 LSA participants) completed the flanker task in the laboratory. The results showed that the HSA individuals performed worse when responding to angry targets. Relative to LSA individuals, HSA individuals showed interference from angry distractors in the flanker task, resulting in significantly lower accuracy in identifying angry targets compared to happy targets. These results were unaffected by the manipulation of WM load. The findings imply HSA individuals have impaired attentional control, and that their threat‐related attentional bias relies more on the bottom‐up automatic attentional process.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38298167</pmid><doi>10.1002/pchj.736</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3010-7290</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2046-0252
ispartof PsyCh journal, 2024-06, Vol.13 (3), p.477-485
issn 2046-0252
2046-0260
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11169755
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central
subjects Adult
Anxiety
Attention - physiology
Attentional Bias - physiology
emotional face
Emotions - physiology
Facial Expression
Facial Recognition - physiology
Female
flanker task
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term - physiology
Original
Phobia, Social
selective attention
Social anxiety
working memory load
Young Adult
title The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20working%20memory%20load%20on%20selective%20attention%20to%20emotional%20faces%20for%20social%20anxiety%20individuals&rft.jtitle=PsyCh%20journal&rft.au=Liu,%20Mingfan&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=477-485&rft.issn=2046-0252&rft.eissn=2046-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pchj.736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3067205369%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3067205369&rft_id=info:pmid/38298167&rfr_iscdi=true