The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals
Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working mem...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PsyCh journal 2024-06, Vol.13 (3), p.477-485 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 485 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 477 |
container_title | PsyCh journal |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Liu, Mingfan Cheng, Chen Xu, Yating Zeng, Lirong |
description | Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention to emotional faces in both high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) groups by manipulating WM load through the inclusion of forward counting in multiples of two (low load) or backward counting in multiples of seven (high load) within a modified flanker task. In the flanker task, emotional faces (angry, happy, or neutral faces) were used as targets and distractors. A total of 70 participants (34 HSA participants; 36 LSA participants) completed the flanker task in the laboratory. The results showed that the HSA individuals performed worse when responding to angry targets. Relative to LSA individuals, HSA individuals showed interference from angry distractors in the flanker task, resulting in significantly lower accuracy in identifying angry targets compared to happy targets. These results were unaffected by the manipulation of WM load. The findings imply HSA individuals have impaired attentional control, and that their threat‐related attentional bias relies more on the bottom‐up automatic attentional process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/pchj.736 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11169755</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3067205369</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-41675ebeb7cc222a435dd72d8be7055c2de821861bf5601723f99d1b1f8535ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoKir4CyTgxs1oHk1mZiVSfCLoQtchk9zY1OmkJtPW_ntTqkUXZnNvbj7OPeEgdEzJOSWEXUzNaHxecrmF9hkZyIIwSbY3vWB76CilMcmnorLi1S7a4xWr86XcR-OXEWBwDkyPg8OLEN9994YnMAlxidugLQ4dTtBmwM8B676Hrvd51gecoVWrW-y0gYRdiDgF4_NAd58e-iX2nfVzb2e6TYdox-UCR9_1AL3eXL8M74rHp9v74dVjYQaEyGKQfQlooCmNYYzpARfWlsxWDZRECMMsVIxWkjZOSEJLxl1dW9pQVwkudMMP0OVadzprJmBN9ht1q6bRT3RcqqC9-vvS-ZF6C3NFKZV1KURWOP1WiOFjBqlX4zCL-Z9JcSJLRgSXdabO1pSJIaUIbrOCErVKRq2SUTmZjJ78trQBf3LIQLEGFr6F5b9C6nl497AS_AJJ5pnC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3067205369</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Liu, Mingfan ; Cheng, Chen ; Xu, Yating ; Zeng, Lirong</creator><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingfan ; Cheng, Chen ; Xu, Yating ; Zeng, Lirong</creatorcontrib><description>Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention to emotional faces in both high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) groups by manipulating WM load through the inclusion of forward counting in multiples of two (low load) or backward counting in multiples of seven (high load) within a modified flanker task. In the flanker task, emotional faces (angry, happy, or neutral faces) were used as targets and distractors. A total of 70 participants (34 HSA participants; 36 LSA participants) completed the flanker task in the laboratory. The results showed that the HSA individuals performed worse when responding to angry targets. Relative to LSA individuals, HSA individuals showed interference from angry distractors in the flanker task, resulting in significantly lower accuracy in identifying angry targets compared to happy targets. These results were unaffected by the manipulation of WM load. The findings imply HSA individuals have impaired attentional control, and that their threat‐related attentional bias relies more on the bottom‐up automatic attentional process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2046-0252</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2046-0260</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/pchj.736</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38298167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anxiety ; Attention - physiology ; Attentional Bias - physiology ; emotional face ; Emotions - physiology ; Facial Expression ; Facial Recognition - physiology ; Female ; flanker task ; Humans ; Male ; Memory, Short-Term - physiology ; Original ; Phobia, Social ; selective attention ; Social anxiety ; working memory load ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>PsyCh journal, 2024-06, Vol.13 (3), p.477-485</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2024 The Authors. PsyCh Journal published by Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-41675ebeb7cc222a435dd72d8be7055c2de821861bf5601723f99d1b1f8535ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3010-7290</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169755/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11169755/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,723,776,780,881,1411,11542,27903,27904,45553,45554,46030,46454,53769,53771</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38298167$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yating</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Lirong</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals</title><title>PsyCh journal</title><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><description>Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention to emotional faces in both high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) groups by manipulating WM load through the inclusion of forward counting in multiples of two (low load) or backward counting in multiples of seven (high load) within a modified flanker task. In the flanker task, emotional faces (angry, happy, or neutral faces) were used as targets and distractors. A total of 70 participants (34 HSA participants; 36 LSA participants) completed the flanker task in the laboratory. The results showed that the HSA individuals performed worse when responding to angry targets. Relative to LSA individuals, HSA individuals showed interference from angry distractors in the flanker task, resulting in significantly lower accuracy in identifying angry targets compared to happy targets. These results were unaffected by the manipulation of WM load. The findings imply HSA individuals have impaired attentional control, and that their threat‐related attentional bias relies more on the bottom‐up automatic attentional process.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Attention - physiology</subject><subject>Attentional Bias - physiology</subject><subject>emotional face</subject><subject>Emotions - physiology</subject><subject>Facial Expression</subject><subject>Facial Recognition - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>flanker task</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Phobia, Social</subject><subject>selective attention</subject><subject>Social anxiety</subject><subject>working memory load</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>2046-0252</issn><issn>2046-0260</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kUtLAzEUhYMoKir4CyTgxs1oHk1mZiVSfCLoQtchk9zY1OmkJtPW_ntTqkUXZnNvbj7OPeEgdEzJOSWEXUzNaHxecrmF9hkZyIIwSbY3vWB76CilMcmnorLi1S7a4xWr86XcR-OXEWBwDkyPg8OLEN9994YnMAlxidugLQ4dTtBmwM8B676Hrvd51gecoVWrW-y0gYRdiDgF4_NAd58e-iX2nfVzb2e6TYdox-UCR9_1AL3eXL8M74rHp9v74dVjYQaEyGKQfQlooCmNYYzpARfWlsxWDZRECMMsVIxWkjZOSEJLxl1dW9pQVwkudMMP0OVadzprJmBN9ht1q6bRT3RcqqC9-vvS-ZF6C3NFKZV1KURWOP1WiOFjBqlX4zCL-Z9JcSJLRgSXdabO1pSJIaUIbrOCErVKRq2SUTmZjJ78trQBf3LIQLEGFr6F5b9C6nl497AS_AJJ5pnC</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Liu, Mingfan</creator><creator>Cheng, Chen</creator><creator>Xu, Yating</creator><creator>Zeng, Lirong</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3010-7290</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals</title><author>Liu, Mingfan ; Cheng, Chen ; Xu, Yating ; Zeng, Lirong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4006-41675ebeb7cc222a435dd72d8be7055c2de821861bf5601723f99d1b1f8535ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Attention - physiology</topic><topic>Attentional Bias - physiology</topic><topic>emotional face</topic><topic>Emotions - physiology</topic><topic>Facial Expression</topic><topic>Facial Recognition - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>flanker task</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Memory, Short-Term - physiology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Phobia, Social</topic><topic>selective attention</topic><topic>Social anxiety</topic><topic>working memory load</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liu, Mingfan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheng, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yating</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Lirong</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liu, Mingfan</au><au>Cheng, Chen</au><au>Xu, Yating</au><au>Zeng, Lirong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals</atitle><jtitle>PsyCh journal</jtitle><addtitle>Psych J</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>477</spage><epage>485</epage><pages>477-485</pages><issn>2046-0252</issn><eissn>2046-0260</eissn><abstract>Research has confirmed that individuals with social anxiety (SA) show an attentional bias towards threat‐related stimuli. However, the extent to which this attentional bias depends on top‐down cognitive control processes remains controversial. The present study investigated the effect of working memory (WM) load on selective attention to emotional faces in both high social anxiety (HSA) and low social anxiety (LSA) groups by manipulating WM load through the inclusion of forward counting in multiples of two (low load) or backward counting in multiples of seven (high load) within a modified flanker task. In the flanker task, emotional faces (angry, happy, or neutral faces) were used as targets and distractors. A total of 70 participants (34 HSA participants; 36 LSA participants) completed the flanker task in the laboratory. The results showed that the HSA individuals performed worse when responding to angry targets. Relative to LSA individuals, HSA individuals showed interference from angry distractors in the flanker task, resulting in significantly lower accuracy in identifying angry targets compared to happy targets. These results were unaffected by the manipulation of WM load. The findings imply HSA individuals have impaired attentional control, and that their threat‐related attentional bias relies more on the bottom‐up automatic attentional process.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd</pub><pmid>38298167</pmid><doi>10.1002/pchj.736</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3010-7290</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2046-0252 |
ispartof | PsyCh journal, 2024-06, Vol.13 (3), p.477-485 |
issn | 2046-0252 2046-0260 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11169755 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Open Access; PubMed Central |
subjects | Adult Anxiety Attention - physiology Attentional Bias - physiology emotional face Emotions - physiology Facial Expression Facial Recognition - physiology Female flanker task Humans Male Memory, Short-Term - physiology Original Phobia, Social selective attention Social anxiety working memory load Young Adult |
title | The effect of working memory load on selective attention to emotional faces for social anxiety individuals |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T21%3A17%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20working%20memory%20load%20on%20selective%20attention%20to%20emotional%20faces%20for%20social%20anxiety%20individuals&rft.jtitle=PsyCh%20journal&rft.au=Liu,%20Mingfan&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=477&rft.epage=485&rft.pages=477-485&rft.issn=2046-0252&rft.eissn=2046-0260&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/pchj.736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3067205369%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3067205369&rft_id=info:pmid/38298167&rfr_iscdi=true |