Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males

This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of exercise science 2024, Vol.17 (2), p.576-589
Hauptverfasser: Enes, Alysson, Alves, Ragami C, Zen, Vinicius, Leonel, Danilo Fonseca, Oneda, Gustavo, Ferreira, Luis H B, Guiraldelli, Luciano R, Simao, Roberto, Escalante, Guillermo, Ulbrich, Anderson Z, Souzajunior, Tacito P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 589
container_issue 2
container_start_page 576
container_title International journal of exercise science
container_volume 17
creator Enes, Alysson
Alves, Ragami C
Zen, Vinicius
Leonel, Danilo Fonseca
Oneda, Gustavo
Ferreira, Luis H B
Guiraldelli, Luciano R
Simao, Roberto
Escalante, Guillermo
Ulbrich, Anderson Z
Souzajunior, Tacito P
description This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume ( = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure ( = 0.003 vs. drop-set; < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption ( = 0.034 vs. drop-set; < 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions ( > 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels ( < 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT ( = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.
doi_str_mv 10.70252/JYBG8718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11164431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3066790911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1461-8b047ac70e09d7bd8c52928f387020a517aead9f299c9d80777e974a8b2d42ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkd9PwjAQxxujEYI8-A-YPeoD2q7b2j4ZJYgaiNFgok9N112hZrS4DhP_ezcBg_fSu94n3_uF0CnBlwzHaXz1-H475ozwA9QlgooBE-nb4Z7fQf0QPnBjlBIm6DHqUM6zNuyi55ExoOsQeRO9QLChVk5DNKuUddbNoxnohbOfa2gIF02hVrkvrW7ZlXeh-bZuQ0MRTVUJ4QQdGVUG6G_fHnq9G82G94PJ0_hheDMZaJJkZMBznDClGQYsCpYXXKexiLmhvJkKq5QwBaoQJhZCi4JjxhgIliiex0USg6E9dL3RXa3zJRQaXF2pUq4qu1TVt_TKyv8ZZxdy7r8kISRLEkoahfOtQuXbCWu5tEFDWSoHfh0kxVnGBBakRS82qK58CBWYvzoEy98zyN0ZGvZsv7E_crd0-gNU3IL0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3066790911</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>World Web Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Enes, Alysson ; Alves, Ragami C ; Zen, Vinicius ; Leonel, Danilo Fonseca ; Oneda, Gustavo ; Ferreira, Luis H B ; Guiraldelli, Luciano R ; Simao, Roberto ; Escalante, Guillermo ; Ulbrich, Anderson Z ; Souzajunior, Tacito P</creator><creatorcontrib>Enes, Alysson ; Alves, Ragami C ; Zen, Vinicius ; Leonel, Danilo Fonseca ; Oneda, Gustavo ; Ferreira, Luis H B ; Guiraldelli, Luciano R ; Simao, Roberto ; Escalante, Guillermo ; Ulbrich, Anderson Z ; Souzajunior, Tacito P</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume ( = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure ( = 0.003 vs. drop-set; &lt; 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption ( = 0.034 vs. drop-set; &lt; 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions ( &gt; 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels ( &lt; 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT ( = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1939-795X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-795X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.70252/JYBG8718</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38860033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Berkeley Electronic Press</publisher><subject>Original Research</subject><ispartof>International journal of exercise science, 2024, Vol.17 (2), p.576-589</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,860,881,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38860033$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Enes, Alysson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Ragami C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zen, Vinicius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonel, Danilo Fonseca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oneda, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Luis H B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiraldelli, Luciano R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simao, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escalante, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulbrich, Anderson Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souzajunior, Tacito P</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males</title><title>International journal of exercise science</title><addtitle>Int J Exerc Sci</addtitle><description>This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume ( = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure ( = 0.003 vs. drop-set; &lt; 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption ( = 0.034 vs. drop-set; &lt; 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions ( &gt; 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels ( &lt; 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT ( = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.</description><subject>Original Research</subject><issn>1939-795X</issn><issn>1939-795X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpVkd9PwjAQxxujEYI8-A-YPeoD2q7b2j4ZJYgaiNFgok9N112hZrS4DhP_ezcBg_fSu94n3_uF0CnBlwzHaXz1-H475ozwA9QlgooBE-nb4Z7fQf0QPnBjlBIm6DHqUM6zNuyi55ExoOsQeRO9QLChVk5DNKuUddbNoxnohbOfa2gIF02hVrkvrW7ZlXeh-bZuQ0MRTVUJ4QQdGVUG6G_fHnq9G82G94PJ0_hheDMZaJJkZMBznDClGQYsCpYXXKexiLmhvJkKq5QwBaoQJhZCi4JjxhgIliiex0USg6E9dL3RXa3zJRQaXF2pUq4qu1TVt_TKyv8ZZxdy7r8kISRLEkoahfOtQuXbCWu5tEFDWSoHfh0kxVnGBBakRS82qK58CBWYvzoEy98zyN0ZGvZsv7E_crd0-gNU3IL0</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Enes, Alysson</creator><creator>Alves, Ragami C</creator><creator>Zen, Vinicius</creator><creator>Leonel, Danilo Fonseca</creator><creator>Oneda, Gustavo</creator><creator>Ferreira, Luis H B</creator><creator>Guiraldelli, Luciano R</creator><creator>Simao, Roberto</creator><creator>Escalante, Guillermo</creator><creator>Ulbrich, Anderson Z</creator><creator>Souzajunior, Tacito P</creator><general>Berkeley Electronic Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males</title><author>Enes, Alysson ; Alves, Ragami C ; Zen, Vinicius ; Leonel, Danilo Fonseca ; Oneda, Gustavo ; Ferreira, Luis H B ; Guiraldelli, Luciano R ; Simao, Roberto ; Escalante, Guillermo ; Ulbrich, Anderson Z ; Souzajunior, Tacito P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1461-8b047ac70e09d7bd8c52928f387020a517aead9f299c9d80777e974a8b2d42ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Original Research</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Enes, Alysson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Ragami C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zen, Vinicius</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leonel, Danilo Fonseca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oneda, Gustavo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, Luis H B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guiraldelli, Luciano R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simao, Roberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Escalante, Guillermo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ulbrich, Anderson Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Souzajunior, Tacito P</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>International journal of exercise science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Enes, Alysson</au><au>Alves, Ragami C</au><au>Zen, Vinicius</au><au>Leonel, Danilo Fonseca</au><au>Oneda, Gustavo</au><au>Ferreira, Luis H B</au><au>Guiraldelli, Luciano R</au><au>Simao, Roberto</au><au>Escalante, Guillermo</au><au>Ulbrich, Anderson Z</au><au>Souzajunior, Tacito P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males</atitle><jtitle>International journal of exercise science</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Exerc Sci</addtitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>576</spage><epage>589</epage><pages>576-589</pages><issn>1939-795X</issn><eissn>1939-795X</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the effects of biset, drop-set and traditional resistance training (RT) techniques on metabolic responses in resistance-trained males. Fifteen trained males (age 29.7 ± 6.1 years; body mass 83.4 ± 7.6 kg; RT experience 11.4 ± 6.7 years; one-repetition maximum (1RM) barbell bench press: body mass ratio 1.4 ± 0.1 a.u.) were assigned to three experimental conditions, in a randomized crossover design. The experimental conditions were bi-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM in barbell bench press followed by 10 repetitions at 60%1RM in incline bench press), drop-set (3×10 repetitions at 70%1RM followed by 10 repetitions at 50%1RM in barbell bench press) and traditional RT (3×20 at 60%1RM in barbell bench press). A portable gas analyzer was used to assess energy expenditure and maximal oxygen uptake during the experimental protocols. Blood lactate levels were assessed at baseline and 1, 3, and 5 minutes after the training session. There were no differences for total training volume ( = 0.999). Post hoc comparisons revealed that bi-set elicited higher aerobic energy expenditure ( = 0.003 vs. drop-set; &lt; 0.001 vs. traditional RT) and aerobic oxygen consumption ( = 0.034 vs. drop-set; &lt; 0.001 vs. traditional RT) than other RT schemes. There were no differences regarding anaerobic EE between-conditions ( &gt; 0.05). There was a main effect of time and condition for blood lactate levels ( &lt; 0.001). Post hoc comparisons revealed that drop-set training elicited higher blood lactate levels than traditional RT ( = 0.009). The results suggest that RT techniques may have a potential role in optimizing metabolic responses in resistance-trained males.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Berkeley Electronic Press</pub><pmid>38860033</pmid><doi>10.70252/JYBG8718</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1939-795X
ispartof International journal of exercise science, 2024, Vol.17 (2), p.576-589
issn 1939-795X
1939-795X
language eng
recordid cdi_pubmedcentral_primary_oai_pubmedcentral_nih_gov_11164431
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; World Web Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Original Research
title Effects of Resistance Training Techniques on Metabolic Responses in Trained Males
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A55%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20Resistance%20Training%20Techniques%20on%20Metabolic%20Responses%20in%20Trained%20Males&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20exercise%20science&rft.au=Enes,%20Alysson&rft.date=2024&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=576&rft.epage=589&rft.pages=576-589&rft.issn=1939-795X&rft.eissn=1939-795X&rft_id=info:doi/10.70252/JYBG8718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3066790911%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3066790911&rft_id=info:pmid/38860033&rfr_iscdi=true